Paul@BYC wrote:
On 12/6/2010 4:43 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:03:45 -0500,
wrote:

On 12/6/2010 9:39 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/6/10 6:14 AM, Paul@BYC wrote:
On 12/5/2010 11:13 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/4/10 8:28 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 17:14:15 -0500, wrote:

On 12/4/10 5:06 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 00:46:17 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

http://www.news-press.com/article/20...ion-from-cold-





Theyr'e on the move Greg. Yep -to the power plant.


I was at the DEP office Friday for my water quality QA and I
talked to
one of the biologists. She says when they do necropsy in the
winter
they are finding manatee with undigested grass still in their
throats.
The literally freeze while they are eating if they venture
away from
the power plant. If they stay there they starve.

Yeah we are really "saving them".

The crime is heating the water.

Gee, on that note, I suppose I should ask my wife to shut off the
"birdbath" water heater she runs outdoors all winter, so that
passing
birds have unfrozen water to drink.


I suppose it all depends on if you support the endangered
species act.
That says you should not intentionally be interrupting or altering
natural migration patterns with human activity.

Both my wife and I enjoy watching the little creatures, and I don't
believe any of the crap they say about not feeding the wildlife. The
animals don't care, why should you?


If you are going to ID spoof someone who can write, you probably
shouldn't write like a moron, moron. :)

Wow, what ****ed you off? You sure seem to enjoy picking Usenet
fights.


You mean, other than the fact that you are a liar, a fraud, and a
troublemaker here?

You and your buddies or alter egos "Harry Kari," (the former
CrotchRot),
Ziggy, et al, really haven't anything of interest on topic to discuss
here, and all you do is disrupt. I don't know what your problem is with
the real Harry, (and i don't care) but your behavior here is just plain
juvenile. There are many posters who are making an effort to improve
the
atmosphere here. You three (or two or one) are not among them. It is
obvious you boys would rather this newsgroup return to the way it was.

Hey 'Paul', as you are so new here you don't know of any of the
problems with
the real Harry, how could you possibly know 'the way it was'?s

You keep making these little boo-boos. :)


You are kidding, right? I read about two weeks of posts here before I
ever posted. It was obvious there were real problems here, and most of
them at that time were caused by a small pack of troublemakers. You
can't redo the past, but you can work to improve the present and the
future.

You seem very tolerant of anyone who causes your friend Harry trouble,
but very intolerant of those who object to the displays of juvenile
behavior those troublemakers exhibit.

Why is that?
Pure bull****.

HarryK wrote:
On 12/7/10 4:48 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:01:46 -0500,
wrote:

On 12/7/10 3:30 PM, John H wrote:

Why don't you apologize for some of your more vile activities and
see if that
has any effect?

I'm behaving reasonably well in here, and am not engaging in any vile
activities. My apologizing isn't going to stop the abhorrent
behavior of
the half dozen or so assholes on your side of the fence whose current
behavior is disruptive. You know it and I know it.

You're reaping the harvest of what you sowed. Your calling those whom
you've
treated the worst 'assholes', as though that's going to stop the
behavior.

Try an apology. Who knows, it may work.

I've done it several times here. I'm still alive.


John, the "worst assholes" have decided they'd rather continuously
trash this newsgroup than behave reasonably. My "apologizing" isn't
going to change their behavior.

Do you really think I need to apologize to flajim, loogy and scotty?


You are incapable of that due to your narcissism.

HarryK wrote:
On 12/7/10 5:16 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:52:10 -0500,
wrote:

On 12/7/10 4:48 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:01:46 -0500,
wrote:

On 12/7/10 3:30 PM, John H wrote:

Why don't you apologize for some of your more vile activities and
see if that
has any effect?

I'm behaving reasonably well in here, and am not engaging in any vile
activities. My apologizing isn't going to stop the abhorrent
behavior of
the half dozen or so assholes on your side of the fence whose current
behavior is disruptive. You know it and I know it.

You're reaping the harvest of what you sowed. Your calling those
whom you've
treated the worst 'assholes', as though that's going to stop the
behavior.

Try an apology. Who knows, it may work.

I've done it several times here. I'm still alive.


John, the "worst assholes" have decided they'd rather continuously
trash
this newsgroup than behave reasonably. My "apologizing" isn't going to
change their behavior.

Do you really think I need to apologize to flajim, loogy and scotty?


Absolutely. They were the brunt of some of your most vile crap. And
your worst
is what led Donnie, jps, slammer, et al, to jump on the bandwagon.


