Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

....doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

On Mar 19, 8:58*am, John H wrote:
...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

Why don't you write your "employer " a letter, and quit posting your
inane thoughts here, Herring?

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

In article ,
says...

...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

The hypocrisy is disgusting. These heathens have no moral core, and no
loyalty to country. Just politics, and power for the lefties here... It
really does make us Ugly Americans...

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...
...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

The hypocrisy is disgusting. These heathens have no moral core, and no
loyalty to country. Just politics, and power for the lefties here... It
really does make us Ugly Americans...


You boys should restrict your "scribblings" to topics you have a chance
of understanding. Interpreting current events and national policy
matters isn't among those topics, obviously.

Oh, and Snotty? Anyone who sees a photo of you will immediately
recognize that among Ugly Americans, you're pretty close to the front of
the pack. You need a makeover.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...
...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

The hypocrisy is disgusting. These heathens have no moral core, and no
loyalty to country. Just politics, and power for the lefties here... It
really does make us Ugly Americans...


Your lack of edu-ma-cation is showing again, bozo. A "heathen" typically
refers to a person whose religion is neither Christian, Jewish, nor
Muslim. It is a pejorative, obviously, but even at that, you're not
using the word correctly.

The word heathen may also refer to a person who has no more religion,
enlightenment, or culture than a pagan. That definition, of course,
would apply to a sawed-off twerp like you, except, of course, comparing
you to a pagan would be an insult to a pagan.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

On 3/19/2011 10:38 AM, Harryk wrote:
I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...
...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar?
Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

The hypocrisy is disgusting. These heathens have no moral core, and no
loyalty to country. Just politics, and power for the lefties here... It
really does make us Ugly Americans...


Your lack of edu-ma-cation is showing again, bozo. A "heathen" typically
refers to a person whose religion is neither Christian, Jewish, nor
Muslim. It is a pejorative, obviously, but even at that, you're not
using the word correctly.

The word heathen may also refer to a person who has no more religion,
enlightenment, or culture than a pagan. That definition, of course,
would apply to a sawed-off twerp like you, except, of course, comparing
you to a pagan would be an insult to a pagan.




If Scotty was referring to you or jps, he was using the word correctly.
If he was referring to others, well, who knows.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

On 19/03/2011 6:58 AM, John H wrote:
...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

Gaddafi must have ****ed of someone in high power somewhere.

If it were about justice, how come for 3 decades the power that be did
nothing? I don't like him, he should have had his neck stretched years
ago, but why now? Our corrupt leaders say so? What is the real motive
for this?

Come now, pretty obvious some alliance exists with US-UN-France where in
about 1/2 dozen countries the UN backed man is trying to replace the
local dictators or even democratically elected. Remeber the people of
Libya wanted Gaddafi and still do, BBC news showed protesters in
Gaddafi's support.

Because US-UN-France is fighting for a minority of gun toting rebel
criminals.

If an armed minority marched on DC, and another country came in to
support them -- that is what the US is doing!

Basically US-UN-France is the drivin force with Europe and Arab rich
calling the shots.

The new world order at work.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 6:58 AM, John H wrote:
...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where
is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

Gaddafi must have ****ed of someone in high power somewhere.

If it were about justice, how come for 3 decades the power that be did
nothing? I don't like him, he should have had his neck stretched years
ago, but why now? Our corrupt leaders say so? What is the real motive
for this?

Come now, pretty obvious some alliance exists with US-UN-France where in
about 1/2 dozen countries the UN backed man is trying to replace the
local dictators or even democratically elected. Remeber the people of
Libya wanted Gaddafi and still do, BBC news showed protesters in
Gaddafi's support.

Because US-UN-France is fighting for a minority of gun toting rebel
criminals.

If an armed minority marched on DC, and another country came in to
support them -- that is what the US is doing!

Basically US-UN-France is the drivin force with Europe and Arab rich
calling the shots.

The new world order at work.

Thank you for the insights into your brain. It's a scary place, what
with your endless conspiracy theories.

I don't like Muammer el-Qaddafi either, but...as bad as he is, he is a
piker when you add up his murders and compare that number to the
hundreds of thousands of innocents our troops killed in Southeast Asia,
Iraq, and Afghanistan.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

On 19/03/2011 8:01 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

The hypocrisy is disgusting. These heathens have no moral core, and no
loyalty to country. Just politics, and power for the lefties here... It
really does make us Ugly Americans...

Yep, I would have to agree. THe hypocracy and her style media
management is amazing. A sad reminder that our own governments are
aggressive, dirty and manipulative themselves.

Take G8/20 in Toronto, where 1000 unarmed peaceful protestors arrested,
finger printed and charged. Some brutalized. Yet US-UN-France backs
armed rebel minorities because they see a chance to install their brand
of puppet leadership. Libya isn't the only country, like Rwanda, Ivory
Coast and several others are getting UN underground support.

Hey, if our people behaved like Lyan rebels, how long would that last?
And if Gaddafi is so bad, how come western/UN/France powers that be
inored him, and in fact armed and supplied him?

Know that no mater what you think of Gaddafi, he does have the majority
support in his country and it is why he is winning -- now France wants
its colonial rich interests protected. Canada is in because of
Suncor/Petro-Canada interests. Hey, this is a corporte/money driven war.

US ignores the slauter going on in Yemen and Behrain. Hippocrits and in
Behrain the majorty are the ones getting cut down. So this isn't about
"democracy", it is about hypocrisy.

Here is my take, Gaddafi has ****ed off someone with a lot of influence
and power. And our own governmetns don't answer to us, they march
towards worlds dominiation. Manage the herd.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

On 19/03/2011 8:38 AM, Harryk wrote:
I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...
...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar?
Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

The hypocrisy is disgusting. These heathens have no moral core, and no
loyalty to country. Just politics, and power for the lefties here... It
really does make us Ugly Americans...


