| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
Get a Mac.
Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. Leave the woman alone, she already has done more than her fair share, she donated her brain years ago. Sorry, krueger, but " isn't going to work, either. Even if you change your handle entirely, the "Krueger" shows through. You go right into the sewage disposal unit with your buddies CrotchRot, Ziggy, and the rest of the ornery, the id spoofers, and so forth. B'bye. It must really suck for you to want my attention so badly. If you want validation, I suggest you pawn that ersatz BMW and spend the money on a hooker. Your posts aren't funny; they're just stupid or, usually, racist. It takes no serious effort to point out what "LG" is doing and why. As for his "question," I see no more reason to respond to him than I do to respond to "Ziggy" or "Crotchrot," two of the others whose interest here is to disrupt. The majority are, but losers like Krueger, Ziggy, the id spoofer, crotch-rot, et cetera, prefer this newsgroup as it was, not as it is. I suspect "Larry LG" will soon be transmogrifying himself into a brand-new handle. Crotchedy Harry. of course. Another occupant of my filter file. Now there's an idea...use gasoline taxes to help fund universal health care. I like it. 1. It was marked OT. 2. It wasn't political. 3. It was more interesting than the "99 ways to smoke a turkey" thread. 4. My comment was directed at Don. I'd have commented in "the other place," but neither of us have received a cordial invite. You are responding to an ID spoofer. Indeed. Morons prefer the company of morons. So, America's time in the sun is over. We can't do anything anymore except invade small, weak, third-world countries. :) You are responding to an ID spoofer. Ignore this asshole who is spoofing my ID. He is doing his best to return rec.boats to an protracted political flame fest. Anyone would be more interesting to interact with than you. Keep this crap up and I will put you back in my bozo bin where you belong. Indeed...this particular HarryK spoofer seems to "connect" mostly with the other spoofers, like Ziggy and Crotchrot, from what my filters tell me. Actually, the three of them are probably one guy or maybe two. If you cut a few words out of your sentences, you'd have perfect little phrases for fortune cookies. Wasn't there an agreement to avoid "religious" posts here? Herring's post clearly was religious in nature. While I enjoy performances of Handel's work, I don't believe *this* is the place to be extolling religious belief, no matter how beautifully expressed. i have mostly avoided making *partisan* political posts. Many issues are political in nature, but it is possible to avoid partisanship. As an example, I think the war against afghanistan is the height of stupidity. I thought that when bush started it and I think it with obama continuing it. But rather than blame bush or obama, I simply state i think that war sucks. As I stated, I appreciate the work as a beautiful piece of religious music. It simply is inappropriate in this sort of newsgroup, and there *was* an agreement to avoid "religious" posts. Shooting simple trespassers is frowned upon in Maryland. Shooting home invaders is less troublesome. The problems arise when religion is shoveled down the throats of those who find it offensive or are non-believers of that religion or, in fact, any religion, and the public's property is used for the presentation. Unfortunately, we live in a country where the majority of citizens and the politicians who pander to them simply ignore the First Amendment. Almost all politicians of every political stripe do this. Both my wife and I enjoy watching the little creatures, and I don't believe any of the crap they say about not feeding the wildlife. The animals don't care, why should you? We live on the edge of a large wooded area. The critters are abundant here. A few of them come by, and the ones that do are recognizable. We have limited interaction with them, and in all the years we have lived here, they have not been "pests." The only pests in our immediate neighborhood are the various religious proselytizers who come knocking uninvited at the front door from time to time. Our pets live long, happy, healthy lives, without concern over their next meal, or where to stay warm and dry, and safe from being hit by cars on nearby roads or shot by ***morons with guns***. The roads down here are littered with the carcasses of deer, raccoons, dogs, foxes, cats, et cetera. i don't support the expenditure of any public funds for the promotion of any religion. Further, I don't support the exemption from taxation of any religious institution, though I do understand how such is construed as separation of church and state under the First Amendment. I believe exempt religious organizations should, at minimum, pay a voluntary annual fee to their communities to cover the cost of providing fire and police protection. You are responding to the id spoofer, greg. Why should I have to leave just because someone wants to shove their religious BS down my throat. I would have called the police if I saw this going on at my local mall. |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
"Ziggy®" wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders & abettors. It would be mind boggling! |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote:
"Ziggy®" wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders & abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
"HarryK" wrote in message m...
