Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,596
Default the success of the bush tax cuts

On 14/06/2011 10:02 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:01:51 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

In om,

says...

In ,
says...

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:05:46 -0400,
wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:04:44 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:33:44 -0400,
wrote:


That would encourage more long term investment.
I think I would but an extra tax on any financial instrument that was
kept less than a month to make flash trading less attractive.

let's get one thing straight

we dont need more INVESTMENT

we need more CONSUMPTION.

although investment is a form of consumption, ONLY MIDDLE CLASS
CONSUMPTION can pull us out of the depression

and wall street is NOT gonna let that happen

You can't get consumption without jobs and the only way we get that is
by expansion. It is clear the stimulus money just went into rich
people's pockets and not much actually got invested in expanded
industry. (thanks for a "no stimulus" stimulus bill)

There are plenty of stim projects underway, even if you don't believe
it or think they're working. They are working. We need more of them.

Name 10 of them.

LOL! It's a joke... I won't hold my breath.


http://stimuluswatch.org/index.php/project/by_state


When I look at the ones around here they are the same projects that we
would expect the government to kick in money into ... FROM OUR GAS
TAXES.
We are sending 38 cents a gallon off to DC and they dribble about half
of it back to us. That is not stimulus, it is government as usual.


Government consumes wealth. Lucky you are getting much back at all.
--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,312
Default the success of the bush tax cuts

In article ,
says...

On 14/06/2011 10:02 AM,
wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:01:51 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

In om,

says...

In ,
says...

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:05:46 -0400,
wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:04:44 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:33:44 -0400,
wrote:


That would encourage more long term investment.
I think I would but an extra tax on any financial instrument that was
kept less than a month to make flash trading less attractive.

let's get one thing straight

we dont need more INVESTMENT

we need more CONSUMPTION.

although investment is a form of consumption, ONLY MIDDLE CLASS
CONSUMPTION can pull us out of the depression

and wall street is NOT gonna let that happen

You can't get consumption without jobs and the only way we get that is
by expansion. It is clear the stimulus money just went into rich
people's pockets and not much actually got invested in expanded
industry. (thanks for a "no stimulus" stimulus bill)

There are plenty of stim projects underway, even if you don't believe
it or think they're working. They are working. We need more of them.

Name 10 of them.

LOL! It's a joke... I won't hold my breath.

http://stimuluswatch.org/index.php/project/by_state


When I look at the ones around here they are the same projects that we
would expect the government to kick in money into ... FROM OUR GAS
TAXES.
We are sending 38 cents a gallon off to DC and they dribble about half
of it back to us. That is not stimulus, it is government as usual.


Government consumes wealth. Lucky you are getting much back at all.


Well, if you look at the figures, California (with it's 6 figure
lifeguards at the beach), Florida, New York, and wonder of wonders,
Illinois got the most porkulous money... snerk

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,596
Default the success of the bush tax cuts

On 14/06/2011 2:43 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On 14/06/2011 10:02 AM,
wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:01:51 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

In om,

says...

In ,
says...

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:05:46 -0400,
wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:04:44 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:33:44 -0400,
wrote:


That would encourage more long term investment.
I think I would but an extra tax on any financial instrument that was
kept less than a month to make flash trading less attractive.

let's get one thing straight

we dont need more INVESTMENT

we need more CONSUMPTION.

although investment is a form of consumption, ONLY MIDDLE CLASS
CONSUMPTION can pull us out of the depression

and wall street is NOT gonna let that happen

You can't get consumption without jobs and the only way we get that is
by expansion. It is clear the stimulus money just went into rich
people's pockets and not much actually got invested in expanded
industry. (thanks for a "no stimulus" stimulus bill)

There are plenty of stim projects underway, even if you don't believe
it or think they're working. They are working. We need more of them.

Name 10 of them.

LOL! It's a joke... I won't hold my breath.

http://stimuluswatch.org/index.php/project/by_state


When I look at the ones around here they are the same projects that we
would expect the government to kick in money into ... FROM OUR GAS
TAXES.
We are sending 38 cents a gallon off to DC and they dribble about half
of it back to us. That is not stimulus, it is government as usual.


Government consumes wealth. Lucky you are getting much back at all.


Well, if you look at the figures, California (with it's 6 figure
lifeguards at the beach), Florida, New York, and wonder of wonders,
Illinois got the most porkulous money...snerk


Isn't Illinois going through some corruption issues, yep, where Obama
came from on his last just visiting?

--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,021
Default the success of the bush tax cuts

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:05:08 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 14/06/2011 2:43 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On 14/06/2011 10:02 AM,
wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:01:51 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

In om,

says...

In ,
says...

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:05:46 -0400,
wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:04:44 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:33:44 -0400,
wrote:


That would encourage more long term investment.
I think I would but an extra tax on any financial instrument that was
kept less than a month to make flash trading less attractive.

let's get one thing straight

we dont need more INVESTMENT

we need more CONSUMPTION.

although investment is a form of consumption, ONLY MIDDLE CLASS
CONSUMPTION can pull us out of the depression

and wall street is NOT gonna let that happen

You can't get consumption without jobs and the only way we get that is
by expansion. It is clear the stimulus money just went into rich
people's pockets and not much actually got invested in expanded
industry. (thanks for a "no stimulus" stimulus bill)

There are plenty of stim projects underway, even if you don't believe
it or think they're working. They are working. We need more of them.

Name 10 of them.

LOL! It's a joke... I won't hold my breath.

http://stimuluswatch.org/index.php/project/by_state


When I look at the ones around here they are the same projects that we
would expect the government to kick in money into ... FROM OUR GAS
TAXES.
We are sending 38 cents a gallon off to DC and they dribble about half
of it back to us. That is not stimulus, it is government as usual.

Government consumes wealth. Lucky you are getting much back at all.


Well, if you look at the figures, California (with it's 6 figure
lifeguards at the beach), Florida, New York, and wonder of wonders,
Illinois got the most porkulous money...snerk


Isn't Illinois going through some corruption issues, yep, where Obama
came from on his last just visiting?


So, you believe that because someone lived in a place they are
responsible for that place ever after. Typical moronic comment.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Great minds on tax cuts... Lu Powell[_11_] General 11 November 9th 09 02:44 PM
Bush's tax cuts - EVIL!!!! Charles Momsen ASA 1 November 9th 08 05:35 PM
Real humans modify the monkey's tax cuts Doug Kanter General 28 March 11th 05 11:17 PM
OT The Bush tax cuts Jonathan Ganz ASA 8 September 16th 04 06:35 PM
OT - So tax cuts don't work? Simple Simon ASA 14 July 25th 03 11:49 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017