on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
 

In article , payer33859
@mypacks.net says...

On 12/14/10 1:23 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:50:58 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 4:47 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:39:52 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote:


wrote in message
...
Get a Mac.

Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter.

snip......

Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat
all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and
their aiders& abettors.
It would be mind boggling!


Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't
imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted
nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally
bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and
HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one
of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah.


Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something
any spoofer might say?

Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is.

I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself
enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to
name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point.


John, your poor skills with the English language are showing again.


That name calling and insulting should help alot.

on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
 

On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:26:56 -0500, HarryK wrote:

On 12/14/10 1:23 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:50:58 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 4:47 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:39:52 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote:


wrote in message
...
Get a Mac.

Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter.

snip......

Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat
all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and
their aiders& abettors.
It would be mind boggling!


Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't
imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted
nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally
bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and
HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one
of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah.


Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something
any spoofer might say?

Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is.

I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself
enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to
name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point.


John, your poor skills with the English language are showing again.

Ziggy *is* a classic little right-wing snot flinger. His posts, those of
his I've read, prove it. The posts of his camp followers are no different.

I'm not *accusing* him of nitwitted nonwitticisms. His words speak for
themselves. They *are* nitwitted nonwitticisms.

The rest of the post is not "unfounded accusations," as you claim, but
speculation. There's a difference, and it isn't subtle.

Once again, I suggest you spend the next week attempting to harass those
you enable, and then report back here. The idea was to *stop* the id
spoofing, the "taunts," and the rest of the moronic nonsense that plague
this newsgroup.

By enabling the trash and by engaging in harassment yourself, you are
part of the problem.


Oh. There's a big difference between your accusatory 'speculation' and
'unfounded accusations'.


There is a difference between speculation and unfounded accusation. It
isn't my fault you cannot discern the difference.

Harry, I just said that.

Nice try at pot stirring, John. Why not follow your own advice, which
you offer so freely to others, and just let it go? Go pester your Ziggy,
Crotchrot, ID spoofer, LG, Bar...you know, the obstreperous assholes on
your side of the political fence. *They* might pay attention to your
preaching. *I* think your biting at my heels stinks of hypocrisy.

....and I think you should be calling *no one* a hypocrit.

If my comments to you, and the spoofers, seems like 'preaching', then maybe
you're overly sensitive - with reason, of course.

In any case, you're a waste of time, mine, the spoofers, or anyone else's.

on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
 

On 12/14/10 4:44 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:26:56 -0500, wrote:

On 12/14/10 1:23 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:50:58 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 4:47 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:39:52 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote:


wrote in message
...
Get a Mac.

Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter.

snip......

Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat
all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and
their aiders& abettors.
It would be mind boggling!


Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't
imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted
nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally
bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and
HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one
of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah.


Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something
any spoofer might say?

Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is.

I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself
enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to
name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point.


John, your poor skills with the English language are showing again.

Ziggy *is* a classic little right-wing snot flinger. His posts, those of
his I've read, prove it. The posts of his camp followers are no different.

I'm not *accusing* him of nitwitted nonwitticisms. His words speak for
themselves. They *are* nitwitted nonwitticisms.

The rest of the post is not "unfounded accusations," as you claim, but
speculation. There's a difference, and it isn't subtle.

Once again, I suggest you spend the next week attempting to harass those
you enable, and then report back here. The idea was to *stop* the id
spoofing, the "taunts," and the rest of the moronic nonsense that plague
this newsgroup.

By enabling the trash and by engaging in harassment yourself, you are
part of the problem.


Oh. There's a big difference between your accusatory 'speculation' and
'unfounded accusations'.


There is a difference between speculation and unfounded accusation. It
isn't my fault you cannot discern the difference.

Harry, I just said that.

Nice try at pot stirring, John. Why not follow your own advice, which
you offer so freely to others, and just let it go? Go pester your Ziggy,
Crotchrot, ID spoofer, LG, Bar...you know, the obstreperous assholes on
your side of the political fence. *They* might pay attention to your
preaching. *I* think your biting at my heels stinks of hypocrisy.

...and I think you should be calling *no one* a hypocrit.

If my comments to you, and the spoofers, seems like 'preaching', then maybe
you're overly sensitive - with reason, of course.

In any case, you're a waste of time, mine, the spoofers, or anyone else's.


