Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

I mean if Gadhafi sent a cruise missile to the Whitehouse I am sure the
Americans would call it an assassination attempt, act of war and so forth.

So what has our society become where such levels of hypocrisy exist and
it is acceptable?

Just maybe, I mean maybe, our leaders are just as bad as the people we
attack. Just more polished in BS and herding our attitudes.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th fleet.

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On 23/03/2011 8:02 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

I mean if Gadhafi sent a cruise missile to the Whitehouse I am sure the
Americans would call it an assassination attempt, act of war and so forth.

So what has our society become where such levels of hypocrisy exist and
it is acceptable?

Just maybe, I mean maybe, our leaders are just as bad as the people we
attack. Just more polished in BS and herding our attitudes.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th
fleet.

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

And more, maybe the charge should be treason. Turns out before US
involvement in Libya ....

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...bels-in-libya/

WTF - Obama is supporting the 9/11 perpetratiors? Do the Bin Laden's
pull Obama's strings?

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:38:57 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 23/03/2011 8:02 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

I mean if Gadhafi sent a cruise missile to the Whitehouse I am sure the
Americans would call it an assassination attempt, act of war and so forth.

So what has our society become where such levels of hypocrisy exist and
it is acceptable?

Just maybe, I mean maybe, our leaders are just as bad as the people we
attack. Just more polished in BS and herding our attitudes.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th
fleet.

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

And more, maybe the charge should be treason. Turns out before US
involvement in Libya ....

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...bels-in-libya/

WTF - Obama is supporting the 9/11 perpetratiors? Do the Bin Laden's
pull Obama's strings?

Look Knuckles, we all know you're a racist, stupid, and a coward, and
you hate Obama. Do you think you're going to be changing people's
minds?

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.


But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th fleet.

gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...


If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On 23/03/2011 10:14 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:38:57 -0600,
wrote:

On 23/03/2011 8:02 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

I mean if Gadhafi sent a cruise missile to the Whitehouse I am sure the
Americans would call it an assassination attempt, act of war and so forth.

So what has our society become where such levels of hypocrisy exist and
it is acceptable?

Just maybe, I mean maybe, our leaders are just as bad as the people we
attack. Just more polished in BS and herding our attitudes.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th
fleet.

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

And more, maybe the charge should be treason. Turns out before US
involvement in Libya ....

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...bels-in-libya/

WTF - Obama is supporting the 9/11 perpetratiors? Do the Bin Laden's
pull Obama's strings?

Look Knuckles, we all know you're a racist, stupid, and a coward, and
you hate Obama. Do you think you're going to be changing people's
minds?

So defumers supports 9/11 types. Go figure. So ae you Muslim?

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

Canuck57 wrote:
On 23/03/2011 10:14 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:38:57 -0600,
wrote:

On 23/03/2011 8:02 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

I mean if Gadhafi sent a cruise missile to the Whitehouse I am sure the
Americans would call it an assassination attempt, act of war and so
forth.

So what has our society become where such levels of hypocrisy exist and
it is acceptable?

Just maybe, I mean maybe, our leaders are just as bad as the people we
attack. Just more polished in BS and herding our attitudes.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th
fleet.

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have
declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted
assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

And more, maybe the charge should be treason. Turns out before US
involvement in Libya ....

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...bels-in-libya/


WTF - Obama is supporting the 9/11 perpetratiors? Do the Bin Laden's
pull Obama's strings?

Look Knuckles, we all know you're a racist, stupid, and a coward, and
you hate Obama. Do you think you're going to be changing people's
minds?

So defumers supports 9/11 types. Go figure. So ae you Muslim?


Thank you, Scott Ingersoll...

Oh, wait...

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th fleet.

gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be white
to lie?

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th
fleet.

gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be white
to lie?

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted
assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

Working family Americans? He sure fu*ked them over, eh?

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On 24/03/2011 8:01 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th
fleet.

gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be white
to lie?

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have
declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted
assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

Working family Americans? He sure fu*ked them over, eh?

Yep, Obma's third year and a record number of people will lose their
homes this year. I would say al-Qaeda Obama's master plan is in full swing.

No wonder Hilary quit. She knew Obama was going to support al-Qaeda.
Think about it you dumb democratic herd sheep.

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 8:01 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th
fleet.

gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be white
to lie?

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have
declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted
assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

Working family Americans? He sure fu*ked them over, eh?

Yep, Obma's third year and a record number of people will lose their
homes this year. I would say al-Qaeda Obama's master plan is in full swing.

No wonder Hilary quit. She knew Obama was going to support al-Qaeda.
Think about it you dumb democratic herd sheep.

D'oh. Mrs. Clinton hasn't quit; she's merely stated she would not be
Secretary of State in Obama's second term.

