On 15/08/2011 12:08 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600,
wrote:


O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook.

Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero).

He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe
the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough
balls to actually do it.

I agree. I think he is capable of standing up to the nutcases,
however. I just don't understand why he would think, after so much
evidence to the contrary, that there is any room for compromise from
these people.

I'm very concerned about who will eventually be the Republican
nominee. While I detest Romney and Huntsman's policies, they are at
least not lunatics. It's impossible to predict what will happen in an
election, and if the nominee is someone like Bachmann, the potential
for disaster should she become president outweighs the significantly
greater likelihood that it will be a rout by Obama. I don't want to
take chances with our future. I would much rather have the election be
closer, with the possibility of one of those two becoming president.

Romney is a corrupt idiot from Harvard. Old corrupt boys golden
handshake club. Perry is a much better choice. In fact Ron Paul,
Bachmann, Rick Perry would all be better choices.

Need a person in the top office that knows how to kick some civil
servant asses, say no to fleabag debt lovers and make things happen for
the people, less back room Harvard linked corruption. The list of
Harvard screw ups is a long one.

--
Flea party (leftie) fear, begets flea party smear.

On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:53:29 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 15/08/2011 12:08 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600,
wrote:


O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook.

Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero).

He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe
the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough
balls to actually do it.

I agree. I think he is capable of standing up to the nutcases,
however. I just don't understand why he would think, after so much
evidence to the contrary, that there is any room for compromise from
these people.

I'm very concerned about who will eventually be the Republican
nominee. While I detest Romney and Huntsman's policies, they are at
least not lunatics. It's impossible to predict what will happen in an
election, and if the nominee is someone like Bachmann, the potential
for disaster should she become president outweighs the significantly
greater likelihood that it will be a rout by Obama. I don't want to
take chances with our future. I would much rather have the election be
closer, with the possibility of one of those two becoming president.

Romney is a corrupt idiot from Harvard. Old corrupt boys golden
handshake club. Perry is a much better choice. In fact Ron Paul,
Bachmann, Rick Perry would all be better choices.

Need a person in the top office that knows how to kick some civil
servant asses, say no to fleabag debt lovers and make things happen for
the people, less back room Harvard linked corruption. The list of
Harvard screw ups is a long one.

Sorry, but three nutcases don't add up to a half brain.

On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:53:29 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 15/08/2011 12:08 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600,
wrote:


O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook.

Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero).

He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe
the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough
balls to actually do it.

I agree. I think he is capable of standing up to the nutcases,
however. I just don't understand why he would think, after so much
evidence to the contrary, that there is any room for compromise from
these people.

I'm very concerned about who will eventually be the Republican
nominee. While I detest Romney and Huntsman's policies, they are at
least not lunatics. It's impossible to predict what will happen in an
election, and if the nominee is someone like Bachmann, the potential
for disaster should she become president outweighs the significantly
greater likelihood that it will be a rout by Obama. I don't want to
take chances with our future. I would much rather have the election be
closer, with the possibility of one of those two becoming president.

Romney is a corrupt idiot from Harvard. Old corrupt boys golden
handshake club. Perry is a much better choice. In fact Ron Paul,
Bachmann, Rick Perry would all be better choices.

dont know much about perry or bachman do you?

her support for slavery

his hatred of roman catholics...

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:53:29 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 15/08/2011 12:08 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600,
wrote:


O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook.

Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero).

He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe
the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough
balls to actually do it.

I agree. I think he is capable of standing up to the nutcases,
however. I just don't understand why he would think, after so much
evidence to the contrary, that there is any room for compromise from
these people.

I'm very concerned about who will eventually be the Republican
nominee. While I detest Romney and Huntsman's policies, they are at
least not lunatics. It's impossible to predict what will happen in an
election, and if the nominee is someone like Bachmann, the potential
for disaster should she become president outweighs the significantly
greater likelihood that it will be a rout by Obama. I don't want to
take chances with our future. I would much rather have the election be
closer, with the possibility of one of those two becoming president.

Romney is a corrupt idiot from Harvard. Old corrupt boys golden
handshake club. Perry is a much better choice. In fact Ron Paul,
Bachmann, Rick Perry would all be better choices.

dont know much about perry or bachman do you?

her support for slavery

his hatred of roman catholics...

Democrat party principles cause the enslavement of people.

On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:52:24 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:53:29 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

I'm very concerned about who will eventually be the Republican
nominee. While I detest Romney and Huntsman's policies, they are at
least not lunatics. It's impossible to predict what will happen in an
election, and if the nominee is someone like Bachmann, the potential
for disaster should she become president outweighs the significantly
greater likelihood that it will be a rout by Obama. I don't want to
take chances with our future. I would much rather have the election be
closer, with the possibility of one of those two becoming president.

Romney is a corrupt idiot from Harvard. Old corrupt boys golden
handshake club. Perry is a much better choice. In fact Ron Paul,
Bachmann, Rick Perry would all be better choices.

dont know much about perry or bachman do you?

her support for slavery

his hatred of roman catholics...

Democrat party principles cause the enslavement of people.


more bobblehead cliches. ever TRY to think for yourself?

On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:52:24 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:53:29 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 15/08/2011 12:08 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600,
wrote:


O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook.

Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero).

He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe
the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough
balls to actually do it.

I agree. I think he is capable of standing up to the nutcases,
however. I just don't understand why he would think, after so much
evidence to the contrary, that there is any room for compromise from
these people.

I'm very concerned about who will eventually be the Republican
nominee. While I detest Romney and Huntsman's policies, they are at
least not lunatics. It's impossible to predict what will happen in an
election, and if the nominee is someone like Bachmann, the potential
for disaster should she become president outweighs the significantly
greater likelihood that it will be a rout by Obama. I don't want to
take chances with our future. I would much rather have the election be
closer, with the possibility of one of those two becoming president.

Romney is a corrupt idiot from Harvard. Old corrupt boys golden
handshake club. Perry is a much better choice. In fact Ron Paul,
Bachmann, Rick Perry would all be better choices.

dont know much about perry or bachman do you?

her support for slavery

his hatred of roman catholics...

Democrat party principles cause the enslavement of people.


Maybe on your tiny, one-man planet in your tiny brain.

On 15/08/2011 11:25 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600,
wrote:


O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook.

Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero).

He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe
the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough
balls to actually do it.

Well put. It is almost as if deliberate, what a better way to destroy a
country by pandering to and selling the greed and envy of debt.

--
Flea party (leftie) fear, begets flea party smear.

On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:47:45 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 15/08/2011 11:25 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600,
wrote:


O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook.

Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero).

He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe
the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough
balls to actually do it.

Well put. It is almost as if deliberate, what a better way to destroy a
country by pandering to and selling the greed and envy of debt.

Fortunately, you have no say in what happens in this great country.
You're banned from entering.

On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook.

Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero).

He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe
the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough
balls to actually do it.

When you say 'Obomba', are you referring to 'Bobo'?

On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:14:17 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook.

Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero).

He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe
the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough
balls to actually do it.

When you say 'Obomba', are you referring to 'Bobo'?

When he says that he's referring to racist **** of which you're quite
familiar.