On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: "Ziggy®" wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders & abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Nice try spoofer. You're really working the crowd, eh? The real Harry only talks boating. -- Ziggy® |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
|
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, HarryK wrote:
On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: "Ziggy®" wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders & abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On 12/13/10 3:48 PM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. When people ridicule me, none of it is true, so there. They lie and they know it. You and a few others of the righties just enable them. JohnH, if you don't "get some religion" and stop this crap, I will put you in bozo bin and only comment on your posts indirectly. Don't say you weren't warned. |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
|
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
|
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point. Here's a suggestion, John. Spend the next week attempting to harass those you enable, and then report back here. |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, HarryK wrote:
On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point. |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point. John, your poor skills with the English language are showing again. Ziggy *is* a classic little right-wing snot flinger. His posts, those of his I've read, prove it. The posts of his camp followers are no different. I'm not *accusing* him of nitwitted nonwitticisms. His words speak for themselves. They *are* nitwitted nonwitticisms. The rest of the post is not "unfounded accusations," as you claim, but speculation. There's a difference, and it isn't subtle. Once again, I suggest you spend the next week attempting to harass those you enable, and then report back here. The idea was to *stop* the id spoofing, the "taunts," and the rest of the moronic nonsense that plague this newsgroup. By enabling the trash and by engaging in harassment yourself, you are part of the problem. |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:22:02 -0500, HarryK wrote:
On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point. Here's a suggestion, John. Spend the next week attempting to harass those you enable, and then report back here. I'm not ditzy enough to attempt addressing the spoofers. I don't know who they are, and I've made my position on the matter well known. |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:39:52 -0500, HarryK wrote:
On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point. John, your poor skills with the English language are showing again. Ziggy *is* a classic little right-wing snot flinger. His posts, those of his I've read, prove it. The posts of his camp followers are no different. I'm not *accusing* him of nitwitted nonwitticisms. His words speak for themselves. They *are* nitwitted nonwitticisms. The rest of the post is not "unfounded accusations," as you claim, but speculation. There's a difference, and it isn't subtle. Once again, I suggest you spend the next week attempting to harass those you enable, and then report back here. The idea was to *stop* the id spoofing, the "taunts," and the rest of the moronic nonsense that plague this newsgroup. By enabling the trash and by engaging in harassment yourself, you are part of the problem. Oh. There's a big difference between your accusatory 'speculation' and 'unfounded accusations'. I'll never get over what a master of the English language you think you are. You are, in your own opinion, *the man*. Kudos, Harry. |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On 12/13/10 4:47 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:39:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point. John, your poor skills with the English language are showing again. Ziggy *is* a classic little right-wing snot flinger. His posts, those of his I've read, prove it. The posts of his camp followers are no different. I'm not *accusing* him of nitwitted nonwitticisms. His words speak for themselves. They *are* nitwitted nonwitticisms. The rest of the post is not "unfounded accusations," as you claim, but speculation. There's a difference, and it isn't subtle. Once again, I suggest you spend the next week attempting to harass those you enable, and then report back here. The idea was to *stop* the id spoofing, the "taunts," and the rest of the moronic nonsense that plague this newsgroup. By enabling the trash and by engaging in harassment yourself, you are part of the problem. Oh. There's a big difference between your accusatory 'speculation' and 'unfounded accusations'. There is a difference between speculation and unfounded accusation. It isn't my fault you cannot discern the difference. |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
"HarryK" wrote in message ...
On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. Would you like a little breather so you can get off the ropes? -- Ziggy® |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
"HarryK" wrote in message ...
On 12/13/10 3:48 PM, HarryK wrote: On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. When people ridicule me, none of it is true, so there. They lie and they know it. You and a few others of the righties just enable them. JohnH, if you don't "get some religion" and stop this crap, I will put you in bozo bin and only comment on your posts indirectly. Don't say you weren't warned. Ziggy deserves an apology. Don't you think, Harry ;-) -- Ziggy® |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
"John H" wrote in message ...
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, HarryK wrote: On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point. The result of too many basket weaving courses and not enough logic and critical thinking. -- Ziggy® |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
"HarryK" wrote in message m...