Well, I don't think such an apology will stop "Ziggy," the Harry
spoofer, or CrotchRot, whether they are one person or three, and
whether they are flajim, loogy and scotty.

Besides, I've seen nothing to indicate these boys will stop trashing
this newsgroup. Nothing at all. They never stopped and they never
will. Their impact isn't on me, but I know for sure it chases off
newbies. Who wants to post in the ****pot they've made of this place
recently?




How would you know if you have everyone killfiled?

Don't bother. The answer is obvious.

On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 18:44:40 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:29:32 -0500, HarryK wrote:

On 12/7/10 5:16 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:52:10 -0500, wrote:

On 12/7/10 4:48 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:01:46 -0500, wrote:

On 12/7/10 3:30 PM, John H wrote:

Why don't you apologize for some of your more vile activities and see if that
has any effect?

I'm behaving reasonably well in here, and am not engaging in any vile
activities. My apologizing isn't going to stop the abhorrent behavior of
the half dozen or so assholes on your side of the fence whose current
behavior is disruptive. You know it and I know it.

You're reaping the harvest of what you sowed. Your calling those whom you've
treated the worst 'assholes', as though that's going to stop the behavior.

Try an apology. Who knows, it may work.

I've done it several times here. I'm still alive.


John, the "worst assholes" have decided they'd rather continuously trash
this newsgroup than behave reasonably. My "apologizing" isn't going to
change their behavior.

Do you really think I need to apologize to flajim, loogy and scotty?


Absolutely. They were the brunt of some of your most vile crap. And your worst
is what led Donnie, jps, slammer, et al, to jump on the bandwagon.


Well, I don't think such an apology will stop "Ziggy," the Harry
spoofer, or CrotchRot, whether they are one person or three, and whether
they are flajim, loogy and scotty.

Besides, I've seen nothing to indicate these boys will stop trashing
this newsgroup. Nothing at all. They never stopped and they never will.
Their impact isn't on me, but I know for sure it chases off newbies. Who
wants to post in the ****pot they've made of this place recently?



The purpose of an apology should not be to 'get' something in return.

An apology is suppose to be a step to resolve conflicts. Do you really
imagine that this is going to have the desired effect? Let's say it
will. Why shouldn't they apologize for all the crap they've said to
anyone and everyone who disagrees with them?

I don't see you stomping on Larry or the spoofers for continuing their
bs games. Why aren't you after them to apologize?

http://blogs.nationalgeographic.com/...hot-water.html

On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 19:25:38 -0500, HarryK wrote:

On 12/7/10 6:44 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:29:32 -0500, wrote:

On 12/7/10 5:16 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:52:10 -0500, wrote:

On 12/7/10 4:48 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:01:46 -0500, wrote:

On 12/7/10 3:30 PM, John H wrote:

Why don't you apologize for some of your more vile activities and see if that
has any effect?

I'm behaving reasonably well in here, and am not engaging in any vile
activities. My apologizing isn't going to stop the abhorrent behavior of
the half dozen or so assholes on your side of the fence whose current
behavior is disruptive. You know it and I know it.

You're reaping the harvest of what you sowed. Your calling those whom you've
treated the worst 'assholes', as though that's going to stop the behavior.

Try an apology. Who knows, it may work.

I've done it several times here. I'm still alive.


John, the "worst assholes" have decided they'd rather continuously trash
this newsgroup than behave reasonably. My "apologizing" isn't going to
change their behavior.

Do you really think I need to apologize to flajim, loogy and scotty?


Absolutely. They were the brunt of some of your most vile crap. And your worst
is what led Donnie, jps, slammer, et al, to jump on the bandwagon.


Well, I don't think such an apology will stop "Ziggy," the Harry
spoofer, or CrotchRot, whether they are one person or three, and whether
they are flajim, loogy and scotty.

Besides, I've seen nothing to indicate these boys will stop trashing
this newsgroup. Nothing at all. They never stopped and they never will.
Their impact isn't on me, but I know for sure it chases off newbies. Who
wants to post in the ****pot they've made of this place recently?



The purpose of an apology should not be to 'get' something in return.


Well, John, apologizing to loogy or flajim isn't really possible since
they no longer post here. Too bad, eh?

So? They are certainly not the only people you've offended with the vile crap.

And, I don't know where flajim or loogy are. They may be monitoring the boatd
just as some other folks do. [N.B. Before you refer to something I said, read it
carefully and quote it!]

On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 19:29:00 -0500, HarryK wrote:

On 12/7/10 7:23 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On 12/7/2010 8:05 AM, BAR wrote:
In , says...