Typically, secretaries of state serve only one term for their president,
and in many cases, not even that long. There have been two term
secretaries of state. Dean Rusk served eight years under Kennedy and
Johnson.

In addition to being a bigoted asshole, you're really grossly
misinformed and uninformed. That's why I don't take your posts
seriously. You're in the same category, politically, as Frogbreath and
Ingersoll - political nincompoops.

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On 24/03/2011 9:01 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 8:01 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes
him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th
fleet.

gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be white
to lie?

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have
declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted
assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

Working family Americans? He sure fu*ked them over, eh?

Yep, Obma's third year and a record number of people will lose their
homes this year. I would say al-Qaeda Obama's master plan is in full
swing.

No wonder Hilary quit. She knew Obama was going to support al-Qaeda.
Think about it you dumb democratic herd sheep.

D'oh. Mrs. Clinton hasn't quit; she's merely stated she would not be
Secretary of State in Obama's second term.

Typically, secretaries of state serve only one term for their president,
and in many cases, not even that long. There have been two term
secretaries of state. Dean Rusk served eight years under Kennedy and
Johnson.

In addition to being a bigoted asshole, you're really grossly
misinformed and uninformed. That's why I don't take your posts
seriously. You're in the same category, politically, as Frogbreath and
Ingersoll - political nincompoops.


Funny, she gave notice she is quitting. Obama Bin Laden I guess was too
much for her to take and she knows Obama be a one term jive turkey. As
when the truth gets out, no one is going to respect al_Queda Barack
Obama Bin Laden.

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On 3/24/2011 11:31 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 9:01 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 8:01 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes
him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more
power....5th
fleet.

gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be
white
to lie?

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have
declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted
assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

Working family Americans? He sure fu*ked them over, eh?

Yep, Obma's third year and a record number of people will lose their
homes this year. I would say al-Qaeda Obama's master plan is in full
swing.

No wonder Hilary quit. She knew Obama was going to support al-Qaeda.
Think about it you dumb democratic herd sheep.

D'oh. Mrs. Clinton hasn't quit; she's merely stated she would not be
Secretary of State in Obama's second term.

Typically, secretaries of state serve only one term for their president,
and in many cases, not even that long. There have been two term
secretaries of state. Dean Rusk served eight years under Kennedy and
Johnson.

In addition to being a bigoted asshole, you're really grossly
misinformed and uninformed. That's why I don't take your posts
seriously. You're in the same category, politically, as Frogbreath and
Ingersoll - political nincompoops.


Funny, she gave notice she is quitting. Obama Bin Laden I guess was too
much for her to take and she knows Obama be a one term jive turkey. As
when the truth gets out, no one is going to respect al_Queda Barack
Obama Bin Laden.


What Mrs. Clinton said was that she was retiring after her current term
as secretary of state expires.

That's not quitting, nor is it "notice" of quitting. You apparently are
not aware of how such things work in the lower 48. Cabinet officials
serve at the pleasure of the president and all their jobs expire at the
end of his or her term of office. The job is over.

To serve again, a cabinet officer has to be re-nominated by the
president and then re-confirmed. Since Mrs. Clinton has indicated she
wants to retire at the end of her current term, it is unlikely President
Obama will re-nominate her.

That's how it is in the real world, which seems a dimension away from
where you live.

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On 24/03/2011 9:47 AM, paul@byc wrote:
On 3/24/2011 11:31 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 9:01 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 8:01 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to
someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the
rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one
man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes
him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more
power....5th
fleet.

gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be
white
to lie?

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have
declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs
with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted
assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume
assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

Working family Americans? He sure fu*ked them over, eh?

Yep, Obma's third year and a record number of people will lose their
homes this year. I would say al-Qaeda Obama's master plan is in full
swing.

No wonder Hilary quit. She knew Obama was going to support al-Qaeda.
Think about it you dumb democratic herd sheep.

D'oh. Mrs. Clinton hasn't quit; she's merely stated she would not be
Secretary of State in Obama's second term.

Typically, secretaries of state serve only one term for their president,
and in many cases, not even that long. There have been two term
secretaries of state. Dean Rusk served eight years under Kennedy and
Johnson.

In addition to being a bigoted asshole, you're really grossly
misinformed and uninformed. That's why I don't take your posts
seriously. You're in the same category, politically, as Frogbreath and
Ingersoll - political nincompoops.


Funny, she gave notice she is quitting. Obama Bin Laden I guess was too
much for her to take and she knows Obama be a one term jive turkey. As
when the truth gets out, no one is going to respect al_Queda Barack
Obama Bin Laden.


