On 9/30/2011 9:37 PM, Honey Badger wrote:
wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John
wrote:

Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the
absolute hypocrisy of the Obama
administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in
Guantanamo.
No, it doesn't.

al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13
years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and
then released because they were guilty of nothing.

Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the
wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus
information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was
coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically.

How do you know he was guilty? Was he tried and convicted, you silly
crazy *******?

-HB

He doesn't know anything, he is just arguing, like he did when he called
himself Plum, or Paul, or Areal boater, X-man...

JustWait wrote:
On 9/30/2011 9:37 PM, Honey Badger wrote:
wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John
wrote:

Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the
absolute hypocrisy of the Obama
administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in
Guantanamo.
No, it doesn't.

al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13
years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and
then released because they were guilty of nothing.

Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the
wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus
information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was
coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically.

How do you know he was guilty? Was he tried and convicted, you silly
crazy *******?

-HB

He doesn't know anything, he is just arguing, like he did when he
called himself Plum, or Paul, or Areal boater, X-man...

What's with the X-Man thing? Is/was he a trans woman?

-HB

In article ,
says...

JustWait wrote:
On 9/30/2011 9:37 PM, Honey Badger wrote:
wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John
wrote:

Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the
absolute hypocrisy of the Obama
administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in
Guantanamo.
No, it doesn't.

al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13
years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and
then released because they were guilty of nothing.

Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the
wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus
information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was
coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically.

How do you know he was guilty? Was he tried and convicted, you silly
crazy *******?

-HB

He doesn't know anything, he is just arguing, like he did when he
called himself Plum, or Paul, or Areal boater, X-man...

What's with the X-Man thing? Is/was he a trans woman?

-HB

He is a shut-in. His "wife" or more correctly landlord keeps him down in
the basement of the house he inhabits. Each time he posts a picture it
has been stripped of any and all identifying meta-data due to the fact
that he has been caught posting other people's photo's before. He is
cowardly and plays with his guns and will not meet anyone from the list
for fear of getting his ass kicked due to his acerbic tongue.

On 10/2/11 8:25 AM, BAR wrote:
In articlez5OdnXKSL8gCIxrTnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

JustWait wrote:
On 9/30/2011 9:37 PM, Honey Badger wrote:
wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John
wrote:

Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the
absolute hypocrisy of the Obama
administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in
Guantanamo.
No, it doesn't.

al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13
years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and
then released because they were guilty of nothing.

Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the
wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus
information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was
coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically.

How do you know he was guilty? Was he tried and convicted, you silly
crazy *******?

-HB

He doesn't know anything, he is just arguing, like he did when he
called himself Plum, or Paul, or Areal boater, X-man...

What's with the X-Man thing? Is/was he a trans woman?

-HB

He is a shut-in. His "wife" or more correctly landlord keeps him down in
the basement of the house he inhabits. Each time he posts a picture it
has been stripped of any and all identifying meta-data due to the fact
that he has been caught posting other people's photo's before. He is
cowardly and plays with his guns and will not meet anyone from the list
for fear of getting his ass kicked due to his acerbic tongue.


No one fantasizes better than the right-wing trash that pollutes this
newsgroup.

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

On 10/2/11 8:25 AM, BAR wrote:
Each time he posts a picture it
has been stripped of any and all identifying meta-data due to the fact
that he has been caught posting other people's photo's before.


As usual, you are full of ****. I upload my photos to Photobucket.
Photobucket retains some metadata and discards the rest. I don't know
whether there is an option to show more metadata. The info is present
when the photos are uploaded.


--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

In article ,
says...

On 10/2/11 8:25 AM, BAR wrote:
Each time he posts a picture it
has been stripped of any and all identifying meta-data due to the fact
that he has been caught posting other people's photo's before.


As usual, you are full of ****. I upload my photos to Photobucket.
Photobucket retains some metadata and discards the rest. I don't know
whether there is an option to show more metadata. The info is present
when the photos are uploaded.

Full of ****? Are you saying you haven't been caught posting photos that
you claimed you took, but were done by a pro and were on his website?
Think hard, coward....

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

JustWait wrote:
On 9/30/2011 9:37 PM, Honey Badger wrote:
wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John
wrote:

Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the
absolute hypocrisy of the Obama
administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in
Guantanamo.
No, it doesn't.

al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13
years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and
then released because they were guilty of nothing.

Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the
wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus
information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was
coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically.

How do you know he was guilty? Was he tried and convicted, you silly
crazy *******?

-HB

He doesn't know anything, he is just arguing, like he did when he
called himself Plum, or Paul, or Areal boater, X-man...

What's with the X-Man thing? Is/was he a trans woman?

-HB

He is a shut-in. His "wife" or more correctly landlord keeps him down in
the basement of the house he inhabits. Each time he posts a picture it
has been stripped of any and all identifying meta-data due to the fact
that he has been caught posting other people's photo's before. He is
cowardly and plays with his guns and will not meet anyone from the list
for fear of getting his ass kicked due to his acerbic tongue.

Yeah, it's not like ex-man, because he's always been a spineless coward,
never a man.

In article ,
says...

JustWait wrote:
On 9/30/2011 9:37 PM, Honey Badger wrote:
wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John
wrote:

Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the
absolute hypocrisy of the Obama
administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in
Guantanamo.
No, it doesn't.

al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13
years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and
then released because they were guilty of nothing.

Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the
wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus
information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was
coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically.

How do you know he was guilty? Was he tried and convicted, you silly
crazy *******?

-HB

He doesn't know anything, he is just arguing, like he did when he
called himself Plum, or Paul, or Areal boater, X-man...

What's with the X-Man thing? Is/was he a trans woman?

-HB

I think so, he and Suckling Don have a very special relationship....

On 10/1/11 12:47 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 00:34:36 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

On 9/30/2011 9:37 PM, Honey Badger wrote:
wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John
wrote:

Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the
absolute hypocrisy of the Obama
administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in
Guantanamo.
No, it doesn't.

al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13
years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and
then released because they were guilty of nothing.

Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the
wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus
information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was
coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically.

How do you know he was guilty? Was he tried and convicted, you silly
crazy *******?

-HB

He doesn't know anything, he is just arguing, like he did when he called
himself Plum, or Paul, or Areal boater, X-man...

Still trying to figure that out?

When he gets confused by a poster, he assumes it is me.

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

In article ,
says...

On 10/1/11 12:47 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 00:34:36 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

On 9/30/2011 9:37 PM, Honey Badger wrote:
wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John
wrote:

Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the
absolute hypocrisy of the Obama
administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in
Guantanamo.
No, it doesn't.

al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13
years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and
then released because they were guilty of nothing.

Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the
wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus
information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was
coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically.

How do you know he was guilty? Was he tried and convicted, you silly
crazy *******?

-HB

He doesn't know anything, he is just arguing, like he did when he called
himself Plum, or Paul, or Areal boater, X-man...

Still trying to figure that out?

When he gets confused by a poster, he assumes it is me.

Don't give yourself credit, coward.