On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 11:54:53 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 06/07/2011 6:43 AM, iBoat alot wrote:
In articled0c9368a-9ba7-4cde-9b94-919045167f75
@c29g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says...

On Jul 5, 9:38 pm, wrote:
So in Florida, kid makes too much noise just throw them to the gators.

If someone comes asking, just lie.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2...y-verdict.html

Does not mater you never reported your two year old missing. Does not
mater that there is no sane use for chloroform in the home or you leave
some behind. No explanations required....

--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.
------
In Debt We Trust!
-- Obama and the democrats, world record in debt incursion.


Are you surprised??
You just have to look at some of the Floridians we suffer in here on a
daily basis to understand what passes for 'normal' down there.

You stupid ****! There are specific, VERY specific guidelines set for a
conviction of first degree murder. Those weren't met. Period. It's a
shame the prosecution didn't do a good enough job, for sure, but again,
those specific guidelines weren't met. You need to go back to Harry's
group and do some self education.

Then they could have gone for second degree or manslaughter. They were
not stuck with the chair or nothing else. In fact, while I believe her
guilty as it gets, I admit I would have been reluctant to do the death
penalty with what I know of this case. But I wouldn't have let her skip
off to do it again....20-25 is appropriate. She can always talk, take a
polygraph and appeal.

As a parent, if my kid was missing for 31 minutes I would be frantically
looking for her non-stop until I found her. Fact is, she didn't give a
flying dead rats ass about Caylee, parental negligence and abuse could
have easily stuck.

Fact is, unreasonable jury just wanted out. Victim gets no justice or
representation.

That may or may not be, but the verdict stands, despite your desire
for vigilantly justice.

On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 11:59:26 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 06/07/2011 10:39 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 23:05:58 -0600,
wrote:

On 05/07/2011 9:53 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 21:32:07 -0600,
wrote:

On 05/07/2011 7:42 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 19:33:15 -0600,
wrote:

On 05/07/2011 7:16 PM, Harryk wrote:
On 7/5/11 8:38 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
So in Florida, kid makes too much noise just throw them to the gators.

If someone comes asking, just lie.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2...y-verdict.html

Does not mater you never reported your two year old missing. Does not
mater that there is no sane use for chloroform in the home or you leave
some behind. No explanations required....



And once again, you demonstrate your stupidity and ignorance.

The state failed to prove its case against Casey Anthony as it pertained
to the three serious charges. The state failed to prove a cause of death
or a time of death or that Casey Anthony killed the child. It did
present a lot of evidence, but much of that evidence was full of holes.
The state, for example, made a big deal about the "death smell" it
alleged emanated from the trunk of Casey Anthony's car. But there is no
court-accepted scientific procedure for evaluating "death smell."

This does not mean Ms. Anthony is innocent. It only means the state was
unable to prove its case. I think Ms. Anthony killed the child, but I
have no proof of it. In a criminal trial, of course, the entire burden
of proof rests with the prosecution.

The fact that the child was not reported missing is not proof the mother
killed her. The forensic evidence related to the chloroform was disputed.

I don't know what you did in your working career, but it obviously did
not involve abstract thinking or, likely, any serious intellectual
activity. I posit that because of your repeated inability to present any
of your arguments logically.

In my opinion, the state failed to get convictions on the serious
charges because its charges exceeded its evidence and it sought the
death penalty. Ms. Anthony might have been convicted of murder in the
second degree or manslaughter in the first degree and served a long
prison sentence.

Now, it is likely she will be released in the next couple of days.

Rationality and reasonable take a brain that at least 12 jurors today
failed to come up with.

Hey, kids, don't even report them missing. Just hide the body long
enough that the evidence of death is not apparent. Florida, it is now
legal not to report your dead kids missing.

Fleabag logic I guess.

Agreed in that not guilty does not mean innocent.

But these facts were beyond all reasonable doubt:

- Casey lied her ass off at every turn and would not cooperate to find
her daughter.

- Casey never reported here missing EVER (her grandmother did). And 31
days missing says it all.

- there is no legal reason to be in possession of chloroform.

The above is good for manslaughter or child abuse resulting in death as
a guaranteed minimum. Skip the rest of the crap. It only adds and
supports that this was in fact 1st degree murder.

Because even if Casey knew who killed her, she is then an accomplice.
Which I don't believe one bit. I think she did it.