What Mrs. Clinton said was that she was retiring after her current term
as secretary of state expires.

That's not quitting, nor is it "notice" of quitting. You apparently are
not aware of how such things work in the lower 48. Cabinet officials
serve at the pleasure of the president and all their jobs expire at the
end of his or her term of office. The job is over.

To serve again, a cabinet officer has to be re-nominated by the
president and then re-confirmed. Since Mrs. Clinton has indicated she
wants to retire at the end of her current term, it is unlikely President
Obama will re-nominate her.

That's how it is in the real world, which seems a dimension away from
where you live.

Only in for 4 year term, pretty early to retire. Secreary of sate often
gets renewed for 2 or 3 terms. 2 being typical.

Somebody had to do it....

http://www.facebook.com/#!/profile.p...00001239032346

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 9:47 AM, paul@byc wrote:
On 3/24/2011 11:31 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 9:01 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 8:01 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does
not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to
someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the
rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one
man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes
him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in
Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more
power....5th
fleet.

gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be
white
to lie?

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have
declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs
with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted
assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume
assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be
tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

Working family Americans? He sure fu*ked them over, eh?

Yep, Obma's third year and a record number of people will lose their
homes this year. I would say al-Qaeda Obama's master plan is in full
swing.

No wonder Hilary quit. She knew Obama was going to support al-Qaeda.
Think about it you dumb democratic herd sheep.

D'oh. Mrs. Clinton hasn't quit; she's merely stated she would not be
Secretary of State in Obama's second term.

Typically, secretaries of state serve only one term for their
president,
and in many cases, not even that long. There have been two term
secretaries of state. Dean Rusk served eight years under Kennedy and
Johnson.

In addition to being a bigoted asshole, you're really grossly
misinformed and uninformed. That's why I don't take your posts
seriously. You're in the same category, politically, as Frogbreath and
Ingersoll - political nincompoops.


Funny, she gave notice she is quitting. Obama Bin Laden I guess was too
much for her to take and she knows Obama be a one term jive turkey. As
when the truth gets out, no one is going to respect al_Queda Barack
Obama Bin Laden.


What Mrs. Clinton said was that she was retiring after her current term
as secretary of state expires.

That's not quitting, nor is it "notice" of quitting. You apparently are
not aware of how such things work in the lower 48. Cabinet officials
serve at the pleasure of the president and all their jobs expire at the
end of his or her term of office. The job is over.

To serve again, a cabinet officer has to be re-nominated by the
president and then re-confirmed. Since Mrs. Clinton has indicated she
wants to retire at the end of her current term, it is unlikely President
Obama will re-nominate her.

That's how it is in the real world, which seems a dimension away from
where you live.

Only in for 4 year term, pretty early to retire. Secreary of sate often
gets renewed for 2 or 3 terms. 2 being typical.

Somebody had to do it....

http://www.facebook.com/#!/profile.p...00001239032346


It's easy enough to look up the entire list of U.S. secretaries of state
and how long they held their jobs. Perhaps it is different in your
country. As stated, you are misinformed and uninformed, especially as it
pertains to "how things are" in the U.S. Mrs. Clinton's announced
retirement, I am confident, has nothing to do with the dictator of Libya.

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:56:04 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th fleet.

gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be white
to lie?

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

I bet if you say something 1000 times you might think someone besides
a moron such as yourself will believe it.

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On 24/03/2011 11:36 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:56:04 -0600,
wrote:

On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th fleet.

gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be white
to lie?

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

I bet if you say something 1000 times you might think someone besides
a moron such as yourself will believe it.

So I guess you are an al-Queda and terrorist supporter.

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:59:40 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 24/03/2011 11:36 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:56:04 -0600,
wrote:

On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th fleet.

gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be white
to lie?

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

I bet if you say something 1000 times you might think someone besides
a moron such as yourself will believe it.

So I guess you are an al-Queda and terrorist supporter.

No need to guess you're an idiot.

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On 24/03/2011 2:39 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:59:40 -0600,
wrote:

On 24/03/2011 11:36 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:56:04 -0600,
wrote:

On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th fleet.

gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be white
to lie?

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

I bet if you say something 1000 times you might think someone besides
a moron such as yourself will believe it.

So I guess you are an al-Queda and terrorist supporter.

No need to guess you're an idiot.

So did you buy your Obama Jack boots yet?

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On 3/24/2011 11:31 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 9:01 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 8:01 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes
him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more
power....5th
fleet.

gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be
white
to lie?

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have
declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted
assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

Working family Americans? He sure fu*ked them over, eh?

Yep, Obma's third year and a record number of people will lose their
homes this year. I would say al-Qaeda Obama's master plan is in full
swing.

