On 10/4/2011 9:56 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 28/09/2011 5:30 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 9/28/2011 5:40 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 28/09/2011 10:54 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 9/28/2011 12:09 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:15:03 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

So, notice in the paragraph where they actually start talking about
"options" the parenting is third in the list of options

I think everyone knows keeping the baby and raising it is the default
option, what happens if you do nothing. That is the choice made by
lots of young girls and why the US is at the top of the list in unwed
teenaged mothers in the industrial world and why infant mortality
numbers are so bad.
People would not even be going to PP if that was their plan.
I also think most people know what PP is.
Perhaps you just want PP to change their name.
Maybe "Plan to not be a parent right now"

Maybe they should just present both options with the respect they
demand
if they are using my money... Like I have said and asked before, who
else here has been in one of their facilities with a scared young
girl??

I have not, but I have seen the results of bull**** that goes in in
them. No pushy bull**** should be allowed to go on. If I was in an
institution and saw someone do the pushy strong arm demeaning crap,
there would be violence on my part.

Well then, you should certainly not walk into a planned abortionhood
office because you would either get violent with them, or prove you are
a fleabagger..., because they push only one thing, very hard...


If a woman goes to an abortion clinic or asks for an abortion, she has
already made here decision and should have it respected. She shouldn't
have discuss anything with those she does not want to.

What if she just wants open minded information..

Then she will ask someone she trusts and use the Internet.

No need for the Salem types.


But you won't fund the other side.. even if they are not the "salem
types" you see behind any corner...

On 9/28/2011 5:40 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 28/09/2011 10:54 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 9/28/2011 12:09 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:15:03 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

So, notice in the paragraph where they actually start talking about
"options" the parenting is third in the list of options

I think everyone knows keeping the baby and raising it is the default
option, what happens if you do nothing. That is the choice made by
lots of young girls and why the US is at the top of the list in unwed
teenaged mothers in the industrial world and why infant mortality
numbers are so bad.
People would not even be going to PP if that was their plan.
I also think most people know what PP is.
Perhaps you just want PP to change their name.
Maybe "Plan to not be a parent right now"

Maybe they should just present both options with the respect they demand
if they are using my money... Like I have said and asked before, who
else here has been in one of their facilities with a scared young girl??

I have not, but I have seen the results of bull**** that goes in in
them. No pushy bull**** should be allowed to go on. If I was in an
institution and saw someone do the pushy strong arm demeaning crap,
there would be violence on my part.
Yeah, and I have seen the results of the bull**** that goes on in there,
the woman that grew up down the street from me, one of my best freinds
in High School, tells me she still cries over the "decision" she made
that day. And she did ask about parenting and adoption, both of those
solutions were summarily dismissed and the Abortion was "shoved down her
throat"...

If a woman goes to an abortion clinic or asks for an abortion, she has
already made here decision and should have it respected. She shouldn't
have discuss anything with those she does not want to.

What is she wants to raise or birth the baby, where does she go then to
get the same respect and financial help abortion victims get? Oh right,
because you beleive it's the best option for her and don't want her to
hear any alternatives...

On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:09:36 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:15:03 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

So, notice in the paragraph where they actually start talking about
"options" the parenting is third in the list of options

I think everyone knows keeping the baby and raising it is the default
option, what happens if you do nothing. That is the choice made by
lots of young girls and why the US is at the top of the list in unwed
teenaged mothers in the industrial world and why infant mortality
numbers are so bad.
People would not even be going to PP if that was their plan.
I also think most people know what PP is.
Perhaps you just want PP to change their name.
Maybe "Plan to not be a parent right now"

You don't think the amount of welfare money given to unwed mothers with lots of kids has something
to do with the unwed mother rates?

I think the rate in DC is about 80% now.

On 9/28/11 4:32 PM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:09:36 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:15:03 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

So, notice in the paragraph where they actually start talking about
"options" the parenting is third in the list of options

I think everyone knows keeping the baby and raising it is the default
option, what happens if you do nothing. That is the choice made by
lots of young girls and why the US is at the top of the list in unwed
teenaged mothers in the industrial world and why infant mortality
numbers are so bad.
People would not even be going to PP if that was their plan.
I also think most people know what PP is.
Perhaps you just want PP to change their name.
Maybe "Plan to not be a parent right now"

You don't think the amount of welfare money given to unwed mothers with lots of kids has something
to do with the unwed mother rates?