Your lack of edu-ma-cation is showing again, bozo. A "heathen" typically
refers to a person whose religion is neither Christian, Jewish, nor
Muslim. It is a pejorative, obviously, but even at that, you're not
using the word correctly.

The word heathen may also refer to a person who has no more religion,
enlightenment, or culture than a pagan. That definition, of course,
would apply to a sawed-off twerp like you, except, of course, comparing
you to a pagan would be an insult to a pagan.

So have you gotten your jack boots yet?

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 6:58 AM, John H wrote:
...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where
is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

Gaddafi must have ****ed of someone in high power somewhere.

If it were about justice, how come for 3 decades the power that be did
nothing? I don't like him, he should have had his neck stretched years
ago, but why now? Our corrupt leaders say so? What is the real motive
for this?

Come now, pretty obvious some alliance exists with US-UN-France where in
about 1/2 dozen countries the UN backed man is trying to replace the
local dictators or even democratically elected. Remeber the people of
Libya wanted Gaddafi and still do, BBC news showed protesters in
Gaddafi's support.

Because US-UN-France is fighting for a minority of gun toting rebel
criminals.

If an armed minority marched on DC, and another country came in to
support them -- that is what the US is doing!

Basically US-UN-France is the drivin force with Europe and Arab rich
calling the shots.

The new world order at work.

Thank you for the insights into your brain. It's a scary place, what
with your endless conspiracy theories.

I don't like Muammer el-Qaddafi either, but...as bad as he is, he is a
piker when you add up his murders and compare that number to the
hundreds of thousands of innocents our troops killed in Southeast Asia,
Iraq, and Afghanistan.

Iceland might be to your liking.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

On 19/03/2011 10:26 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 6:58 AM, John H wrote:
...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where
is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

Gaddafi must have ****ed of someone in high power somewhere.

If it were about justice, how come for 3 decades the power that be did
nothing? I don't like him, he should have had his neck stretched years
ago, but why now? Our corrupt leaders say so? What is the real motive
for this?

Come now, pretty obvious some alliance exists with US-UN-France where in
about 1/2 dozen countries the UN backed man is trying to replace the
local dictators or even democratically elected. Remeber the people of
Libya wanted Gaddafi and still do, BBC news showed protesters in
Gaddafi's support.

Because US-UN-France is fighting for a minority of gun toting rebel
criminals.

If an armed minority marched on DC, and another country came in to
support them -- that is what the US is doing!

Basically US-UN-France is the drivin force with Europe and Arab rich
calling the shots.

The new world order at work.

Thank you for the insights into your brain. It's a scary place, what
with your endless conspiracy theories.

I don't like Muammer el-Qaddafi either, but...as bad as he is, he is a
piker when you add up his murders and compare that number to the
hundreds of thousands of innocents our troops killed in Southeast Asia,
Iraq, and Afghanistan.


I am too small for them to worry about. I don't disagree, Qaddafi (one
of many spellings) is a bad dude and should have been incarerated some 3
or 4 decades ago.

But you stupid sheep haven't asked why our governments dealt so well
with him for so long and all of a sudden govenment says he is evil?
What you might want to ask is who has Qaddafi ****ed off so much that
warrents outsiders interfering in a civil conflict of armed
disobendience. Know these rebel are a MINORITY. That is why the UN is
hesitant to get in on the ground, they could get a bullet in the back
like Somalia.

Yet Obama does not care about the MAJORITY being shot at in Bahrain.
Hypocracy on democracy? The word democracy has been over used in this
conflict as a media ploy -- this whole mess over there is not about
democracy, it is about politicial wars going on.

Might I suggest that you Obama is answering to a differet drummer?

No reason for the US to interfere in Ivory Coast, Guana, Libya or some
other UN-French mess.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

On 19/03/2011 10:36 AM, BAR wrote:
In articleZsKdnVZuaezWRBnQnZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 6:58 AM, John H wrote:
...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where
is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

Gaddafi must have ****ed of someone in high power somewhere.

If it were about justice, how come for 3 decades the power that be did
nothing? I don't like him, he should have had his neck stretched years
ago, but why now? Our corrupt leaders say so? What is the real motive
for this?

Come now, pretty obvious some alliance exists with US-UN-France where in
about 1/2 dozen countries the UN backed man is trying to replace the
local dictators or even democratically elected. Remeber the people of
Libya wanted Gaddafi and still do, BBC news showed protesters in
Gaddafi's support.

Because US-UN-France is fighting for a minority of gun toting rebel
criminals.

If an armed minority marched on DC, and another country came in to
support them -- that is what the US is doing!

Basically US-UN-France is the drivin force with Europe and Arab rich
calling the shots.

The new world order at work.

Thank you for the insights into your brain. It's a scary place, what
with your endless conspiracy theories.

I don't like Muammer el-Qaddafi either, but...as bad as he is, he is a
piker when you add up his murders and compare that number to the
hundreds of thousands of innocents our troops killed in Southeast Asia,
Iraq, and Afghanistan.

Iceland might be to your liking.

I was thinking Costa Rica. They got rid of the national army on the
last copue d'etat attempt. They don't miss the army either.

We war mongers in the west spend far too much on WAR, and little on much
else.

Peaceful place too Costa Rica is. War mongers get dismissed pretty quick.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:30:51 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 08:58:15 -0400, John H
wrote:

...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

Why not help people that want to help themselves? I didn't see that in
Iraq.... except by the Kurds.

The Libyans people seem to need help and the world community
*including* The Arab League is on board.

I don't see ANY similarities between that and the Iraq debacle....
we're certainly not looking for imaginary weapons of mass destruction.
Are we?

