Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says... BAR wrote: In articleobudnXJyJOFaWjPQnZ2dnUVZ_j2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389 @mypacks.net says... BAR wrote: In articlejYWdneirypkx4zDQnZ2dnUVZ_rGdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389 @mypacks.net says... I_am_Tosk wrote: That's what gas prices were the day Barak Obama took the Whitehouse. Pelosi promised the "first" thing she would address would be gas prices. They have done nothing but shift a bunch of food into dollars for Chicago ethanol speculators and refiners, this of course will be a disaster... What a simple-minded little troll you are. Fuel prices are determined by speculators who depend upon fear-mongering. You're one of the "fear-mongered" masses. What's your problem? Is the kiddie motorbike racing season in jeopardy? The Saudi's have come out and said that the market is over supplied. The price should drop. The questions is will it? The market, which is for all intents and purposes, unregulated, is controlled by speculators, not by supply and demand. We. of course, let the speculators do this, instead of standing up to them and forcing changes in the way that part of the petrol business is run. What is your plan to enforce changes in an international commodities market? How is the US a net purchaser of oil going to change the oil market? If you are interested, there are plenty of articles available on how and why the European common market partners are discussing commodity regulation. They are struggling with it, especially the French, but more commodity regulation is in the cards. The era of "free markets" is ending, Bertie. All "free markets" have done for the last few generations is make the rich richer and the middle class and poor poorer. Unsustainable. Sorry. The problems is not free markets. The problem is whiners. Why are we giving money to Brazil to develop their off-shore oil fields? Why are we giving money to Columbia to develop an oil refinery? We should be developing our own oil field's and our own refinery's. This is an issue of US national security and sovereignty. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 20/04/2011 6:04 PM, BAR wrote:
In articlenoidnQ4SZq2STTPQnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389 @mypacks.net says... BAR wrote: In articleobudnXJyJOFaWjPQnZ2dnUVZ_j2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389 @mypacks.net says... BAR wrote: In articlejYWdneirypkx4zDQnZ2dnUVZ_rGdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389 @mypacks.net says... I_am_Tosk wrote: That's what gas prices were the day Barak Obama took the Whitehouse. Pelosi promised the "first" thing she would address would be gas prices. They have done nothing but shift a bunch of food into dollars for Chicago ethanol speculators and refiners, this of course will be a disaster... What a simple-minded little troll you are. Fuel prices are determined by speculators who depend upon fear-mongering. You're one of the "fear-mongered" masses. What's your problem? Is the kiddie motorbike racing season in jeopardy? The Saudi's have come out and said that the market is over supplied. The price should drop. The questions is will it? The market, which is for all intents and purposes, unregulated, is controlled by speculators, not by supply and demand. We. of course, let the speculators do this, instead of standing up to them and forcing changes in the way that part of the petrol business is run. What is your plan to enforce changes in an international commodities market? How is the US a net purchaser of oil going to change the oil market? If you are interested, there are plenty of articles available on how and why the European common market partners are discussing commodity regulation. They are struggling with it, especially the French, but more commodity regulation is in the cards. The era of "free markets" is ending, Bertie. All "free markets" have done for the last few generations is make the rich richer and the middle class and poor poorer. Unsustainable. Sorry. The problems is not free markets. The problem is whiners. Why are we giving money to Brazil to develop their off-shore oil fields? Why are we giving money to Columbia to develop an oil refinery? We should be developing our own oil field's and our own refinery's. This is an issue of US national security and sovereignty. It isn't economical to build more of it into the USA. Taxes, whiners, unions, stupid politicians, corrupt management, excessive costs...screw it. Refine it elsewhere as the plastics go to China where they build things. As for sovereignty, can't have sovereignty when your $14.5 trillion in debt (state/city/county extra). That is like saying you own a home with a 110% mortgage on it. But Obama closed down your drilling a year ago or so. I think you and I are near the same page, but it isn't as simple as fleabaggers think. The government needs a major shakedown, every department bar none needs to be justified, axed and trimmed by at least $1.7 trillion per year or USA economic futures are that of third world status. Just might take a decade to really get that far. -- I can assure you that the road to prosperity is not paved with fleabagger debt. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 20:04:43 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , payer3389 says... BAR wrote: In articleobudnXJyJOFaWjPQnZ2dnUVZ_j2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389 @mypacks.net says... BAR wrote: In articlejYWdneirypkx4zDQnZ2dnUVZ_rGdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389 @mypacks.net says... I_am_Tosk wrote: That's what gas prices were the day Barak Obama took the Whitehouse. Pelosi promised the "first" thing she would address would be gas prices. They have done nothing but shift a bunch of food into dollars for Chicago ethanol speculators and refiners, this of course will be a disaster... What a simple-minded little troll you are. Fuel prices are determined by speculators who depend upon fear-mongering. You're one of the "fear-mongered" masses. What's your problem? Is the kiddie motorbike racing season in jeopardy? The Saudi's have come out and said that the market is over supplied. The price should drop. The questions is will it? The market, which is for all intents and purposes, unregulated, is controlled by speculators, not by supply and demand. We. of course, let the speculators do this, instead of standing up to them and forcing changes in the way that part of the petrol business is run. What is your plan to enforce changes in an international commodities market? How is the US a net purchaser of oil going to change the oil market? If you are interested, there are plenty of articles available on how and why the European common market partners are discussing commodity regulation. They are struggling with it, especially the French, but more commodity regulation is in the cards. The era of "free markets" is ending, Bertie. All "free markets" have done for the last few generations is make the rich richer and the middle class and poor poorer. Unsustainable. Sorry. The problems is not free markets. The problem is whiners. Why are we giving money to Brazil to develop their off-shore oil fields? Why are we giving money to Columbia to develop an oil refinery? We should be developing our own oil field's and our own refinery's. This is an issue of US national security and sovereignty. I guess you've never heard of Texas. http://www.eia.doe.gov/neic/rankings/refineries.htm |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: I guess you've never heard of Texas. http://www.eia.doe.gov/neic/rankings/refineries.htm You mean, the state that you and Krause love to hate, D'Plume. He was talking about drilling; not refining. You need to have your ADHD checked when you go to the Doctor. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
$2.96 a gallon | General | |||
$2.96 a gallon | General | |||
$2.96 a gallon | General | |||
$2.96 a gallon | General | |||
$2.96 a gallon | General |