About Us

Canuck57[_9_]

On 30/03/2011 4:19 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:36:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote:
...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed:

"The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup
of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security
policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad
hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or
Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force
wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how
long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the
White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that
matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important,
neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the
public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy -
and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today."

--Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302.

'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make
decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent."

- Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011

Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust.
Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find
him consistent.

You're delusional? If you substitute Bush for Obama in your nonsense,
it would almost make sense.

Not at all. Bush went to Congress before making acts of war. Came back
with Democriter and Republican support. Further, Bush had provocation
-- Libya had no provocation pure and simple. Just probably told Obama to
shove it up his ass. Mubarack kissed Obama's ass but Qaddafi told Obma
where to stuff it.

Obama is fishing this war on political egos, back room deals and for
UN-France colonialism and money.

If Obama ever had to face a honest court devoid of political distortions
he would be tried for an assassination attempt and war without provocation.

Put a leash on Obama or better yet, impeach him.

[email protected]

On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:44:20 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 30/03/2011 4:19 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:36:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote:
...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed:

"The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup
of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security
policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad
hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or
Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force
wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how
long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the
White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that
matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important,
neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the
public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy -
and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today."

--Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302.

'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make
decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent."

- Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011

Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust.
Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find
him consistent.

You're delusional? If you substitute Bush for Obama in your nonsense,
it would almost make sense.

Not at all. Bush went to Congress before making acts of war. Came back
with Democriter and Republican support. Further, Bush had provocation
-- Libya had no provocation pure and simple. Just probably told Obama to
shove it up his ass. Mubarack kissed Obama's ass but Qaddafi told Obma
where to stuff it.

He lied to Congress and the world. Bush had no "provocation" other
than what he made up to suit him.

Bush normalized relations with Libya/Qadaffi the PanAm bomber in
chief. Bush was interested in oil and big business.

Obama is fishing this war on political egos, back room deals and for
UN-France colonialism and money.

Fishing? What the heck point are you trying to make? You keep saying
the same thing over and over, as though you expect your nonsense to
eventually make sense.

If Obama ever had to face a honest court devoid of political distortions
he would be tried for an assassination attempt and war without provocation.

Put a leash on Obama or better yet, impeach him.

You're an idiot.

Canuck57[_9_]

On 30/03/2011 9:13 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:44:20 -0600,
wrote:

On 30/03/2011 4:19 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:36:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote:
...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed:

"The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup
of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security
policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad
hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or
Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force
wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how
long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the
White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that
matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important,
neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the
public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy -
and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today."

--Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302.

'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make
decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent."

- Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011

Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust.
Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find
him consistent.

You're delusional? If you substitute Bush for Obama in your nonsense,
it would almost make sense.

Not at all. Bush went to Congress before making acts of war. Came back
with Democriter and Republican support. Further, Bush had provocation
-- Libya had no provocation pure and simple. Just probably told Obama to
shove it up his ass. Mubarack kissed Obama's ass but Qaddafi told Obma
where to stuff it.

He lied to Congress and the world. Bush had no "provocation" other
than what he made up to suit him.

Bush normalized relations with Libya/Qadaffi the PanAm bomber in
chief. Bush was interested in oil and big business.

Obama is fishing this war on political egos, back room deals and for
UN-France colonialism and money.

Fishing? What the heck point are you trying to make? You keep saying
the same thing over and over, as though you expect your nonsense to
eventually make sense.

If Obama ever had to face a honest court devoid of political distortions
he would be tried for an assassination attempt and war without provocation.

Put a leash on Obama or better yet, impeach him.

You're an idiot.

Dream on, normalized relations with Libya are approaching 4 decades.

As for Bush, still think it is all Bush's fault? My god, your robably
60 years old and blaming your mother too. Suck it up, it is now Obama's
issue of his own making. Obama couldn't even get the assassination
attempt right.