Why should we help the Libyan minority? Saddam was killing his people by the
hundreds of thousands. What was wrong with our helping them? Is it the right
thing to attack Libya because some Libyans have weapons, but the wrong thing to
have helped Iraqis because they didn't?

Are there more countries in favor of our attacking Libya than were supporting
our attack in Iraq? So what?

The fact that we're not looking for WMD, and that there's been no indication the
Libyans possess such makes the question that much more pertinent.

Where is the threat to the USA?

Your response was very weak. But, I can see you are in favor of attacking Libya.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:30:51 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 08:58:15 -0400, John H
wrote:

...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

Why not help people that want to help themselves? I didn't see that in
Iraq.... except by the Kurds.

The Libyans people seem to need help and the world community
*including* The Arab League is on board.

I don't see ANY similarities between that and the Iraq debacle....
we're certainly not looking for imaginary weapons of mass destruction.
Are we?

Why should we help the Libyan minority? Saddam was killing his people by the
hundreds of thousands. What was wrong with our helping them? Is it the right
thing to attack Libya because some Libyans have weapons, but the wrong thing to
have helped Iraqis because they didn't?

Are there more countries in favor of our attacking Libya than were supporting
our attack in Iraq? So what?

The fact that we're not looking for WMD, and that there's been no indication the
Libyans possess such makes the question that much more pertinent.

Where is the threat to the USA?

Your response was very weak. But, I can see you are in favor of attacking Libya.

It's the French attacking Libya.
Blame it on the French, sucker.
Obama saw you coming a mile away.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 08:58:15 -0400, John H
wrote:

...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

You've been off in the mental shallow end for quite a while.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 13:32:45 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:30:51 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 08:58:15 -0400, John H
wrote:

...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

Why not help people that want to help themselves? I didn't see that in
Iraq.... except by the Kurds.

The Libyans people seem to need help and the world community
*including* The Arab League is on board.

I don't see ANY similarities between that and the Iraq debacle....
we're certainly not looking for imaginary weapons of mass destruction.
Are we?

Why should we help the Libyan minority? Saddam was killing his people by the
hundreds of thousands. What was wrong with our helping them? Is it the right
thing to attack Libya because some Libyans have weapons, but the wrong thing to
have helped Iraqis because they didn't?

We should have helped the Iraqi people, but Bush I decided not to do
it. Instead his son made up a bunch of nonsense and got us into a war
of choice based on lies.

Are there more countries in favor of our attacking Libya than were supporting
our attack in Iraq? So what?

Read the news yourself.

The fact that we're not looking for WMD, and that there's been no indication the
Libyans possess such makes the question that much more pertinent.

No it doesn't. It makes you look stupid.

Where is the threat to the USA?

Your response was very weak. But, I can see you are in favor of attacking Libya.

You're weak mentally. Feel free to vote for Palin if she doesn't quit
before she starts.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 08:58:15 -0400, John H
wrote:

...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

Why not help people that want to help themselves? I didn't see that in
Iraq.... except by the Kurds.

The Kurds are a bigger problem due the their domain being within Turkey,
Iran and Iraq.

The Libyans people seem to need help and the world community
*including* The Arab League is on board.

I don't see the Arab League sending troops or assistance to help the
rebels in Libya.

I don't see ANY similarities between that and the Iraq debacle....
we're certainly not looking for imaginary weapons of mass destruction.
Are we?

The weapon of mass destruction in Libya is Gaddafi.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

In article ,
says...
I don't like Muammer el-Qaddafi either, but...as bad as he is, he is a
piker when you add up his murders and compare that number to the
hundreds of thousands of innocents our troops killed in Southeast Asia,
Iraq, and Afghanistan.

Iceland might be to your liking.

I was thinking Costa Rica. They got rid of the national army on the
last copue d'etat attempt. They don't miss the army either.

We war mongers in the west spend far too much on WAR, and little on much
else.

Peaceful place too Costa Rica is. War mongers get dismissed pretty quick.

I have friends in Costa Rica. I have even slept with Miss Costa Rica.
Slept in the same house. She was the cousin of the guy my sister was
dating in college. They stayed at my parents house when they visited DC
about 30 years ago.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 10:36 AM, BAR wrote:
In articleZsKdnVZuaezWRBnQnZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 6:58 AM, John H wrote:
...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where
is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

Gaddafi must have ****ed of someone in high power somewhere.

If it were about justice, how come for 3 decades the power that be did
nothing? I don't like him, he should have had his neck stretched years
ago, but why now? Our corrupt leaders say so? What is the real motive
for this?

Come now, pretty obvious some alliance exists with US-UN-France
where in
about 1/2 dozen countries the UN backed man is trying to replace the
local dictators or even democratically elected. Remeber the people of
Libya wanted Gaddafi and still do, BBC news showed protesters in
Gaddafi's support.

Because US-UN-France is fighting for a minority of gun toting rebel
criminals.

If an armed minority marched on DC, and another country came in to
support them -- that is what the US is doing!

Basically US-UN-France is the drivin force with Europe and Arab rich
calling the shots.

The new world order at work.

Thank you for the insights into your brain. It's a scary place, what
with your endless conspiracy theories.

I don't like Muammer el-Qaddafi either, but...as bad as he is, he is a
piker when you add up his murders and compare that number to the
hundreds of thousands of innocents our troops killed in Southeast Asia,
Iraq, and Afghanistan.

Iceland might be to your liking.

I was thinking Costa Rica. They got rid of the national army on the last
copue d'etat attempt. They don't miss the army either.

We war mongers in the west spend far too much on WAR, and little on much
else.

Peaceful place too Costa Rica is. War mongers get dismissed pretty quick.

