|
Youse guys must be rich
On Oct 27, 1:15*pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote: On Oct 27, 12:40*pm, "*e#c" wrote: On Oct 27, 9:54*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... On 10/27/2010 9:31 AM, I am Tosk wrote: You seem to be caught up in the rhetoric of those nattering nabobs of negativism, the tea party and fox news. Not me. Ahhh, that's it.. I am a conservative, so I must listen to Fox News and be a teabagger... So narrow minded, these regressives. Everything is about smearing, shaming, or threatening anybody who opposes the takeover. I thought you would appreciate a quote of Spiro T. Agnew, who was a colorful speaker. I don't know if you are a teabagger, as you put it. You certainly seem to share some of the beliefs and attributes of that subset of the GOP. Well, I'm out of here for most of the rest of today's daylight hours. Watch out for those Gordian knots. Uh, just for the record... I am a social liberal, a national conservative, and a dedicated live and let live libertarian... -- Rowdy Mouse Racing - Pain is temporary, Glory is forever! You forgot to add that you are a panty wearing coward who hides under his desk, posting death threats .- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Since you seem to be on board with the new guidelines and such, I am up for debate... As to the death threats, you clearly weeks before offered to kill me for 5 dollars, you have threatened my wife, threatened to shoot my daughter, and blow up my home along with my neighbors, yikes! Nobody would blame me for defending myself sooo.. I responded with something like, "if you come here to kill me, between me and the CT justice system, you would go home in a box.." *OK, now we are clear on that but I have another question...Really, you are a dude, right? What is this "panty goddes", panty goddess, stuff? Cause,. I gotta' tell you, that almost makes the thought being close enough to you to blow your frekin' balls off, kinda' weird, really. Are you trying to "make it weird"? Cause it is, ewwwww.... Hopefully it won't ruin the experience for me;) Ha, ha... sorry guys, but I just couldn't help myself;) *Sue me.... As to the death threats, you clearly weeks before offered to kill me for 5 dollars, But...YOUR threat to " give me the beating I deserve " was posted WAY before that. I see you conveniently forgot that. you clearly weeks before offered to kill me for 5 dollars, That was what I thought the job was worth ie : your not worth more than 5 bucks. you have threatened my wife, This never happened. My words were " If you cant control your husbands activities on the Internet, things could go very bad" That...is not a threat of any kind. threatened to shoot my daughter, Once again that is you stretching things the way you want them to look, to make it APPEAR a threat. My words again were : I hope there's no Hunters in the racing area, a stray bullet could kill someone". and blow up my home Once again, my words were " tick,tick,tick, mother****er " Explain the threat there? Are you now paranoid? This is what you reap, when you sow what you did. YOU are to blame for this response. What is this "panty goddes", panty goddess, stuff? You are stupid, so I will explain it. It referrs to you, hiding under your desk, wearing your Wifes panties, acting like the sniveling coward you are. If I ever see you, I wont need a gun to dispatch you, asswipe. Now, **** off under your desk where you belong. |
Youse guys must be rich
On 10/27/10 2:38 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:40:33 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Karen Grear, MD, PhD, wrote: On 10/27/10 6:45 AM, Paul@BYC wrote: On 10/27/2010 6:24 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:00:05 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 5:50 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:01:53 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 3:38 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 10/26/2010 3:18 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:19:34 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 11:43 AM, jps wrote: On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:00:01 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/25/2010 12:28 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... I get a lunch break, but you guys get to post here all day. Rich? Retired? Not me. I work from home, my wife is my boss, and after 20 years, we still get along, couldn't be better. Admittedly much of our business is now automated, but we spent many a year and hour getting here;) I teach at a university in the middle of the state. What do you teach? Upper level undergrad and some grad courses in the traditional liberal arts. Uh oh, one of the brainwashers! As you know, ignorance is being worn as a badge of honor by a good many Americans, including certain beverage-based political organizations. Glad to hear there's still some who are committed to edumacating our yungins. Through no fault of mine, we have a very high percentage of our students going on to receive doctorates in the arts and sciences. Smart is encouraged; stupid is not. :) And still a political troll post, no matter how you look at it... It is trolling to mention teaching and academic achievement? Look out, you've already raised some hairs. Just mentioning higher ed makes folks nervous around here... Kool-aid is served year 'round hereabouts. There really is a strong undercurrent of anti-intellectualism in this country, more so than at any other time I can remember. It's too bad because a dumbed down America will go down the tubes. You mean "down the tubes" faster. The Chinese are turning out engineers at 10 times the rate we are, many of them studying at our universities. The emergence of this beverage-based group really puts a point on it. Their candidates don't require a basic knowledge of the constitution, pivotal supreme court rulings or basic tenets of law. Instead, they just supply a few common sense-isms, rail on the media, taxes, them smart folks who got us in all this trouble, and mention the day they accepted Jesus into their lives as their personal lord and savior. That's it! You're electable and ready to govern! Yahooo! Please don't feel obligated to respond. I'm already tainted by the "liberal" stamp and you can remain above the fray. You should try to keep it that way as long as possible since you'll have chosen sides otherwise. I hope your students help our country rediscover the pride of a liberal arts education, the ability to leverage well-developed critical thinking skills, and be of a country that accepts the responsibility of the social compact between citizens, our obligation to the state and our country. Screw the greedy, the globalists and anybody who shops Walmart. It's ok JPS, our new poster already tainted himself, progressives can't help it, they just can't play fair here or anywhere else... I don't know you at all, but you seem extraordinarily volatile and subject to wide mood swings. One minute you seem to agree this would be a better place without all the personal name calling and the next minute you're engaging in it. Sure, I'm progressive. I believe in progress, in moving forward, in extending rights, in scientific development, in opening doors, in making sure the "play" is fair. I don't believe in scapegoating, in blaming one ethnic group or another for our society's failures, or in trying to get ahead by scaring large blocks of nervous people. Paul, I don't know where you are from, but in my neck of the woods if one wants to minimize arguments and name calling, it makes sense to avoid religious and political topics. Now if you enjoy heated debates, you are right on target. Debating with the likes of you is like hitting a heavy bag. Thud, thud, thud. No response. Just dense mass of filling with a coarse cover. Again, is calling someone a "dense mass of filling with a course cover" in the best interest of a kinder and gentler rec.boats? -- Dr. Dr. Dr. For a good time. |
Youse guys must be rich
On 10/27/10 2:35 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:41:23 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Karen Grear, MD, PhD, wrote: On 10/27/10 7:13 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 06:45:47 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: Sure, I'm progressive. I believe in progress, in moving forward, in extending rights, in scientific development, in opening doors, in making sure the "play" is fair. I don't believe in scapegoating, in blaming one ethnic group or another for our society's failures, or in trying to get ahead by scaring large blocks of nervous people. Now you've done it - sit back and watch the fur fly. Are you a sociology professor studying internet behavior? That would make more sense then he is actually trying to get rec.boats back on topic. It's pretty obvious you're not a subscriber to higher ed. Actually I am. -- Dr. Dr. Dr. For a good time. |
Youse guys must be rich
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:10:52 -0400, "Harry®" wrote:
"John H" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:16:01 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/27/2010 7:09 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... Sure, I'm progressive. I believe in progress, in moving forward, in extending rights, in scientific development, in opening doors, in making sure the "play" is fair. I don't believe in scapegoating, in blaming one ethnic group or another for our society's failures, or in trying to get ahead by scaring large blocks of nervous people. /snip You are suggesting that "the other side" does not want "scientific development" (which is code for you want no compromise on stem cell research whatsoever) and you got the LaRaza line down for the rest of the paragraph, suggesting that the other side is not for "fair play" which of course is code for "no id's required, free lunch time", and the whole "scaring large blocks of people" is directed at republicans, even though the whole "we are gonna' have 8% unemployment if we don't pay off the unions right now", and "the big bad republicans are sneaking outside money (like the millions the dems got from Soros and the Chinese Military in the last few elections) in to "steal" the election when the dems still have the same money coming in, plus millions from undocumented donations through the Labor Unions.... I've made no such suggestion. I've merely stated that I am a progressive and have certain beliefs and values based upon my position as a progressive. As a student of history, I am an admirer of thinkers on both sides of our two party political spectrum, including Dwight Eisenhower, Nelson Rockefeller and even Richard Nixon, two of whom were both conservative and progressive. You seem to be caught up in the rhetoric of those nattering nabobs of negativism, the tea party and fox news. Not me. Such a shame. For a day or so, I'd thought you were real. I must be getting old. -- Hope you're having a great day! John H Paul aka Jim aka Secular Humanist aka Secular Humorist aka Hkar etc. When things get to dull around here for him, he has wifey sew him up a new sock puppet. And this is the guy who is encouraging us to play nice. We've been doing our part,eh? Yeah, we've been 'trying'. Now, defining 'trying' may be tough, but what the hey. It's worth a shot. There are a few folks around who can't let go, and may have a problem. But, they are ignoreable. I noticed that Paul thought the use of Karen's name was quite the egregious offense, but said nothing when slammer makes comments like, "...Do you stick the gun barrel in Terris mouth when you **** her? Does it make you even more turgid, you little ****ing coward?" Spoofing is not the best behavior, in my opinion, but it's not nearly as sick as slammer's crap. -- Hope you're having a great day! John H |
Youse guys must be rich
|
Youse guys must be rich
