| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On Mar 25, 11:59*am, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us.... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. I guess when the people on the ground there claim that Obama inspired them, they love America, and have signs that read Yes We Can, that means in your tiny brain that bin laden is behind it all. Ah yes, another bit of stupidity from nincdepoop. How better to get support from Obama than to proclaim him the Messiah and praise the country of which he's the president. Wake up, ninc. And, I'm not one to put up with your continuous stupidity. |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
John H wrote:
Ah yes, another bit of stupidity from nincdepoop. How better to get support from Obama than to proclaim him the Messiah and praise the country of which he's the president. Wake up, ninc. And, I'm not one to put up with your continuous stupidity. Speaking of stupidity, herring, you're only a baby step in intelligence above your fellow right-wing racists here. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:43:16 -0700 (PDT), John H
wrote: On Mar 25, 11:59*am, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. I guess when the people on the ground there claim that Obama inspired them, they love America, and have signs that read Yes We Can, that means in your tiny brain that bin laden is behind it all. Ah yes, another bit of stupidity from nincdepoop. How better to get support from Obama than to proclaim him the Messiah and praise the country of which he's the president. Wake up, ninc. And, I'm not one to put up with your continuous stupidity. Ah yes, another bit of racist nonsense from a right-wing moron. Despite your stupidity, you have the right to declare it as often as you like. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On 25/03/2011 1:43 PM, John H wrote:
On Mar 25, 11:59 am, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. I guess when the people on the ground there claim that Obama inspired them, they love America, and have signs that read Yes We Can, that means in your tiny brain that bin laden is behind it all. Ah yes, another bit of stupidity from nincdepoop. How better to get support from Obama than to proclaim him the Messiah and praise the country of which he's the president. Wake up, ninc. And, I'm not one to put up with your continuous stupidity. Scary part, the idiot might have is is going to breed. What a thought. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:41:18 -0400, OmDeFlume wrote:
On 3/25/2011 11:59 AM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. I guess when the people on the ground there claim that Obama inspired them, they love America, and have signs that read Yes We Can, that means in your tiny brain that bin laden is behind it all. Dear, you are talking gibberish. But, she's being all that she can be. That's what counts. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
"Gene" wrote in message ... On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46 pm, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. That's paranoid, but would be a wise course, for them.... Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. Since nearly all of the 911 attackers were from Saudi Arabia.... been there done that..... Bottom Line? give people a taste of freedom and self determination and things will take their own course. The Libyans (unlike the Iraqis) are the best current example of folks willing to fight and die for that cause. Morally, we owe them a bit of help..... and should NOT turn our backs on them the way we did the Poles in WWII..... To place this in historical perspective... we should be eternally grateful to the French for providing damn near every grain of powder fired by US during the American Revolution..... otherwise you'd be speaking British, today.... ************* Speaking British might be a vast improvement over what comes out of the mouths of Kevin, Scotty and some of the other dopers in this newsgroup. ;-) |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:57:12 -0400, Gene
wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46*pm, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. *This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. *while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving *the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. That's paranoid, but would be a wise course, for them.... Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. Since nearly all of the 911 attackers were from Saudi Arabia.... been there done that..... Bottom Line? give people a taste of freedom and self determination and things will take their own course. The Libyans (unlike the Iraqis) are the best current example of folks willing to fight and die for that cause. Morally, we owe them a bit of help..... and should NOT turn our backs on them the way we did the Poles in WWII..... To place this in historical perspective... we should be eternally grateful to the French for providing damn near every grain of powder fired by US during the American Revolution..... otherwise you'd be speaking British, today.... Well, my gosh. It's nice to know you have such a great warmth for all those rebels everywhere. I sure as hell hope you're right and they're all 'good guys'! |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:00:37 -0400, Gene
wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:25:39 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:57:12 -0400, Gene wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46*pm, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. *This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. *while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving *the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. That's paranoid, but would be a wise course, for them.... Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. Since nearly all of the 911 attackers were from Saudi Arabia.... been there done that..... Bottom Line? give people a taste of freedom and self determination and things will take their own course. The Libyans (unlike the Iraqis) are the best current example of folks willing to fight and die for that cause. Morally, we owe them a bit of help..... and should NOT turn our backs on them the way we did the Poles in WWII..... To place this in historical perspective... we should be eternally grateful to the French for providing damn near every grain of powder fired by US during the American Revolution..... otherwise you'd be speaking British, today.... Well, my gosh. It's nice to know you have such a great warmth for all those rebels everywhere. I sure as hell hope you're right and they're all 'good guys'! I am, also, not Pollyanna... I hope so, too.... sometimes you just have to give it your best shot and hope your best guess won't come back and slap you silly.... I guess erring on the positive side is better than doing nothing.... however, the "fool me once" caveat kicks in and we don't get silly twice.... If Afghanistan is once...and it is, then Libya is twice. Even Gen Ham can't answer the questions he's given. |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
NATO sticks it to Uncle Sam again.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:41:16 -0400, Gene
wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:00:14 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:00:37 -0400, Gene wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:25:39 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:57:12 -0400, Gene wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:44:30 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:27:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Mar 24, 11:46*pm, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...o-fly-libya-us... NATO Agrees To Take Over Command Of Libya No-Fly Zone, U.S. Likely To Remain In Charge Of Brunt Of Combat WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States welcomed a partial handover for the Libyan air campaign to NATO on Thursday, but the allies apparently balked at assuming full control and the U.S. military was left in charge of the brunt of combat. NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no-fly zone over Libya, protective flights meant to deter Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi from putting warplanes in the air. That leaves the U.S. with responsibility for attacks on Gadhafi's ground forces and other targets, which are the toughest and most controversial portion of the operation.... It is certain that NATO wishes the United states all the grief, while the United Nations shares the glory within itself. *This is nothing new. The United Nations prefers to hate the U.S. *while it's leaders try to appease the UN by bending forward before it, and giving *the American cheque payer the bill. You should really vote in different politicians. I got a really weird [maybe bad] feeling about this whole scenario. You ever wonder if maybe *all* the uprisings over there are inspired by al Queada, with the eventual goal of a totally radical Islamic side of the world. That's paranoid, but would be a wise course, for them.... Wow, that could make life a bitch. I wonder what we'll do when they go after Saudi Arabia. Since nearly all of the 911 attackers were from Saudi Arabia.... been there done that..... Bottom Line? give people a taste of freedom and self determination and things will take their own course. The Libyans (unlike the Iraqis) are the best current example of folks willing to fight and die for that cause. Morally, we owe them a bit of help..... and should NOT turn our backs on them the way we did the Poles in WWII..... To place this in historical perspective... we should be eternally grateful to the French for providing damn near every grain of powder fired by US during the American Revolution..... otherwise you'd be speaking British, today.... Well, my gosh. It's nice to know you have such a great warmth for all those rebels everywhere. I sure as hell hope you're right and they're all 'good guys'! I am, also, not Pollyanna... I hope so, too.... sometimes you just have to give it your best shot and hope your best guess won't come back and slap you silly.... I guess erring on the positive side is better than doing nothing.... however, the "fool me once" caveat kicks in and we don't get silly twice.... If Afghanistan is once...and it is, then Libya is twice. Even Gen Ham can't answer the questions he's given. Keep your fingers crossed.... this really is a gamble.... an honest gamble.... but, in all honesty, a gamble... I'm thinking it's a gamble designed to attract some Republican and Independent votes...nothing more. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| NATO is concerned about smarter pirates | General | |||
| Blue Cross Sticks It to Everyone...Still. | General | |||
| Denmark and Nato.. | General | |||
| Uncle Sam Needs the Rec.Boats Righties... | General | |||
| It's your Uncle Sam calling... | General | |||
![John H[_2_] is offline](https://www.boatbanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Hybrid Mode