I think the rate in DC is about 80% now.


Let's see...you are anti-abortion and you are anti-supporting the kids
that result when abortion isn't readily available. That makes you...a
mindless conservative.



--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

On 28/09/2011 2:36 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 9/28/11 4:32 PM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:09:36 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:15:03 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

So, notice in the paragraph where they actually start talking about
"options" the parenting is third in the list of options

I think everyone knows keeping the baby and raising it is the default
option, what happens if you do nothing. That is the choice made by
lots of young girls and why the US is at the top of the list in unwed
teenaged mothers in the industrial world and why infant mortality
numbers are so bad.
People would not even be going to PP if that was their plan.
I also think most people know what PP is.
Perhaps you just want PP to change their name.
Maybe "Plan to not be a parent right now"

You don't think the amount of welfare money given to unwed mothers
with lots of kids has something
to do with the unwed mother rates?

I think the rate in DC is about 80% now.


Let's see...you are anti-abortion and you are anti-supporting the kids
that result when abortion isn't readily available. That makes you...a
mindless conservative.

Hey, maybe the pro-lifers need a tax just for them to support unwed
mothers and mothers where the dad buggers off. Yep, register the
pro-lifers with a surtax to go to support them.

--
Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs.
-- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude

On 9/28/2011 5:44 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 28/09/2011 2:36 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 9/28/11 4:32 PM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:09:36 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:15:03 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

So, notice in the paragraph where they actually start talking about
"options" the parenting is third in the list of options

I think everyone knows keeping the baby and raising it is the default
option, what happens if you do nothing. That is the choice made by
lots of young girls and why the US is at the top of the list in unwed
teenaged mothers in the industrial world and why infant mortality
numbers are so bad.
People would not even be going to PP if that was their plan.
I also think most people know what PP is.
Perhaps you just want PP to change their name.
Maybe "Plan to not be a parent right now"

You don't think the amount of welfare money given to unwed mothers
with lots of kids has something
to do with the unwed mother rates?

I think the rate in DC is about 80% now.


Let's see...you are anti-abortion and you are anti-supporting the kids
that result when abortion isn't readily available. That makes you...a
mindless conservative.

Hey, maybe the pro-lifers need a tax just for them to support unwed
mothers and mothers where the dad buggers off. Yep, register the
pro-lifers with a surtax to go to support them.


But you are fine with my tax money going to abortions? Yep, you are a
honest to goodness fleabagger for sure.

On 28/09/2011 5:37 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 9/28/2011 5:44 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 28/09/2011 2:36 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 9/28/11 4:32 PM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:09:36 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:15:03 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

So, notice in the paragraph where they actually start talking about
"options" the parenting is third in the list of options

I think everyone knows keeping the baby and raising it is the default
option, what happens if you do nothing. That is the choice made by
lots of young girls and why the US is at the top of the list in unwed
teenaged mothers in the industrial world and why infant mortality
numbers are so bad.
People would not even be going to PP if that was their plan.
I also think most people know what PP is.
Perhaps you just want PP to change their name.
Maybe "Plan to not be a parent right now"

You don't think the amount of welfare money given to unwed mothers
with lots of kids has something
to do with the unwed mother rates?

I think the rate in DC is about 80% now.


Let's see...you are anti-abortion and you are anti-supporting the kids
that result when abortion isn't readily available. That makes you...a
mindless conservative.

Hey, maybe the pro-lifers need a tax just for them to support unwed
mothers and mothers where the dad buggers off. Yep, register the
pro-lifers with a surtax to go to support them.


But you are fine with my tax money going to abortions? Yep, you are a
honest to goodness fleabagger for sure.