On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point. John, your poor skills with the English language are showing again. Ziggy *is* a classic little right-wing snot flinger. His posts, those of his I've read, prove it. The posts of his camp followers are no different. I'm not *accusing* him of nitwitted nonwitticisms. His words speak for themselves. They *are* nitwitted nonwitticisms. The rest of the post is not "unfounded accusations," as you claim, but speculation. There's a difference, and it isn't subtle. Once again, I suggest you spend the next week attempting to harass those you enable, and then report back here. The idea was to *stop* the id spoofing, the "taunts," and the rest of the moronic nonsense that plague this newsgroup. By enabling the trash and by engaging in harassment yourself, you are part of the problem. A little silence on the line folks while we hear some non caustic witticisms from our dear friend Harry Krause. SILENCE PLEASE! Go ahead Harry. You have the floor. -- Ziggy® |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On 12/13/10 5:04 PM, Ziggy® wrote:
wrote in message ... On 12/13/10 3:48 PM, HarryK wrote: On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. When people ridicule me, none of it is true, so there. They lie and they know it. You and a few others of the righties just enable them. JohnH, if you don't "get some religion" and stop this crap, I will put you in bozo bin and only comment on your posts indirectly. Don't say you weren't warned. Ziggy deserves an apology. Don't you think, Harry ;-) At least you are not JohnH. |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
YukonBound wrote:
"Ziggy®" wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders & abettors. It would be mind boggling! To a dummy, yes, it would be overwhelming. |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
"L G" wrote in message ... YukonBound wrote: "Ziggy®" wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders & abettors. It would be mind boggling! To a dummy, yes, it would be overwhelming. Thanks for reinforcing my point................ |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On Dec 13, 4:40*pm, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:22:02 -0500, HarryK wrote: On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, *wrote: On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, * wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: "Ziggy * wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& * abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point. Here's a suggestion, John. Spend the next week attempting to harass those you enable, and then report back here. I'm not ditzy enough to attempt addressing the spoofers. I don't know who they are, and I've made my position on the matter well known. BULL **** |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On Dec 13, 5:04*pm, Ziggy® wrote:
"HarryK" wrote in messagenews:bZOdnW8FQPGfFZvQnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@gigan ews.com... On 12/13/10 3:48 PM, HarryK wrote: On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. When people ridicule me, none of it is true, so there. *They lie and they know it. *You and a few others of the righties just enable them. JohnH, if you don't "get some religion" and stop this crap, I will put you in bozo bin and only comment on your posts indirectly. *Don't say you weren't warned. Ziggy deserves an apology. Don't you think, Harry ;-) -- Ziggy® ****, this MUST be Ingersoll. Just LOOK at the " machine-gun " posts...lol. |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On 12/14/10 12:36 AM, Hadenough wrote:
On Dec 13, 4:40 pm, John wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:22:02 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point. Here's a suggestion, John. Spend the next week attempting to harass those you enable, and then report back here. I'm not ditzy enough to attempt addressing the spoofers. I don't know who they are, and I've made my position on the matter well known. BULL **** Beware of this spoofer. Please don't enable him. |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
In article , payer33859
@mypacks.net says... On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point. John, your poor skills with the English language are showing again. Ziggy *is* a classic little right-wing snot flinger. His posts, those of his I've read, prove it. The posts of his camp followers are no different. I'm not *accusing* him of nitwitted nonwitticisms. His words speak for themselves. They *are* nitwitted nonwitticisms. Nice name calling and insulting. That should help with the group harmony! |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
In article , payer33859
@mypacks.net says... On 12/14/10 6:16 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In article60b82a51-2c70-4f72-a197-35a2235611db@ 30g2000yql.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 13, 5:04 pm, wrote: wrote in messagenews:bZOdnW8FQPGfFZvQnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@gigan ews.com... On 12/13/10 3:48 PM, HarryK wrote: On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. When people ridicule me, none of it is true, so there. They lie and they know it. You and a few others of the righties just enable them. JohnH, if you don't "get some religion" and stop this crap, I will put you in bozo bin and only comment on your posts indirectly. Don't say you weren't warned. Ziggy deserves an apology. Don't you think, Harry ;-) -- Ziggy® What do you care who or who not he plonks? |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
|
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On 12/14/2010 9:39 AM, Hairy Clown wrote:
In , says... YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! To a dummy, yes, it would be overwhelming. Nice insulting and name calling. Yet another ID here, "Crotchrot"? As you are one of the most consistent "insulters" here, it seems a tad incongruous that you are calling out others for allegedly behaving as you do. |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On 12/14/2010 7:59 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/14/10 12:36 AM, Hadenough wrote: On Dec 13, 4:40 pm, John wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:22:02 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point. Here's a suggestion, John. Spend the next week attempting to harass those you enable, and then report back here. I'm not ditzy enough to attempt addressing the spoofers. I don't know who they are, and I've made my position on the matter well known. BULL **** Beware of this spoofer. Please don't enable him. You should be ashamed of yourself for playing these childish ID spoofing games, Ziggy. |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
"Paul@BYC" wrote in message ...