Three of my retired union buddies have moved to Costa Rica, and another
is thinking about it. They have national health care that even
"furriners" can buy into at a reasonable price. Imported manufactured
goods are very, very expensive, because of import taxes. There have been
some problems with kidnapping of Americans, and its neighbors to the
north and south wander across the border from time to time to start
trouble. But, mostly, it is a peaceful place with many assets to attract
U.S. citizens. Pretty country, too, with mountains and seashores and
excellent fishing. Almost every Costa Rican I encountered on my trip
there spoke pretty good English. And for the bachelors, the chica ticas
are...well, fabulous.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

John H wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:30:51 -0400,
wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 08:58:15 -0400, John
wrote:

...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.
Why not help people that want to help themselves? I didn't see that in
Iraq.... except by the Kurds.

The Libyans people seem to need help and the world community
*including* The Arab League is on board.

I don't see ANY similarities between that and the Iraq debacle....
we're certainly not looking for imaginary weapons of mass destruction.
Are we?

Why should we help the Libyan minority? Saddam was killing his people by the
hundreds of thousands. What was wrong with our helping them? Is it the right
thing to attack Libya because some Libyans have weapons, but the wrong thing to
have helped Iraqis because they didn't?

Are there more countries in favor of our attacking Libya than were supporting
our attack in Iraq? So what?

The fact that we're not looking for WMD, and that there's been no indication the
Libyans possess such makes the question that much more pertinent.

Where is the threat to the USA?

Your response was very weak. But, I can see you are in favor of attacking Libya.


There are many differences, including these:

No one in the Obama administration is lying about why we might get
involved in a limited way in Libya. The Bush administration lied us into
Iraq.

I haven't seen any statements that would commit U.S. ground troops to Libya.

What may take place in Libya is an incursion to remove the dictator
there. How many *years* has Bush's war in Iraq been going on?

You are an idiot, Herring. With your help, we lost in Southeast Asia.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

On 19/03/2011 12:49 PM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 10:36 AM, BAR wrote:
In articleZsKdnVZuaezWRBnQnZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 6:58 AM, John H wrote:
...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar?
Where
is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

Gaddafi must have ****ed of someone in high power somewhere.

If it were about justice, how come for 3 decades the power that be did
nothing? I don't like him, he should have had his neck stretched years
ago, but why now? Our corrupt leaders say so? What is the real motive
for this?

Come now, pretty obvious some alliance exists with US-UN-France
where in
about 1/2 dozen countries the UN backed man is trying to replace the
local dictators or even democratically elected. Remeber the people of
Libya wanted Gaddafi and still do, BBC news showed protesters in
Gaddafi's support.

Because US-UN-France is fighting for a minority of gun toting rebel
criminals.

If an armed minority marched on DC, and another country came in to
support them -- that is what the US is doing!

Basically US-UN-France is the drivin force with Europe and Arab rich
calling the shots.

The new world order at work.

Thank you for the insights into your brain. It's a scary place, what
with your endless conspiracy theories.

I don't like Muammer el-Qaddafi either, but...as bad as he is, he is a
piker when you add up his murders and compare that number to the
hundreds of thousands of innocents our troops killed in Southeast Asia,
Iraq, and Afghanistan.

Iceland might be to your liking.

I was thinking Costa Rica. They got rid of the national army on the last
copue d'etat attempt. They don't miss the army either.

We war mongers in the west spend far too much on WAR, and little on much
else.

Peaceful place too Costa Rica is. War mongers get dismissed pretty quick.

Three of my retired union buddies have moved to Costa Rica, and another
is thinking about it. They have national health care that even
"furriners" can buy into at a reasonable price. Imported manufactured
goods are very, very expensive, because of import taxes. There have been
some problems with kidnapping of Americans, and its neighbors to the
north and south wander across the border from time to time to start
trouble. But, mostly, it is a peaceful place with many assets to attract
U.S. citizens. Pretty country, too, with mountains and seashores and
excellent fishing. Almost every Costa Rican I encountered on my trip
there spoke pretty good English. And for the bachelors, the chica ticas
are...well, fabulous.

From what I hear, a big Canadian community down there too. And would
be nice to learn spanish from a nice one the eyes chica ticas even
though I have no intention of an intimate relationship. Could be
tempting though, temptation is nice but like my wife as she is. Maybe a
threesone? Hahaha -- dreaming.

No big, I probably would not import much. Bet the local made stuff is
good. Get a lot more fresh produce local that is real good, just have
to addapt the cooking skills.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

On 19/03/2011 10:30 AM, Gene wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 08:58:15 -0400, John
wrote:

...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

Why not help people that want to help themselves? I didn't see that in
Iraq.... except by the Kurds.

The Libyans people seem to need help and the world community
*including* The Arab League is on board.

I don't see ANY similarities between that and the Iraq debacle....
we're certainly not looking for imaginary weapons of mass destruction.
Are we?

No need to any more. Just take the country over. Libya isn't the only
place this is going on. Media has been well managed by our governments
and the UN. Don't like the leader? Incite riot, arm the militants and
excuse to trash the country. Then install a UN puppet leader. The
modern way.

Because just a list of where UN-France and other foreign invaders are
messing up include Guiana, Ivory Coast and I hear Rwanda and Zimbabwe
are ramping up. Our leaders are quietly ignoring the carnage in Yemem
and Bahrain but I suspect that is because Saudi's are pulling Obama and
the UN srings here.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

On 19/03/2011 12:00 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 08:58:15 -0400, John
wrote:

...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

Why not help people that want to help themselves? I didn't see that in
Iraq.... except by the Kurds.

The Kurds are a bigger problem due the their domain being within Turkey,
Iran and Iraq.

The Libyans people seem to need help and the world community
*including* The Arab League is on board.

I don't see the Arab League sending troops or assistance to help the
rebels in Libya.

I don't see ANY similarities between that and the Iraq debacle....
we're certainly not looking for imaginary weapons of mass destruction.
Are we?

