Canuck57 wrote:
On 22/04/2011 5:42 PM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 22/04/2011 10:19 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 22/04/2011 9:33 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 22/04/2011 6:54 AM, OmDeFlume wrote:

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2...a-deeper-hole/






Guess Arne has gone soft. Too much liberal bacon and BS in
government
finally got to him.

It's sad that someone involved in a manslaughter had part of his
sentence commuted and Dick Cheney is still not in prison?

Funny, I would have thought Obama would be in prison for siding with
Libya rebels, al Qaeda affiliates that did 9/11.

But guess Obama bows to his hidden masters and big central banks as
Libya has a central bank they don't control. Then there is oil. And by
sending a cruise missile into Gaddafi's home, well, that is an
attempted
assassination of a foreign official and without the approval of
congress. No provocation either.

If Gaddafi sent a missile to the Whitehouse would it not be called an
assassination attempt? Pretty darn clear who is the aggressor, Adolf
Obama.

But then again, hypocrisy and Obama are synonymous. What should really
worry Americans is that this is their government out of control.



Do you have some evidence the majority of the insurgents in Libya had
anything to do with 9/11?

You come across here like a psychotic, paranoid lunatic.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...bels-in-libya/




Washington Times good enough? Note the date is well before Obama
supported the rebels. So either Obama is supporting al Qaeda allies in
his head or he is one dumb MFer.

al Qaeda is probably laughing their heads off right now. All this free
US military support for their friends. Priceless.

And you know the CIA would have known. But maybe Obama is Christian on
the outside and Muslim on the inside.


And once again, you've demonstrated you do not understand what you read.
The article you cited did not state that the insurgents had anything to
do with 9-11. That's what I asked you, for proof of that claim of yours.
You have none. Oh, and the article said al qaeda offered help, it didn't
say it was involved. Finally, the Wash Times is a right-wing wingnut
paper, the print version of Faux News. In other words, it is trash.

I could make the same argument about al Qaeda itself. You can get the
same article on al Jazeera, India Times or BBC too.

Trouble is you herd sheeple fleabaggers think your Liberal leftie media
is be all end all. Thy are puppets of the politicians and if you read
more than Obamanation media you would understand how biased it is.

The real reasons Libya is getting nailed includes that they operate the
worlds most solvent central bank and know of Euro/US central bank
corruption. Libya has very little sovereign debt, financially well
managed by comparison to US debt worshipers.

And mussolini ran the trains on time.


Then there is oil and Gadhafi uttered the words nationalization...then
when Obama called Gadhafi would be just the type to tell Obama to shove it.

Add in that now UN-France deposed Gbadbo and Gadhafi supported a United
African States not under the UN-France colonial rule, well, this is well
seriously disturbing to the hidden powers that be.

That is why Obama only has lip service for unarmed civilians being shot
in Yemen, Behrain and Syria yet supports armed militant rebels in Libya
that are al Quada friendlies.

Trouble is your pea sized brain cannot see the corruption of this. If
Obama was white like Bush you would be up and down and all over bashing
him.

But then, fleabaggers are hypocrites.

Whatever meds you are taking, you should either increase the dosage
dramatically or sign up for some ECT.

Other than a few islands in the Indian Ocean, the French have nothing in
or near Africa. As far as the United States of Africa goes, that idea
was put forth by Marcus Garvey a long, long time ago.

The conclusions you reach are just more evidence of your bat**** craziness.

On 23/04/2011 11:26 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 22/04/2011 5:42 PM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 22/04/2011 10:19 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 22/04/2011 9:33 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 22/04/2011 6:54 AM, OmDeFlume wrote:

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2...a-deeper-hole/







Guess Arne has gone soft. Too much liberal bacon and BS in
government
finally got to him.

It's sad that someone involved in a manslaughter had part of his
sentence commuted and Dick Cheney is still not in prison?

Funny, I would have thought Obama would be in prison for siding with
Libya rebels, al Qaeda affiliates that did 9/11.

But guess Obama bows to his hidden masters and big central banks as
Libya has a central bank they don't control. Then there is oil.
And by
sending a cruise missile into Gaddafi's home, well, that is an
attempted
assassination of a foreign official and without the approval of
congress. No provocation either.

If Gaddafi sent a missile to the Whitehouse would it not be called an
assassination attempt? Pretty darn clear who is the aggressor, Adolf
Obama.

But then again, hypocrisy and Obama are synonymous. What should
really
worry Americans is that this is their government out of control.



Do you have some evidence the majority of the insurgents in Libya had
anything to do with 9/11?

You come across here like a psychotic, paranoid lunatic.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...bels-in-libya/





Washington Times good enough? Note the date is well before Obama
supported the rebels. So either Obama is supporting al Qaeda allies in
his head or he is one dumb MFer.

al Qaeda is probably laughing their heads off right now. All this free
US military support for their friends. Priceless.

And you know the CIA would have known. But maybe Obama is Christian on
the outside and Muslim on the inside.


And once again, you've demonstrated you do not understand what you read.
The article you cited did not state that the insurgents had anything to
do with 9-11. That's what I asked you, for proof of that claim of yours.
You have none. Oh, and the article said al qaeda offered help, it didn't
say it was involved. Finally, the Wash Times is a right-wing wingnut
paper, the print version of Faux News. In other words, it is trash.

I could make the same argument about al Qaeda itself. You can get the
same article on al Jazeera, India Times or BBC too.

Trouble is you herd sheeple fleabaggers think your Liberal leftie media
is be all end all. Thy are puppets of the politicians and if you read
more than Obamanation media you would understand how biased it is.

The real reasons Libya is getting nailed includes that they operate the
worlds most solvent central bank and know of Euro/US central bank
corruption. Libya has very little sovereign debt, financially well
managed by comparison to US debt worshipers.

And mussolini ran the trains on time.


Then there is oil and Gadhafi uttered the words nationalization...then
when Obama called Gadhafi would be just the type to tell Obama to
shove it.

Add in that now UN-France deposed Gbadbo and Gadhafi supported a United
African States not under the UN-France colonial rule, well, this is well
seriously disturbing to the hidden powers that be.

That is why Obama only has lip service for unarmed civilians being shot
in Yemen, Behrain and Syria yet supports armed militant rebels in Libya
that are al Quada friendlies.

Trouble is your pea sized brain cannot see the corruption of this. If
Obama was white like Bush you would be up and down and all over bashing
him.

But then, fleabaggers are hypocrites.

Whatever meds you are taking, you should either increase the dosage
dramatically or sign up for some ECT.

Other than a few islands in the Indian Ocean, the French have nothing in
or near Africa. As far as the United States of Africa goes, that idea
was put forth by Marcus Garvey a long, long time ago.

The conclusions you reach are just more evidence of your bat**** craziness.

Illiterate or is Liberal leftie media brain dead your gray cells?

What do you call Ivory Coast and Libya? Part of the USA?

Ya, independence so long as colonial interests are kept. Do business
with dictaors until they say nationalization of France interests and
then Gbagbo and Gadhafi have to go... ya I see the corruption.

Not is all that it seems I can assure you. Your just a leftie herd sheep.
--
I can assure you that the road to prosperity is not paved with
fleabagger debt.