Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

I mean if Gadhafi sent a cruise missile to the Whitehouse I am sure the
Americans would call it an assassination attempt, act of war and so forth.

So what has our society become where such levels of hypocrisy exist and
it is acceptable?

Just maybe, I mean maybe, our leaders are just as bad as the people we
attack. Just more polished in BS and herding our attitudes.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th fleet.

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On 23/03/2011 8:02 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

I mean if Gadhafi sent a cruise missile to the Whitehouse I am sure the
Americans would call it an assassination attempt, act of war and so forth.

So what has our society become where such levels of hypocrisy exist and
it is acceptable?

Just maybe, I mean maybe, our leaders are just as bad as the people we
attack. Just more polished in BS and herding our attitudes.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th
fleet.

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

And more, maybe the charge should be treason. Turns out before US
involvement in Libya ....

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...bels-in-libya/

WTF - Obama is supporting the 9/11 perpetratiors? Do the Bin Laden's
pull Obama's strings?

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:38:57 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 23/03/2011 8:02 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

I mean if Gadhafi sent a cruise missile to the Whitehouse I am sure the
Americans would call it an assassination attempt, act of war and so forth.

So what has our society become where such levels of hypocrisy exist and
it is acceptable?

Just maybe, I mean maybe, our leaders are just as bad as the people we
attack. Just more polished in BS and herding our attitudes.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th
fleet.

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

And more, maybe the charge should be treason. Turns out before US
involvement in Libya ....

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...bels-in-libya/

WTF - Obama is supporting the 9/11 perpetratiors? Do the Bin Laden's
pull Obama's strings?

Look Knuckles, we all know you're a racist, stupid, and a coward, and
you hate Obama. Do you think you're going to be changing people's
minds?

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.


But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th fleet.

gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...


If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On 23/03/2011 10:14 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:38:57 -0600,
wrote:

On 23/03/2011 8:02 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

I mean if Gadhafi sent a cruise missile to the Whitehouse I am sure the
Americans would call it an assassination attempt, act of war and so forth.

So what has our society become where such levels of hypocrisy exist and
it is acceptable?

Just maybe, I mean maybe, our leaders are just as bad as the people we
attack. Just more polished in BS and herding our attitudes.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th
fleet.

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

And more, maybe the charge should be treason. Turns out before US
involvement in Libya ....

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...bels-in-libya/

WTF - Obama is supporting the 9/11 perpetratiors? Do the Bin Laden's
pull Obama's strings?

Look Knuckles, we all know you're a racist, stupid, and a coward, and
you hate Obama. Do you think you're going to be changing people's
minds?

So defumers supports 9/11 types. Go figure. So ae you Muslim?

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

Canuck57 wrote:
On 23/03/2011 10:14 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:38:57 -0600,
wrote:

On 23/03/2011 8:02 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

I mean if Gadhafi sent a cruise missile to the Whitehouse I am sure the
Americans would call it an assassination attempt, act of war and so
forth.

So what has our society become where such levels of hypocrisy exist and
it is acceptable?

Just maybe, I mean maybe, our leaders are just as bad as the people we
attack. Just more polished in BS and herding our attitudes.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th
fleet.

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have
declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted
assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

And more, maybe the charge should be treason. Turns out before US
involvement in Libya ....

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...bels-in-libya/


WTF - Obama is supporting the 9/11 perpetratiors? Do the Bin Laden's
pull Obama's strings?

Look Knuckles, we all know you're a racist, stupid, and a coward, and
you hate Obama. Do you think you're going to be changing people's
minds?

So defumers supports 9/11 types. Go figure. So ae you Muslim?


Thank you, Scott Ingersoll...

Oh, wait...

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th fleet.

gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be white
to lie?

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th
fleet.

gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be white
to lie?

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted
assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

Working family Americans? He sure fu*ked them over, eh?

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On 24/03/2011 8:01 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th
fleet.

gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be white
to lie?

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have
declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted
assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

Working family Americans? He sure fu*ked them over, eh?

Yep, Obma's third year and a record number of people will lose their
homes this year. I would say al-Qaeda Obama's master plan is in full swing.

No wonder Hilary quit. She knew Obama was going to support al-Qaeda.
Think about it you dumb democratic herd sheep.

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 8:01 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th
fleet.

gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be white
to lie?

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have
declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted
assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

Working family Americans? He sure fu*ked them over, eh?

Yep, Obma's third year and a record number of people will lose their
homes this year. I would say al-Qaeda Obama's master plan is in full swing.

No wonder Hilary quit. She knew Obama was going to support al-Qaeda.
Think about it you dumb democratic herd sheep.

D'oh. Mrs. Clinton hasn't quit; she's merely stated she would not be
Secretary of State in Obama's second term.

Typically, secretaries of state serve only one term for their president,
and in many cases, not even that long. There have been two term
secretaries of state. Dean Rusk served eight years under Kennedy and
Johnson.

In addition to being a bigoted asshole, you're really grossly
misinformed and uninformed. That's why I don't take your posts
seriously. You're in the same category, politically, as Frogbreath and
Ingersoll - political nincompoops.