The weapon of mass destruction in Libya is Gaddafi.

People who midles hate like that also followed Adolph.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 10:30 AM, Gene wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 08:58:15 -0400, John
wrote:

...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar?
Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

Why not help people that want to help themselves? I didn't see that in
Iraq.... except by the Kurds.

The Libyans people seem to need help and the world community
*including* The Arab League is on board.

I don't see ANY similarities between that and the Iraq debacle....
we're certainly not looking for imaginary weapons of mass destruction.
Are we?

No need to any more. Just take the country over. Libya isn't the only
place this is going on. Media has been well managed by our governments
and the UN. Don't like the leader? Incite riot, arm the militants and
excuse to trash the country. Then install a UN puppet leader. The modern
way.

Because just a list of where UN-France and other foreign invaders are
messing up include Guiana, Ivory Coast and I hear Rwanda and Zimbabwe
are ramping up. Our leaders are quietly ignoring the carnage in Yemem
and Bahrain but I suspect that is because Saudi's are pulling Obama and
the UN srings here.

Take the country over?

Colonialism is sort of out of date, eh?

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

I was thinking Costa Rica. They got rid of the national army on the last
copue d'etat attempt. They don't miss the army either.

We war mongers in the west spend far too much on WAR, and little on much
else.

Peaceful place too Costa Rica is. War mongers get dismissed pretty quick.

Three of my retired union buddies have moved to Costa Rica, and another
is thinking about it. They have national health care that even
"furriners" can buy into at a reasonable price. Imported manufactured
goods are very, very expensive, because of import taxes. There have been
some problems with kidnapping of Americans, and its neighbors to the
north and south wander across the border from time to time to start
trouble. But, mostly, it is a peaceful place with many assets to attract
U.S. citizens. Pretty country, too, with mountains and seashores and
excellent fishing. Almost every Costa Rican I encountered on my trip
there spoke pretty good English. And for the bachelors, the chica ticas
are...well, fabulous.

Some 30 years ago my sisters boyfriend at the time had purchased an
automobile in the US and wanted to take it back to Costa Rica. However,
he didn't want to pay to have it shipped by boat due to the import
duties. This guy decided to drive his car from the US to Costa Rica.
Once he entered Mexico he was never heard from again.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 13:11:20 -0600, Canuck57 wrote:

On 19/03/2011 10:30 AM, Gene wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 08:58:15 -0400, John
wrote:

...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

Why not help people that want to help themselves? I didn't see that in
Iraq.... except by the Kurds.

The Libyans people seem to need help and the world community
*including* The Arab League is on board.

I don't see ANY similarities between that and the Iraq debacle....
we're certainly not looking for imaginary weapons of mass destruction.
Are we?

No need to any more. Just take the country over. Libya isn't the only
place this is going on. Media has been well managed by our governments
and the UN. Don't like the leader? Incite riot, arm the militants and
excuse to trash the country. Then install a UN puppet leader. The
modern way.

Because just a list of where UN-France and other foreign invaders are
messing up include Guiana, Ivory Coast and I hear Rwanda and Zimbabwe
are ramping up. Our leaders are quietly ignoring the carnage in Yemem
and Bahrain but I suspect that is because Saudi's are pulling Obama and
the UN srings here.

It's all about oil. I keep waiting for jps to jump in and say that.

What a bunch of jokers!

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

On 19/03/2011 1:56 PM, BAR wrote:
In articleDLGdnfcWfdMsZxnQnZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

I was thinking Costa Rica. They got rid of the national army on the last
copue d'etat attempt. They don't miss the army either.

We war mongers in the west spend far too much on WAR, and little on much
else.

Peaceful place too Costa Rica is. War mongers get dismissed pretty quick.

Three of my retired union buddies have moved to Costa Rica, and another
is thinking about it. They have national health care that even
"furriners" can buy into at a reasonable price. Imported manufactured
goods are very, very expensive, because of import taxes. There have been
some problems with kidnapping of Americans, and its neighbors to the
north and south wander across the border from time to time to start
trouble. But, mostly, it is a peaceful place with many assets to attract
U.S. citizens. Pretty country, too, with mountains and seashores and
excellent fishing. Almost every Costa Rican I encountered on my trip
there spoke pretty good English. And for the bachelors, the chica ticas
are...well, fabulous.

Some 30 years ago my sisters boyfriend at the time had purchased an
automobile in the US and wanted to take it back to Costa Rica. However,
he didn't want to pay to have it shipped by boat due to the import
duties. This guy decided to drive his car from the US to Costa Rica.
Once he entered Mexico he was never heard from again.

FUD. People disappear here in Canada and I am sure in the US too. In
fact the missing reports of our two countries is a lot of people. At
least 7 or so have disapeared inside of a few hours from where I live,
and that is just the missing bodies.

If it isn't disavatagious cost wise I too might bring the vehicle to
Costa Rica. Just some places I would avoid in both Mexico and the US.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:30:51 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 08:58:15 -0400, John H
wrote:

...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

Why not help people that want to help themselves? I didn't see that in
Iraq.... except by the Kurds.

The Libyans people seem to need help and the world community
*including* The Arab League is on board.

I don't see ANY similarities between that and the Iraq debacle....
we're certainly not looking for imaginary weapons of mass destruction.
Are we?

This is far too complex for the simpletons on the right to figure out
on their own. Attacking a country on juiced up intelligence vs.
taking out military installations of a dictator actively killing his
own countrymen in open warfare.

They don't get the difference.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

jps wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:30:51 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 08:58:15 -0400, John
wrote:

...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.
Why not help people that want to help themselves? I didn't see that in
Iraq.... except by the Kurds.

The Libyans people seem to need help and the world community
*including* The Arab League is on board.

