On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 08:43:37 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:



Yep, Obma's third year and a record number of people will lose their
homes this year. I would say al-Qaeda Obama's master plan is in full swing.

courtesy of wall street. funny the US deregulated our economy and it
collapsed. the canadians didnt do it so much and they're doing MUCH
better.


No wonder Hilary quit. She knew Obama was going to support al-Qaeda.
Think about it you dumb democratic herd sheep.

his argument is that ANY fascist MUST be supported if AQ opposes them

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:56:04 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th fleet.

gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be white
to lie?

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

I bet if you say something 1000 times you might think someone besides
a moron such as yourself will believe it.

On 24/03/2011 11:36 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:56:04 -0600,
wrote:

On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th fleet.

gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be white
to lie?

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

I bet if you say something 1000 times you might think someone besides
a moron such as yourself will believe it.

So I guess you are an al-Queda and terrorist supporter.

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:59:40 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 24/03/2011 11:36 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:56:04 -0600,
wrote:

On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th fleet.

gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be white
to lie?

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

I bet if you say something 1000 times you might think someone besides
a moron such as yourself will believe it.

So I guess you are an al-Queda and terrorist supporter.

No need to guess you're an idiot.

On 3/24/2011 1:36 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:56:04 -0600,
wrote:

On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

But clearly the president of the USA has too much power for one man.
Instigating war without provocation and without consultation makes him
as much of a tyrant as Chavez, Castro, Gadhafi and others in Yemen,
Syria, Hamas, Rwanda and others... but he does have more power....5th fleet.

gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be white
to lie?

If Harper, Ignatieff and Layton had any morals, they would have declined
entry into other peoples wars. So Canada, UK, France and otehrs with
vested interests in Libya are also deserving of blame.

But the question is, should Obama be impeached for attempted assassination?

But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

I bet if you say something 1000 times you might think someone besides
a moron such as yourself will believe it.

You're a moron. Are you keeping count?

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:56:04 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

HAHAHAHA they said the same about the egyptian rebels too! you saying
that EVERY fascist govt has to be supported if they're against AQ??

you're SO easily manipulated!


So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

no but you are

your support of fascist govts is mother's milk to AQ


gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be white
to lie?

your ONLY argument is that AQ is trying to take advantage of a
situation and on THAT basis you conclude that fascism is better than
democracy

yyeah i always knew that about you.


But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

ah. so when a WHITE guy does it, it's OK but when a BLACK guy does
it...

On 24/03/2011 4:00 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:56:04 -0600,
wrote:

On 24/03/2011 3:38 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:30 -0600,
wrote:

Since no formal declaration of war exists, and no-fly zone does not
cover ground attacks, would not sending a cruise missile to someones
home be characterized as an assassination attempt?

?? unless gaddahfi is known to be in benghazi, no.

Before Obama got into this, al Qaeda had stated they wanted the rebels
to win, they had al Qaeda support, and wanted Gadhafi out.

HAHAHAHA they said the same about the egyptian rebels too! you saying
that EVERY fascist govt has to be supported if they're against AQ??

you're SO easily manipulated!


So in fact Obama Bin Laden is supporting al Quada interests.

no but you are

your support of fascist govts is mother's milk to AQ


gee. bush lied and 4400 US troops died at a cost of a trillion

oh...but he's white...

Well Obama Bin Laden be lying to you. Do you think you have to be white
to lie?

your ONLY argument is that AQ is trying to take advantage of a
situation and on THAT basis you conclude that fascism is better than
democracy

yyeah i always knew that about you.


But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

ah. so when a WHITE guy does it, it's OK but when a BLACK guy does
it...

So is that an excuse or a reason?

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:23:28 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 24/03/2011 4:00 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:56:04 -0600,
wrote:

your ONLY argument is that AQ is trying to take advantage of a
situation and on THAT basis you conclude that fascism is better than
democracy

yyeah i always knew that about you.


But Ronald Reagan tried it too. So is one to assume assassination in
other countries is legal in the USA?

bush got saddam hussein captured and hanged. so bush should be tried
as well

Well, at least Bush knew who the enemy was.

ah. so when a WHITE guy does it, it's OK but when a BLACK guy does
it...

So is that an excuse or a reason?


you're the member of the ku klux clown. you tell me