jps wrote:

"Bill Cole" wrote in message
news:mJieb.470933$cF.152373@rwcrnsc53...

Are you talking about Harry "Catch and Release Them" Krause?

Whomever fits the description.

Are you brave enough to step away from any of your mentors in the White
House?




It's going to be fun watching the Bush-shippers squirm for a few days
until they get their lies straight about outing the CIA agent. Treason,
of course, is far less serious than lying about a blow job, eh?

--
* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jps wrote:

"Bill Cole" wrote in message
news:mJieb.470933$cF.152373@rwcrnsc53...

Are you talking about Harry "Catch and Release Them" Krause?

Whomever fits the description.

Are you brave enough to step away from any of your mentors in the White
House?




It's going to be fun watching the Bush-shippers squirm for a few days
until they get their lies straight about outing the CIA agent. Treason,
of course, is far less serious than lying about a blow job, eh?

--
* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.

Let's actually get some facts straight. If she is an analyst and not a
covert agent, no law was broken. The reporter who posted her name, said it
was not the White House, but her husband who stated the fact. Now where was
the outrage when the last administration illegally released tax returns on
one women that accused WJC and personnel records of another? As well as
illegally having FBI files.

gyps, I have no mentor in the White House.


"jps" wrote in message
...
"Bill Cole" wrote in message
news:mJieb.470933$cF.152373@rwcrnsc53...

Are you talking about Harry "Catch and Release Them" Krause?

Whomever fits the description.

Are you brave enough to step away from any of your mentors in the White
House?

"jps" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...

Careful now. If you start attacking fisherman, you won't have Harry
around
to fight your battles for you. In other words, you'll be in new,
uncharted
waters.

Fishermen get no dispensation from me. Killing things for sport isn't
cool,
and it's certainly not "conservative."

If you're fishing to eat, that's okay by me. If one out of 50 fish are
big
enough to eat, that's not fishing to eat. Time to try another hole.


You really don't have a clue. No responsible sport fisherman is out
*killing* fish for sport. Practicing tried and true catch and release
techniques virtually guarantees the survival of your catch.

Use circle hooks so you gut-hook fewer fish.
Use a wet rag when handling them.
Revive your catch before throwing them back.
Properly vent bottom fish before releasing them.

Five people went fishing the other day. We caught upwards of 100 fish...and
all but one swam off in good health when released. We also kept 3 grouper,
3 mackeral, a couple of dozen grunts, and a couple of dozen snapper for
dinner. I had enough for lunch and dinner that day...and another couple of
pounds went into the freezer. Nothing glutinous.

As for "keeping 1 out of 50"...it's because the regulations are set up that
way. They set the parameters so that most fish are released and can
rejuvenate the populations.

You're accusing the President of leaking the name to Novak? Where's your
proof he was involved?

My proof about Clinton's lies have been caught on tape.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jps wrote:

"Bill Cole" wrote in message
news:mJieb.470933$cF.152373@rwcrnsc53...

Are you talking about Harry "Catch and Release Them" Krause?

Whomever fits the description.

Are you brave enough to step away from any of your mentors in the White
House?




It's going to be fun watching the Bush-shippers squirm for a few days
until they get their lies straight about outing the CIA agent. Treason,
of course, is far less serious than lying about a blow job, eh?

--
* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...

Let's actually get some facts straight. If she is an analyst and not a
covert agent, no law was broken. The reporter who posted her name, said
it
was not the White House, but her husband who stated the fact.


I think *you* need to straighten your facts out...


Point 1

There is nothing to the argument that, since she was an analyst, she was not
covert. In fact, she was.

The statute includes three other elements necessary to obtain a conviction:
that the disclosure was intentional, the accused knew the person being
identified was a covert agent and the accused also knew that "the United
States is taking affirmative measures to conceal such covert agent's
intelligence relationship to the United States."
The law says no person other than the one accused of leaking the information
can be prosecuted, a provision that would protect journalists who report
leaked classified information identifying a covert agent. But there is one
exception to that protection.

The measure says people who engage in a "pattern of activities" intended to
identify covert agents and who have "reason to believe that such activities
would impair or impede the foreign intelligence activities of the United
States" can be prosecuted.



Point 2

On CNN's "Crossfire" on Monday, Novak said he learned Plame's identity from
two senior Bush administration officials in the course of researching an
article about Wilson.


Point 3

Check your sources and hang up the bluff routine.

"NOYB" wrote in message
om...

Five people went fishing the other day. We caught upwards of 100
fish...and
all but one swam off in good health when released. We also kept 3
grouper,
3 mackeral, a couple of dozen grunts, and a couple of dozen snapper for
dinner. I had enough for lunch and dinner that day...and another couple
of
pounds went into the freezer. Nothing glutinous.

I've seen plenty of fish float to the surface after darting off, technique
or no technique.

You mean...er...ummm....you fish?


"jps" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
om...

Five people went fishing the other day. We caught upwards of 100
fish...and
all but one swam off in good health when released. We also kept 3
grouper,
3 mackeral, a couple of dozen grunts, and a couple of dozen snapper for
dinner. I had enough for lunch and dinner that day...and another couple
of
pounds went into the freezer. Nothing glutinous.

I've seen plenty of fish float to the surface after darting off, technique
or no technique.

"NOYB" wrote in message
om...

You're accusing the President of leaking the name to Novak? Where's your
proof he was involved?

If you're talking about Harry's comparison to blow jobs, it's not tit for
tat doc. He's comparing misgiving for misgiving and the likely reaction,
not the players. No one could react as harshly as Henry Hyde and the
Republican lynch mob did when Billy was caught lying about bjs.

You and your amalgam of beer swillers, n'er do wells and stinking rich
people will downplay the administration's attempt to embarrass and
compromise Joseph Wilson and his wife even though the crime is far more
egregious.

It is not fishing, it is called slaughtering our natural resources. I hope
he does not own a fossil fuel internal combustion engine.

Listening to him preach to you, is as funny as watching Harry preach against
hunting, as he munches on a steak.


"NOYB" wrote in message
om...
You mean...er...ummm....you fish?


"jps" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
om...

Five people went fishing the other day. We caught upwards of 100
fish...and
all but one swam off in good health when released. We also kept 3
grouper,
3 mackeral, a couple of dozen grunts, and a couple of dozen snapper
for
dinner. I had enough for lunch and dinner that day...and another
couple
of
pounds went into the freezer. Nothing glutinous.

I've seen plenty of fish float to the surface after darting off,
technique
or no technique.