|
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On 12/14/2010 9:39 AM, Hairy Clown wrote:
In , says... YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! To a dummy, yes, it would be overwhelming. Nice insulting and name calling. Yet another ID here, "Crotchrot"? As you are one of the most consistent "insulters" here, it seems a tad incongruous that you are calling out others for allegedly behaving as you do. |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On 12/14/2010 7:59 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/14/10 12:36 AM, Hadenough wrote: On Dec 13, 4:40 pm, John wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:22:02 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point. Here's a suggestion, John. Spend the next week attempting to harass those you enable, and then report back here. I'm not ditzy enough to attempt addressing the spoofers. I don't know who they are, and I've made my position on the matter well known. BULL **** Beware of this spoofer. Please don't enable him. You should be ashamed of yourself for playing these childish ID spoofing games, Ziggy. |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
"Paul@BYC" wrote in message ...
On 12/14/2010 7:59 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/14/10 12:36 AM, Hadenough wrote: On Dec 13, 4:40 pm, John wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:22:02 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point. Here's a suggestion, John. Spend the next week attempting to harass those you enable, and then report back here. I'm not ditzy enough to attempt addressing the spoofers. I don't know who they are, and I've made my position on the matter well known. BULL **** Beware of this spoofer. Please don't enable him. You should be ashamed of yourself for playing these childish ID spoofing games, Ziggy. Let me see if I can drill this into your thick skull. Ziggy isn't the spoofer. -- Ziggy® |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:16:21 -0500, Ziggy® wrote:
"Paul@BYC" wrote in message ... On 12/14/2010 7:59 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/14/10 12:36 AM, Hadenough wrote: On Dec 13, 4:40 pm, John wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:22:02 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point. Here's a suggestion, John. Spend the next week attempting to harass those you enable, and then report back here. I'm not ditzy enough to attempt addressing the spoofers. I don't know who they are, and I've made my position on the matter well known. BULL **** Beware of this spoofer. Please don't enable him. You should be ashamed of yourself for playing these childish ID spoofing games, Ziggy. Let me see if I can drill this into your thick skull. Ziggy isn't the spoofer. Ziggy is a cartoon character. You are a clown. |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:02:08 -0500, "Paul@BYC"
wrote: On 12/14/2010 9:39 AM, Hairy Clown wrote: In , says... YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! To a dummy, yes, it would be overwhelming. Nice insulting and name calling. Yet another ID here, "Crotchrot"? As you are one of the most consistent "insulters" here, it seems a tad incongruous that you are calling out others for allegedly behaving as you do. The syntax of the Freak. |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On 12/14/10 11:53 AM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:16:21 -0500, wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/14/2010 7:59 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/14/10 12:36 AM, Hadenough wrote: On Dec 13, 4:40 pm, John wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:22:02 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point. Here's a suggestion, John. Spend the next week attempting to harass those you enable, and then report back here. I'm not ditzy enough to attempt addressing the spoofers. I don't know who they are, and I've made my position on the matter well known. BULL **** Beware of this spoofer. Please don't enable him. You should be ashamed of yourself for playing these childish ID spoofing games, Ziggy. Let me see if I can drill this into your thick skull. Ziggy isn't the spoofer. Ziggy is a cartoon character. You are a clown. Ziggy's "altered egos" engage in ID spoofing. And why are you insulting clowns? |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
|
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
|
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:50:58 -0500, HarryK wrote:
On 12/13/10 4:47 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:39:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point. John, your poor skills with the English language are showing again. Ziggy *is* a classic little right-wing snot flinger. His posts, those of his I've read, prove it. The posts of his camp followers are no different. I'm not *accusing* him of nitwitted nonwitticisms. His words speak for themselves. They *are* nitwitted nonwitticisms. The rest of the post is not "unfounded accusations," as you claim, but speculation. There's a difference, and it isn't subtle. Once again, I suggest you spend the next week attempting to harass those you enable, and then report back here. The idea was to *stop* the id spoofing, the "taunts," and the rest of the moronic nonsense that plague this newsgroup. By enabling the trash and by engaging in harassment yourself, you are part of the problem. Oh. There's a big difference between your accusatory 'speculation' and 'unfounded accusations'. There is a difference between speculation and unfounded accusation. It isn't my fault you cannot discern the difference. Harry, I just said that. |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On 12/14/10 1:23 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:50:58 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 4:47 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:39:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point. John, your poor skills with the English language are showing again. Ziggy *is* a classic little right-wing snot flinger. His posts, those of his I've read, prove it. The posts of his camp followers are no different. I'm not *accusing* him of nitwitted nonwitticisms. His words speak for themselves. They *are* nitwitted nonwitticisms. The rest of the post is not "unfounded accusations," as you claim, but speculation. There's a difference, and it isn't subtle. Once again, I suggest you spend the next week attempting to harass those you enable, and then report back here. The idea was to *stop* the id spoofing, the "taunts," and the rest of the moronic nonsense that plague this newsgroup. By enabling the trash and by engaging in harassment yourself, you are part of the problem. Oh. There's a big difference between your accusatory 'speculation' and 'unfounded accusations'. There is a difference between speculation and unfounded accusation. It isn't my fault you cannot discern the difference. Harry, I just said that. Nice try at pot stirring, John. Why not follow your own advice, which you offer so freely to others, and just let it go? Go pester your Ziggy, Crotchrot, ID spoofer, LG, Bar...you know, the obstreperous assholes on your side of the political fence. *They* might pay attention to your preaching. *I* think your biting at my heels stinks of hypocrisy. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:56 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com