Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#33
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#34
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:42:57 -0500, HarryK wrote:
On 12/14/10 1:37 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:34:23 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 13, 8:09 pm, L wrote: *e#c wrote: On Dec 13, 4:15 pm, wrote: On 12/13/10 3:54 PM, *e#c wrote: On Dec 13, 12:01 pm, Don wrote: So much for the behaving. I see that Harry and Don are up to their usual name calling, lying, accusing, insulting and general boorish behavior. I knew they couldn't last but really would have liked it to. I think it says quite a bit about a man who has to resort to this crap to get noticed. Like the ID Spoofers? Hey, you're not supposed to mention that to the id spoofers, herring, scotty, and the rest of the enablers. :) **** that. It seems there's a whole " new " batch of sock puppet names. " Learn to read Headers " ....what ever. When you " hide " your ISP Posting Host Number, its dam hard to trace exactly who the spoofer is. And then the idiots will blab off about the fact that " they " can tell who is spoofing. Well, to sum it up, headers are of no use at all, IF you're hiding your ISP number...... ISP number? What the hell is that? Did you know an ISP is an Internet Service Provider? A large ISP can handle millions of IP addresses. When you look at the headers, you SHOULD see a NNTP Posting Host Number. ALL of the spoofers hide it, and dont tell me you cant . IDs CAN be masked, which is what the idiots do in a vain attempt to " hide " their IDs. Where does this point? Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!po stnews.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: rec.boats Subject: Oh well...... Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 08:28:00 -0500 Lines: 30 l-september.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net grNaqsrBmZADv8r0ABNHkAH6sV5Ae0ZQIszyqZP2uEAowWejfp Cancel-Lock: sha1:hr/uLKXfsxS+ZgIbpFHrjIp6Iw0= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 Bytes: 2262 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com rec.boats:1085536 BTW, I know your computer knowledge is...weak...but in my case, whether the NNTP posting host appears in my headers depends upon which posting host I am using, and has nothing to do with any action on my part. Inform your buddy, slammer. He can't seem to understand any of that. |
#35
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:39:17 -0500, HarryK wrote:
On 12/14/10 1:32 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:34:23 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 13, 8:09 pm, L wrote: *e#c wrote: On Dec 13, 4:15 pm, wrote: On 12/13/10 3:54 PM, *e#c wrote: On Dec 13, 12:01 pm, Don wrote: So much for the behaving. I see that Harry and Don are up to their usual name calling, lying, accusing, insulting and general boorish behavior. I knew they couldn't last but really would have liked it to. I think it says quite a bit about a man who has to resort to this crap to get noticed. Like the ID Spoofers? Hey, you're not supposed to mention that to the id spoofers, herring, scotty, and the rest of the enablers. :) **** that. It seems there's a whole " new " batch of sock puppet names. " Learn to read Headers " ....what ever. When you " hide " your ISP Posting Host Number, its dam hard to trace exactly who the spoofer is. And then the idiots will blab off about the fact that " they " can tell who is spoofing. Well, to sum it up, headers are of no use at all, IF you're hiding your ISP number...... ISP number? What the hell is that? Did you know an ISP is an Internet Service Provider? A large ISP can handle millions of IP addresses. When you look at the headers, you SHOULD see a NNTP Posting Host Number. ALL of the spoofers hide it, and dont tell me you cant . IDs CAN be masked, which is what the idiots do in a vain attempt to " hide " their IDs. The real Harry must be hiding his also, huh? Why am I the object of your obsession, herring? Projecting again, Harry? Of course, most people would be obsessed with you because you're such an honorable, stand-up type guy. |
#36
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/14/10 4:41 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:39:17 -0500, wrote: On 12/14/10 1:32 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:34:23 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 13, 8:09 pm, L wrote: *e#c wrote: On Dec 13, 4:15 pm, wrote: On 12/13/10 3:54 PM, *e#c wrote: On Dec 13, 12:01 pm, Don wrote: So much for the behaving. I see that Harry and Don are up to their usual name calling, lying, accusing, insulting and general boorish behavior. I knew they couldn't last but really would have liked it to. I think it says quite a bit about a man who has to resort to this crap to get noticed. Like the ID Spoofers? Hey, you're not supposed to mention that to the id spoofers, herring, scotty, and the rest of the enablers. :) **** that. It seems there's a whole " new " batch of sock puppet names. " Learn to read Headers " ....what ever. When you " hide " your ISP Posting Host Number, its dam hard to trace exactly who the spoofer is. And then the idiots will blab off about the fact that " they " can tell who is spoofing. Well, to sum it up, headers are of no use at all, IF you're hiding your ISP number...... ISP number? What the hell is that? Did you know an ISP is an Internet Service Provider? A large ISP can handle millions of IP addresses. When you look at the headers, you SHOULD see a NNTP Posting Host Number. ALL of the spoofers hide it, and dont tell me you cant . IDs CAN be masked, which is what the idiots do in a vain attempt to " hide " their IDs. The real Harry must be hiding his also, huh? Why am I the object of your obsession, herring? Projecting again, Harry? Of course, most people would be obsessed with you because you're such an honorable, stand-up type guy. Far more honorable and stand-up than you are, for sure. |
#37
