| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 09:41:45 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
I am not very good at math. Can someone explain that how adding 117,000 new jobs/mo (good news) when it takes 157,000 or more/mo to keep up with the population growth causes the unemployment rate to *drop*? Clearly. It's better than 18K jobs added or even a negative number. I guess you don't remember the US bleeding 700K jobs per month during the last part of the Bush admin/beginning of the Obama admin. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Math Predictor | General | |||
| Need Help with the Math | General | |||
| Rules of the Road Fuzzy - ON TOPIC! | General | |||
| Do the math | ASA | |||
| Do the math | ASA | |||