On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:53:29 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 15/08/2011 12:08 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:32 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:25:24 -0600,
wrote:


O'bomba looks to be under 40% support with a negative outlook.

Rated F with a FICO score of 000 (Zero).

He worked hard to get that rating, let him reap the benefits. Maybe
the next person elected on a platform of "change" will grow enough
balls to actually do it.

I agree. I think he is capable of standing up to the nutcases,
however. I just don't understand why he would think, after so much
evidence to the contrary, that there is any room for compromise from
these people.

I'm very concerned about who will eventually be the Republican
nominee. While I detest Romney and Huntsman's policies, they are at
least not lunatics. It's impossible to predict what will happen in an
election, and if the nominee is someone like Bachmann, the potential
for disaster should she become president outweighs the significantly
greater likelihood that it will be a rout by Obama. I don't want to
take chances with our future. I would much rather have the election be
closer, with the possibility of one of those two becoming president.

Romney is a corrupt idiot from Harvard. Old corrupt boys golden
handshake club. Perry is a much better choice. In fact Ron Paul,
Bachmann, Rick Perry would all be better choices.

dont know much about perry or bachman do you?

her support for slavery

his hatred of roman catholics...