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 14, 4:40*pm, John H wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:42:57 -0500, HarryK wrote: On 12/14/10 1:37 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:34:23 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 13, 8:09 pm, L *wrote: *e#c wrote: On Dec 13, 4:15 pm, * *wrote: On 12/13/10 3:54 PM, *e#c wrote: On Dec 13, 12:01 pm, Don * * *wrote: So much for the behaving. I see that Harry and Don are up to their usual name calling, lying, accusing, insulting and general boorish behavior. I knew they couldn't last but really would have liked it to. I think it says quite a bit about a man who has to resort to this crap to get noticed. Like the ID Spoofers? Hey, you're not supposed to mention that to the id spoofers, herring, scotty, and the rest of the enablers. :) **** that. It seems there's a whole " new " batch of sock puppet names. " Learn to read Headers " ....what ever. When you " hide " your ISP Posting Host Number, its dam hard to trace exactly who the spoofer is. And then the idiots will blab off about the fact that " they " can tell who is spoofing. Well, to sum it up, headers are of no use at all, IF you're hiding your ISP number...... ISP number? *What the hell is that? *Did you know an ISP is an Internet Service Provider? *A large ISP can handle millions of IP addresses.. When you look at the headers, you SHOULD see a NNTP Posting Host Number. ALL of the spoofers hide it, and dont tell me you cant . IDs CAN be masked, which is what the idiots do in a vain attempt to " hide " their IDs. Where does this point? Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!po stnews.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: rec.boats Subject: Oh well...... Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 08:28:00 -0500 Lines: 30 l-september.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net grNaqsrBmZADv8r0ABNHkAH6sV5Ae0ZQIszyqZP2uEAowWejfp Cancel-Lock: sha1:hr/uLKXfsxS+ZgIbpFHrjIp6Iw0= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 Bytes: 2262 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com rec.boats:1085536 BTW, I know your computer knowledge is...weak...but in my case, whether the NNTP posting host appears in my headers depends upon which posting host I am using, and has nothing to do with any action on my part. Inform your buddy, slammer. He can't seem to understand any of that. Read the following, it solidifies my point completely. the NNTP posting host appears in my headers depends upon which posting host I am using, ( depending on WHICH POSTING HOST I AM USING) I dll'ed a program last night that enables me to show a US destination as MY Internet Address, get it? Next topic: Why should I understand anything, Herring? YOU keep posting **** on here, what do you expect to receive in return? Why...more ****, of course. |
#38
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hadenough wrote:
On Dec 13, 8:09 pm, L wrote: *e#c wrote: On Dec 13, 4:15 pm, wrote: On 12/13/10 3:54 PM, *e#c wrote: On Dec 13, 12:01 pm, Don wrote: So much for the behaving. I see that Harry and Don are up to their usual name calling, lying, accusing, insulting and general boorish behavior. I knew they couldn't last but really would have liked it to. I think it says quite a bit about a man who has to resort to this crap to get noticed. Like the ID Spoofers? Hey, you're not supposed to mention that to the id spoofers, herring, scotty, and the rest of the enablers. :) **** that. It seems there's a whole " new " batch of sock puppet names. " Learn to read Headers " ....what ever. When you " hide " your ISP Posting Host Number, its dam hard to trace exactly who the spoofer is. And then the idiots will blab off about the fact that " they " can tell who is spoofing. Well, to sum it up, headers are of no use at all, IF you're hiding your ISP number...... ISP number? What the hell is that? Did you know an ISP is an Internet Service Provider? A large ISP can handle millions of IP addresses. When you look at the headers, you SHOULD see a NNTP Posting Host Number. ALL of the spoofers hide it, and dont tell me you cant . IDs CAN be masked, which is what the idiots do in a vain attempt to " hide " their IDs. I don't change anything or hide anything in my headers, expert. |
#39
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
HarryK wrote:
On 12/14/10 1:37 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:34:23 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 13, 8:09 pm, L wrote: *e#c wrote: On Dec 13, 4:15 pm, wrote: On 12/13/10 3:54 PM, *e#c wrote: On Dec 13, 12:01 pm, Don wrote: So much for the behaving. I see that Harry and Don are up to their usual name calling, lying, accusing, insulting and general boorish behavior. I knew they couldn't last but really would have liked it to. I think it says quite a bit about a man who has to resort to this crap to get noticed. Like the ID Spoofers? Hey, you're not supposed to mention that to the id spoofers, herring, scotty, and the rest of the enablers. :) **** that. It seems there's a whole " new " batch of sock puppet names. " Learn to read Headers " ....what ever. When you " hide " your ISP Posting Host Number, its dam hard to trace exactly who the spoofer is. And then the idiots will blab off about the fact that " they " can tell who is spoofing. Well, to sum it up, headers are of no use at all, IF you're hiding your ISP number...... ISP number? What the hell is that? Did you know an ISP is an Internet Service Provider? A large ISP can handle millions of IP addresses. When you look at the headers, you SHOULD see a NNTP Posting Host Number. ALL of the spoofers hide it, and dont tell me you cant . IDs CAN be masked, which is what the idiots do in a vain attempt to " hide " their IDs. Where does this point? Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!po stnews.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: rec.boats Subject: Oh well...... Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 08:28:00 -0500 Lines: 30 l-september.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net grNaqsrBmZADv8r0ABNHkAH6sV5Ae0ZQIszyqZP2uEAowWejfp Cancel-Lock: sha1:hr/uLKXfsxS+ZgIbpFHrjIp6Iw0= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 Bytes: 2262 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com rec.boats:1085536 Just keep stirring the pot, herring, and you'll soon have rec.boats back to the way you liked it. You've already covered that. You never stopped, WAFA. |
#40
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|