But, of course you can ignore all of this and blindly go on about your
business and believe that Harry is a wonderful guy but, we know the
truth.

Paul already said he doesn't care why so many people dislike me. Why
don't you just drop it?

Because I don't have to just drop it.

You have been an ass for far too long. You may think that your image has
been rehabilitated but, your behavior over these past many years has
been disgusting. I still remember someone telling me not to tangle with
you when I first visited this group. I knew then that you were a bully
and you haven't changed.



snerk Another intellectual who thinks he is playing with me.

You've been hooked by ZiggyCrotchrot.

Harry, the ID spoofer is your problem. You can be Richard Depew and
create a new cancel bot and cancel all of the messages from the spoofers
to protect your persona but, the rest of us don't really care whether it
is you or the ID spoofer.

Poor Bertie. Still boatless.

Poor Harry. Still friendless.



Well, Bertie, I have a lot of friends, many of whom go back to my high
school days. There's a handful of people in here with whom I am
friendly. And then there are the losers like you.

Why are you here, Bertie? After all, you have no interest in boating.

Bert has friends here also.

On 12/8/10 8:13 AM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 19:25:38 -0500, wrote:

On 12/7/10 6:44 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:29:32 -0500, wrote:

On 12/7/10 5:16 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:52:10 -0500, wrote:

On 12/7/10 4:48 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:01:46 -0500, wrote:

On 12/7/10 3:30 PM, John H wrote:

Why don't you apologize for some of your more vile activities and see if that
has any effect?

I'm behaving reasonably well in here, and am not engaging in any vile
activities. My apologizing isn't going to stop the abhorrent behavior of
the half dozen or so assholes on your side of the fence whose current
behavior is disruptive. You know it and I know it.

You're reaping the harvest of what you sowed. Your calling those whom you've
treated the worst 'assholes', as though that's going to stop the behavior.

Try an apology. Who knows, it may work.

I've done it several times here. I'm still alive.


John, the "worst assholes" have decided they'd rather continuously trash
this newsgroup than behave reasonably. My "apologizing" isn't going to
change their behavior.

Do you really think I need to apologize to flajim, loogy and scotty?


Absolutely. They were the brunt of some of your most vile crap. And your worst
is what led Donnie, jps, slammer, et al, to jump on the bandwagon.


Well, I don't think such an apology will stop "Ziggy," the Harry
spoofer, or CrotchRot, whether they are one person or three, and whether
they are flajim, loogy and scotty.

Besides, I've seen nothing to indicate these boys will stop trashing
this newsgroup. Nothing at all. They never stopped and they never will.
Their impact isn't on me, but I know for sure it chases off newbies. Who
wants to post in the ****pot they've made of this place recently?



The purpose of an apology should not be to 'get' something in return.


Well, John, apologizing to loogy or flajim isn't really possible since
they no longer post here. Too bad, eh?

So? They are certainly not the only people you've offended with the vile crap.

And, I don't know where flajim or loogy are. They may be monitoring the boatd
just as some other folks do. [N.B. Before you refer to something I said, read it
carefully and quote it!]

You've offended a lot of people here, Herring. I haven't seen your
heart-felt apology.

Incidentally, why are you regurgitating your views of the past? Do you
think it adds to group harmony?

On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:22:01 -0500, HarryK wrote:

On 12/8/10 8:13 AM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 19:25:38 -0500, wrote:

On 12/7/10 6:44 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:29:32 -0500, wrote:

On 12/7/10 5:16 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:52:10 -0500, wrote:

On 12/7/10 4:48 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:01:46 -0500, wrote:

On 12/7/10 3:30 PM, John H wrote:

Why don't you apologize for some of your more vile activities and see if that
has any effect?

I'm behaving reasonably well in here, and am not engaging in any vile
activities. My apologizing isn't going to stop the abhorrent behavior of
the half dozen or so assholes on your side of the fence whose current
behavior is disruptive. You know it and I know it.

You're reaping the harvest of what you sowed. Your calling those whom you've
treated the worst 'assholes', as though that's going to stop the behavior.

Try an apology. Who knows, it may work.

I've done it several times here. I'm still alive.


John, the "worst assholes" have decided they'd rather continuously trash
this newsgroup than behave reasonably. My "apologizing" isn't going to
change their behavior.

Do you really think I need to apologize to flajim, loogy and scotty?


Absolutely. They were the brunt of some of your most vile crap. And your worst
is what led Donnie, jps, slammer, et al, to jump on the bandwagon.