Worst part, this bitch can now do it again. Change her name, dye her
hair, she might even look after kids in a daycare.

So, your proposal is to dispense with the current legal system and
replace it with what exactly? Oh wait, you like the systems they have
in China and Somalia.

In Somalia, likely no charges at all. In China, she would have to
answer for 31 days of no reporting and the details. That is, forced to
testify on discovery and not cooperating with police is a much more
serious offense.

Which isn't a bad idea. This case exemplifies a flaw in current law.

While she hasn't been convicted, it does not mean innocent. Funny that
her worst punishment has yet to come, her face is almost as recognizable
as Obama's. Will not take long at the party for the chat to start.

So, basically you prefer the Chinese system. Feel free to move there,
assuming they'll let you in, which I doubt.

Yes, she's not innocent, just not guilty. So? What does that have to
do with your mental problems?

In many ways, the Chinese system is better. No where near as corrupt.
Much lower government cost per worker. But I do not know Chinese and
far too many people to be a good place to live.

I would pick south America somewhere south of Mexico. As Mexico is a
drug hole and pit of corruption.

So, move there! What are you waiting for??? You've always got some
excuse, but the bottom line is that you're in your trailer for good.

Hey fleabag, I need to get accounts, pick up on some of the language,
buy a property...see unlike a fleabag like you I have assets to manage
and move. Plus, I have to visit them, get some local legal advice,
banking etc. It isn't like my life fits in one suitcase like you.

Hey moron.. you need to do lots of things, but you're not going to do
any of them, and you know it. Have another noname beer and relax.

On 7/6/2011 2:06 PM, Harryk wrote:
On 7/6/11 1:54 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 06/07/2011 6:43 AM, iBoat alot wrote:
In articled0c9368a-9ba7-4cde-9b94-919045167f75
@c29g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says...

On Jul 5, 9:38 pm, wrote:
So in Florida, kid makes too much noise just throw them to the
gators.

If someone comes asking, just lie.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2...y-verdict.html



Does not mater you never reported your two year old missing. Does not
mater that there is no sane use for chloroform in the home or you
leave
some behind. No explanations required....

--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.
------
In Debt We Trust!
-- Obama and the democrats, world record in debt incursion.


Are you surprised??
You just have to look at some of the Floridians we suffer in here on a
daily basis to understand what passes for 'normal' down there.

You stupid ****! There are specific, VERY specific guidelines set for a
conviction of first degree murder. Those weren't met. Period. It's a
shame the prosecution didn't do a good enough job, for sure, but again,
those specific guidelines weren't met. You need to go back to Harry's
group and do some self education.

Then they could have gone for second degree or manslaughter. They were
not stuck with the chair or nothing else. In fact, while I believe her
guilty as it gets, I admit I would have been reluctant to do the death
penalty with what I know of this case. But I wouldn't have let her skip
off to do it again....20-25 is appropriate. She can always talk, take a
polygraph and appeal.

As a parent, if my kid was missing for 31 minutes I would be frantically
looking for her non-stop until I found her. Fact is, she didn't give a
flying dead rats ass about Caylee, parental negligence and abuse could
have easily stuck.

Fact is, unreasonable jury just wanted out. Victim gets no justice or
representation.


1. The prosecution could have sought different, lesser, charges. No
dispute there. If it had, it might have gotten a conviction.
IT DID. YOU STUPID ****. I THINK THERE WERE A TOTAL OF 7 CHARGES FROM
MURDER 1 DOWN TO LYING TO L.E.
2. There was no evidence offered of negligence or abuse, so we have no
idea of what might have "stuck."
NEGLIGENCE? WHERE'S CALEY? A RESPONSIBLE MOTHER WOULD KNOW
3. You have no way of knowing what happened in the jury room, other
than the jury was not convinced by the prosecution. My theory is that
the prosecutors, figuring they were facing an accused without
financial means, threw the book at the defendant and figured it would
stick. They prosecuted beyond what their evidence could prove, and
instead of a cheesy public defender, they faced a law firm with some
resources. The victim got representation. Justice? We don't know.

There is no shortage of impoverished defendants in this country who
are railroaded into prison for long terms because they cannot afford
good counsel.

ALL THE PROSECUTION HAD FROM THE BEGINNING WAS CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE.
NOT ENOUGH TO CONVICT. TOO BAD.