On 10/27/2010 9:53 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , says... On 10/27/2010 9:23 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 10/27/2010 8:18 AM, John H wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:51:18 -0400, wrote: On 10/27/2010 7:13 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 06:45:47 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: Sure, I'm progressive. I believe in progress, in moving forward, in extending rights, in scientific development, in opening doors, in making sure the "play" is fair. I don't believe in scapegoating, in blaming one ethnic group or another for our society's failures, or in trying to get ahead by scaring large blocks of nervous people. Now you've done it - sit back and watch the fur fly. Are you a sociology professor studying internet behavior? That's pretty funny! If I were, some posters here would make for an interesting study group, I'd bet. My underpinnings and teachings are more classical, and less trade-schoolish, not that there is anything wrong with learning a trade. In my classes, you might learn what some great thinkers thought, why they thought that, how those thoughts evolved, how they influence us today. You'd also be required to write many long papers. Must the papers be of a certain 'bent' to recieve a good grade? Of course not. What we like to see is evidence the writer properly prepared himself by reading and assimilating pertinent works, and spent significant time thinking and writing so as to present a logical, coherent paper. In class discussions, any ideas are welcome, but the presenter has to be able to defend them. We try to teach our students to think logically and to develop and use their wits. Yes, "must be able to defend them". Against who? A professor with a liberal bent that might not challenge one side as vigorously as the other... Especially if that professor doesn't feel one side needs defending at all... Watched three kids come through the system, and my mom was a school administrator for almost 50 years, I know how it works... You appear unfamiliar with the process of "defending" one's papers, thoughts, presentations as it is done at the college/university level. I say that because you are injecting partisan politics into a process that has nothing to do with partisan politics. The exercise is intellectual, not political. No offense, but you seem eager to point fingers and make accusations, even on subjects about which you know little or nothing. The challenges to the presenters come not from me, but from fellow students chosen at random and given a copy of the paper a few days before the class discussion. The object of the exercise is to develop logical thinking processes, not to insult the presenters or the challengers. My role is that of sometime moderator, to keep the discussions on track and within the time limitations. I trust you have the best intentions... I just know how tough it is for my kid to be in a Social Studies class with a openly regressive teacher who's car sports a bumper sticker saying "impeach Bush, torture Cheney". She is a bright kid and knows how to play the game, she has the highest grades in the class and it's not even her they are grading;) You present an interesting paradox. On the one hand, you lament what you perceive as a decline in freedom of speech and on the other hand, you lament your kid's teacher expressing his or her freedom of speech on a bumper sticker. |
Youse guys must be rich
On 10/27/2010 10:30 AM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:16:01 -0400, wrote: On 10/27/2010 7:09 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... Sure, I'm progressive. I believe in progress, in moving forward, in extending rights, in scientific development, in opening doors, in making sure the "play" is fair. I don't believe in scapegoating, in blaming one ethnic group or another for our society's failures, or in trying to get ahead by scaring large blocks of nervous people. /snip You are suggesting that "the other side" does not want "scientific development" (which is code for you want no compromise on stem cell research whatsoever) and you got the LaRaza line down for the rest of the paragraph, suggesting that the other side is not for "fair play" which of course is code for "no id's required, free lunch time", and the whole "scaring large blocks of people" is directed at republicans, even though the whole "we are gonna' have 8% unemployment if we don't pay off the unions right now", and "the big bad republicans are sneaking outside money (like the millions the dems got from Soros and the Chinese Military in the last few elections) in to "steal" the election when the dems still have the same money coming in, plus millions from undocumented donations through the Labor Unions.... I've made no such suggestion. I've merely stated that I am a progressive and have certain beliefs and values based upon my position as a progressive. As a student of history, I am an admirer of thinkers on both sides of our two party political spectrum, including Dwight Eisenhower, Nelson Rockefeller and even Richard Nixon, two of whom were both conservative and progressive. You seem to be caught up in the rhetoric of those nattering nabobs of negativism, the tea party and fox news. Not me. Such a shame. For a day or so, I'd thought you were real. I must be getting old. Say what? |
Youse guys must be rich
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:12:50 -0400, John H
wrote: Spoofing is not the best behavior, in my opinion, but it's not nearly as sick as slammer's crap. John, why do you re-quote it? I'd never see most of that junk if people didn't reply to it or re-post it in some way. After a while he'd get tired of talking to himself. |
Youse guys must be rich
On 10/27/2010 10:32 AM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:32:49 -0400, wrote: On 10/27/2010 8:18 AM, John H wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:51:18 -0400, wrote: On 10/27/2010 7:13 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 06:45:47 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: Sure, I'm progressive. I believe in progress, in moving forward, in extending rights, in scientific development, in opening doors, in making sure the "play" is fair. I don't believe in scapegoating, in blaming one ethnic group or another for our society's failures, or in trying to get ahead by scaring large blocks of nervous people. Now you've done it - sit back and watch the fur fly. Are you a sociology professor studying internet behavior? That's pretty funny! If I were, some posters here would make for an interesting study group, I'd bet. My underpinnings and teachings are more classical, and less trade-schoolish, not that there is anything wrong with learning a trade. In my classes, you might learn what some great thinkers thought, why they thought that, how those thoughts evolved, how they influence us today. You'd also be required to write many long papers. Must the papers be of a certain 'bent' to recieve a good grade? Of course not. What we like to see is evidence the writer properly prepared himself by reading and assimilating pertinent works, and spent significant time thinking and writing so as to present a logical, coherent paper. In class discussions, any ideas are welcome, but the presenter has to be able to defend them. We try to teach our students to think logically and to develop and use their wits. Hee, hee. That's cute. Goodbye. Please outline your recent experience teaching upper level liberal arts discussion oriented classes at a major private college or university. |
Youse guys must be rich
|
Youse guys must be rich
On 10/27/10 4:43 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , says... On 10/27/2010 9:53 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 10/27/2010 9:23 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 10/27/2010 8:18 AM, John H wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:51:18 -0400, wrote: On 10/27/2010 7:13 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 06:45:47 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: Sure, I'm progressive. I believe in progress, in moving forward, in extending rights, in scientific development, in opening doors, in making sure the "play" is fair. I don't believe in scapegoating, in blaming one ethnic group or another for our society's failures, or in trying to get ahead by scaring large blocks of nervous people. Now you've done it - sit back and watch the fur fly. Are you a sociology professor studying internet behavior? That's pretty funny! If I were, some posters here would make for an interesting study group, I'd bet. My underpinnings and teachings are more classical, and less trade-schoolish, not that there is anything wrong with learning a trade. In my classes, you might learn what some great thinkers thought, why they thought that, how those thoughts evolved, how they influence us today. You'd also be required to write many long papers. Must the papers be of a certain 'bent' to recieve a good grade? Of course not. What we like to see is evidence the writer properly prepared himself by reading and assimilating pertinent works, and spent significant time thinking and writing so as to present a logical, coherent paper. In class discussions, any ideas are welcome, but the presenter has to be able to defend them. We try to teach our students to think logically and to develop and use their wits. Yes, "must be able to defend them". Against who? A professor with a liberal bent that might not challenge one side as vigorously as the other... Especially if that professor doesn't feel one side needs defending at all... Watched three kids come through the system, and my mom was a school administrator for almost 50 years, I know how it works... You appear unfamiliar with the process of "defending" one's papers, thoughts, presentations as it is done at the college/university level. I say that because you are injecting partisan politics into a process that has nothing to do with partisan politics. The exercise is intellectual, not political. No offense, but you seem eager to point fingers and make accusations, even on subjects about which you know little or nothing. The challenges to the presenters come not from me, but from fellow students chosen at random and given a copy of the paper a few days before the class discussion. The object of the exercise is to develop logical thinking processes, not to insult the presenters or the challengers. My role is that of sometime moderator, to keep the discussions on track and within the time limitations. I trust you have the best intentions... I just know how tough it is for my kid to be in a Social Studies class with a openly regressive teacher who's car sports a bumper sticker saying "impeach Bush, torture Cheney". She is a bright kid and knows how to play the game, she has the highest grades in the class and it's not even her they are grading;) You present an interesting paradox. On the one hand, you lament what you perceive as a decline in freedom of speech and on the other hand, you lament your kid's teacher expressing his or her freedom of speech on a bumper sticker. Nope, the problem comes when the teacher brings that radical/militant attitude to the classroom, but you know that is what I meant, didn't you? So, you want to discuss politics here, eh? :) |
Youse guys must be rich
On 10/27/2010 4:43 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , says... On 10/27/2010 9:53 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 10/27/2010 9:23 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 10/27/2010 8:18 AM, John H wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:51:18 -0400, wrote: On 10/27/2010 7:13 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 06:45:47 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: Sure, I'm progressive. I believe in progress, in moving forward, in extending rights, in scientific development, in opening doors, in making sure the "play" is fair. I don't believe in scapegoating, in blaming one ethnic group or another for our society's failures, or in trying to get ahead by scaring large blocks of nervous people. Now you've done it - sit back and watch the fur fly. Are you a sociology professor studying internet behavior? That's pretty funny! If I were, some posters here would make for an interesting study group, I'd bet. My underpinnings and teachings are more classical, and less trade-schoolish, not that there is anything wrong with learning a trade. In my classes, you might learn what some great thinkers thought, why they thought that, how those thoughts evolved, how they influence us today. You'd also be required to write many long papers. Must the papers be of a certain 'bent' to recieve a good grade? Of course not. What we like to see is evidence the writer properly prepared himself by reading and assimilating pertinent works, and spent significant time thinking and writing so as to present a logical, coherent paper. In class discussions, any ideas are welcome, but the presenter has to be able to defend them. We try to teach our students to think logically and to develop and use their wits. Yes, "must be able to defend them". Against who? A professor with a liberal bent that might not challenge one side as vigorously as the other... Especially if that professor doesn't feel one side needs defending at all... Watched three kids come through the system, and my mom was a school administrator for almost 50 years, I know how it works... You appear unfamiliar with the process of "defending" one's papers, thoughts, presentations as it is done at the college/university level. I say that because you are injecting partisan politics into a process that has nothing to do with partisan politics. The exercise is intellectual, not political. No offense, but you seem eager to point fingers and make accusations, even on subjects about which you know little or nothing. The challenges to the presenters come not from me, but from fellow students chosen at random and given a copy of the paper a few days before the class discussion. The object of the exercise is to develop logical thinking processes, not to insult the presenters or the challengers. My role is that of sometime moderator, to keep the discussions on track and within the time limitations. I trust you have the best intentions... I just know how tough it is for my kid to be in a Social Studies class with a openly regressive teacher who's car sports a bumper sticker saying "impeach Bush, torture Cheney". She is a bright kid and knows how to play the game, she has the highest grades in the class and it's not even her they are grading;) You present an interesting paradox. On the one hand, you lament what you perceive as a decline in freedom of speech and on the other hand, you lament your kid's teacher expressing his or her freedom of speech on a bumper sticker. Nope, the problem comes when the teacher brings that radical/militant attitude to the classroom, but you know that is what I meant, didn't you? To be brutally frank, no. You didn't say that, nor did you imply it. I don't know what "openly regressive" means, either. I don't understand your comment about "not even her they are grading." What does that mean? Perhaps we might have better understanding if you just came out and said what you mean, instead of obfuscating. I read through some of your long post on your kid's motorcycling adventures before I gave up because I didn't understand much of the lingo you were using. I'm a big fan of standard English. It is too late to impeach Bush. :) |
