In article ,
says...

On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:53:52 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

The price for my support for Obama?s war is the admission by liberals
that Bush was right. Otherwise, we are logically forced to conclude
that liberal policies involving deaths of US servicemen is driven
purely by US politics. If they will admit that Bush was right, it
will be evidence that they can learn from their mistakes and I will
then be able to support the war. Until then, I will use Liberals own
rhetoric against them.

Afghanistan: Bush was right.

Iraq: Bush was a 100% gold plated ball bearing idiot.

Easy to say... But what if Obama goes back to Iraq for some reason,
maybe cause like Libya, the French tell him to. Then will Bush have been
right about Iraq all of a sudden? snerk

In article 80081ca9-837d-41e6-bbbd-2597befae4c4
@s9g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says...

On Mar 22, 8:20*pm, Gene wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:53:52 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch

wrote:
The price for my support for Obama s war is the admission by liberals
that Bush was right. *Otherwise, we are logically forced to conclude
that liberal policies involving deaths of US servicemen is driven
purely by US politics. *If they will admit that Bush was right, it
will be evidence that they can learn from their mistakes and I will
then be able to support the war. *Until then, I will use Liberals own
rhetoric against them.

Afghanistan: Bush was right.

Iraq: Bush was a 100% gold plated ball bearing idiot.

--

Fort Agent 6.00 Build 1186

"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by
the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do.
So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor.
Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover." * - Unknown

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepage
*http://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm

Unless you agree that Bush was right in Iraq then logically you cannot
support Obama's war in Libya. However, one should never try to
confuse a liberal with logic. Let's try slogans.
NO WAR FOR OIL
I support the troops, I do not support the war. Bring them home.
Yes, pilots are troops.
How many civilians have to die for Obama's lust for oil?
We should all urge 18 year old kids NOT to sign up for the military
because otherwise they will have to fight in Obama's Oil War.

No, no, no... it's different now...

Canuck57 wrote:
On 22/03/2011 5:13 PM, Harryk wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
The price for my support for Obama’s war is the admission by liberals
that Bush was right.

No one gives a flying f*ck about your support for Obama.

I think, except for fleabaggers; we have open contempt for Obama, not
support and certainy no respect either. The man is only good at standing
on a soap box, all talk and no walk.

No one cares what you think, either, teahadist.

On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:13:12 -0400, Harryk
wrote:

Frogwatch wrote:
The price for my support for Obama’s war is the admission by liberals
that Bush was right.

No one gives a flying f*ck about your support for Obama.

He wouldn't support Obama if he were gold plated. Nobody give's a damn
about his opinion other than his nutty friends.

In article 80081ca9-837d-41e6-bbbd-2597befae4c4
@s9g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says...

On Mar 22, 8:20*pm, Gene wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:53:52 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch

wrote:
The price for my support for Obama s war is the admission by liberals
that Bush was right. *Otherwise, we are logically forced to conclude
that liberal policies involving deaths of US servicemen is driven
purely by US politics. *If they will admit that Bush was right, it
will be evidence that they can learn from their mistakes and I will
then be able to support the war. *Until then, I will use Liberals own
rhetoric against them.

Afghanistan: Bush was right.

Iraq: Bush was a 100% gold plated ball bearing idiot.

--

Fort Agent 6.00 Build 1186

"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by
the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do.
So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor.
Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover." * - Unknown

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepage
*http://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm

Unless you agree that Bush was right in Iraq then logically you cannot
support Obama's war in Libya. However, one should never try to
confuse a liberal with logic. Let's try slogans.
NO WAR FOR OIL
I support the troops, I do not support the war. Bring them home.
Yes, pilots are troops.
How many civilians have to die for Obama's lust for oil?
We should all urge 18 year old kids NOT to sign up for the military
because otherwise they will have to fight in Obama's Oil War.

This is way to honest and logical for those on the left...

In article ,
says...

On 22/03/2011 4:53 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
The price for my support for Obama?s war is the admission by liberals
that Bush was right. Otherwise, we are logically forced to conclude
that liberal policies involving deaths of US servicemen is driven
purely by US politics. If they will admit that Bush was right, it
will be evidence that they can learn from their mistakes and I will
then be able to support the war. Until then, I will use Liberals own
rhetoric against them.

Yep. It is in fact. Obama be a war monger too. So suck it up dim-wit
fleabaggers, Obama just said Bush was right so tow THE Obama line now ya
all hear.....

Didn't big mouth THE Obama "In Debt We Trust!" also say he was going to
end the war? Oh well, just another liar politician with no brains, just
lies.

It's over... Obama has checked out on the world. He is just on vacation
and it's gone too far, I don't think he can save it now... Good.

In article ,
says...

On 22/03/2011 5:13 PM, Harryk wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
The price for my support for Obama?s war is the admission by liberals
that Bush was right.

No one gives a flying f*ck about your support for Obama.

I think, except for fleabaggers; we have open contempt for Obama, not
support and certainy no respect either. The man is only good at
standing on a soap box, all talk and no walk.

OH, he has walk alright. He has walked away from the frekin' job...
Where the hell is the guy while the **** is hitting the fan.. Oh yeah,
on vacation, and filling in "the brackets". Sad indeed.

I_am_Tosk wrote:
In article80081ca9-837d-41e6-bbbd-2597befae4c4
@s9g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says...
On Mar 22, 8:20 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:53:52 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch

wrote:
The price for my support for Obama s war is the admission by liberals
that Bush was right. Otherwise, we are logically forced to conclude
that liberal policies involving deaths of US servicemen is driven
purely by US politics. If they will admit that Bush was right, it
will be evidence that they can learn from their mistakes and I will
then be able to support the war. Until then, I will use Liberals own
rhetoric against them.
Afghanistan: Bush was right.

Iraq: Bush was a 100% gold plated ball bearing idiot.

--

Fort Agent 6.00 Build 1186

"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by
the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do.
So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor.
Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover." - Unknown

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepage
http://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm
Unless you agree that Bush was right in Iraq then logically you cannot
support Obama's war in Libya. However, one should never try to
confuse a liberal with logic. Let's try slogans.
NO WAR FOR OIL
I support the troops, I do not support the war. Bring them home.
Yes, pilots are troops.
How many civilians have to die for Obama's lust for oil?
We should all urge 18 year old kids NOT to sign up for the military
because otherwise they will have to fight in Obama's Oil War.

This is way to honest and logical for those on the left...


Frogwatch, Canuck and Snotty Ingersoll - uninformed, ignorant, and full
of hate.

On 3/22/2011 7:45 PM, Canuck57 wrote:

The man is only good at standing
on a soap box, all talk and no walk.

Only if the soap box is accompanied by teleprompters.

On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 20:20:00 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:53:52 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

The price for my support for Obama’s war is the admission by liberals
that Bush was right. Otherwise, we are logically forced to conclude
that liberal policies involving deaths of US servicemen is driven
purely by US politics. If they will admit that Bush was right, it
will be evidence that they can learn from their mistakes and I will
then be able to support the war. Until then, I will use Liberals own
rhetoric against them.

Afghanistan: Bush was right.

Iraq: Bush was a 100% gold plated ball bearing idiot.

As is *your* boy in Libya.