No wonder Hilary quit. She knew Obama was going to support al-Qaeda.
Think about it you dumb democratic herd sheep.

D'oh. Mrs. Clinton hasn't quit; she's merely stated she would not be
Secretary of State in Obama's second term.

Typically, secretaries of state serve only one term for their president,
and in many cases, not even that long. There have been two term
secretaries of state. Dean Rusk served eight years under Kennedy and
Johnson.

In addition to being a bigoted asshole, you're really grossly
misinformed and uninformed. That's why I don't take your posts
seriously. You're in the same category, politically, as Frogbreath and
Ingersoll - political nincompoops.


Funny, she gave notice she is quitting. Obama Bin Laden I guess was too
much for her to take and she knows Obama be a one term jive turkey. As
when the truth gets out, no one is going to respect al_Queda Barack
Obama Bin Laden.

I think she plans to fumigate the White House and move in.

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On 3/24/2011 1:36 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:56:04 -0600,
wrote:

On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th fleet.

gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be white
to lie?

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

I bet if you say something 1000 times you might think someone besides
a moron such as yourself will believe it.

You're a moron. Are you keeping count?

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:50:57 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 24/03/2011 2:39 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:59:40 -0600,
wrote:

On 24/03/2011 11:36 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:56:04 -0600,
wrote:

On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th fleet.

gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be white
to lie?

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

I bet if you say something 1000 times you might think someone besides
a moron such as yourself will believe it.

So I guess you are an al-Queda and terrorist supporter.

No need to guess you're an idiot.

So did you buy your Obama Jack boots yet?

I think you've got the market corned on Jack boots!

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:56:04 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

HAHAHAHA they said the same about the egyptian rebels too! you saying
that EVERY fascist govt has to be supported if they're against AQ??

you're SO easily manipulated!


So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

no but you are

your support of fascist govts is mother's milk to AQ


gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be white
to lie?

your ONLY argument is that AQ is trying to take advantage of a
situation and on THAT basis you conclude that fascism is better than
democracy

yyeah i always knew that about you.


But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

ah. so when a WHITE guy does it, it's OK but when a BLACK guy does
it...

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 08:43:37 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:



Yep, Obma's third year and a record number of people will lose their
homes this year. I would say al-Qaeda Obama's master plan is in full swing.

courtesy of wall street. funny the US deregulated our economy and it
collapsed. the canadians didnt do it so much and they're doing MUCH
better.


No wonder Hilary quit. She knew Obama was going to support al-Qaeda.
Think about it you dumb democratic herd sheep.

his argument is that ANY fascist MUST be supported if AQ opposes them

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:31:10 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 24/03/2011 9:01 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote

In addition to being a bigoted asshole, you're really grossly
misinformed and uninformed. That's why I don't take your posts
seriously. You're in the same category, politically, as Frogbreath and
Ingersoll - political nincompoops.


Funny, she gave notice she is quitting. Obama Bin Laden I guess was too
much for her to take and she knows Obama be a one term jive turkey. As
when the truth gets out, no one is going to respect al_Queda Barack
Obama Bin Laden.

uh no. she said she wouldnt serve in a 2nd term.

you just cant read.

and your support of AQ's fascists efforts is noted

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On 24/03/2011 4:00 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:56:04 -0600,
wrote:

On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

HAHAHAHA they said the same about the egyptian rebels too! you saying
that EVERY fascist govt has to be supported if they're against AQ??

you're SO easily manipulated!


So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

no but you are

your support of fascist govts is mother's milk to AQ


gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be white
to lie?

your ONLY argument is that AQ is trying to take advantage of a
situation and on THAT basis you conclude that fascism is better than
democracy

yyeah i always knew that about you.


But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

ah. so when a WHITE guy does it, it's OK but when a BLACK guy does
it...

So is that an excuse or a reason?

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:23:28 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 24/03/2011 4:00 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:56:04 -0600,
wrote:

your ONLY argument is that AQ is trying to take advantage of a
situation and on THAT basis you conclude that fascism is better than
democracy

yyeah i always knew that about you.


But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

ah. so when a WHITE guy does it, it's OK but when a BLACK guy does
it...

So is that an excuse or a reason?


you're the member of the ku klux clown. you tell me

Obama - Charge, attempted assassination
 

On 24/03/2011 5:20 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:23:28 -0600,
wrote:

On 24/03/2011 4:00 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:56:04 -0600,
wrote:

your ONLY argument is that AQ is trying to take advantage of a
situation and on THAT basis you conclude that fascism is better than
democracy

yyeah i always knew that about you.


But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

ah. so when a WHITE guy does it, it's OK but when a BLACK guy does
it...

So is that an excuse or a reason?


you're the member of the ku klux clown. you tell me

Why, are you recruiting?