Youse guys must be rich
On 10/27/10 4:59 PM, Paul@BYC wrote:
On 10/27/2010 4:43 PM, I am Tosk wrote: You present an interesting paradox. On the one hand, you lament what you perceive as a decline in freedom of speech and on the other hand, you lament your kid's teacher expressing his or her freedom of speech on a bumper sticker. Nope, the problem comes when the teacher brings that radical/militant attitude to the classroom, but you know that is what I meant, didn't you? To be brutally frank, no. You didn't say that, nor did you imply it. I don't know what "openly regressive" means, either. I don't understand your comment about "not even her they are grading." What does that mean? Perhaps we might have better understanding if you just came out and said what you mean, instead of obfuscating. I read through some of your long post on your kid's motorcycling adventures before I gave up because I didn't understand much of the lingo you were using. I'm a big fan of standard English. It is too late to impeach Bush. :) Standard English? In wrecked boats? Dream on. |
Youse guys must be rich
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:41:06 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:12:50 -0400, John H wrote: Spoofing is not the best behavior, in my opinion, but it's not nearly as sick as slammer's crap. John, why do you re-quote it? I'd never see most of that junk if people didn't reply to it or re-post it in some way. After a while he'd get tired of talking to himself. I quoted only enough to make my point. I saw the whole message only because someone else had quoted the whole message. I've got the individual filtered. Now, I don't recall your commenting on the original entire quote. But, I could have missed it. Senility is heck. -- Hope you're having a great day! John H |
Youse guys must be rich
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:00:10 -0400, John H
wrote: Senility is heck. What? :-) |
Youse guys must be rich
On Oct 27, 6:00*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:41:06 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:12:50 -0400, John H wrote: Spoofing is not the best behavior, in my opinion, but it's not nearly as sick as slammer's crap. John, why do you re-quote it? *I'd never see most of that junk if people didn't reply to it or re-post it in some way. *After a while he'd get tired of talking to himself. I quoted only enough to make my point. I saw the whole message only because someone else had quoted the whole message. I've got the individual filtered. Now, I don't recall your commenting on the original entire quote. But, I could have missed it. Senility is heck. -- Hope you're having a great day! John H Spoofing is not the best behavior, in my opinion, but it's not nearly as sick as slammer's crap. You don't have to read one thing I post, " Pope " John.... Ingersoll gets what he deserves, nothing less. Now, go cash yet another cheque from the Government, you teat-sucking asshole racist. |
Youse guys must be rich
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:42:07 -0400, "Paul@BYC"
wrote: On 10/27/2010 8:35 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Oct 27, 7:41 am, wrote: If "critical thinking" (aka indoctrination) is what happened to my oldest, you can have it. A product of American U, just finishing up her masters, she still thinks George Bush pushed a button in the oval office, sent missiles to take out the twin towers, the pentagon, and the plane over PA, "there were no planes, the footage was faked", "the witnesses were staged"... Yeah, critical thinking... Pffffttttt... Are you blaming American University for this?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, actually I think it was more the pseudo - intellectuals she got in with earlier at U-Hart... I doubt many intellectuals, even pseudo-intellectuals, believe that "George Bush pushed a button in the oval office, sent missiles to take out the twin towers, the pentagon, and the plane over PA, "there were no planes, the footage was faked", "the witnesses were staged"..." If I were you, I would look elsewhere for the origins of those thoughts in your child's head. University is meant to teach rigor. Conspiracy theories generally lack much rigor. That said, I wouldn't doubt that George knew something was afoot, to happen and planned to use it to invade Iraq, whatever it was. The neocon crew were hoping for an incident that would allow them to launch a US military force, the specific goal being change in the mideast. Certain of them also liked the idea of controlling all that oil. That said, to string everyone's worst nightmare together to form a theory probably isn't a good idea but certain aspects of each of them are at least considerable. |
Youse guys must be rich
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:29:02 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c"
wrote: On Oct 27, 6:19*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:39:32 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 6:54 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 10/26/2010 3:38 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 10/26/2010 3:18 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:19:34 -0400, "Paul@BYC" * *wrote: On 10/26/2010 11:43 AM, jps wrote: On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:00:01 -0400, "Paul@BYC" * * wrote: On 10/25/2010 12:28 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... I get a lunch break, but you guys get to post here all day. Rich? Retired? Not me. I work from home, my wife is my boss, and after 20 years, *we still get along, couldn't be better. Admittedly much of our business is now automated, but we spent many a year and hour getting here;) I teach at a university in the middle of the state. What do you teach? Upper level undergrad and some grad courses in the traditional liberal arts. Uh oh, one of the brainwashers! As you know, ignorance is being worn as a badge of honor by a good many Americans, including certain beverage-based political organizations. Glad to hear there's still some who are committed to edumacating our yungins. Through no fault of mine, we have a very high percentage of our students going on to receive doctorates in the arts and sciences. Smart is encouraged; stupid is not. :) And still a political troll post, *no matter how you look at it... It is trolling to mention teaching and academic achievement? No, but the trashing of the tea party is... The tea party? Who mentioned the tea party, besides you? When I mentioned the beveraged-based party, I was referring to Cokeheads and Pepsidroids. Yeah sure... I guess a liar never changes his spots... I see you've come to realize that about yourself, huh Panty Goddess. He at least takes himself a little too seriously. He should probably consider weaning himself from Hannity and O'Reilly. |
Youse guys must be rich
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:08:12 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Phd, Md. STD"
wrote: On 10/27/10 2:38 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:40:33 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Karen Grear, MD, PhD, wrote: On 10/27/10 6:45 AM, Paul@BYC wrote: On 10/27/2010 6:24 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:00:05 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 5:50 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:01:53 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 3:38 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 10/26/2010 3:18 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:19:34 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 11:43 AM, jps wrote: On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:00:01 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/25/2010 12:28 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... I get a lunch break, but you guys get to post here all day. Rich? Retired? Not me. I work from home, my wife is my boss, and after 20 years, we still get along, couldn't be better. Admittedly much of our business is now automated, but we spent many a year and hour getting here;) I teach at a university in the middle of the state. What do you teach? Upper level undergrad and some grad courses in the traditional liberal arts. Uh oh, one of the brainwashers! As you know, ignorance is being worn as a badge of honor by a good many Americans, including certain beverage-based political organizations. Glad to hear there's still some who are committed to edumacating our yungins. Through no fault of mine, we have a very high percentage of our students going on to receive doctorates in the arts and sciences. Smart is encouraged; stupid is not. :) And still a political troll post, no matter how you look at it... It is trolling to mention teaching and academic achievement? Look out, you've already raised some hairs. Just mentioning higher ed makes folks nervous around here... Kool-aid is served year 'round hereabouts. There really is a strong undercurrent of anti-intellectualism in this country, more so than at any other time I can remember. It's too bad because a dumbed down America will go down the tubes. You mean "down the tubes" faster. The Chinese are turning out engineers at 10 times the rate we are, many of them studying at our universities. The emergence of this beverage-based group really puts a point on it. Their candidates don't require a basic knowledge of the constitution, pivotal supreme court rulings or basic tenets of law. Instead, they just supply a few common sense-isms, rail on the media, taxes, them smart folks who got us in all this trouble, and mention the day they accepted Jesus into their lives as their personal lord and savior. That's it! You're electable and ready to govern! Yahooo! Please don't feel obligated to respond. I'm already tainted by the "liberal" stamp and you can remain above the fray. You should try to keep it that way as long as possible since you'll have chosen sides otherwise. I hope your students help our country rediscover the pride of a liberal arts education, the ability to leverage well-developed critical thinking skills, and be of a country that accepts the responsibility of the social compact between citizens, our obligation to the state and our country. Screw the greedy, the globalists and anybody who shops Walmart. It's ok JPS, our new poster already tainted himself, progressives can't help it, they just can't play fair here or anywhere else... I don't know you at all, but you seem extraordinarily volatile and subject to wide mood swings. One minute you seem to agree this would be a better place without all the personal name calling and the next minute you're engaging in it. Sure, I'm progressive. I believe in progress, in moving forward, in extending rights, in scientific development, in opening doors, in making sure the "play" is fair. I don't believe in scapegoating, in blaming one ethnic group or another for our society's failures, or in trying to get ahead by scaring large blocks of nervous people. Paul, I don't know where you are from, but in my neck of the woods if one wants to minimize arguments and name calling, it makes sense to avoid religious and political topics. Now if you enjoy heated debates, you are right on target. Debating with the likes of you is like hitting a heavy bag. Thud, thud, thud. No response. Just dense mass of filling with a coarse cover. Again, is calling someone a "dense mass of filling with a course cover" in the best interest of a kinder and gentler rec.boats? WTF do you care? You're just a spoofin' fool that likes to buttsniff his percieved adversaries. |