I don't see ANY similarities between that and the Iraq debacle....
we're certainly not looking for imaginary weapons of mass destruction.
Are we?

This is far too complex for the simpletons on the right to figure out
on their own. Attacking a country on juiced up intelligence vs.
taking out military installations of a dictator actively killing his
own countrymen in open warfare.

They don't get the difference.

Let's be real here. What sort of intellectually and logically based
commentary would you anticipate coming from the racist birthers here?
Are you expecting that a glimmer of enlightenment might strike Herring,
Ingersoll, Frogwatch, Canuck, et al? Why?

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

On 3/20/2011 12:26 AM, jps wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:30:51 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 08:58:15 -0400, John
wrote:

...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

Why not help people that want to help themselves? I didn't see that in
Iraq.... except by the Kurds.

The Libyans people seem to need help and the world community
*including* The Arab League is on board.

I don't see ANY similarities between that and the Iraq debacle....
we're certainly not looking for imaginary weapons of mass destruction.
Are we?

This is far too complex for the simpletons on the right to figure out
on their own. Attacking a country on juiced up intelligence vs.
taking out military installations of a dictator actively killing his
own countrymen in open warfare.

They don't get the difference.

What was Saddam's body count vs Muammar's?

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 10:36 AM, BAR wrote:
In articleZsKdnVZuaezWRBnQnZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 6:58 AM, John H wrote:
...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where
is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

Gaddafi must have ****ed of someone in high power somewhere.

If it were about justice, how come for 3 decades the power that be did
nothing? I don't like him, he should have had his neck stretched years
ago, but why now? Our corrupt leaders say so? What is the real motive
for this?

Come now, pretty obvious some alliance exists with US-UN-France
where in
about 1/2 dozen countries the UN backed man is trying to replace the
local dictators or even democratically elected. Remeber the people of
Libya wanted Gaddafi and still do, BBC news showed protesters in
Gaddafi's support.

Because US-UN-France is fighting for a minority of gun toting rebel
criminals.

If an armed minority marched on DC, and another country came in to
support them -- that is what the US is doing!

Basically US-UN-France is the drivin force with Europe and Arab rich
calling the shots.

The new world order at work.

Thank you for the insights into your brain. It's a scary place, what
with your endless conspiracy theories.

I don't like Muammer el-Qaddafi either, but...as bad as he is, he is a
piker when you add up his murders and compare that number to the
hundreds of thousands of innocents our troops killed in Southeast Asia,
Iraq, and Afghanistan.

Iceland might be to your liking.

I was thinking Costa Rica. They got rid of the national army on the last
copue d'etat attempt. They don't miss the army either.

We war mongers in the west spend far too much on WAR, and little on much
else.

Peaceful place too Costa Rica is. War mongers get dismissed pretty quick.

Three of my retired union buddies have moved to Costa Rica, and another
is thinking about it. They have national health care that even
"furriners" can buy into at a reasonable price. Imported manufactured
goods are very, very expensive, because of import taxes. There have been
some problems with kidnapping of Americans, and its neighbors to the
north and south wander across the border from time to time to start
trouble. But, mostly, it is a peaceful place with many assets to attract
U.S. citizens. Pretty country, too, with mountains and seashores and
excellent fishing. Almost every Costa Rican I encountered on my trip
there spoke pretty good English. And for the bachelors, the chica ticas
are...well, fabulous.

All of the chicas are "fabulous". That's a racist statement.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

On 3/20/2011 8:28 AM, HarryisPaul wrote:
In articleDLGdnfcWfdMsZxnQnZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 10:36 AM, BAR wrote:
In articleZsKdnVZuaezWRBnQnZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 6:58 AM, John H wrote:
...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where
is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

Gaddafi must have ****ed of someone in high power somewhere.

If it were about justice, how come for 3 decades the power that be did
nothing? I don't like him, he should have had his neck stretched years
ago, but why now? Our corrupt leaders say so? What is the real motive
for this?

Come now, pretty obvious some alliance exists with US-UN-France
where in
about 1/2 dozen countries the UN backed man is trying to replace the
local dictators or even democratically elected. Remeber the people of
Libya wanted Gaddafi and still do, BBC news showed protesters in
Gaddafi's support.

Because US-UN-France is fighting for a minority of gun toting rebel
criminals.

If an armed minority marched on DC, and another country came in to
support them -- that is what the US is doing!

Basically US-UN-France is the drivin force with Europe and Arab rich
calling the shots.

The new world order at work.

Thank you for the insights into your brain. It's a scary place, what
with your endless conspiracy theories.

I don't like Muammer el-Qaddafi either, but...as bad as he is, he is a
piker when you add up his murders and compare that number to the
hundreds of thousands of innocents our troops killed in Southeast Asia,
Iraq, and Afghanistan.

Iceland might be to your liking.

I was thinking Costa Rica. They got rid of the national army on the last
copue d'etat attempt. They don't miss the army either.

We war mongers in the west spend far too much on WAR, and little on much
else.

Peaceful place too Costa Rica is. War mongers get dismissed pretty quick.

Three of my retired union buddies have moved to Costa Rica, and another
is thinking about it. They have national health care that even
"furriners" can buy into at a reasonable price. Imported manufactured
goods are very, very expensive, because of import taxes. There have been
some problems with kidnapping of Americans, and its neighbors to the
north and south wander across the border from time to time to start
trouble. But, mostly, it is a peaceful place with many assets to attract
U.S. citizens. Pretty country, too, with mountains and seashores and
excellent fishing. Almost every Costa Rican I encountered on my trip
there spoke pretty good English. And for the bachelors, the chica ticas
are...well, fabulous.

All of the chicas are "fabulous". That's a racist statement.

Harry is partial to those buxom white chicks. Sorry Plume.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
There are many differences, including these:

No one in the Obama administration is lying about why we might get
involved in a limited way in Libya. The Bush administration lied us into
Iraq.

