On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:26:56 -0500, HarryK wrote:

On 12/14/10 1:23 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:50:58 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 4:47 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:39:52 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote:


wrote in message
...
Get a Mac.

Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter.

snip......

Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat
all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and
their aiders& abettors.
It would be mind boggling!


Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't
imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted
nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally
bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and
HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one
of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah.


Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something
any spoofer might say?

Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is.

I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself
enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to
name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point.


John, your poor skills with the English language are showing again.

Ziggy *is* a classic little right-wing snot flinger. His posts, those of
his I've read, prove it. The posts of his camp followers are no different.

I'm not *accusing* him of nitwitted nonwitticisms. His words speak for
themselves. They *are* nitwitted nonwitticisms.

The rest of the post is not "unfounded accusations," as you claim, but
speculation. There's a difference, and it isn't subtle.

Once again, I suggest you spend the next week attempting to harass those
you enable, and then report back here. The idea was to *stop* the id
spoofing, the "taunts," and the rest of the moronic nonsense that plague
this newsgroup.

By enabling the trash and by engaging in harassment yourself, you are
part of the problem.


Oh. There's a big difference between your accusatory 'speculation' and
'unfounded accusations'.


There is a difference between speculation and unfounded accusation. It
isn't my fault you cannot discern the difference.

Harry, I just said that.

Nice try at pot stirring, John. Why not follow your own advice, which
you offer so freely to others, and just let it go? Go pester your Ziggy,
Crotchrot, ID spoofer, LG, Bar...you know, the obstreperous assholes on
your side of the political fence. *They* might pay attention to your
preaching. *I* think your biting at my heels stinks of hypocrisy.

....and I think you should be calling *no one* a hypocrit.

If my comments to you, and the spoofers, seems like 'preaching', then maybe
you're overly sensitive - with reason, of course.

In any case, you're a waste of time, mine, the spoofers, or anyone else's.