On 2/3/11 8:46 AM, BAR wrote:
In , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Doing well only refers to one aspect of a corporation's performance,
typically. The problem is that corporations have become the actual
government in many countries, such as this one, and corporate actions
are destroying the middle class.

Businesses/corporations have always run the world. You really do need to
brush up on some history.




Slavery used to be "legal" in this country until we made it illegal.

Slavery is still practiced around the world. Why am I not surprised that
you are not concerned with the condition of man outside the USA?


My comments were about the United States. My comments were not about the
rest of the world. Since my comments were limited, you have no idea
whether my concerns extend to the rest of the world. Your response was
not logical.

We can change the negative impacts corporations have on society.

Why would we want to devolve to an agrarian society? Why do you want to
return to the days of 18th century?

Again, your comment is not logical. I offered no suggestion that we go
back to an agrarian society. I do believe we can control corporations.

You obviously have never taken a rigorous course in logic or
participated on a debate team. You would have been laughed out of the
former and kicked off the latter. You have a teabagger's approach to
adult discussion.

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Slavery used to be "legal" in this country until we made it illegal.

Slavery is still practiced around the world. Why am I not surprised that
you are not concerned with the condition of man outside the USA?


My comments were about the United States. My comments were not about the
rest of the world. Since my comments were limited, you have no idea
whether my concerns extend to the rest of the world. Your response was
not logical.

Are you pro slavery outside the USA?

We can change the negative impacts corporations have on society.

Why would we want to devolve to an agrarian society? Why do you want to
return to the days of 18th century?

Again, your comment is not logical. I offered no suggestion that we go
back to an agrarian society. I do believe we can control corporations.

You are always obtuse.

You obviously have never taken a rigorous course in logic or
participated on a debate team. You would have been laughed out of the
former and kicked off the latter. You have a teabagger's approach to
adult discussion.

You have a hard time with commitment don't you.

On 2/3/11 9:01 AM, BAR wrote:
In articlevO6dnXU2Wdw3LtfQnZ2dnUVZ_tmdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Slavery used to be "legal" in this country until we made it illegal.

Slavery is still practiced around the world. Why am I not surprised that
you are not concerned with the condition of man outside the USA?


My comments were about the United States. My comments were not about the
rest of the world. Since my comments were limited, you have no idea
whether my concerns extend to the rest of the world. Your response was
not logical.

Are you pro slavery outside the USA?

We can change the negative impacts corporations have on society.

Why would we want to devolve to an agrarian society? Why do you want to
return to the days of 18th century?

Again, your comment is not logical. I offered no suggestion that we go
back to an agrarian society. I do believe we can control corporations.

You are always obtuse.

There was nothing obtuse about my statements. When discussing making
slavery illegal, I clearly stated "this country." Perhaps you don't know
what obtuse means.



You obviously have never taken a rigorous course in logic or
participated on a debate team. You would have been laughed out of the
former and kicked off the latter. You have a teabagger's approach to
adult discussion.

You have a hard time with commitment don't you.

You're talking nonsense...again. The subject I raised was directed at
your inability to think logically and to debate. Commitment? Commitment
to what, in the context I raised?

Is your inability to engage in responsible, adult discussion an
outgrowth of your ducking out on formal education or your time in the
marines, or both?

In article ,
says...

On 2/3/11 9:01 AM, BAR wrote:
In articlevO6dnXU2Wdw3LtfQnZ2dnUVZ_tmdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Slavery used to be "legal" in this country until we made it illegal.

Slavery is still practiced around the world. Why am I not surprised that
you are not concerned with the condition of man outside the USA?


My comments were about the United States. My comments were not about the
rest of the world. Since my comments were limited, you have no idea
whether my concerns extend to the rest of the world. Your response was
not logical.

Are you pro slavery outside the USA?

We can change the negative impacts corporations have on society.

Why would we want to devolve to an agrarian society? Why do you want to
return to the days of 18th century?

Again, your comment is not logical. I offered no suggestion that we go
back to an agrarian society. I do believe we can control corporations.

You are always obtuse.

There was nothing obtuse about my statements. When discussing making
slavery illegal, I clearly stated "this country." Perhaps you don't know
what obtuse means.



You obviously have never taken a rigorous course in logic or
participated on a debate team. You would have been laughed out of the
former and kicked off the latter. You have a teabagger's approach to
adult discussion.

You have a hard time with commitment don't you.

You're talking nonsense...again. The subject I raised was directed at
your inability to think logically and to debate. Commitment? Commitment
to what, in the context I raised?

Is your inability to engage in responsible, adult discussion an
outgrowth of your ducking out on formal education or your time in the
marines, or both?

