"Canuck57" wrote in message ...

On 31/08/2011 8:39 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
http://blog.heritage.org/2011/08/30/...medium=twitter

Accumulated policies like this and other job killing regulations have
resulted in our huge unemployment rate. Why are only liberals
surprised?

This is so typical of a government that has gotten so big they become a
byzantine **** up.

This company firing the drunk is trying to preserve American jobs. Does
no good if the drunk hits a school bus, they get sued out of business
because they couldn't fire the drunk.

But it is an Obamanation. Making everyone suffer for fleabaggers.
--
If it is all Bush's fault, then how come Obama is doing much more of the
same and expecting different results?


===========================
reply:
The company did not fire the drunk. Just said they would never get a
driving position. He may be a warehouseman, etc. The Fed's complained
about the drunk not driving. Any Class A license will be lifted for one
drunk driving arrest. Even in a car, not related to for hire driving, and
the BAC is much lower for a commercial license.