Why the hell is this guy even thinking about going into Libya?

http://tinyurl.com/6dqzdpf

Looks like Gates is the only one with sense.

On 3/4/2011 11:32 AM, John H wrote:
Why the hell is this guy even thinking about going into Libya?

http://tinyurl.com/6dqzdpf

Looks like Gates is the only one with sense.

Looks Like Obama is a war monger.

On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 12:16:18 -0500, HenryK wrote:

On 3/4/2011 11:32 AM, John H wrote:
Why the hell is this guy even thinking about going into Libya?

http://tinyurl.com/6dqzdpf

Looks like Gates is the only one with sense.

Looks Like Obama is a war monger.

Maybe he figures that'll get conservatives flocking to his causes.

On 3/4/11 12:30 PM, John H wrote:
On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 12:16:18 -0500, wrote:

On 3/4/2011 11:32 AM, John H wrote:
Why the hell is this guy even thinking about going into Libya?

http://tinyurl.com/6dqzdpf

Looks like Gates is the only one with sense.

Looks Like Obama is a war monger.

Maybe he figures that'll get conservatives flocking to his causes.


Oh, yuck. The stench of it.

On 3/4/2011 12:39 PM, Harryk wrote:
On 3/4/11 12:30 PM, John H wrote:
On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 12:16:18 -0500, wrote:

On 3/4/2011 11:32 AM, John H wrote:
Why the hell is this guy even thinking about going into Libya?

http://tinyurl.com/6dqzdpf

Looks like Gates is the only one with sense.

Looks Like Obama is a war monger.

Maybe he figures that'll get conservatives flocking to his causes.


Oh, yuck. The stench of it.

Time to clean the litter box(s).

On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 11:32:48 -0500, John H
wrote:

Why the hell is this guy even thinking about going into Libya?

http://tinyurl.com/6dqzdpf

Looks like Gates is the only one with sense.

Looks like you're the one without any sense.

On 04/03/2011 9:32 AM, John H wrote:
Why the hell is this guy even thinking about going into Libya?

http://tinyurl.com/6dqzdpf

Looks like Gates is the only one with sense.

It is an excuse to saddle some $45,000 of new debt expansion. Ruining
USA with debt.

--
Socialism is a great ideal as long as someone else pays for it. And when
no one is left to pay for it, they all can share nothing.

On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 11:32:48 -0500, John H
wrote:

Why the hell is this guy even thinking about going into Libya?

http://tinyurl.com/6dqzdpf

Looks like Gates is the only one with sense.

because h e's not?

gee. go figure

On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 16:00:04 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 11:32:48 -0500, John H
wrote:

Why the hell is this guy even thinking about going into Libya?

http://tinyurl.com/6dqzdpf

Looks like Gates is the only one with sense.

From what I hear, Obama's going after the weapons of mass destruction.
We know Gadaffi's got 'em, now's our chance to catch him red
handed.....

How come Bush didn't invade Libya? Oh yeah, he took them off the list
of states sponsors of terrorism.

On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:10:19 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:51:08 -0800, wrote:

On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 16:00:04 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 11:32:48 -0500, John H
wrote:

Why the hell is this guy even thinking about going into Libya?

http://tinyurl.com/6dqzdpf

Looks like Gates is the only one with sense.

From what I hear, Obama's going after the weapons of mass destruction.
We know Gadaffi's got 'em, now's our chance to catch him red
handed.....

How come Bush didn't invade Libya? Oh yeah, he took them off the list
of states sponsors of terrorism.

Damn you! Quit trying to confuse us with the facts....... besides
being incredibly annoying, it conflicts with our new world view....

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12799651...east/n_africa/

I'm not sure what you're implying. Did Bush make some huge mistake by not
invading Libya? Is that your contention?

So, is it your contention that we *should* attack Libya?

If so, why?