Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote: On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600, wrote: Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones home be characterized as an assassination attempt? ?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no. Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the rebels to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out. So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests. But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man. Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen, Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th fleet. gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion oh...but he's white... Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be white to lie? If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have declined entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame. But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted assassination? But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in other countries is legal in the USA? bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried as well Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was. Working family Americans? He sure fu*ked them over, eh? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|