Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
stone wrote:
The point of all this is that the wilderness in the lower 48 is gone....long gone. If you want a "wilderness experience" go to Alaska or get Disney to make you for you. You can't bring it back....areas logged over three times ain't wilderness......and will not ever be so again..... Just because it's not perfect or pristine anymore is no excuse for letting it go completely to hell. The idea is to preserve what's left. If you want a river that's so polluted that it catches on fire, go to Cleveland. and don't dare to tell me that because I live in a relatively "undeveloped" area I have to stop my ecomonic developement so you can wander around in the "woods." You don't own the river. Nobody owns the river. Stop acting like you have some sort of claim on it that you don't. You evidently live in NC....which is a wonderful state with many great places....but don't stick your nose in our Michigan and tell us how to live our lives.... Ok, I'll stick my nose in then: We should conserve the rivers as a public resource. How's that? -- //-Walt // // |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
River Grades - Rafts vs Kayaks | General | |||
Survey - How many rivers/new rivers? | General |