On 7/6/11 2:44 PM, Florida Jim wrote:
On 7/6/2011 2:06 PM, Harryk wrote:
On 7/6/11 1:54 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 06/07/2011 6:43 AM, iBoat alot wrote:
In articled0c9368a-9ba7-4cde-9b94-919045167f75
@c29g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says...

On Jul 5, 9:38 pm, wrote:
So in Florida, kid makes too much noise just throw them to the
gators.

If someone comes asking, just lie.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2...y-verdict.html



Does not mater you never reported your two year old missing. Does not
mater that there is no sane use for chloroform in the home or you
leave
some behind. No explanations required....

--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.
------
In Debt We Trust!
-- Obama and the democrats, world record in debt incursion.


Are you surprised??
You just have to look at some of the Floridians we suffer in here on a
daily basis to understand what passes for 'normal' down there.

You stupid ****! There are specific, VERY specific guidelines set for a
conviction of first degree murder. Those weren't met. Period. It's a
shame the prosecution didn't do a good enough job, for sure, but again,
those specific guidelines weren't met. You need to go back to Harry's
group and do some self education.

Then they could have gone for second degree or manslaughter. They were
not stuck with the chair or nothing else. In fact, while I believe her
guilty as it gets, I admit I would have been reluctant to do the death
penalty with what I know of this case. But I wouldn't have let her skip
off to do it again....20-25 is appropriate. She can always talk, take a
polygraph and appeal.

As a parent, if my kid was missing for 31 minutes I would be frantically
looking for her non-stop until I found her. Fact is, she didn't give a
flying dead rats ass about Caylee, parental negligence and abuse could
have easily stuck.

Fact is, unreasonable jury just wanted out. Victim gets no justice or
representation.


1. The prosecution could have sought different, lesser, charges. No
dispute there. If it had, it might have gotten a conviction.
IT DID. YOU STUPID ****. I THINK THERE WERE A TOTAL OF 7 CHARGES FROM
MURDER 1 DOWN TO LYING TO L.E.
2. There was no evidence offered of negligence or abuse, so we have no
idea of what might have "stuck."
NEGLIGENCE? WHERE'S CALEY? A RESPONSIBLE MOTHER WOULD KNOW
3. You have no way of knowing what happened in the jury room, other
than the jury was not convinced by the prosecution. My theory is that
the prosecutors, figuring they were facing an accused without
financial means, threw the book at the defendant and figured it would
stick. They prosecuted beyond what their evidence could prove, and
instead of a cheesy public defender, they faced a law firm with some
resources. The victim got representation. Justice? We don't know.

There is no shortage of impoverished defendants in this country who
are railroaded into prison for long terms because they cannot afford
good counsel.

ALL THE PROSECUTION HAD FROM THE BEGINNING WAS CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE.
NOT ENOUGH TO CONVICT. TOO BAD.


Your prose is just like the loogy's, except you have you cap locks on.


--
Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where
personal insults are not allowed?

http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing

On Jul 6, 9:45*am, iBoat alot wrote:
In article , naled24511
@mypacks.net says...







On 7/5/11 8:38 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
So in Florida, kid makes too much noise just throw them to the gators..

If someone comes asking, just lie.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2...y-verdict.html

Does not mater you never reported your two year old missing. Does not
mater that there is no sane use for chloroform in the home or you leave
some behind. No explanations required....

And once again, you demonstrate your stupidity and ignorance.

The state failed to prove its case against Casey Anthony as it pertained
to the three serious charges. The state failed to prove a cause of death
or a time of death or that Casey Anthony killed the child. It did
present a lot of evidence, but much of that evidence was full of holes.
The state, for example, made a big deal about the "death smell" it
alleged emanated from the trunk of Casey Anthony's car. But there is no
court-accepted scientific procedure for evaluating "death smell."

This does not mean Ms. Anthony is innocent. It only means the state was
unable to prove its case. I think Ms. Anthony killed the child, but I
have no proof of it. In a criminal trial, of course, the entire burden
of proof rests with the prosecution.

The fact that the child was not reported missing is not proof the mother
killed her. *The forensic evidence related to the chloroform was disputed.

I don't know what you did in your working career, but it obviously did
not involve abstract thinking or, likely, any serious intellectual
activity. I posit that because of your repeated inability to present any
of your arguments logically.