Youse guys must be rich
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:08:34 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Phd, Md. STD"
wrote: On 10/27/10 2:35 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:41:23 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Karen Grear, MD, PhD, wrote: On 10/27/10 7:13 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 06:45:47 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: Sure, I'm progressive. I believe in progress, in moving forward, in extending rights, in scientific development, in opening doors, in making sure the "play" is fair. I don't believe in scapegoating, in blaming one ethnic group or another for our society's failures, or in trying to get ahead by scaring large blocks of nervous people. Now you've done it - sit back and watch the fur fly. Are you a sociology professor studying internet behavior? That would make more sense then he is actually trying to get rec.boats back on topic. It's pretty obvious you're not a subscriber to higher ed. Actually I am. Your grammar proves otherwise. |
Youse guys must be rich
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:41:50 -0400, "Paul@BYC"
wrote: On 10/27/2010 10:32 AM, John H wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:32:49 -0400, wrote: On 10/27/2010 8:18 AM, John H wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:51:18 -0400, wrote: On 10/27/2010 7:13 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 06:45:47 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: Sure, I'm progressive. I believe in progress, in moving forward, in extending rights, in scientific development, in opening doors, in making sure the "play" is fair. I don't believe in scapegoating, in blaming one ethnic group or another for our society's failures, or in trying to get ahead by scaring large blocks of nervous people. Now you've done it - sit back and watch the fur fly. Are you a sociology professor studying internet behavior? That's pretty funny! If I were, some posters here would make for an interesting study group, I'd bet. My underpinnings and teachings are more classical, and less trade-schoolish, not that there is anything wrong with learning a trade. In my classes, you might learn what some great thinkers thought, why they thought that, how those thoughts evolved, how they influence us today. You'd also be required to write many long papers. Must the papers be of a certain 'bent' to recieve a good grade? Of course not. What we like to see is evidence the writer properly prepared himself by reading and assimilating pertinent works, and spent significant time thinking and writing so as to present a logical, coherent paper. In class discussions, any ideas are welcome, but the presenter has to be able to defend them. We try to teach our students to think logically and to develop and use their wits. Hee, hee. That's cute. Goodbye. Please outline your recent experience teaching upper level liberal arts discussion oriented classes at a major private college or university. He was a substitute math teacher at inner city schools who has a thing for black folk and the education system. He hates the government but has lived off the government his entire life. Ex-military with a bad attitude. Sucks at the same teat of government he despises. Also hates the NY Times and WA Post. He's enlightened. |
Youse guys must be rich
On Oct 27, 7:32*pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:41:50 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/27/2010 10:32 AM, John H wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:32:49 -0400, *wrote: On 10/27/2010 8:18 AM, John H wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:51:18 -0400, * wrote: On 10/27/2010 7:13 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 06:45:47 -0400, "Paul@BYC" * *wrote: Sure, I'm progressive. I believe in progress, in moving forward, in extending rights, in scientific development, in opening doors, in making sure the "play" is fair. I don't believe in scapegoating, in blaming one ethnic group or another for our society's failures, or in trying to get ahead by scaring large blocks of nervous people. Now you've done it - sit back and watch the fur fly. Are you a sociology professor studying internet behavior? That's pretty funny! If I were, some posters here would make for an interesting study group, I'd bet. My underpinnings and teachings are more classical, and less trade-schoolish, not that there is anything wrong with learning a trade. In my classes, you might learn what some great thinkers thought, why they thought that, how those thoughts evolved, how they influence us today. You'd also be required to write many long papers. Must the papers be of a certain 'bent' to recieve a good grade? Of course not. What we like to see is evidence the writer properly prepared himself by reading and assimilating pertinent works, and spent significant time thinking and writing so as to present a logical, coherent paper. In class discussions, any ideas are welcome, but the presenter has to be able to defend them. We try to teach our students to think logically and to develop and use their wits. Hee, hee. That's cute. Goodbye. Please outline your recent experience teaching upper level liberal arts discussion oriented classes at a major private college or university. He was a substitute math teacher at inner city schools who has a thing for black folk and the education system. *He hates the government but has lived off the government his entire life. * Ex-military with a bad attitude. *Sucks at the same teat of government he despises. *Also hates the NY Times and WA Post. *He's enlightened.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Don't even want to try huh JPS? BTW, for our new readers, the above is a total fabrication/smear job, by our spoofer JPS.. I wonder if our new "Progressive" (sic) is gonna' get on "this" spoofer, on the other hand I also wonder if Paul will find outrage with the smear, or if he will just nod his head and agree;) snerk |
Youse guys must be rich
On 10/27/10 7:25 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:08:12 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Phd, Md. STD" wrote: On 10/27/10 2:38 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:40:33 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Karen Grear, MD, PhD, wrote: On 10/27/10 6:45 AM, Paul@BYC wrote: On 10/27/2010 6:24 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:00:05 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 5:50 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:01:53 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 3:38 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 10/26/2010 3:18 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:19:34 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 11:43 AM, jps wrote: On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:00:01 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/25/2010 12:28 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... I get a lunch break, but you guys get to post here all day. Rich? Retired? Not me. I work from home, my wife is my boss, and after 20 years, we still get along, couldn't be better. Admittedly much of our business is now automated, but we spent many a year and hour getting here;) I teach at a university in the middle of the state. What do you teach? Upper level undergrad and some grad courses in the traditional liberal arts. Uh oh, one of the brainwashers! As you know, ignorance is being worn as a badge of honor by a good many Americans, including certain beverage-based political organizations. Glad to hear there's still some who are committed to edumacating our yungins. Through no fault of mine, we have a very high percentage of our students going on to receive doctorates in the arts and sciences. Smart is encouraged; stupid is not. :) And still a political troll post, no matter how you look at it... It is trolling to mention teaching and academic achievement? Look out, you've already raised some hairs. Just mentioning higher ed makes folks nervous around here... Kool-aid is served year 'round hereabouts. There really is a strong undercurrent of anti-intellectualism in this country, more so than at any other time I can remember. It's too bad because a dumbed down America will go down the tubes. You mean "down the tubes" faster. The Chinese are turning out engineers at 10 times the rate we are, many of them studying at our universities. The emergence of this beverage-based group really puts a point on it. Their candidates don't require a basic knowledge of the constitution, pivotal supreme court rulings or basic tenets of law. Instead, they just supply a few common sense-isms, rail on the media, taxes, them smart folks who got us in all this trouble, and mention the day they accepted Jesus into their lives as their personal lord and savior. That's it! You're electable and ready to govern! Yahooo! Please don't feel obligated to respond. I'm already tainted by the "liberal" stamp and you can remain above the fray. You should try to keep it that way as long as possible since you'll have chosen sides otherwise. I hope your students help our country rediscover the pride of a liberal arts education, the ability to leverage well-developed critical thinking skills, and be of a country that accepts the responsibility of the social compact between citizens, our obligation to the state and our country. Screw the greedy, the globalists and anybody who shops Walmart. It's ok JPS, our new poster already tainted himself, progressives can't help it, they just can't play fair here or anywhere else... I don't know you at all, but you seem extraordinarily volatile and subject to wide mood swings. One minute you seem to agree this would be a better place without all the personal name calling and the next minute you're engaging in it. Sure, I'm progressive. I believe in progress, in moving forward, in extending rights, in scientific development, in opening doors, in making sure the "play" is fair. I don't believe in scapegoating, in blaming one ethnic group or another for our society's failures, or in trying to get ahead by scaring large blocks of nervous people. Paul, I don't know where you are from, but in my neck of the woods if one wants to minimize arguments and name calling, it makes sense to avoid religious and political topics. Now if you enjoy heated debates, you are right on target. Debating with the likes of you is like hitting a heavy bag. Thud, thud, thud. No response. Just dense mass of filling with a coarse cover. Again, is calling someone a "dense mass of filling with a course cover" in the best interest of a kinder and gentler rec.boats? WTF do you care? You're just a spoofin' fool that likes to buttsniff his percieved adversaries. You seem to be filled with anger and rage. Shouldn't you find another venue to release that pent up frustration? -- Dr. Dr. Dr. For a good time. |
Youse guys must be rich
On 10/27/10 7:26 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:08:34 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Phd, Md. STD" wrote: On 10/27/10 2:35 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:41:23 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Karen Grear, MD, PhD, wrote: On 10/27/10 7:13 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 06:45:47 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: Sure, I'm progressive. I believe in progress, in moving forward, in extending rights, in scientific development, in opening doors, in making sure the "play" is fair. I don't believe in scapegoating, in blaming one ethnic group or another for our society's failures, or in trying to get ahead by scaring large blocks of nervous people. Now you've done it - sit back and watch the fur fly. Are you a sociology professor studying internet behavior? That would make more sense then he is actually trying to get rec.boats back on topic. It's pretty obvious you're not a subscriber to higher ed. Actually I am. Your grammar proves otherwise. OK, and what does your post prove about yourself? -- Dr. Dr. Dr. For a good time. |
Youse guys must be rich
