Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,637
Default NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.

On Mar 25, 11:59*am, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John H
wrote:



On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:


On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, TopBassDog wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us....


NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To
Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for
the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently
balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in
charge of the brunt of combat.


NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone
over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar
Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with
responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other
targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the
operation....


It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while
the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing
new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders
try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the
American cheque payer the bill.


You should really vote in different politicians.


I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario.


You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al
Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world.


Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after
Saudi Arabia.


I guess when the people on the ground there claim that Obama inspired
them, they love America, and have signs that read Yes We Can, that
means in your tiny brain that bin laden is behind it all.


Ah yes, another bit of stupidity from nincdepoop.

How better to get support from Obama than to proclaim him the Messiah
and praise the country of which he's the president.

Wake up, ninc. And, I'm not one to put up with your continuous
stupidity.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,524
Default NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.

John H wrote:


Ah yes, another bit of stupidity from nincdepoop.

How better to get support from Obama than to proclaim him the Messiah
and praise the country of which he's the president.

Wake up, ninc. And, I'm not one to put up with your continuous
stupidity.



Speaking of stupidity, herring, you're only a baby step in intelligence
above your fellow right-wing racists here.
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,021
Default NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.

On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:43:16 -0700 (PDT), John H
wrote:

On Mar 25, 11:59*am, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John H
wrote:



On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:


On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, TopBassDog wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us...


NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To
Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for
the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently
balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in
charge of the brunt of combat.


NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone
over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar
Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with
responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other
targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the
operation....


It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while
the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing
new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders
try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the
American cheque payer the bill.


You should really vote in different politicians.


I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario.


You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al
Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world.


Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after
Saudi Arabia.


I guess when the people on the ground there claim that Obama inspired
them, they love America, and have signs that read Yes We Can, that
means in your tiny brain that bin laden is behind it all.


Ah yes, another bit of stupidity from nincdepoop.

How better to get support from Obama than to proclaim him the Messiah
and praise the country of which he's the president.

Wake up, ninc. And, I'm not one to put up with your continuous
stupidity.


Ah yes, another bit of racist nonsense from a right-wing moron.

Despite your stupidity, you have the right to declare it as often as
you like.


  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,596
Default NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.

On 25/03/2011 2:25 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:43:16 -0700 (PDT), John H
wrote:

On Mar 25, 11:59 am, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John
wrote:



On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us...

NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To
Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for
the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently
balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in
charge of the brunt of combat.

NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone
over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar
Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with
responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other
targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the
operation....

It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while
the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing
new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders
try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the
American cheque payer the bill.

You should really vote in different politicians.

I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario.

You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al
Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world.

Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after
Saudi Arabia.

I guess when the people on the ground there claim that Obama inspired
them, they love America, and have signs that read Yes We Can, that
means in your tiny brain that bin laden is behind it all.


Ah yes, another bit of stupidity from nincdepoop.

How better to get support from Obama than to proclaim him the Messiah
and praise the country of which he's the president.

Wake up, ninc. And, I'm not one to put up with your continuous
stupidity.


Ah yes, another bit of racist nonsense from a right-wing moron.

Despite your stupidity, you have the right to declare it as often as
you like.


You still haven't told us, is bringing up race an excuse or a reason?
  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,021
Default NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.

On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:20:59 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 25/03/2011 2:25 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:43:16 -0700 (PDT), John H
wrote:

On Mar 25, 11:59 am, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John
wrote:



On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us...

NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To
Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for
the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently
balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in
charge of the brunt of combat.

NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone
over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar
Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with
responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other
targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the
operation....

It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while
the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing
new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders
try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the
American cheque payer the bill.

You should really vote in different politicians.

I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario.

You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al
Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world.

Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after
Saudi Arabia.

I guess when the people on the ground there claim that Obama inspired
them, they love America, and have signs that read Yes We Can, that
means in your tiny brain that bin laden is behind it all.

Ah yes, another bit of stupidity from nincdepoop.

How better to get support from Obama than to proclaim him the Messiah
and praise the country of which he's the president.

Wake up, ninc. And, I'm not one to put up with your continuous
stupidity.


Ah yes, another bit of racist nonsense from a right-wing moron.