In my opinion, the state failed to get convictions on the serious
charges because its charges exceeded its evidence and it sought the
death penalty. Ms. Anthony might have been convicted of murder in the
second degree or manslaughter in the first degree and served a long
prison sentence.

Now, it is likely she will be released in the next couple of days.

Well, your buddy Don is just as stupid. He's said virtually the same
thing!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Did I...liar??

On 7/6/11 3:23 PM, North Star wrote:
On Jul 6, 9:45 am, iBoat wrote:
In articley_SdnVzvoI7qKo7TnZ2dnUVZ_sCdn...@earthlink .com, naled24511
@mypacks.net says...







On 7/5/11 8:38 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
So in Florida, kid makes too much noise just throw them to the gators.

If someone comes asking, just lie.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2...y-verdict.html

Does not mater you never reported your two year old missing. Does not
mater that there is no sane use for chloroform in the home or you leave
some behind. No explanations required....

And once again, you demonstrate your stupidity and ignorance.

The state failed to prove its case against Casey Anthony as it pertained
to the three serious charges. The state failed to prove a cause of death
or a time of death or that Casey Anthony killed the child. It did
present a lot of evidence, but much of that evidence was full of holes.
The state, for example, made a big deal about the "death smell" it
alleged emanated from the trunk of Casey Anthony's car. But there is no
court-accepted scientific procedure for evaluating "death smell."

This does not mean Ms. Anthony is innocent. It only means the state was
unable to prove its case. I think Ms. Anthony killed the child, but I
have no proof of it. In a criminal trial, of course, the entire burden
of proof rests with the prosecution.

The fact that the child was not reported missing is not proof the mother
killed her. The forensic evidence related to the chloroform was disputed.

I don't know what you did in your working career, but it obviously did
not involve abstract thinking or, likely, any serious intellectual
activity. I posit that because of your repeated inability to present any
of your arguments logically.

In my opinion, the state failed to get convictions on the serious
charges because its charges exceeded its evidence and it sought the
death penalty. Ms. Anthony might have been convicted of murder in the
second degree or manslaughter in the first degree and served a long
prison sentence.

Now, it is likely she will be released in the next couple of days.

Well, your buddy Don is just as stupid. He's said virtually the same
thing!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Did I...liar??

Don, you really did say the same thing, I just tried to ignore your
post. Pretend you didn't say it, and it will be forgotten.

--
Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where
personal insults are not allowed?

http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing

In article 8502377d-773a-40e6-a119-1929c32a6733
@hd10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com, says...

On Jul 6, 9:45*am, iBoat alot wrote:
In article , naled24511
@mypacks.net says...







On 7/5/11 8:38 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
So in Florida, kid makes too much noise just throw them to the gators.

If someone comes asking, just lie.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2...y-verdict.html

Does not mater you never reported your two year old missing. Does not
mater that there is no sane use for chloroform in the home or you leave
some behind. No explanations required....

And once again, you demonstrate your stupidity and ignorance.

The state failed to prove its case against Casey Anthony as it pertained
to the three serious charges. The state failed to prove a cause of death
or a time of death or that Casey Anthony killed the child. It did
present a lot of evidence, but much of that evidence was full of holes.
The state, for example, made a big deal about the "death smell" it
alleged emanated from the trunk of Casey Anthony's car. But there is no
court-accepted scientific procedure for evaluating "death smell."

This does not mean Ms. Anthony is innocent. It only means the state was
unable to prove its case. I think Ms. Anthony killed the child, but I
have no proof of it. In a criminal trial, of course, the entire burden
of proof rests with the prosecution.

The fact that the child was not reported missing is not proof the mother
killed her. *The forensic evidence related to the chloroform was disputed.

I don't know what you did in your working career, but it obviously did
not involve abstract thinking or, likely, any serious intellectual
activity. I posit that because of your repeated inability to present any
of your arguments logically.

In my opinion, the state failed to get convictions on the serious
charges because its charges exceeded its evidence and it sought the
death penalty. Ms. Anthony might have been convicted of murder in the
second degree or manslaughter in the first degree and served a long
prison sentence.

Now, it is likely she will be released in the next couple of days.

Well, your buddy Don is just as stupid. He's said virtually the same
thing!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Did I...liar??

Yes, you did. Now, go back to Harry's group and play with yourself.