On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:40:39 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:35:01 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:56:26 -0400, Harryk
wrote:

On 3/14/11 6:48 PM, True North wrote:
Was that you, Johnny.... always preaching about the benefits of nuclear
power?
Good I guess, as long as you don't have an earthquake.

I haven't been opposed to nuclear power. I live about 20 miles from one.
But this latest incident in Japan sure gives one pause.

I think the significant thing is that the problem wasn't the 9.0
earthquake, it was the tsunami. That makes most of the US reactors
somewhat immune to the biggest problem.

Except the one 5 miles from my house.....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brunswi...rating_Station

i live within 100 miles of 2 of the top 10 worst in the country,
limierick (about 20 miles) and 3 mile island.

not looking forward to any problems

bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:40:39 -0400, Gene
wrote:


On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:35:01 -0400, wrote:


On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:56:26 -0400,
wrote:


On 3/14/11 6:48 PM, True North wrote:

Was that you, Johnny.... always preaching about the benefits of nuclear
power?
Good I guess, as long as you don't have an earthquake.

I haven't been opposed to nuclear power. I live about 20 miles from one.
But this latest incident in Japan sure gives one pause.

I think the significant thing is that the problem wasn't the 9.0
earthquake, it was the tsunami. That makes most of the US reactors
somewhat immune to the biggest problem.

Except the one 5 miles from my house.....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brunswi...rating_Station

i live within 100 miles of 2 of the top 10 worst in the country,
limierick (about 20 miles) and 3 mile island.

not looking forward to any problems

You seem to be already affected.