On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:05:47 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 24/03/2011 4:17 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:56:51 -0600,
wrote:



Agreed, it is more complex, and much of it we have not been told.

My guess is this, Obama tried to talk to Gadafi like he did with Egypt.
But Gadafi told Obama to fly a kite.

i hope. that way obama continues to be seen as he is. a man of peace

Obama is a war monger.

now let's see....

number of wars started w/o UN approval:

bush: 1
obama: 0

yeah. but bush is white...


so you think all we have to do is to continue to support crazed
dictators and everything's gonna be alright

proof? well none.

The cruise missile says it all.

so you have no proof. yep. figured that.


Saudi/Arab, it is a nice diversion to take attention off of the real
carnage to unarmed civilians n Yemen and Behrain. Further, Gadafi never
really fit in to the Arab oil racketeering cartels so Saudi view him as
a victim of convenience. Maybe adafi even told a Bin Laden family
member to take a hike.

go ahead and live in your fantasy world. i suppose in your world,
japanese reactors never have partial meltdowns either

You mean like Three Mile Island, the GE designed reactors in Japan, you
got 23 exactly like them in your back yard. Even more if you count
similar models. You might not want to be so smug.

hey you're the rightie with the view that all blacks should be
domestics. not me


and you believe this because gaddhafi said it.

uh huh

Nope, I follow the energy markets.

gee. so do the taliban. they visited the US in 94 to discuss a
pipeline

would you have supported those nice gentlemen??


If it is about freedom and democracy, Yemen and Behrain would not be
ignored. They are actually worse shape. No, Obama, UN, France and
Saudi -- they want Gadafi out so they can keep it a nice subservient
colonial place and a little ego satisfaction.

whatever this means

we havent had relations with libya for over 25 years. your tin foil
hat needs a calendar

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:05:02 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:14:03 -0400, bpuharic wrote:


yeah and our reputation is stellar, right?

Not at all but our history in Africa is fairly limited.

not quite. we've done our share of CIA inspired damage there during
the cold war



This could blow up in our face.
I am sure Qdaffy is already spinning this as the European
recolonization of Africa and if that catches hold, we could hit a
wall.

it's already blowing up in our face. this is the consequence of
supporting crazed dictators for generations

I said it before, we will support anyone who promises to only oppress
their own people, sell the west cheap oil and tolerate Israel.

yep. that is true.

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:08:36 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:18:56 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:24:39 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:


Unless you agree that Bush was right in Iraq then logically you cannot
support Obama's war in Libya.

remind me...how many UN mandates did bush have for iraq?

oh. none.

There were several UN resolutions about Iraq.
At least he got approval from the US congress. Obama didn't for Libya.

didnt need to. he's not the first pres to fire missles at libya w/o
congresss approval