If I am a waste of time here, herring, then why do you pose 75% of your
posts to me. As my late father used to say, GPUAR,

on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
 

On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:27:18 -0500, HarryK wrote:

On 12/14/10 4:44 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:26:56 -0500, wrote:

On 12/14/10 1:23 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:50:58 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 4:47 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:39:52 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote:


wrote in message
...
Get a Mac.

Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter.

snip......

Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat
all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and
their aiders& abettors.
It would be mind boggling!


Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't
imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted
nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally
bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and
HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one
of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah.


Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something
any spoofer might say?

Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is.

I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself
enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to
name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point.


John, your poor skills with the English language are showing again.

Ziggy *is* a classic little right-wing snot flinger. His posts, those of
his I've read, prove it. The posts of his camp followers are no different.

I'm not *accusing* him of nitwitted nonwitticisms. His words speak for
themselves. They *are* nitwitted nonwitticisms.

The rest of the post is not "unfounded accusations," as you claim, but
speculation. There's a difference, and it isn't subtle.

Once again, I suggest you spend the next week attempting to harass those
you enable, and then report back here. The idea was to *stop* the id
spoofing, the "taunts," and the rest of the moronic nonsense that plague
this newsgroup.

By enabling the trash and by engaging in harassment yourself, you are
part of the problem.


Oh. There's a big difference between your accusatory 'speculation' and
'unfounded accusations'.


There is a difference between speculation and unfounded accusation. It
isn't my fault you cannot discern the difference.

Harry, I just said that.

Nice try at pot stirring, John. Why not follow your own advice, which
you offer so freely to others, and just let it go? Go pester your Ziggy,
Crotchrot, ID spoofer, LG, Bar...you know, the obstreperous assholes on
your side of the political fence. *They* might pay attention to your
preaching. *I* think your biting at my heels stinks of hypocrisy.

...and I think you should be calling *no one* a hypocrit.

If my comments to you, and the spoofers, seems like 'preaching', then maybe
you're overly sensitive - with reason, of course.

In any case, you're a waste of time, mine, the spoofers, or anyone else's.


If I am a waste of time here, herring, then why do you pose 75% of your
posts to me. As my late father used to say, GPUAR,

I told you. It's cause you're such an honorable, stand-up type guy!

Now, for the next month I want you to track closely the responses I make to you,
Donnie, and the slammer. Hell, throw in your buddy Paul and nincdeplum.

By doing so, you'll see how spoofers should be handled. You'll note that I don't
resort to name-calling either!

on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
 

On 12/14/10 5:53 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:27:18 -0500, wrote:

On 12/14/10 4:44 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:26:56 -0500, wrote:

On 12/14/10 1:23 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:50:58 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 4:47 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:39:52 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote:


wrote in message
...
Get a Mac.

Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter.

snip......

Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat
all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and
their aiders& abettors.
It would be mind boggling!


Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't
imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted
nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally
bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and
HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one
of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah.


Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something
any spoofer might say?

Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is.

I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself
enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to
name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point.


John, your poor skills with the English language are showing again.

Ziggy *is* a classic little right-wing snot flinger. His posts, those of
his I've read, prove it. The posts of his camp followers are no different.

I'm not *accusing* him of nitwitted nonwitticisms. His words speak for
themselves. They *are* nitwitted nonwitticisms.

The rest of the post is not "unfounded accusations," as you claim, but
speculation. There's a difference, and it isn't subtle.

Once again, I suggest you spend the next week attempting to harass those
you enable, and then report back here. The idea was to *stop* the id
spoofing, the "taunts," and the rest of the moronic nonsense that plague
this newsgroup.

By enabling the trash and by engaging in harassment yourself, you are
part of the problem.


Oh. There's a big difference between your accusatory 'speculation' and
'unfounded accusations'.


There is a difference between speculation and unfounded accusation. It
isn't my fault you cannot discern the difference.

Harry, I just said that.

Nice try at pot stirring, John. Why not follow your own advice, which
you offer so freely to others, and just let it go? Go pester your Ziggy,
Crotchrot, ID spoofer, LG, Bar...you know, the obstreperous assholes on
your side of the political fence. *They* might pay attention to your
preaching. *I* think your biting at my heels stinks of hypocrisy.

...and I think you should be calling *no one* a hypocrit.

