|
Right-wingers wrong on drug testing, too...
On 9/30/11 11:45 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 06:30:17 -0400, X ` wrote: On 9/30/11 1:15 AM, wrote: Most places don't even test for alcohol unless it is an accident investigation. If this is just a random drug screen, you can be ****faced drunk and pass. If you are "stoned out of your mind" or "****faced drunk," you likely are not going to be allowed to go to or continue your job the day of the testing. If you repeatedly show up for work that way, you're going to be fired. One would think that was true but we had a minority hire at IBM who was a smack addict and everyone just assumed he was stupid. It took almost 3 years to get rid of him and they ended up buying him out. When I asked him how he was getting away with it, he said he was stoned at his interview and they never saw any difference over the years. There are plenty of people who drink at work. US Civil service people spring to mind. They are pretty much fire proof too. I knew a guy who was selling drugs right at his desk at an agency down on Western Avenue. Nobody ever questioned how a GS-5 was driving a new Benz. He was in the mail room so I assume the tax payer was his shipping department. Wow...you really have an attitude about construction workers and civil servants. Your pool of experience, though, seems to be before drug testing got serious, or on "light" construction jobs. -- I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one. |
Right-wingers wrong on drug testing, too...
On 9/30/2011 12:08 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 9/30/11 11:53 AM, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 06:31:41 -0400, X ` wrote: You say a "lot" of construction workers shave their heads. Have you done a study? What percentage shave their heads? ... and maybe you forgot I was an electrical inspector for 8 years I attend about half of my local union's monthly meetings. We have a lot of members. There's a lot of male baldness among the older guys, but I'd guesstimate that less than five per cent of the non-black actives shave their heads. About a third of the black guys shave their heads. Most of the black guys look cool with shaved heads. Most of the white guys who shave their heads look like white supremacists. I also visit at least three to four commercial construction jobsites each month and see very few white dudes with shaved heads. Dripping with racism. Way to go Krousie boy. |
Right-wingers wrong on drug testing, too...
|
Right-wingers wrong on drug testing, too...
|
Right-wingers wrong on drug testing, too...
X ` Man wrote:
On 9/30/11 11:45 AM, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 06:30:17 -0400, X ` wrote: On 9/30/11 1:15 AM, wrote: Most places don't even test for alcohol unless it is an accident investigation. If this is just a random drug screen, you can be ****faced drunk and pass. If you are "stoned out of your mind" or "****faced drunk," you likely are not going to be allowed to go to or continue your job the day of the testing. If you repeatedly show up for work that way, you're going to be fired. One would think that was true but we had a minority hire at IBM who was a smack addict and everyone just assumed he was stupid. It took almost 3 years to get rid of him and they ended up buying him out. When I asked him how he was getting away with it, he said he was stoned at his interview and they never saw any difference over the years. There are plenty of people who drink at work. US Civil service people spring to mind. They are pretty much fire proof too. I knew a guy who was selling drugs right at his desk at an agency down on Western Avenue. Nobody ever questioned how a GS-5 was driving a new Benz. He was in the mail room so I assume the tax payer was his shipping department. Wow...you really have an attitude about construction workers and civil servants. Your pool of experience, though, seems to be before drug testing got serious, or on "light" construction jobs. He seems to avoid the truth. Harry is the biggest A-Hole I've seen here so far. -HB |
Right-wingers wrong on drug testing, too...
|
Right-wingers wrong on drug testing, too...
On 9/30/2011 9:54 PM, Honey Badger wrote:
X ` Man wrote: On 9/30/11 1:15 AM, wrote: On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:45:09 -0400, X ` wrote: Your information regarding the validity of modern tests is out of date. This is the $30 reagent test, not the $150 gas chromatograph test. Anyone can beat any test by abstaining a while anyway, each drug is different. The real ugly ones burn out the fastest. Marijuana in your test results is enough to get you tossed off a construction job, and mj lingers a long time, longer than you might think...plus, the tests typically are given on a random schedule. True but if you smoke crack on Friday afternoon you will probably pass the test on Monday. OTOH if your doctor gives you a prescription for Vicodin you are fine, no matter what even if you are stoned out of your mind. That is a real flaw in the drug testing scam. Most places don't even test for alcohol unless it is an accident investigation. If this is just a random drug screen, you can be ****faced drunk and pass. BTW I am surprised you didn't mention the original test law said you had to be tested in Scott's own lab. That didn't last long. If you are "stoned out of your mind" or "****faced drunk," you likely are not going to be allowed to go to or continue your job the day of the testing. If you repeatedly show up for work that way, you're going to be fired. No zero tolerance in the union jobs? That's silly! -HB I actually worked with the labor force in the union, I wasn't a union propagandist like our friend here and I can tell you, the crack pipes were glowing in the parking lot all night long... At least 50% of the warehouse workers were either drunk or stoned, each and every night... |
Right-wingers wrong on drug testing, too...
On 9/30/2011 10:00 PM, Honey Badger wrote:
X ` Man wrote: On 9/30/11 11:45 AM, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 06:30:17 -0400, X ` wrote: On 9/30/11 1:15 AM, wrote: Most places don't even test for alcohol unless it is an accident investigation. If this is just a random drug screen, you can be ****faced drunk and pass. If you are "stoned out of your mind" or "****faced drunk," you likely are not going to be allowed to go to or continue your job the day of the testing. If you repeatedly show up for work that way, you're going to be fired. One would think that was true but we had a minority hire at IBM who was a smack addict and everyone just assumed he was stupid. It took almost 3 years to get rid of him and they ended up buying him out. When I asked him how he was getting away with it, he said he was stoned at his interview and they never saw any difference over the years. There are plenty of people who drink at work. US Civil service people spring to mind. They are pretty much fire proof too. I knew a guy who was selling drugs right at his desk at an agency down on Western Avenue. Nobody ever questioned how a GS-5 was driving a new Benz. He was in the mail room so I assume the tax payer was his shipping department. Wow...you really have an attitude about construction workers and civil servants. Your pool of experience, though, seems to be before drug testing got serious, or on "light" construction jobs. He seems to avoid the truth. Harry is the biggest A-Hole I've seen here so far. -HB Remember, he is a paid propagandist for the union, what do you expect him to say? |
Right-wingers wrong on drug testing, too...
On 9/30/2011 11:58 PM, Tim wrote:
Speaking of drugs in the work force.... http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/...Name=topNew s Is that a right to work shop, or a closed union daycare??? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:14 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com