Despite your stupidity, you have the right to declare it as often as
you like.


You still haven't told us, is bringing up race an excuse or a reason?


You've already told us you're a racist. You don't have to keep telling
us.
  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,637
Default NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.

On Mar 25, 9:33*pm, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:20:59 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:



On 25/03/2011 2:25 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:43:16 -0700 (PDT), John H
*wrote:


On Mar 25, 11:59 am, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John
wrote:


On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), *wrote:


On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, *wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us...


NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To
Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for
the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently
balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in
charge of the brunt of combat.


NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone
over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar
Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with
responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other
targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the
operation....


It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while
the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing
new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders
try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the
American cheque payer the bill.


You should really vote in different politicians.


I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario..


You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al
Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world.


Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after
Saudi Arabia.


I guess when the people on the ground there claim that Obama inspired
them, they love America, and have signs that read Yes We Can, that
means in your tiny brain that bin laden is behind it all.


Ah yes, another bit of stupidity from nincdepoop.


How better to get support from Obama than to proclaim him the Messiah
and praise the country of which he's the president.


Wake up, ninc. And, I'm not one to put up with your continuous
stupidity.


Ah yes, another bit of racist nonsense from a right-wing moron.


Despite your stupidity, you have the right to declare it as often as
you like.


You still haven't told us, is bringing up race an excuse or a reason?


You've already told us you're a racist. You don't have to keep telling
us.


Simply the best she could be.
  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,021
Default NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.

On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 06:23:03 -0700 (PDT), John H
wrote:

On Mar 25, 9:33*pm, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:20:59 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:



On 25/03/2011 2:25 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:43:16 -0700 (PDT), John H
*wrote:


On Mar 25, 11:59 am, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John
wrote:


On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), *wrote:


On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, *wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us...


NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To
Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for
the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently
balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in
charge of the brunt of combat.


NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone
over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar
Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with
responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other
targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the
operation....


It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while
the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing
new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders
try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the
American cheque payer the bill.


You should really vote in different politicians.


I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario.


You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al
Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world.


Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after
Saudi Arabia.


I guess when the people on the ground there claim that Obama inspired
them, they love America, and have signs that read Yes We Can, that
means in your tiny brain that bin laden is behind it all.


Ah yes, another bit of stupidity from nincdepoop.


How better to get support from Obama than to proclaim him the Messiah
and praise the country of which he's the president.


Wake up, ninc. And, I'm not one to put up with your continuous
stupidity.


Ah yes, another bit of racist nonsense from a right-wing moron.


Despite your stupidity, you have the right to declare it as often as
you like.


You still haven't told us, is bringing up race an excuse or a reason?


You've already told us you're a racist. You don't have to keep telling
us.


Simply the best she could be.


I notice that you're not denying for Nuckles or yourself...
  #10   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,596
Default NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.

On 25/03/2011 1:43 PM, John H wrote:
On Mar 25, 11:59 am, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John
wrote:



On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote:


On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us...


NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To
Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for
the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently
balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in
charge of the brunt of combat.


NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone
over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar
Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with
responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other
targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the
operation....


It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while
the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing
new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders
try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the
American cheque payer the bill.


You should really vote in different politicians.


I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario.


You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al
Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world.


Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after
Saudi Arabia.


I guess when the people on the ground there claim that Obama inspired
them, they love America, and have signs that read Yes We Can, that
means in your tiny brain that bin laden is behind it all.


Ah yes, another bit of stupidity from nincdepoop.

How better to get support from Obama than to proclaim him the Messiah
and praise the country of which he's the president.

Wake up, ninc. And, I'm not one to put up with your continuous
stupidity.


Scary part, the idiot might have is is going to breed. What a thought.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NATO is concerned about smarter pirates Tim General 0 January 15th 11 10:09 PM
Blue Cross Sticks It to Everyone...Still. Secular Humouresque General 14 October 20th 10 03:41 AM
Denmark and Nato.. Soren General 3 April 11th 09 04:18 PM
Uncle Sam Needs the Rec.Boats Righties... Bert Robbins General 0 June 19th 05 10:36 PM
It's your Uncle Sam calling... Tim General 31 March 11th 05 12:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017