Nobody in the administration has laid out our national interests in
Libya.

I haven't seen any statements that would commit U.S. ground troops to Libya.

The fact that you haven't seen the statements doesn't mean that they
don't exist.

What may take place in Libya is an incursion to remove the dictator
there. How many *years* has Bush's war in Iraq been going on?

The war in Iraq is over we have no combat troops in Iraq.

You are an idiot, Herring. With your help, we lost in Southeast Asia.

The Democrats ensured our loss in SEA. Johnson's Tuesday pick a target
lunches. McNamara running the war as an accounting exercise.

Tet '68 could have been a turning point. The VC and NVA got their asses
handed to them and if we had loosed the dogs of war we could have taken
the war to Hanoi.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

In article ,
says...

jps wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:30:51 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 08:58:15 -0400, John
wrote:

...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.
Why not help people that want to help themselves? I didn't see that in
Iraq.... except by the Kurds.

The Libyans people seem to need help and the world community
*including* The Arab League is on board.

I don't see ANY similarities between that and the Iraq debacle....
we're certainly not looking for imaginary weapons of mass destruction.
Are we?

This is far too complex for the simpletons on the right to figure out
on their own. Attacking a country on juiced up intelligence vs.
taking out military installations of a dictator actively killing his
own countrymen in open warfare.

They don't get the difference.

Let's be real here. What sort of intellectually and logically based
commentary would you anticipate coming from the racist birthers here?
Are you expecting that a glimmer of enlightenment might strike Herring,
Ingersoll, Frogwatch, Canuck, et al? Why?

On the other hand, we do know what sort of intellectual dishonesty is
going to come from the pedophile Harry Krause of Huntington Maryland...
He is a Fleabagger to the gills...

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

In article ,
says...

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 10:36 AM, BAR wrote:
In articleZsKdnVZuaezWRBnQnZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 6:58 AM, John H wrote:
...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where
is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

Gaddafi must have ****ed of someone in high power somewhere.

If it were about justice, how come for 3 decades the power that be did
nothing? I don't like him, he should have had his neck stretched years
ago, but why now? Our corrupt leaders say so? What is the real motive
for this?

Come now, pretty obvious some alliance exists with US-UN-France
where in
about 1/2 dozen countries the UN backed man is trying to replace the
local dictators or even democratically elected. Remeber the people of
Libya wanted Gaddafi and still do, BBC news showed protesters in
Gaddafi's support.

Because US-UN-France is fighting for a minority of gun toting rebel
criminals.

If an armed minority marched on DC, and another country came in to
support them -- that is what the US is doing!

Basically US-UN-France is the drivin force with Europe and Arab rich
calling the shots.

The new world order at work.

Thank you for the insights into your brain. It's a scary place, what
with your endless conspiracy theories.

I don't like Muammer el-Qaddafi either, but...as bad as he is, he is a
piker when you add up his murders and compare that number to the
hundreds of thousands of innocents our troops killed in Southeast Asia,
Iraq, and Afghanistan.

Iceland might be to your liking.

I was thinking Costa Rica. They got rid of the national army on the last
copue d'etat attempt. They don't miss the army either.

We war mongers in the west spend far too much on WAR, and little on much
else.

Peaceful place too Costa Rica is. War mongers get dismissed pretty quick.

Three of my retired union buddies have moved to Costa Rica, and another
is thinking about it. They have national health care that even
"furriners" can buy into at a reasonable price. Imported manufactured
goods are very, very expensive, because of import taxes. There have been
some problems with kidnapping of Americans, and its neighbors to the
north and south wander across the border from time to time to start
trouble. But, mostly, it is a peaceful place with many assets to attract
U.S. citizens. Pretty country, too, with mountains and seashores and
excellent fishing. Almost every Costa Rican I encountered on my trip
there spoke pretty good English. And for the bachelors, the chica ticas
are...well, fabulous.

All of the chicas are "fabulous". That's a racist statement.

Harry Krause is the resident Pedophile Racist, child abuser, women
stalker, etc in the group.. He is a sick man...

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...
jps wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:30:51 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 08:58:15 -0400, John
wrote:

...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.
Why not help people that want to help themselves? I didn't see that in
Iraq.... except by the Kurds.

The Libyans people seem to need help and the world community
*including* The Arab League is on board.

I don't see ANY similarities between that and the Iraq debacle....
we're certainly not looking for imaginary weapons of mass destruction.
Are we?
This is far too complex for the simpletons on the right to figure out
on their own. Attacking a country on juiced up intelligence vs.
taking out military installations of a dictator actively killing his
own countrymen in open warfare.

They don't get the difference.
Let's be real here. What sort of intellectually and logically based
commentary would you anticipate coming from the racist birthers here?
Are you expecting that a glimmer of enlightenment might strike Herring,
Ingersoll, Frogwatch, Canuck, et al? Why?

On the other hand, we do know what sort of intellectual dishonesty is
going to come from the pedophile Harry Krause of Huntington Maryland...
He is a Fleabagger to the gills...

Scott Ingersoll, demonstrating his intellectual prowess...

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...
In articleDLGdnfcWfdMsZxnQnZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 10:36 AM, BAR wrote:
In articleZsKdnVZuaezWRBnQnZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 6:58 AM, John H wrote:
...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where
is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.
Gaddafi must have ****ed of someone in high power somewhere.

If it were about justice, how come for 3 decades the power that be did
nothing? I don't like him, he should have had his neck stretched years
ago, but why now? Our corrupt leaders say so? What is the real motive
for this?

Come now, pretty obvious some alliance exists with US-UN-France
where in
about 1/2 dozen countries the UN backed man is trying to replace the
local dictators or even democratically elected. Remeber the people of
Libya wanted Gaddafi and still do, BBC news showed protesters in
Gaddafi's support.

