jps wrote:

"Bill Cole" wrote in message
news:mJieb.470933$cF.152373@rwcrnsc53...

Are you talking about Harry "Catch and Release Them" Krause?

Whomever fits the description.

Are you brave enough to step away from any of your mentors in the White
House?




It's going to be fun watching the Bush-shippers squirm for a few days
until they get their lies straight about outing the CIA agent. Treason,
of course, is far less serious than lying about a blow job, eh?

--
* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jps wrote:

"Bill Cole" wrote in message
news:mJieb.470933$cF.152373@rwcrnsc53...

Are you talking about Harry "Catch and Release Them" Krause?

Whomever fits the description.

Are you brave enough to step away from any of your mentors in the White
House?




It's going to be fun watching the Bush-shippers squirm for a few days
until they get their lies straight about outing the CIA agent. Treason,
of course, is far less serious than lying about a blow job, eh?

--
* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.

Let's actually get some facts straight. If she is an analyst and not a
covert agent, no law was broken. The reporter who posted her name, said it
was not the White House, but her husband who stated the fact. Now where was
the outrage when the last administration illegally released tax returns on
one women that accused WJC and personnel records of another? As well as
illegally having FBI files.

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...

Let's actually get some facts straight. If she is an analyst and not a
covert agent, no law was broken. The reporter who posted her name, said
it
was not the White House, but her husband who stated the fact.


I think *you* need to straighten your facts out...


Point 1

There is nothing to the argument that, since she was an analyst, she was not
covert. In fact, she was.

The statute includes three other elements necessary to obtain a conviction:
that the disclosure was intentional, the accused knew the person being
identified was a covert agent and the accused also knew that "the United
States is taking affirmative measures to conceal such covert agent's
intelligence relationship to the United States."
The law says no person other than the one accused of leaking the information
can be prosecuted, a provision that would protect journalists who report
leaked classified information identifying a covert agent. But there is one
exception to that protection.

The measure says people who engage in a "pattern of activities" intended to
identify covert agents and who have "reason to believe that such activities
would impair or impede the foreign intelligence activities of the United
States" can be prosecuted.



Point 2

On CNN's "Crossfire" on Monday, Novak said he learned Plame's identity from
two senior Bush administration officials in the course of researching an
article about Wilson.


Point 3

Check your sources and hang up the bluff routine.

"jps" wrote in message
...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...

Let's actually get some facts straight. If she is an analyst and not a
covert agent, no law was broken. The reporter who posted her name, said
it
was not the White House, but her husband who stated the fact.


I think *you* need to straighten your facts out...


Point 1

There is nothing to the argument that, since she was an analyst, she was
not
covert. In fact, she was.

The statute includes three other elements necessary to obtain a
conviction:
that the disclosure was intentional, the accused knew the person being
identified was a covert agent and the accused also knew that "the United
States is taking affirmative measures to conceal such covert agent's
intelligence relationship to the United States."
The law says no person other than the one accused of leaking the
information
can be prosecuted, a provision that would protect journalists who report
leaked classified information identifying a covert agent. But there is one
exception to that protection.

The measure says people who engage in a "pattern of activities" intended
to
identify covert agents and who have "reason to believe that such
activities
would impair or impede the foreign intelligence activities of the United
States" can be prosecuted.



Point 2

On CNN's "Crossfire" on Monday, Novak said he learned Plame's identity
from
two senior Bush administration officials in the course of researching an
article about Wilson.


Point 3

Check your sources and hang up the bluff routine.


Check your sources. Kovak originally stated it was not the White House as
his source.

You're accusing the President of leaking the name to Novak? Where's your
proof he was involved?

My proof about Clinton's lies have been caught on tape.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jps wrote:

"Bill Cole" wrote in message
news:mJieb.470933$cF.152373@rwcrnsc53...

Are you talking about Harry "Catch and Release Them" Krause?

Whomever fits the description.

Are you brave enough to step away from any of your mentors in the White
House?




It's going to be fun watching the Bush-shippers squirm for a few days
until they get their lies straight about outing the CIA agent. Treason,
of course, is far less serious than lying about a blow job, eh?

--
* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.

"NOYB" wrote in message
om...

You're accusing the President of leaking the name to Novak? Where's your
proof he was involved?

If you're talking about Harry's comparison to blow jobs, it's not tit for
tat doc. He's comparing misgiving for misgiving and the likely reaction,
not the players. No one could react as harshly as Henry Hyde and the
Republican lynch mob did when Billy was caught lying about bjs.

You and your amalgam of beer swillers, n'er do wells and stinking rich
people will downplay the administration's attempt to embarrass and
compromise Joseph Wilson and his wife even though the crime is far more
egregious.