On 10/27/10 7:32 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:41:50 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/27/2010 10:32 AM, John H wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:32:49 -0400, wrote: On 10/27/2010 8:18 AM, John H wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:51:18 -0400, wrote: On 10/27/2010 7:13 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 06:45:47 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: Sure, I'm progressive. I believe in progress, in moving forward, in extending rights, in scientific development, in opening doors, in making sure the "play" is fair. I don't believe in scapegoating, in blaming one ethnic group or another for our society's failures, or in trying to get ahead by scaring large blocks of nervous people. Now you've done it - sit back and watch the fur fly. Are you a sociology professor studying internet behavior? That's pretty funny! If I were, some posters here would make for an interesting study group, I'd bet. My underpinnings and teachings are more classical, and less trade-schoolish, not that there is anything wrong with learning a trade. In my classes, you might learn what some great thinkers thought, why they thought that, how those thoughts evolved, how they influence us today. You'd also be required to write many long papers. Must the papers be of a certain 'bent' to recieve a good grade? Of course not. What we like to see is evidence the writer properly prepared himself by reading and assimilating pertinent works, and spent significant time thinking and writing so as to present a logical, coherent paper. In class discussions, any ideas are welcome, but the presenter has to be able to defend them. We try to teach our students to think logically and to develop and use their wits. Hee, hee. That's cute. Goodbye. Please outline your recent experience teaching upper level liberal arts discussion oriented classes at a major private college or university. He was a substitute math teacher at inner city schools who has a thing for black folk and the education system. He hates the government but has lived off the government his entire life. Ex-military with a bad attitude. Sucks at the same teat of government he despises. Also hates the NY Times and WA Post. He's enlightened. well it does look like you are spending all of your time with your nose where it doesn't belong. -- Dr. Dr. Dr. For a good time. |
Youse guys must be rich
On Oct 27, 7:44*pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote: On Oct 27, 7:32*pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:41:50 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/27/2010 10:32 AM, John H wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:32:49 -0400, *wrote: On 10/27/2010 8:18 AM, John H wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:51:18 -0400, * wrote: On 10/27/2010 7:13 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 06:45:47 -0400, "Paul@BYC" * *wrote: Sure, I'm progressive. I believe in progress, in moving forward, in extending rights, in scientific development, in opening doors, in making sure the "play" is fair. I don't believe in scapegoating, in blaming one ethnic group or another for our society's failures, or in trying to get ahead by scaring large blocks of nervous people. Now you've done it - sit back and watch the fur fly. Are you a sociology professor studying internet behavior? That's pretty funny! If I were, some posters here would make for an interesting study group, I'd bet. My underpinnings and teachings are more classical, and less trade-schoolish, not that there is anything wrong with learning a trade. In my classes, you might learn what some great thinkers thought, why they thought that, how those thoughts evolved, how they influence us today. You'd also be required to write many long papers. Must the papers be of a certain 'bent' to recieve a good grade? Of course not. What we like to see is evidence the writer properly prepared himself by reading and assimilating pertinent works, and spent significant time thinking and writing so as to present a logical, coherent paper. In class discussions, any ideas are welcome, but the presenter has to be able to defend them. We try to teach our students to think logically and to develop and use their wits. Hee, hee. That's cute. Goodbye. Please outline your recent experience teaching upper level liberal arts discussion oriented classes at a major private college or university. He was a substitute math teacher at inner city schools who has a thing for black folk and the education system. *He hates the government but has lived off the government his entire life. * Ex-military with a bad attitude. *Sucks at the same teat of government he despises. *Also hates the NY Times and WA Post. *He's enlightened.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Don't even want to try huh JPS? BTW, for our new readers, the above is a total fabrication/smear job, by our spoofer JPS.. I wonder if our new "Progressive" (sic) is gonna' get on "this" spoofer, on the other hand I also wonder if Paul will find outrage with the smear, or if he will just nod his head and agree;) snerk Everything stated about Herring was correct. Nice " try " on the deflection, Panty Goddess. There are NO " new readers " here, snotty, only " new " sock puppets. You're just stupid, and cant tell the difference. |
Youse guys must be rich
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:05:17 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Phd, Md. STD"
wrote: On 10/27/10 7:25 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:08:12 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Phd, Md. STD" wrote: On 10/27/10 2:38 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:40:33 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Karen Grear, MD, PhD, wrote: On 10/27/10 6:45 AM, Paul@BYC wrote: On 10/27/2010 6:24 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:00:05 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 5:50 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:01:53 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 3:38 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 10/26/2010 3:18 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:19:34 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 11:43 AM, jps wrote: On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:00:01 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/25/2010 12:28 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... I get a lunch break, but you guys get to post here all day. Rich? Retired? Not me. I work from home, my wife is my boss, and after 20 years, we still get along, couldn't be better. Admittedly much of our business is now automated, but we spent many a year and hour getting here;) I teach at a university in the middle of the state. What do you teach? Upper level undergrad and some grad courses in the traditional liberal arts. Uh oh, one of the brainwashers! As you know, ignorance is being worn as a badge of honor by a good many Americans, including certain beverage-based political organizations. Glad to hear there's still some who are committed to edumacating our yungins. Through no fault of mine, we have a very high percentage of our students going on to receive doctorates in the arts and sciences. Smart is encouraged; stupid is not. :) And still a political troll post, no matter how you look at it... It is trolling to mention teaching and academic achievement? Look out, you've already raised some hairs. Just mentioning higher ed makes folks nervous around here... Kool-aid is served year 'round hereabouts. There really is a strong undercurrent of anti-intellectualism in this country, more so than at any other time I can remember. It's too bad because a dumbed down America will go down the tubes. You mean "down the tubes" faster. The Chinese are turning out engineers at 10 times the rate we are, many of them studying at our universities. The emergence of this beverage-based group really puts a point on it. Their candidates don't require a basic knowledge of the constitution, pivotal supreme court rulings or basic tenets of law. Instead, they just supply a few common sense-isms, rail on the media, taxes, them smart folks who got us in all this trouble, and mention the day they accepted Jesus into their lives as their personal lord and savior. That's it! You're electable and ready to govern! Yahooo! Please don't feel obligated to respond. I'm already tainted by the "liberal" stamp and you can remain above the fray. You should try to keep it that way as long as possible since you'll have chosen sides otherwise. I hope your students help our country rediscover the pride of a liberal arts education, the ability to leverage well-developed critical thinking skills, and be of a country that accepts the responsibility of the social compact between citizens, our obligation to the state and our country. Screw the greedy, the globalists and anybody who shops Walmart. It's ok JPS, our new poster already tainted himself, progressives can't help it, they just can't play fair here or anywhere else... I don't know you at all, but you seem extraordinarily volatile and subject to wide mood swings. One minute you seem to agree this would be a better place without all the personal name calling and the next minute you're engaging in it. Sure, I'm progressive. I believe in progress, in moving forward, in extending rights, in scientific development, in opening doors, in making sure the "play" is fair. I don't believe in scapegoating, in blaming one ethnic group or another for our society's failures, or in trying to get ahead by scaring large blocks of nervous people. Paul, I don't know where you are from, but in my neck of the woods if one wants to minimize arguments and name calling, it makes sense to avoid religious and political topics. Now if you enjoy heated debates, you are right on target. Debating with the likes of you is like hitting a heavy bag. Thud, thud, thud. No response. Just dense mass of filling with a coarse cover. Again, is calling someone a "dense mass of filling with a course cover" in the best interest of a kinder and gentler rec.boats? WTF do you care? You're just a spoofin' fool that likes to buttsniff his percieved adversaries. You seem to be filled with anger and rage. Shouldn't you find another venue to release that pent up frustration? Filled with rage and anger? Your sensors are either completely out of whack or the whole system needs a reboot. My passion is reserved for things that matter. perceived, btw. |
Youse guys must be rich
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:40:33 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c"
wrote: On Oct 27, 9:54*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... On 10/27/2010 9:31 AM, I am Tosk wrote: You seem to be caught up in the rhetoric of those nattering nabobs of negativism, the tea party and fox news. Not me. Ahhh, that's it.. I am a conservative, so I must listen to Fox News and be a teabagger... So narrow minded, these regressives. Everything is about smearing, shaming, or threatening anybody who opposes the takeover. I thought you would appreciate a quote of Spiro T. Agnew, who was a colorful speaker. I don't know if you are a teabagger, as you put it. You certainly seem to share some of the beliefs and attributes of that subset of the GOP. Well, I'm out of here for most of the rest of today's daylight hours. Watch out for those Gordian knots. Uh, just for the record... I am a social liberal, a national conservative, and a dedicated live and let live libertarian... -- Rowdy Mouse Racing - Pain is temporary, Glory is forever! You forgot to add that you are a panty wearing coward who hides under his desk, posting death threats . What he is, is confused. |
Youse guys must be rich
On 10/28/2010 12:27 AM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:05:17 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Phd, Md. STD" wrote: On 10/27/10 7:25 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:08:12 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Phd, Md. STD" wrote: On 10/27/10 2:38 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:40:33 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Karen Grear, MD, PhD, wrote: On 10/27/10 6:45 AM, Paul@BYC wrote: On 10/27/2010 6:24 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:00:05 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 5:50 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:01:53 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 3:38 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 10/26/2010 3:18 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:19:34 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 11:43 AM, jps wrote: On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:00:01 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/25/2010 12:28 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... I get a lunch break, but you guys get to post here all day. Rich? Retired? Not me. I work from home, my wife is my boss, and after 20 years, we still get along, couldn't be better. Admittedly much of our business is now automated, but we spent many a year and hour getting here;) I teach at a university in the middle of the state. What do you teach? Upper level undergrad and some grad courses in the traditional liberal arts. Uh oh, one of the brainwashers! As you know, ignorance is being worn as a badge of honor by a good many Americans, including certain beverage-based political organizations. Glad to hear there's still some who are committed to edumacating our yungins. Through no fault of mine, we have a very high percentage of our students going on to receive doctorates in the arts and sciences. Smart is encouraged; stupid is not. :) And still a political troll post, no matter