On 12/14/2010 7:59 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/14/10 12:36 AM, Hadenough wrote: On Dec 13, 4:40 pm, John wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:22:02 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point. Here's a suggestion, John. Spend the next week attempting to harass those you enable, and then report back here. I'm not ditzy enough to attempt addressing the spoofers. I don't know who they are, and I've made my position on the matter well known. BULL **** Beware of this spoofer. Please don't enable him. You should be ashamed of yourself for playing these childish ID spoofing games, Ziggy. Let me see if I can drill this into your thick skull. Ziggy isn't the spoofer. -- Ziggy® |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:16:21 -0500, Ziggy® wrote:
"Paul@BYC" wrote in message ... On 12/14/2010 7:59 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/14/10 12:36 AM, Hadenough wrote: On Dec 13, 4:40 pm, John wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:22:02 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point. Here's a suggestion, John. Spend the next week attempting to harass those you enable, and then report back here. I'm not ditzy enough to attempt addressing the spoofers. I don't know who they are, and I've made my position on the matter well known. BULL **** Beware of this spoofer. Please don't enable him. You should be ashamed of yourself for playing these childish ID spoofing games, Ziggy. Let me see if I can drill this into your thick skull. Ziggy isn't the spoofer. Ziggy is a cartoon character. You are a clown. |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:02:08 -0500, "Paul@BYC"
wrote: On 12/14/2010 9:39 AM, Hairy Clown wrote: In , says... YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! To a dummy, yes, it would be overwhelming. Nice insulting and name calling. Yet another ID here, "Crotchrot"? As you are one of the most consistent "insulters" here, it seems a tad incongruous that you are calling out others for allegedly behaving as you do. The syntax of the Freak. |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On 12/14/10 11:53 AM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:16:21 -0500, wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/14/2010 7:59 AM, HarryK wrote: On 12/14/10 12:36 AM, Hadenough wrote: On Dec 13, 4:40 pm, John wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:22:02 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point. Here's a suggestion, John. Spend the next week attempting to harass those you enable, and then report back here. I'm not ditzy enough to attempt addressing the spoofers. I don't know who they are, and I've made my position on the matter well known. BULL **** Beware of this spoofer. Please don't enable him. You should be ashamed of yourself for playing these childish ID spoofing games, Ziggy. Let me see if I can drill this into your thick skull. Ziggy isn't the spoofer. Ziggy is a cartoon character. You are a clown. Ziggy's "altered egos" engage in ID spoofing. And why are you insulting clowns? |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
|
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
|
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:50:58 -0500, HarryK wrote:
On 12/13/10 4:47 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:39:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point. John, your poor skills with the English language are showing again. Ziggy *is* a classic little right-wing snot flinger. His posts, those of his I've read, prove it. The posts of his camp followers are no different. I'm not *accusing* him of nitwitted nonwitticisms. His words speak for themselves. They *are* nitwitted nonwitticisms. The rest of the post is not "unfounded accusations," as you claim, but speculation. There's a difference, and it isn't subtle. Once again, I suggest you spend the next week attempting to harass those you enable, and then report back here. The idea was to *stop* the id spoofing, the "taunts," and the rest of the moronic nonsense that plague this newsgroup. By enabling the trash and by engaging in harassment yourself, you are part of the problem. Oh. There's a big difference between your accusatory 'speculation' and 'unfounded accusations'. There is a difference between speculation and unfounded accusation. It isn't my fault you cannot discern the difference. Harry, I just said that. |
on the first 5 days of December he done said unto we
On 12/14/10 1:23 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:50:58 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 4:47 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:39:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote: On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Get a Mac. Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter. snip...... Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and their aiders& abettors. It would be mind boggling! Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah. Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something any spoofer might say? Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is. I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point. John, your poor skills with the English language are showing again. Ziggy *is* a classic little right-wing snot flinger. His posts, those of his I've read, prove it. The posts of his camp followers are no different. I'm not *accusing* him of nitwitted nonwitticisms. His words speak for themselves. They *are* nitwitted nonwitticisms. The rest of the post is not "unfounded accusations," as you claim, but speculation. There's a difference, and it isn't subtle. Once again, I suggest you spend the next week attempting to harass those you enable, and then report back here. The idea was to *stop* the id spoofing, the "taunts," and the rest of the moronic nonsense that plague this newsgroup. By enabling the trash and by engaging in harassment yourself, you are part of the problem. Oh. There's a big difference between your accusatory 'speculation' and 'unfounded accusations'. There is a difference between speculation and unfounded accusation. It isn't my fault you cannot discern the difference. Harry, I just said that. Nice try at pot stirring, John. Why not follow your own advice, which you offer so freely to others, and just let it go? Go pester your Ziggy, Crotchrot, ID spoofer, LG, Bar...you know, the obstreperous assholes on your side of the political fence. *They* might pay attention to your preaching. *I* think your biting at my heels stinks of hypocrisy. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:07 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com