Because US-UN-France is fighting for a minority of gun toting rebel
criminals.

If an armed minority marched on DC, and another country came in to
support them -- that is what the US is doing!

Basically US-UN-France is the drivin force with Europe and Arab rich
calling the shots.

The new world order at work.
Thank you for the insights into your brain. It's a scary place, what
with your endless conspiracy theories.

I don't like Muammer el-Qaddafi either, but...as bad as he is, he is a
piker when you add up his murders and compare that number to the
hundreds of thousands of innocents our troops killed in Southeast Asia,
Iraq, and Afghanistan.
Iceland might be to your liking.
I was thinking Costa Rica. They got rid of the national army on the last
copue d'etat attempt. They don't miss the army either.

We war mongers in the west spend far too much on WAR, and little on much
else.

Peaceful place too Costa Rica is. War mongers get dismissed pretty quick.
Three of my retired union buddies have moved to Costa Rica, and another
is thinking about it. They have national health care that even
"furriners" can buy into at a reasonable price. Imported manufactured
goods are very, very expensive, because of import taxes. There have been
some problems with kidnapping of Americans, and its neighbors to the
north and south wander across the border from time to time to start
trouble. But, mostly, it is a peaceful place with many assets to attract
U.S. citizens. Pretty country, too, with mountains and seashores and
excellent fishing. Almost every Costa Rican I encountered on my trip
there spoke pretty good English. And for the bachelors, the chica ticas
are...well, fabulous.
All of the chicas are "fabulous". That's a racist statement.

Harry Krause is the resident Pedophile Racist, child abuser, women
stalker, etc in the group.. He is a sick man...


D'oh. You two are outdoing yourselves in utter stupidity. Do you even
know what a chica tica is?

Chica tica is the colloquial phrase for an attractive woman of Costa
Rican descent. It is not a pejorative.

Tico is the word that references Costa Rican males.

Had you two assholes been anywhere in Latin America, you might have a
wider view of the world.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 08:01:35 -0400, Harryk
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:30:51 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 08:58:15 -0400, John
wrote:

...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.
Why not help people that want to help themselves? I didn't see that in
Iraq.... except by the Kurds.

The Libyans people seem to need help and the world community
*including* The Arab League is on board.

I don't see ANY similarities between that and the Iraq debacle....
we're certainly not looking for imaginary weapons of mass destruction.
Are we?

This is far too complex for the simpletons on the right to figure out
on their own. Attacking a country on juiced up intelligence vs.
taking out military installations of a dictator actively killing his
own countrymen in open warfare.

They don't get the difference.

Let's be real here. What sort of intellectually and logically based
commentary would you anticipate coming from the racist birthers here?
Are you expecting that a glimmer of enlightenment might strike Herring,
Ingersoll, Frogwatch, Canuck, et al? Why?

None.
No.
NA.

Please tell me what Gaddafi is...
 

On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 11:00:52 -0400, Harryk
wrote:

I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...
In articleDLGdnfcWfdMsZxnQnZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 10:36 AM, BAR wrote:
In articleZsKdnVZuaezWRBnQnZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 6:58 AM, John H wrote:
...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where
is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.
Gaddafi must have ****ed of someone in high power somewhere.

If it were about justice, how come for 3 decades the power that be did
nothing? I don't like him, he should have had his neck stretched years
ago, but why now? Our corrupt leaders say so? What is the real motive
for this?

Come now, pretty obvious some alliance exists with US-UN-France
where in
about 1/2 dozen countries the UN backed man is trying to replace the
local dictators or even democratically elected. Remeber the people of
Libya wanted Gaddafi and still do, BBC news showed protesters in
Gaddafi's support.

Because US-UN-France is fighting for a minority of gun toting rebel
criminals.

If an armed minority marched on DC, and another country came in to
support them -- that is what the US is doing!

Basically US-UN-France is the drivin force with Europe and Arab rich
calling the shots.

The new world order at work.
Thank you for the insights into your brain. It's a scary place, what
with your endless conspiracy theories.

I don't like Muammer el-Qaddafi either, but...as bad as he is, he is a
piker when you add up his murders and compare that number to the
hundreds of thousands of innocents our troops killed in Southeast Asia,
Iraq, and Afghanistan.
Iceland might be to your liking.
I was thinking Costa Rica. They got rid of the national army on the last
copue d'etat attempt. They don't miss the army either.

We war mongers in the west spend far too much on WAR, and little on much
else.

Peaceful place too Costa Rica is. War mongers get dismissed pretty quick.
Three of my retired union buddies have moved to Costa Rica, and another
is thinking about it. They have national health care that even
"furriners" can buy into at a reasonable price. Imported manufactured
goods are very, very expensive, because of import taxes. There have been
some problems with kidnapping of Americans, and its neighbors to the
north and south wander across the border from time to time to start
trouble. But, mostly, it is a peaceful place with many assets to attract
U.S. citizens. Pretty country, too, with mountains and seashores and
excellent fishing. Almost every Costa Rican I encountered on my trip
there spoke pretty good English. And for the bachelors, the chica ticas
are...well, fabulous.
All of the chicas are "fabulous". That's a racist statement.

Harry Krause is the resident Pedophile Racist, child abuser, women
stalker, etc in the group.. He is a sick man...


D'oh. You two are outdoing yourselves in utter stupidity. Do you even
know what a chica tica is?

Chica tica is the colloquial phrase for an attractive woman of Costa
Rican descent. It is not a pejorative.

Tico is the word that references Costa Rican males.

Had you two assholes been anywhere in Latin America, you might have a
wider view of the world.


It probably won't matter to Chuckles, since they probably won't let
him in there either. Costa Ricans are not stupid.