If my comments to you, and the spoofers, seems like 'preaching', then maybe
you're overly sensitive - with reason, of course.

In any case, you're a waste of time, mine, the spoofers, or anyone else's.


If I am a waste of time here, herring, then why do you pose 75% of your
posts to me. As my late father used to say, GPUAR,

I told you. It's cause you're such an honorable, stand-up type guy!

Now, for the next month I want you to track closely the responses I make to you,
Donnie, and the slammer. Hell, throw in your buddy Paul and nincdeplum.

By doing so, you'll see how spoofers should be handled. You'll note that I don't
resort to name-calling either!


Oh, I think it would be terrific if you mostly limited your responses to
your buddies Ziggy, the ID spoofer, Crotchrot, Bert, LG, and the rest of
the right-wing assholes. And toss in some christiancrap, too, plus
photos of your grandkids, your terrific golf scores and maybe your
clapped out motorcycle, too.

Go for it.

on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
 

"HarryK" wrote in message
...
On 12/14/10 5:53 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:27:18 -0500,
wrote:

On 12/14/10 4:44 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:26:56 -0500,
wrote:

On 12/14/10 1:23 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:50:58 -0500,
wrote:

On 12/13/10 4:47 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:39:52 -0500,
wrote:

On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500,
wrote:

On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500,
wrote:

On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote:


wrote in message
...
Get a Mac.

Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter.

snip......

Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to
actually repeat
all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators,
instigators and
their aiders& abettors.
It would be mind boggling!


Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I
can't
imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his
nitwitted
nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone
accidentally
bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his
CrotchRotted Don and
HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred
with one
of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah.


Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the
group than something
any spoofer might say?

Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is.

I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't
control himself
enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must
resort to
name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point.


John, your poor skills with the English language are showing
again.

Ziggy *is* a classic little right-wing snot flinger. His posts,
those of
his I've read, prove it. The posts of his camp followers are no
different.

I'm not *accusing* him of nitwitted nonwitticisms. His words speak
for
themselves. They *are* nitwitted nonwitticisms.

The rest of the post is not "unfounded accusations," as you claim,
but
speculation. There's a difference, and it isn't subtle.

Once again, I suggest you spend the next week attempting to harass
those
you enable, and then report back here. The idea was to *stop* the
id
spoofing, the "taunts," and the rest of the moronic nonsense that
plague
this newsgroup.

By enabling the trash and by engaging in harassment yourself, you
are
part of the problem.


Oh. There's a big difference between your accusatory 'speculation'
and
'unfounded accusations'.


There is a difference between speculation and unfounded accusation.
It
isn't my fault you cannot discern the difference.

Harry, I just said that.

Nice try at pot stirring, John. Why not follow your own advice, which
you offer so freely to others, and just let it go? Go pester your
Ziggy,
Crotchrot, ID spoofer, LG, Bar...you know, the obstreperous assholes
on
your side of the political fence. *They* might pay attention to your
preaching. *I* think your biting at my heels stinks of hypocrisy.

...and I think you should be calling *no one* a hypocrit.

If my comments to you, and the spoofers, seems like 'preaching', then
maybe
you're overly sensitive - with reason, of course.

In any case, you're a waste of time, mine, the spoofers, or anyone
else's.


If I am a waste of time here, herring, then why do you pose 75% of your
posts to me. As my late father used to say, GPUAR,

I told you. It's cause you're such an honorable, stand-up type guy!

Now, for the next month I want you to track closely the responses I make
to you,
Donnie, and the slammer. Hell, throw in your buddy Paul and nincdeplum.

By doing so, you'll see how spoofers should be handled. You'll note that
I don't
resort to name-calling either!


Oh, I think it would be terrific if you mostly limited your responses to
your buddies Ziggy, the ID spoofer, Crotchrot, Bert, LG, and the rest of
the right-wing assholes. And toss in some christiancrap, too, plus photos
of your grandkids, your terrific golf scores and maybe your clapped out
motorcycle, too.

Go for it.

Don't forget his recipe book.

on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
 

On 12/14/10 5:59 PM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/14/10 5:53 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:27:18 -0500, wrote:

On 12/14/10 4:44 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:26:56 -0500,
wrote:

On 12/14/10 1:23 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:50:58 -0500,
wrote:

On 12/13/10 4:47 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:39:52 -0500,
wrote:

On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500,
wrote:

On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500,
wrote:

On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote:


wrote in message
...
Get a Mac.

Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter.

snip......

Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to
actually repeat
all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators,
instigators and
their aiders& abettors.
It would be mind boggling!


Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I
can't
imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his
nitwitted
nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone
accidentally
bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his
CrotchRotted Don and
HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was
bred with one
of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah.


Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the
group than something
any spoofer might say?

Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is.

I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't
control himself
enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must
resort to
name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point.


John, your poor skills with the English language are showing
again.

Ziggy *is* a classic little right-wing snot flinger. His posts,
those of
his I've read, prove it. The posts of his camp followers are no
different.

I'm not *accusing* him of nitwitted nonwitticisms. His words
speak for
themselves. They *are* nitwitted nonwitticisms.

The rest of the post is not "unfounded accusations," as you
claim, but
speculation. There's a difference, and it isn't subtle.

Once again, I suggest you spend the next week attempting to
harass those
you enable, and then report back here. The idea was to *stop*
the id
spoofing, the "taunts," and the rest of the moronic nonsense
that plague
this newsgroup.

By enabling the trash and by engaging in harassment yourself,
you are
part of the problem.


Oh. There's a big difference between your accusatory
'speculation' and
'unfounded accusations'.


There is a difference between speculation and unfounded
accusation. It
isn't my fault you cannot discern the difference.

Harry, I just said that.

Nice try at pot stirring, John. Why not follow your own advice, which
you offer so freely to others, and just let it go? Go pester your
Ziggy,
Crotchrot, ID spoofer, LG, Bar...you know, the obstreperous
assholes on
your side of the political fence. *They* might pay attention to your
preaching. *I* think your biting at my heels stinks of hypocrisy.

...and I think you should be calling *no one* a hypocrit.

If my comments to you, and the spoofers, seems like 'preaching',
then maybe
you're overly sensitive - with reason, of course.

In any case, you're a waste of time, mine, the spoofers, or anyone
else's.


If I am a waste of time here, herring, then why do you pose 75% of your
posts to me. As my late father used to say, GPUAR,

I told you. It's cause you're such an honorable, stand-up type guy!

Now, for the next month I want you to track closely the responses I
make to you,
Donnie, and the slammer. Hell, throw in your buddy Paul and nincdeplum.

By doing so, you'll see how spoofers should be handled. You'll note
that I don't
resort to name-calling either!


Oh, I think it would be terrific if you mostly limited your responses to
your buddies Ziggy, the ID spoofer, Crotchrot, Bert, LG, and the rest of
the right-wing assholes. And toss in some christiancrap, too, plus
photos of your grandkids, your terrific golf scores and maybe your
clapped out motorcycle, too.

Go for it.

I apologize again, I don't know what is wrong with me today.

Paul, please forgive me.

on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
 

YukonBound wrote:


"L G" wrote in message
...
YukonBound wrote:


"Ziggy®" wrote in message
...
Get a Mac.

Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter.

snip......

Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually
repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators,
instigators and their aiders & abettors.
It would be mind boggling!
To a dummy, yes, it would be overwhelming.

Thanks for reinforcing my point................
Dementia is a sad disease. Get well, Donnie!

on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
 

In article ,
says...

On 12/14/10 4:44 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:26:56 -0500, wrote:

On 12/14/10 1:23 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:50:58 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 4:47 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:39:52 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote:


wrote in message
...
Get a Mac.

Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter.

snip......

Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat
all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and
their aiders& abettors.
It would be mind boggling!


Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't
imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted
nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally
bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and
HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one
of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah.


Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something
any spoofer might say?

Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is.

I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself
enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to
name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point.


The one who made an Atlantic crossing in a small outboard boat in
November and got a fire boat welcome for that feat?

on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
 

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:27:18 -0500, HarryK wrote:

On 12/14/10 4:44 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:26:56 -0500, wrote:

On 12/14/10 1:23 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:50:58 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 4:47 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:39:52 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote:


wrote in message
...
Get a Mac.

Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter.

snip......

Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat
all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and
their aiders& abettors.
It would be mind boggling!


Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't
imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted
nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally
bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and
HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one
of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah.


Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something
any spoofer might say?

Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is.

I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself
enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to

The only thing Don and Harry can do here is call names and insult. It's
all they have in their miserable lives.