how you look at it... It is trolling to mention teaching and academic achievement? Look out, you've already raised some hairs. Just mentioning higher ed makes folks nervous around here... Kool-aid is served year 'round hereabouts. There really is a strong undercurrent of anti-intellectualism in this country, more so than at any other time I can remember. It's too bad because a dumbed down America will go down the tubes. You mean "down the tubes" faster. The Chinese are turning out engineers at 10 times the rate we are, many of them studying at our universities. The emergence of this beverage-based group really puts a point on it. Their candidates don't require a basic knowledge of the constitution, pivotal supreme court rulings or basic tenets of law. Instead, they just supply a few common sense-isms, rail on the media, taxes, them smart folks who got us in all this trouble, and mention the day they accepted Jesus into their lives as their personal lord and savior. That's it! You're electable and ready to govern! Yahooo! Please don't feel obligated to respond. I'm already tainted by the "liberal" stamp and you can remain above the fray. You should try to keep it that way as long as possible since you'll have chosen sides otherwise. I hope your students help our country rediscover the pride of a liberal arts education, the ability to leverage well-developed critical thinking skills, and be of a country that accepts the responsibility of the social compact between citizens, our obligation to the state and our country. Screw the greedy, the globalists and anybody who shops Walmart. It's ok JPS, our new poster already tainted himself, progressives can't help it, they just can't play fair here or anywhere else... I don't know you at all, but you seem extraordinarily volatile and subject to wide mood swings. One minute you seem to agree this would be a better place without all the personal name calling and the next minute you're engaging in it. Sure, I'm progressive. I believe in progress, in moving forward, in extending rights, in scientific development, in opening doors, in making sure the "play" is fair. I don't believe in scapegoating, in blaming one ethnic group or another for our society's failures, or in trying to get ahead by scaring large blocks of nervous people. Paul, I don't know where you are from, but in my neck of the woods if one wants to minimize arguments and name calling, it makes sense to avoid religious and political topics. Now if you enjoy heated debates, you are right on target. Debating with the likes of you is like hitting a heavy bag. Thud, thud, thud. No response. Just dense mass of filling with a coarse cover. Again, is calling someone a "dense mass of filling with a course cover" in the best interest of a kinder and gentler rec.boats? WTF do you care? You're just a spoofin' fool that likes to buttsniff his percieved adversaries. You seem to be filled with anger and rage. Shouldn't you find another venue to release that pent up frustration? Filled with rage and anger? Your sensors are either completely out of whack or the whole system needs a reboot. My passion is reserved for things that matter. perceived, btw. Why not just set up your news reader to block posts from the ID spoofer? That way, you won't see his b.s. and I won't, either. I've already got him blocked and unless someone quotes him, I don't see him. He obviously cares not a whit about improving the tone in here. At the moment, he's the only one here I am blocking. But there are a couple more ID spoofers on the possibles list, plus two others who seemingly have anger management issues and no self control. |
Youse guys must be rich
On 10/27/10 7:44 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Oct 27, 7:32 pm, wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:41:50 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/27/2010 10:32 AM, John H wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:32:49 -0400, wrote: On 10/27/2010 8:18 AM, John H wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:51:18 -0400, wrote: On 10/27/2010 7:13 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 06:45:47 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: Sure, I'm progressive. I believe in progress, in moving forward, in extending rights, in scientific development, in opening doors, in making sure the "play" is fair. I don't believe in scapegoating, in blaming one ethnic group or another for our society's failures, or in trying to get ahead by scaring large blocks of nervous people. Now you've done it - sit back and watch the fur fly. Are you a sociology professor studying internet behavior? That's pretty funny! If I were, some posters here would make for an interesting study group, I'd bet. My underpinnings and teachings are more classical, and less trade-schoolish, not that there is anything wrong with learning a trade. In my classes, you might learn what some great thinkers thought, why they thought that, how those thoughts evolved, how they influence us today. You'd also be required to write many long papers. Must the papers be of a certain 'bent' to recieve a good grade? Of course not. What we like to see is evidence the writer properly prepared himself by reading and assimilating pertinent works, and spent significant time thinking and writing so as to present a logical, coherent paper. In class discussions, any ideas are welcome, but the presenter has to be able to defend them. We try to teach our students to think logically and to develop and use their wits. Hee, hee. That's cute. Goodbye. Please outline your recent experience teaching upper level liberal arts discussion oriented classes at a major private college or university. He was a substitute math teacher at inner city schools who has a thing for black folk and the education system. He hates the government but has lived off the government his entire life. Ex-military with a bad attitude. Sucks at the same teat of government he despises. Also hates the NY Times and WA Post. He's enlightened.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Don't even want to try huh JPS? BTW, for our new readers, the above is a total fabrication/smear job, by our spoofer JPS.. I wonder if our new "Progressive" (sic) is gonna' get on "this" spoofer, on the other hand I also wonder if Paul will find outrage with the smear, or if he will just nod his head and agree;)snerk If you think someone is stirring the pot unnecessarily, do you think it is helpful to stir it some more? A lot of us are hoping the atmosphere in here will improve. In order to help that process, we're letting a lot of posts just slide by. If you are interested in that happening, you might want to join in. It's not that difficult. |
Youse guys must be rich
On 10/28/10 7:05 AM, Paul@BYC wrote:
On 10/28/2010 12:27 AM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:05:17 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Phd, Md. STD" wrote: On 10/27/10 7:25 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:08:12 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Phd, Md. STD" wrote: On 10/27/10 2:38 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:40:33 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Karen Grear, MD, PhD, wrote: On 10/27/10 6:45 AM, Paul@BYC wrote: On 10/27/2010 6:24 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:00:05 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 5:50 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:01:53 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 3:38 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 10/26/2010 3:18 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:19:34 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 11:43 AM, jps wrote: On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:00:01 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/25/2010 12:28 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... I get a lunch break, but you guys get to post here all day. Rich? Retired? Not me. I work from home, my wife is my boss, and after 20 years, we still get along, couldn't be better. Admittedly much of our business is now automated, but we spent many a year and hour getting here;) I teach at a university in the middle of the state. What do you teach? Upper level undergrad and some grad courses in the traditional liberal arts. Uh oh, one of the brainwashers! As you know, ignorance is being worn as a badge of honor by a good many Americans, including certain beverage-based political organizations. Glad to hear there's still some who are committed to edumacating our yungins. Through no fault of mine, we have a very high percentage of our students going on to receive doctorates in the arts and sciences. Smart is encouraged; stupid is not. :) And still a political troll post, no matter how you look at it... It is trolling to mention teaching and academic achievement? Look out, you've already raised some hairs. Just mentioning higher ed makes folks nervous around here... Kool-aid is served year 'round hereabouts. There really is a strong undercurrent of anti-intellectualism in this country, more so than at any other time I can remember. It's too bad because a dumbed down America will go down the tubes. You mean "down the tubes" faster. The Chinese are turning out engineers at 10 times the rate we are, many of them studying at our universities. The emergence of this beverage-based group really puts a point on it. Their candidates don't require a basic knowledge of the constitution, pivotal supreme court rulings or basic tenets of law. Instead, they just supply a few common sense-isms, rail on the media, taxes, them smart folks who got us in all this trouble, and mention the day they accepted Jesus into their lives as their personal lord and savior. That's it! You're electable and ready to govern! Yahooo! Please don't feel obligated to respond. I'm already tainted by the "liberal" stamp and you can remain above the fray. You should try to keep it that way as long as possible since you'll have chosen sides otherwise. I hope your students help our country rediscover the pride of a liberal arts education, the ability to leverage well-developed critical thinking skills, and be of a country that accepts the responsibility of the social compact between citizens, our obligation to the state and our country. Screw the greedy, the globalists and anybody who shops Walmart. It's ok JPS, our new poster already tainted himself, progressives can't help it, they just can't play fair here or anywhere else... I don't know you at all, but you seem extraordinarily volatile and subject to wide mood swings. One minute you seem to agree this would be a better place without all the personal name calling and the next minute you're engaging in it. Sure, I'm progressive. I believe in progress, in moving forward, in extending rights, in scientific development, in opening doors, in making sure the "play" is fair. I don't believe in scapegoating, in blaming one ethnic group or another for our society's failures, or in trying to get ahead by scaring large blocks of nervous people. Paul, I don't know where you are from, but in my neck of the woods if one wants to minimize arguments and name calling, it makes sense to avoid religious and political topics. Now if you enjoy heated debates, you are right on target. Debating with the likes of you is like hitting a heavy bag. Thud, thud, thud. No response. Just dense mass of filling with a coarse cover. Again, is calling someone a "dense mass of filling with a course cover" in the best interest of a kinder and gentler rec.boats? WTF do you care? You're just a spoofin' fool that likes to buttsniff his percieved adversaries. You seem to be filled with anger and rage. Shouldn't you find another venue to release that pent up frustration? Filled with rage and anger? Your sensors are either completely out of whack or the whole system needs a reboot. My passion is reserved for things that matter. perceived, btw. Why not just set up your news reader to block posts from the ID spoofer? That way, you won't see his b.s. and I won't, either. I've already got him blocked and unless someone quotes him, I don't see him. He obviously cares not a whit about improving the tone in here. At the moment, he's the only one here I am blocking. But there are a couple more ID spoofers on the possibles list, plus two others who seemingly have anger management issues and no self control. It should be obvious by now the ID Spoofers and a couple of others have *absolutely* no interest in improving the atmosphere in rec.boats. If you engage them at all, you're simply encouraging their bad behavior. |
Youse guys must be rich