Tax money goes to queers, corruption, bailouts, waste, Michelle's 50+
personal staff maids too....don't see you complaining.
--
Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs.
-- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude

On Sep 28, 7:43*pm, wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:37:10 -0400, JustWait









wrote:
On 9/28/2011 5:44 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 28/09/2011 2:36 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 9/28/11 4:32 PM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:09:36 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:15:03 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

So, notice in the paragraph where they actually start talking about
"options" the parenting is third in the list of options

I think everyone knows keeping the baby and raising it is the default
option, what happens if you do nothing. That is the choice made by
lots of young girls and why the US is at the top of the list in unwed
teenaged mothers in the industrial world and why infant mortality
numbers are so bad.
People would not even be going to PP if that was their plan.
I also think most people know what PP is.
Perhaps you just want PP to change their name.
Maybe "Plan to not be a parent right now"

You don't think the amount of welfare money given to unwed mothers
with lots of kids has something
to do with the unwed mother rates?

I think the rate in DC is about 80% now.

Let's see...you are anti-abortion and you are anti-supporting the kids
that result when abortion isn't readily available. That makes you...a
mindless conservative.

Hey, maybe the pro-lifers need a tax just for them to support unwed
mothers and mothers where the dad buggers off. Yep, register the
pro-lifers with a surtax to go to support them.

But you are fine with my tax money going to abortions? Yep, you are a
honest to goodness fleabagger for sure.

Personally, I'm fine with all of you pro-life folks shouldering all of
the expense of unwanted children from cradle to grave. Unfortunately,
that isn't the way it works.

Yup, typical fleabagger. You want to **** with no accountability, and
then you want me to pay your bills... Yep, we get it, oh, and we know
who you are but I am not gonna' mention your name till you do mine
again, only difference is this time I come back with nukes...

On 28/09/2011 5:43 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:37:10 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

On 9/28/2011 5:44 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 28/09/2011 2:36 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 9/28/11 4:32 PM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:09:36 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:15:03 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

So, notice in the paragraph where they actually start talking about
"options" the parenting is third in the list of options

I think everyone knows keeping the baby and raising it is the default
option, what happens if you do nothing. That is the choice made by
lots of young girls and why the US is at the top of the list in unwed
teenaged mothers in the industrial world and why infant mortality
numbers are so bad.
People would not even be going to PP if that was their plan.
I also think most people know what PP is.
Perhaps you just want PP to change their name.
Maybe "Plan to not be a parent right now"

You don't think the amount of welfare money given to unwed mothers
with lots of kids has something
to do with the unwed mother rates?

I think the rate in DC is about 80% now.


Let's see...you are anti-abortion and you are anti-supporting the kids
that result when abortion isn't readily available. That makes you...a
mindless conservative.

Hey, maybe the pro-lifers need a tax just for them to support unwed
mothers and mothers where the dad buggers off. Yep, register the
pro-lifers with a surtax to go to support them.


But you are fine with my tax money going to abortions? Yep, you are a
honest to goodness fleabagger for sure.

Personally, I'm fine with all of you pro-life folks shouldering all of
the expense of unwanted children from cradle to grave. Unfortunately,
that isn't the way it works.

Isn't that the truth.
--
Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs.
-- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude

On Sep 28, 4:36*pm, X ` Man wrote:
On 9/28/11 4:32 PM, John H wrote:





On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:09:36 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:15:03 -0400, JustWait
*wrote:

So, notice in the paragraph where they actually start talking about
"options" the parenting is third in the list of options

I think everyone knows keeping the baby and raising it is the default
option, what happens if you do nothing. That is the choice made by
lots of young girls and why the US is at the top of the list in unwed
teenaged mothers in the industrial world and why infant mortality
numbers are so bad.
People would not even be going to PP if that was their plan.
I also think most people know what PP is.
Perhaps you just want PP to change their name.
Maybe "Plan to not be a parent right now"

You don't think the amount of welfare money given to unwed mothers with lots of kids has something
to do with the unwed mother rates?

I think the rate in DC is about 80% now.

Let's see...you are anti-abortion and you are anti-supporting the kids
that result when abortion isn't readily available. That makes you...a
mindless conservative.

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Bigot more like it. Herring just likes to see the type he has posted.
It must give him an erection.