"YukonBound" wrote in message ...


"Harry®" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 00:55:11 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:03:56 -0700, wrote:

I
don't see any dispute in the article header and there are lots of
references. Feel free to discount all that.

Allow me to suggest that his might be a topic better discussed in an
EMAIL exchange than in a boating group.

Allow me to suggest that you're not the group monitor. Greg and I were
having a conversation. If you don't like it, stay out of it.

Oh, and get off my back. I haven't done anything approaching what
others have done.


We are all the group monitor, dearie. If you want to keep your pillow talk
with greg private, this aint the place.


Just can't stop the spoofing , eh?


That one slipped out. I am in the process of changing over to my new identity.


--
Ziggy

On 11/1/10 3:34 PM, Ziggy® wrote:
wrote in message ...


wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 00:55:11 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:03:56 -0700, wrote:

I
don't see any dispute in the article header and there are lots of
references. Feel free to discount all that.

Allow me to suggest that his might be a topic better discussed in an
EMAIL exchange than in a boating group.

Allow me to suggest that you're not the group monitor. Greg and I were
having a conversation. If you don't like it, stay out of it.

Oh, and get off my back. I haven't done anything approaching what
others have done.


We are all the group monitor, dearie. If you want to keep your pillow talk
with greg private, this aint the place.


Just can't stop the spoofing , eh?


That one slipped out. I am in the process of changing over to my new identity.



If you are having an identity crisis, you can always go back to using
flajim.

On 11/1/10 3:54 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:18:54 -0400, wrote:

I sent you a link for another forum that may be more appropriate and
is a pretty good bunch of people.

Is it boating related? Because this one is heading back into the crapper.

Not a boat forum
You can come over if you want.
http://forums.delphiforums.com/Streetlight/?

The only rule is no flaming


Ahh. I'm on one of those already, called "The Fire List." No flaming
there, either.

On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 12:47:17 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 09:02:19 -0700, wrote:

I don't believe Greg and I have ever had a seriously nasty exchange. I
can't control spoofers and asses, however.

That's all true but history tells us that certain discussion topics
tend to get out of control, and attract the aforementioned
individuals. Let's remember that it is a boating group, and
presumably that is why you are here.

I'm not responsible for what other people do.

On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:45:43 -0400, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 09:02:19 -0700, wrote:

I don't believe Greg and I have ever had a seriously nasty exchange. I
can't control spoofers and asses, however.

That's all true but history tells us that certain discussion topics
tend to get out of control, and attract the aforementioned
individuals. Let's remember that it is a boating group, and
presumably that is why you are here.

The problem was, and still is at least up until yesterday... Anyone
beyond Greg that gets in the conversation is subject to being called:
moron
idiot
little ****
small dick
paranoid
afraid
etc
etc
etc...

We don't mind having nice political conversations with "the group", but
you seem to want to have a private conversation with Greg and anyone
else that gets involved will be dismissed and called names...

And no Plume, I did plonk you days ago. I see your stuff second hand
reading others' posts.

Sure. Whatever. Like I said, you're a thin-skinned little sh*t.

I really like how you address me, but refuse to read the responses
(according to you of course).

On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:17:25 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 09:02:19 -0700, wrote:

On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 08:52:16 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 22:42:58 -0700, wrote:

Allow me to suggest that you're not the group monitor. Greg and I were
having a conversation. If you don't like it, stay out of it.

Oh, and get off my back. I haven't done anything approaching what
others have done.

You and Greg should take the conversation off line before it incites a
political food fight. That's what we are *all* trying to avoid. It
has happened way too many times in the past.

I don't believe Greg and I have ever had a seriously nasty exchange. I
can't control spoofers and asses, however.

I sent you a link for another forum that may be more appropriate and
is a pretty good bunch of people.

I'll check it out.

On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:16:41 -0700, wrote:

That's all true but history tells us that certain discussion topics
tend to get out of control, and attract the aforementioned
individuals. Let's remember that it is a boating group, and
presumably that is why you are here.

I'm not responsible for what other people do.

That's disingenuous, and indirectly you can be. Surely you have
heard of Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919)?

The law is on your side here but the effect is the same.

wrote in message ...
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:45:43 -0400, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 09:02:19 -0700, wrote:

I don't believe Greg and I have ever had a seriously nasty exchange. I
can't control spoofers and asses, however.

That's all true but history tells us that certain discussion topics
tend to get out of control, and attract the aforementioned
individuals. Let's remember that it is a boating group, and
presumably that is why you are here.

The problem was, and still is at least up until yesterday... Anyone
beyond Greg that gets in the conversation is subject to being called:
moron
idiot
little ****
small dick
paranoid
afraid
etc
etc
etc...

We don't mind having nice political conversations with "the group", but
you seem to want to have a private conversation with Greg and anyone
else that gets involved will be dismissed and called names...

And no Plume, I did plonk you days ago. I see your stuff second hand
reading others' posts.

Sure. Whatever. Like I said, you're a thin-skinned little sh*t.

I really like how you address me, but refuse to read the responses
(according to you of course).


You really should work on cleaning up that potty mouth of yours.

--
H

On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 18:21:17 -0400, Ziggy® wrote:

wrote in message ...
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:45:43 -0400, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 09:02:19 -0700, wrote:

I don't believe Greg and I have ever had a seriously nasty exchange. I
can't control spoofers and asses, however.

That's all true but history tells us that certain discussion topics
tend to get out of control, and attract the aforementioned
individuals. Let's remember that it is a boating group, and
presumably that is why you are here.

The problem was, and still is at least up until yesterday... Anyone
beyond Greg that gets in the conversation is subject to being called:
moron
idiot
little ****
small dick
paranoid
afraid
etc
etc
etc...

We don't mind having nice political conversations with "the group", but
you seem to want to have a private conversation with Greg and anyone
else that gets involved will be dismissed and called names...

And no Plume, I did plonk you days ago. I see your stuff second hand
reading others' posts.

Sure. Whatever. Like I said, you're a thin-skinned little sh*t.

I really like how you address me, but refuse to read the responses
(according to you of course).


You really should work on cleaning up that potty mouth of yours.

Feel free to plonk me.

On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 17:42:05 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:16:41 -0700, wrote:

That's all true but history tells us that certain discussion topics
tend to get out of control, and attract the aforementioned
individuals. Let's remember that it is a boating group, and
presumably that is why you are here.

I'm not responsible for what other people do.

That's disingenuous, and indirectly you can be. Surely you have
heard of Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919)?

The law is on your side here but the effect is the same.

Huh? That's about freedom of speech protection. What's that got to do
with me being responsible for what some jerk says on a newsgroup?