Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Gann wrote:
Walt wrote: [snip] Just because it's not perfect or pristine anymore is no excuse for letting it go completely to hell. The idea is to preserve what's left. If you want a river that's so polluted that it catches on fire, go to Cleveland. I've never been much of a fan of Ohio in general or Cleveland in particular (though I did have some fine ol' times years ago in the late 70's when I used to play the Hannah Theatre there) - but - IIRC, Cleveland should not be used as an example of how to catch a river on fire, but, rather how to salvage a river from such a condition. Exactly. Conservation/preservation/restoration works, or can work if you give it a chance. I was hoping a field trip to the Cuyahoga might drive that point home. -- //-Walt // // |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
River Grades - Rafts vs Kayaks | General | |||
Survey - How many rivers/new rivers? | General |