[email protected]

On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:11:18 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 30/03/2011 9:13 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:44:20 -0600,
wrote:

On 30/03/2011 4:19 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:36:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote:
...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed:

"The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup
of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security
policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad
hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or
Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force
wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how
long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the
White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that
matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important,
neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the
public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy -
and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today."

--Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302.

'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make
decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent."

- Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011

Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust.
Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find
him consistent.

You're delusional? If you substitute Bush for Obama in your nonsense,
it would almost make sense.

Not at all. Bush went to Congress before making acts of war. Came back
with Democriter and Republican support. Further, Bush had provocation
-- Libya had no provocation pure and simple. Just probably told Obama to
shove it up his ass. Mubarack kissed Obama's ass but Qaddafi told Obma
where to stuff it.

He lied to Congress and the world. Bush had no "provocation" other
than what he made up to suit him.

Bush normalized relations with Libya/Qadaffi the PanAm bomber in
chief. Bush was interested in oil and big business.

Obama is fishing this war on political egos, back room deals and for
UN-France colonialism and money.

Fishing? What the heck point are you trying to make? You keep saying
the same thing over and over, as though you expect your nonsense to
eventually make sense.

If Obama ever had to face a honest court devoid of political distortions
he would be tried for an assassination attempt and war without provocation.

Put a leash on Obama or better yet, impeach him.

You're an idiot.

Dream on, normalized relations with Libya are approaching 4 decades.

As for Bush, still think it is all Bush's fault? My god, your robably
60 years old and blaming your mother too. Suck it up, it is now Obama's
issue of his own making. Obama couldn't even get the assassination
attempt right.

You're completely stupid. Even your buddies here must be realizing it
at this point.

OmDeFlume

On 3/31/2011 1:54 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:11:18 -0600,
wrote:

On 30/03/2011 9:13 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:44:20 -0600,
wrote:

On 30/03/2011 4:19 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:36:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote:
...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed:

"The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup
of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security
policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad
hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or
Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force
wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how
long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the
White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that
matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important,
neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the
public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy -
and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today."

--Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302.

'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make
decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent."

- Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011

Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust.
Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find
him consistent.

You're delusional? If you substitute Bush for Obama in your nonsense,
it would almost make sense.

Not at all. Bush went to Congress before making acts of war. Came back
with Democriter and Republican support. Further, Bush had provocation
-- Libya had no provocation pure and simple. Just probably told Obama to
shove it up his ass. Mubarack kissed Obama's ass but Qaddafi told Obma
where to stuff it.

He lied to Congress and the world. Bush had no "provocation" other
than what he made up to suit him.

Bush normalized relations with Libya/Qadaffi the PanAm bomber in
chief. Bush was interested in oil and big business.

Obama is fishing this war on political egos, back room deals and for
UN-France colonialism and money.

Fishing? What the heck point are you trying to make? You keep saying
the same thing over and over, as though you expect your nonsense to
eventually make sense.

If Obama ever had to face a honest court devoid of political distortions
he would be tried for an assassination attempt and war without provocation.

Put a leash on Obama or better yet, impeach him.

You're an idiot.

Dream on, normalized relations with Libya are approaching 4 decades.

As for Bush, still think it is all Bush's fault? My god, your robably
60 years old and blaming your mother too. Suck it up, it is now Obama's
issue of his own making. Obama couldn't even get the assassination
attempt right.

You're completely stupid. Even your buddies here must be realizing it
at this point.

You can't believe everything you read on the girls room walls dear. Is
that where your off the wall comments originate? You need to do better.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Great Quotes from today's Washington Post...	John H[_2_]	General	29	April 2nd 11 03:23 AM
Yo Loogy - some great quotes by Democrats	Another John	General	0	August 6th 09 01:46 PM
Some great quotes from the three that think the group is better withthem here.	[email protected]	General	23	June 3rd 08 05:41 PM
OT - Great Ronald Reagan Quotes	Wilbur Hubbard	ASA	0	June 23rd 07 06:31 PM
( OT ) Quotes	Jim	General	1	March 21st 04 02:28 AM

Menu

About Us