On 10/28/10 9:38 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , says... On 10/28/2010 12:27 AM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:05:17 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Phd, Md. STD" wrote: On 10/27/10 7:25 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:08:12 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Phd, Md. STD" wrote: On 10/27/10 2:38 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:40:33 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Karen Grear, MD, PhD, wrote: On 10/27/10 6:45 AM, Paul@BYC wrote: On 10/27/2010 6:24 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:00:05 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 5:50 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:01:53 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 3:38 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 10/26/2010 3:18 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:19:34 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 11:43 AM, jps wrote: On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:00:01 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/25/2010 12:28 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... I get a lunch break, but you guys get to post here all day. Rich? Retired? Not me. I work from home, my wife is my boss, and after 20 years, we still get along, couldn't be better. Admittedly much of our business is now automated, but we spent many a year and hour getting here;) I teach at a university in the middle of the state. What do you teach? Upper level undergrad and some grad courses in the traditional liberal arts. Uh oh, one of the brainwashers! As you know, ignorance is being worn as a badge of honor by a good many Americans, including certain beverage-based political organizations. Glad to hear there's still some who are committed to edumacating our yungins. Through no fault of mine, we have a very high percentage of our students going on to receive doctorates in the arts and sciences. Smart is encouraged; stupid is not. :) And still a political troll post, no matter how you look at it... It is trolling to mention teaching and academic achievement? Look out, you've already raised some hairs. Just mentioning higher ed makes folks nervous around here... Kool-aid is served year 'round hereabouts. There really is a strong undercurrent of anti-intellectualism in this country, more so than at any other time I can remember. It's too bad because a dumbed down America will go down the tubes. You mean "down the tubes" faster. The Chinese are turning out engineers at 10 times the rate we are, many of them studying at our universities. The emergence of this beverage-based group really puts a point on it. Their candidates don't require a basic knowledge of the constitution, pivotal supreme court rulings or basic tenets of law. Instead, they just supply a few common sense-isms, rail on the media, taxes, them smart folks who got us in all this trouble, and mention the day they accepted Jesus into their lives as their personal lord and savior. That's it! You're electable and ready to govern! Yahooo! Please don't feel obligated to respond. I'm already tainted by the "liberal" stamp and you can remain above the fray. You should try to keep it that way as long as possible since you'll have chosen sides otherwise. I hope your students help our country rediscover the pride of a liberal arts education, the ability to leverage well-developed critical thinking skills, and be of a country that accepts the responsibility of the social compact between citizens, our obligation to the state and our country. Screw the greedy, the globalists and anybody who shops Walmart. It's ok JPS, our new poster already tainted himself, progressives can't help it, they just can't play fair here or anywhere else... I don't know you at all, but you seem extraordinarily volatile and subject to wide mood swings. One minute you seem to agree this would be a better place without all the personal name calling and the next minute you're engaging in it. Sure, I'm progressive. I believe in progress, in moving forward, in extending rights, in scientific development, in opening doors, in making sure the "play" is fair. I don't believe in scapegoating, in blaming one ethnic group or another for our society's failures, or in trying to get ahead by scaring large blocks of nervous people. Paul, I don't know where you are from, but in my neck of the woods if one wants to minimize arguments and name calling, it makes sense to avoid religious and political topics. Now if you enjoy heated debates, you are right on target. Debating with the likes of you is like hitting a heavy bag. Thud, thud, thud. No response. Just dense mass of filling with a coarse cover. Again, is calling someone a "dense mass of filling with a course cover" in the best interest of a kinder and gentler rec.boats? WTF do you care? You're just a spoofin' fool that likes to buttsniff his percieved adversaries. You seem to be filled with anger and rage. Shouldn't you find another venue to release that pent up frustration? Filled with rage and anger? Your sensors are either completely out of whack or the whole system needs a reboot. My passion is reserved for things that matter. perceived, btw. Why not just set up your news reader to block posts from the ID spoofer? That way, you won't see his b.s. and I won't, either. I've already got him blocked and unless someone quotes him, I don't see him. He obviously cares not a whit about improving the tone in here. At the moment, he's the only one here I am blocking. But there are a couple more ID spoofers on the possibles list, plus two others who seemingly have anger management issues and no self control. I would imagine you are putting me in there and we understand the ideological bent, but if you take a count, I think I should be able to at least address 1 in 50 attack posts directed at me by my stalker, right?? I didn't see where the poster you reference said he was putting you on his block list. I did get the idea he was blocking an ID spoofer and might block more of those, plus other posters who he perceived were out of control. There was no reference to "ideological bent." So, unless you are ID spoofing or are out of control, why would you be on his block list? |
Youse guys must be rich
"I am Tosk" wrote in message
... In article , says... On 10/28/2010 12:27 AM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:05:17 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Phd, Md. STD" wrote: On 10/27/10 7:25 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:08:12 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Phd, Md. STD" wrote: On 10/27/10 2:38 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:40:33 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Karen Grear, MD, PhD, wrote: On 10/27/10 6:45 AM, Paul@BYC wrote: On 10/27/2010 6:24 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:00:05 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 5:50 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:01:53 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 3:38 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 10/26/2010 3:18 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:19:34 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 11:43 AM, jps wrote: On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:00:01 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/25/2010 12:28 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... I get a lunch break, but you guys get to post here all day. Rich? Retired? Not me. I work from home, my wife is my boss, and after 20 years, we still get along, couldn't be better. Admittedly much of our business is now automated, but we spent many a year and hour getting here;) I teach at a university in the middle of the state. What do you teach? Upper level undergrad and some grad courses in the traditional liberal arts. Uh oh, one of the brainwashers! As you know, ignorance is being worn as a badge of honor by a good many Americans, including certain beverage-based political organizations. Glad to hear there's still some who are committed to edumacating our yungins. Through no fault of mine, we have a very high percentage of our students going on to receive doctorates in the arts and sciences. Smart is encouraged; stupid is not. :) And still a political troll post, no matter how you look at it... It is trolling to mention teaching and academic achievement? Look out, you've already raised some hairs. Just mentioning higher ed makes folks nervous around here... Kool-aid is served year 'round hereabouts. There really is a strong undercurrent of anti-intellectualism in this country, more so than at any other time I can remember. It's too bad because a dumbed down America will go down the tubes. You mean "down the tubes" faster. The Chinese are turning out engineers at 10 times the rate we are, many of them studying at our universities. The emergence of this beverage-based group really puts a point on it. Their candidates don't require a basic knowledge of the constitution, pivotal supreme court rulings or basic tenets of law. Instead, they just supply a few common sense-isms, rail on the media, taxes, them smart folks who got us in all this trouble, and mention the day they accepted Jesus into their lives as their personal lord and savior. That's it! You're electable and ready to govern! Yahooo! Please don't feel obligated to respond. I'm already tainted by the "liberal" stamp and you can remain above the fray. You should try to keep it that way as long as possible since you'll have chosen sides otherwise. I hope your students help our country rediscover the pride of a liberal arts education, the ability to leverage well-developed critical thinking skills, and be of a country that accepts the responsibility of the social compact between citizens, our obligation to the state and our country. Screw the greedy, the globalists and anybody who shops Walmart. It's ok JPS, our new poster already tainted himself, progressives can't help it, they just can't play fair here or anywhere else... I don't know you at all, but you seem extraordinarily volatile and subject to wide mood swings. One minute you seem to agree this would be a better place without all the personal name calling and the next minute you're engaging in it. Sure, I'm progressive. I believe in progress, in moving forward, in extending rights, in scientific development, in opening doors, in making sure the "play" is fair. I don't believe in scapegoating, in blaming one ethnic group or another for our society's failures, or in trying to get ahead by scaring large blocks of nervous people. Paul, I don't know where you are from, but in my neck of the woods if one wants to minimize arguments and name calling, it makes sense to avoid religious and political topics. Now if you enjoy heated debates, you are right on target. Debating with the likes of you is like hitting a heavy bag. Thud, thud, thud. No response. Just dense mass of filling with a coarse cover. Again, is calling someone a "dense mass of filling with a course cover" in the best interest of a kinder and gentler rec.boats? WTF do you care? You're just a spoofin' fool that likes to buttsniff his percieved adversaries. You seem to be filled with anger and rage. Shouldn't you find another venue to release that pent up frustration? Filled with rage and anger? Your sensors are either completely out of whack or the whole system needs a reboot. My passion is reserved for things that matter. perceived, btw. Why not just set up your news reader to block posts from the ID spoofer? That way, you won't see his b.s. and I won't, either. I've already got him blocked and unless someone quotes him, I don't see him. He obviously cares not a whit about improving the tone in here. At the moment, he's the only one here I am blocking. But there are a couple more ID spoofers on the possibles list, plus two others who seemingly have anger management issues and no self control. I would imagine you are putting me in there and we understand the ideological bent, but if you take a count, I think I should be able to at least address 1 in 50 attack posts directed at me by my stalker, right?? -- Rowdy Mouse Racing - Pain is temporary, Glory is forever! What on earth do you expect to gain by engaging him? |
Youse guys must be rich
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 07:05:14 -0400, "Paul@BYC"