And as usual, Harry starts losing the argument, the insults and name
calling start....

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Slavery used to be "legal" in this country until we made it illegal.

Slavery is still practiced around the world. Why am I not surprised
that
you are not concerned with the condition of man outside the USA?


My comments were about the United States. My comments were not about the
rest of the world. Since my comments were limited, you have no idea
whether my concerns extend to the rest of the world. Your response was
not logical.

Are you pro slavery outside the USA?

We can change the negative impacts corporations have on society.

Why would we want to devolve to an agrarian society? Why do you want to
return to the days of 18th century?

Again, your comment is not logical. I offered no suggestion that we go
back to an agrarian society. I do believe we can control corporations.

You are always obtuse.

You obviously have never taken a rigorous course in logic or
participated on a debate team. You would have been laughed out of the
former and kicked off the latter. You have a teabagger's approach to
adult discussion.

You have a hard time with commitment don't you.


"rigorous course in logic" Translation: Attempting to learn something that
is completely foreign to him.

Parse his other statement. Is he inferring that he was a member of a debate
team and that he actually debated?

His closing remark was just too weird to comment on.

--
Ziggy®

In article ,
says...
You obviously have never taken a rigorous course in logic or
participated on a debate team. You would have been laughed out of the
former and kicked off the latter. You have a teabagger's approach to
adult discussion.

You have a hard time with commitment don't you.


"rigorous course in logic" Translation: Attempting to learn something that
is completely foreign to him.

Parse his other statement. Is he inferring that he was a member of a debate
team and that he actually debated?

His closing remark was just too weird to comment on.


He was the debate team manager. He carried the 3x5 cards for the members
of the team.

On 2/3/11 7:56 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...
You obviously have never taken a rigorous course in logic or
participated on a debate team. You would have been laughed out of the
former and kicked off the latter. You have a teabagger's approach to
adult discussion.

You have a hard time with commitment don't you.


"rigorous course in logic" Translation: Attempting to learn something that
is completely foreign to him.

Parse his other statement. Is he inferring that he was a member of a debate
team and that he actually debated?

His closing remark was just too weird to comment on.


He was the debate team manager. He carried the 3x5 cards for the members
of the team.


This from a few mooks who couldn't have made it through a two year
course of study at a community college?

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/3/11 7:56 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...
You obviously have never taken a rigorous course in logic or
participated on a debate team. You would have been laughed out of the
former and kicked off the latter. You have a teabagger's approach to
adult discussion.

You have a hard time with commitment don't you.


"rigorous course in logic" Translation: Attempting to learn something that
is completely foreign to him.

Parse his other statement. Is he inferring that he was a member of a debate
team and that he actually debated?

His closing remark was just too weird to comment on.


He was the debate team manager. He carried the 3x5 cards for the members
of the team.


This from a few mooks who couldn't have made it through a two year
course of study at a community college?

Your jealousy is apparent.

On 2/3/11 10:06 PM, BAR wrote:
In articleVsOdnQWr6_1jxdbQnZ2dnUVZ_o6dnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/3/11 7:56 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...
You obviously have never taken a rigorous course in logic or
participated on a debate team. You would have been laughed out of the
former and kicked off the latter. You have a teabagger's approach to
adult discussion.

You have a hard time with commitment don't you.


"rigorous course in logic" Translation: Attempting to learn something that
is completely foreign to him.

Parse his other statement. Is he inferring that he was a member of a debate
team and that he actually debated?

His closing remark was just too weird to comment on.


He was the debate team manager. He carried the 3x5 cards for the members
of the team.


This from a few mooks who couldn't have made it through a two year
course of study at a community college?

Your jealousy is apparent.

Of what? Your going into the military instead of college...

Your inability to think logically?

Your inability to maintain an adult discussion?

Your circle of jerkoff right-wing buddies here?

Your belief in "birther-ism"?

Your "go-fer" job at a tech company?

Your lack of a boat?

Sorry, BertieBirther...you just don't have anything that interests me.

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
In article ,
says...
You obviously have never taken a rigorous course in logic or
participated on a debate team. You would have been laughed out of the
former and kicked off the latter. You have a teabagger's approach to
adult discussion.

You have a hard time with commitment don't you.


"rigorous course in logic" Translation: Attempting to learn something
that
is completely foreign to him.

Parse his other statement. Is he inferring that he was a member of a
debate
team and that he actually debated?

His closing remark was just too weird to comment on.


He was the debate team manager. He carried the 3x5 cards for the members
of the team.


Likely, you are correct. I can't imagine him debating. After all, he's NEVER
shown us he's capable.

--
Ziggy®