On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 20:59:53 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:13:40 -0700, wrote:

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:12:27 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 08/09/2011 12:33 PM, wrote:

The Republican field at the debate, Google results.

And think, any one of them a better choice than Obama.

The only one who is qualified to be president is Huntsman, but he has
no chance of getting the nomination. The combined intelligence of the
rest of them is less than Buddy the dog.


Is that a slam on Roemer? ;-)

http://www.buddyroemer.com/

I saw him on The Daily Show. I was commenting on the debate
participants. Don't know much about him. I'm sure there are a few more
fringe candidates also.

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 22:39:33 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:06:39 -0700, wrote:

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 20:59:53 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:13:40 -0700, wrote:

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:12:27 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 08/09/2011 12:33 PM, wrote:

The Republican field at the debate, Google results.

And think, any one of them a better choice than Obama.

The only one who is qualified to be president is Huntsman, but he has
no chance of getting the nomination. The combined intelligence of the
rest of them is less than Buddy the dog.


Is that a slam on Roemer? ;-)

http://www.buddyroemer.com/

I saw him on The Daily Show. I was commenting on the debate
participants. Don't know much about him. I'm sure there are a few more
fringe candidates also.

I remember Roemer from the David Duke days.
He was trying to be the voice of reason then.

I am not sure about what he is doing now but in a party of Bachmann
and Perry I am convinced he is the fringe,

If he was trying to be a voice of reason, then that's more proof that
Bachmann and Perry are the fringe candidates.