Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been sorta neutral on the subject of the TAmpa to Orlando high
speed train. Years ago I did vote for the high speed train amendment to the Fl constitution but only as a way to show how silly it was to amend the constitution by popular ballot (I also voted on the pregnant pig amendment that requires prego pigs to be treated nicely). I have only driven from Orlando to Tampa once and it was no problem so I never knew why this corridor was chosen but maybe it does have a lot of traffic. However, being in Tallahassee, I see a lot of the political crap going on about Gov Scott vetoing it and looked into the matter. The feds would pay about half the projected cost and Fl taxpayers the rest. Might be a good deal but, turns out the cost estimates were done by the very companies who will benefit from it so are suspect. A look at ALL other high speed rail projects show cost overruns of 1.8-2.2X and us Fl taxpayers would be on the hook for that amount...........not so good. How much time would it save? Wiki has a table showing about 15 minutes at most and that is very optimistic and would probably be less if they add stops. By the time you add in parking and waiting for a cab, you lose time. Ridership, bizarro optimistic projections done by those who will benefit from the construction. Operating costs would be paid by FL and there is only one passenger train in the entire USA that pays its own costs (NE corridor). No way this one will pay its own way and us taxpayers will end paying these costs. Now the kicker. If ridership is low, the feds can decide they want their 2 billion back from us FL taxpayers. Huh? No way. Cancel this clunker of a deal now. Generate jobs? During construction yes. Long term jobs, no. Keeping the money in pvt hands is well known to generate more jobs. An interesting measure of potential ridership might be the number of people who take private buses each day from one end to the other. Such buses are truly convenient because they normally go right to where people want to go. I cannot find anybody who has looked into this as a measurement of possible ridership. |