Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 12:50:50 -0400, LilAbner wrote:
On 8/5/2011 12:44 PM, wrote: On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 09:41:45 -0400, wrote: I am not very good at math. Can someone explain that how adding 117,000 new jobs/mo (good news) when it takes 157,000 or more/mo to keep up with the population growth causes the unemployment rate to *drop*? Clearly. It's better than 18K jobs added or even a negative number. I guess you don't remember the US bleeding 700K jobs per month during the last part of the Bush admin/beginning of the Obama admin. Would you all polish up your insults a bit? No insult was intended. I pointed out that it's not an empirical math issue. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Math Predictor | General | |||
Need Help with the Math | General | |||
Rules of the Road Fuzzy - ON TOPIC! | General | |||
Do the math | ASA | |||
Do the math | ASA |