Well, I don't think such an apology will stop "Ziggy," the Harry
spoofer, or CrotchRot, whether they are one person or three, and whether
they are flajim, loogy and scotty.

Besides, I've seen nothing to indicate these boys will stop trashing
this newsgroup. Nothing at all. They never stopped and they never will.
Their impact isn't on me, but I know for sure it chases off newbies. Who
wants to post in the ****pot they've made of this place recently?



The purpose of an apology should not be to 'get' something in return.


Well, John, apologizing to loogy or flajim isn't really possible since
they no longer post here. Too bad, eh?

So? They are certainly not the only people you've offended with the vile crap.

And, I don't know where flajim or loogy are. They may be monitoring the boatd
just as some other folks do. [N.B. Before you refer to something I said, read it
carefully and quote it!]

You've offended a lot of people here, Herring. I haven't seen your
heart-felt apology.

Incidentally, why are you regurgitating your views of the past? Do you
think it adds to group harmony?

Then you must have had me filtered.

'Regurgitating my views of the past' makes no sense to me. We were talking about
an apology.

On 12/7/2010 1:55 PM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/7/10 1:24 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 08:11:58 -0500,
wrote:

On 12/6/2010 4:46 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:51:51 -0500, wrote:

On 12/6/10 10:41 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,
says...

On 12/6/2010 9:39 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/6/10 6:14 AM, Paul@BYC wrote:
On 12/5/2010 11:13 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/4/10 8:28 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 17:14:15 -0500,
wrote:

On 12/4/10 5:06 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 00:46:17 -0800 (PST),

wrote:

http://www.news-press.com/article/20...ion-from-cold-





Theyr'e on the move Greg. Yep -to the power plant.


I was at the DEP office Friday for my water quality QA and I
talked to
one of the biologists. She says when they do necropsy in
the winter
they are finding manatee with undigested grass still in their
throats.
The literally freeze while they are eating if they venture
away from
the power plant. If they stay there they starve.

Yeah we are really "saving them".

The crime is heating the water.

Gee, on that note, I suppose I should ask my wife to shut
off the
"birdbath" water heater she runs outdoors all winter, so
that passing
birds have unfrozen water to drink.


I suppose it all depends on if you support the endangered
species act.
That says you should not intentionally be interrupting or
altering
natural migration patterns with human activity.

Both my wife and I enjoy watching the little creatures, and I
don't
believe any of the crap they say about not feeding the
wildlife. The
animals don't care, why should you?


If you are going to ID spoof someone who can write, you probably
shouldn't write like a moron, moron. :)

Wow, what ****ed you off? You sure seem to enjoy picking Usenet
fights.


Why don't you ask Harry why he and Don keep up the name calling and
insulting if they want the newsgroup to stay sane?

Paul returns every few days to call someone names. Don, JPS, and Bob
don't seem to want to come on board either but we all know why
they are
here. Harry is doing great as far as I can tell and for the most
part,
most of us have the rest of them filtered so leave it be. At least
they
are not machine gun posters so they are easier to filter out...
Leave it
be, it's fine and if we can hang on, spring should bring us a
bunch of
new boaters and hopefully a new group of posters...



From what I have seen, Paul restricts his negative comments to the ID
spoofer and his buddies. Maybe he cannot filter out the ID spoofer? I
dunno. I have, and I also have his buddies Ziggy and Harry Kari
filtered, along with Krueger.

Me, I've been busy drilling holes in firewood so I can shove sticks of
dy-no-mite in them. (No, I'm not really doing that...)

I wish all of you would concentrate on the fundraiser for my holiday
gift...a new diesel tractor with a strong enough front PTO to spin
a two
stage snow blower.


Actually, Paul seems to restrict his negative comments to those who,
in the
past, were not very supportive of you. How he knows this is beyond
me, as he has
indicated he is new here.

Have you noticed the same thing?

Actually, I throw most of my darts at those adults (well, supposed
adults) who behave like children.

... and live on the conservative side of the street.



Paul seems to think most of those who behave here like children are
"conservatives." although he doesn't identify them as such. I agree. The
number of childish conservative attack dogs here is larger than the
total number of moderates and liberals. Let's see, there's flajim and
his iterations, ziggy and his iterations, crotchrot and his iterations,
the harry spoofers, canuck, BAR, LG Krueger...that's what, seven? And I
haven't even started the count.

You taught math...count 'em up, count up the fools whose almost every
post is an attack...and every ID spoof is an attack.

Damit, don't you people get it? I'M UNDER ATTACK!