wrote: On 10/28/2010 12:27 AM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:05:17 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Phd, Md. STD" wrote: On 10/27/10 7:25 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:08:12 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Phd, Md. STD" wrote: On 10/27/10 2:38 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:40:33 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Karen Grear, MD, PhD, wrote: On 10/27/10 6:45 AM, Paul@BYC wrote: On 10/27/2010 6:24 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:00:05 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 5:50 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:01:53 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 3:38 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 10/26/2010 3:18 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:19:34 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 11:43 AM, jps wrote: On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:00:01 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/25/2010 12:28 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... I get a lunch break, but you guys get to post here all day. Rich? Retired? Not me. I work from home, my wife is my boss, and after 20 years, we still get along, couldn't be better. Admittedly much of our business is now automated, but we spent many a year and hour getting here;) I teach at a university in the middle of the state. What do you teach? Upper level undergrad and some grad courses in the traditional liberal arts. Uh oh, one of the brainwashers! As you know, ignorance is being worn as a badge of honor by a good many Americans, including certain beverage-based political organizations. Glad to hear there's still some who are committed to edumacating our yungins. Through no fault of mine, we have a very high percentage of our students going on to receive doctorates in the arts and sciences. Smart is encouraged; stupid is not. :) And still a political troll post, no matter how you look at it... It is trolling to mention teaching and academic achievement? Look out, you've already raised some hairs. Just mentioning higher ed makes folks nervous around here... Kool-aid is served year 'round hereabouts. There really is a strong undercurrent of anti-intellectualism in this country, more so than at any other time I can remember. It's too bad because a dumbed down America will go down the tubes. You mean "down the tubes" faster. The Chinese are turning out engineers at 10 times the rate we are, many of them studying at our universities. The emergence of this beverage-based group really puts a point on it. Their candidates don't require a basic knowledge of the constitution, pivotal supreme court rulings or basic tenets of law. Instead, they just supply a few common sense-isms, rail on the media, taxes, them smart folks who got us in all this trouble, and mention the day they accepted Jesus into their lives as their personal lord and savior. That's it! You're electable and ready to govern! Yahooo! Please don't feel obligated to respond. I'm already tainted by the "liberal" stamp and you can remain above the fray. You should try to keep it that way as long as possible since you'll have chosen sides otherwise. I hope your students help our country rediscover the pride of a liberal arts education, the ability to leverage well-developed critical thinking skills, and be of a country that accepts the responsibility of the social compact between citizens, our obligation to the state and our country. Screw the greedy, the globalists and anybody who shops Walmart. It's ok JPS, our new poster already tainted himself, progressives can't help it, they just can't play fair here or anywhere else... I don't know you at all, but you seem extraordinarily volatile and subject to wide mood swings. One minute you seem to agree this would be a better place without all the personal name calling and the next minute you're engaging in it. Sure, I'm progressive. I believe in progress, in moving forward, in extending rights, in scientific development, in opening doors, in making sure the "play" is fair. I don't believe in scapegoating, in blaming one ethnic group or another for our society's failures, or in trying to get ahead by scaring large blocks of nervous people. Paul, I don't know where you are from, but in my neck of the woods if one wants to minimize arguments and name calling, it makes sense to avoid religious and political topics. Now if you enjoy heated debates, you are right on target. Debating with the likes of you is like hitting a heavy bag. Thud, thud, thud. No response. Just dense mass of filling with a coarse cover. Again, is calling someone a "dense mass of filling with a course cover" in the best interest of a kinder and gentler rec.boats? WTF do you care? You're just a spoofin' fool that likes to buttsniff his percieved adversaries. You seem to be filled with anger and rage. Shouldn't you find another venue to release that pent up frustration? Filled with rage and anger? Your sensors are either completely out of whack or the whole system needs a reboot. My passion is reserved for things that matter. perceived, btw. Why not just set up your news reader to block posts from the ID spoofer? That way, you won't see his b.s. and I won't, either. I've already got him blocked and unless someone quotes him, I don't see him. He obviously cares not a whit about improving the tone in here. At the moment, he's the only one here I am blocking. But there are a couple more ID spoofers on the possibles list, plus two others who seemingly have anger management issues and no self control. I have nearly every yahoo in here blocked. They change their ID every few minutes or mimick someone else's ID that I'd like to read. My bozo bin includes: Tosk Justwait Herring BAR Harry? Canuck Jack Three pontoons Larry and his every-three-week ID change for the past 2 years GC Boater jp christian insurance salesman ....among others Most of these bozos post under several ID's, so I plonk 'em as they come up. Unfortunately, I see their drivel if someone responds to them. |
Youse guys must be rich
On Oct 28, 11:11*am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 07:05:14 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/28/2010 12:27 AM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:05:17 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Phd, Md. STD" *wrote: On 10/27/10 7:25 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:08:12 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Phd, Md. STD" * wrote: On 10/27/10 2:38 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:40:33 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Karen Grear, MD, PhD, * *wrote: On 10/27/10 6:45 AM, Paul@BYC wrote: On 10/27/2010 6:24 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:00:05 -0400, "Paul@BYC" * *wrote: On 10/26/2010 5:50 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:01:53 -0400, "Paul@BYC" * *wrote: On 10/26/2010 3:38 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 10/26/2010 3:18 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:19:34 -0400, "Paul@BYC" * *wrote: On 10/26/2010 11:43 AM, jps wrote: On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:00:01 -0400, "Paul@BYC" * *wrote: On 10/25/2010 12:28 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... I get a lunch break, but you guys get to post here all day. Rich? Retired? Not me. I work from home, my wife is my boss, and after 20 years, we still get along, couldn't be better. Admittedly much of our business is now automated, but we spent many a year and hour getting here;) I teach at a university in the middle of the state. What do you teach? Upper level undergrad and some grad courses in the traditional liberal arts. Uh oh, one of the brainwashers! As you know, ignorance is being worn as a badge of honor by a good many Americans, including certain beverage-based political organizations. Glad to hear there's still some who are committed to edumacating our yungins. Through no fault of mine, we have a very high percentage of our students going on to receive doctorates in the arts and sciences. Smart is encouraged; stupid is not. :) And still a political troll post, no matter how you look at it... It is trolling to mention teaching and academic achievement? Look out, you've already raised some hairs. Just mentioning higher ed makes folks nervous around here... Kool-aid is served year 'round hereabouts. There really is a strong undercurrent of anti-intellectualism in this country, more so than at any other time I can remember. It's too bad because a dumbed down America will go down the tubes. You mean "down the tubes" faster. The Chinese are turning out engineers at 10 times the rate we are, many of them studying at our universities. The emergence of this beverage-based group really puts a point on it. Their candidates don't require a basic knowledge of the constitution, pivotal supreme court rulings or basic tenets of law. Instead, they just supply a few common sense-isms, rail on the media, taxes, them smart folks who got us in all this trouble, and mention the day they accepted Jesus into their lives as their personal lord and savior. That's it! You're electable and ready to govern! Yahooo! Please don't feel obligated to respond. I'm already tainted by the "liberal" stamp and you can remain above the fray. You should try to keep it that way as long as possible since you'll have chosen sides otherwise. I hope your students help our country rediscover the pride of a liberal arts education, the ability to leverage well-developed critical thinking skills, and be of a country that accepts the responsibility of the social compact between citizens, our obligation to the state and our country. Screw the greedy, the globalists and anybody who shops Walmart.. It's ok JPS, our new poster already tainted himself, progressives can't help it, they just can't play fair here or anywhere else... I don't know you at all, but you seem extraordinarily volatile and subject to wide mood swings. One minute you seem to agree this would be a better place without all the personal name calling and the next minute you're engaging in it. Sure, I'm progressive. I believe in progress, in moving forward, in extending rights, in scientific development, in opening doors, in making sure the "play" is fair. I don't believe in scapegoating, in blaming one ethnic group or another for our society's failures, or in trying to get ahead by scaring large blocks of nervous people. Paul, I don't know where you are from, but in my neck of the woods if one wants to minimize arguments and name calling, it makes sense to avoid religious and political topics. *Now if you enjoy heated debates, you are right on target. Debating with the likes of you is like hitting a heavy bag. Thud, thud, thud. *No response. *Just dense mass of filling with a coarse cover. Again, is calling someone a "dense mass of filling with a course cover" in the best interest of a kinder and gentler rec.boats? WTF do you care? *You're just a spoofin' fool that likes to buttsniff his percieved adversaries. You seem to be filled with anger and rage. *Shouldn't you find another venue to release that pent up frustration? Filled with rage and anger? *Your sensors are either completely out of whack or the whole system needs a reboot. My passion is reserved for things that matter. perceived, btw. Why not just set up your news reader to block posts from the ID spoofer? That way, you won't see his b.s. and I won't, either. I've already got him blocked and unless someone quotes him, I don't see him. He obviously cares not a whit about improving the tone in here. At the moment, he's the only one here I am blocking. But there are a couple more ID spoofers on the possibles list, plus two others who seemingly have anger management issues and no self control. I have nearly every yahoo in here blocked. *They change their ID every few minutes or mimick someone else's ID that I'd like to read. My bozo bin includes: Tosk Justwait Herring BAR Harry? Canuck Jack Three pontoons Larry and his every-three-week ID change for the past 2 years GC Boater jp christian insurance salesman ...among others Most of these bozos post under several ID's, so I plonk 'em as *they come up. Unfortunately, I see their drivel if someone responds to them.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Unfortunately, you are one of the three who haven't even made one bit of an effort to change your style... Nothing at all. So if the group keeps going "up" the way it is, you will probably be irrelevant long before me or anybody else.. Later dude, wallow in your anger, the new breed here will leave you in the dust... |
Youse guys must be rich
"JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote in message
... On Oct 28, 11:11 am, jps wrote: On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 07:05:14 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/28/2010 12:27 AM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:05:17 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Phd, Md. STD" wrote: On 10/27/10 7:25 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:08:12 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Phd, Md. STD" wrote: On 10/27/10 2:38 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:40:33 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Karen Grear, MD, PhD, wrote: On 10/27/10 6:45 AM, Paul@BYC wrote: On 10/27/2010 6:24 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:00:05 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 5:50 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:01:53 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 3:38 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 10/26/2010 3:18 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:19:34 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 11:43 AM, jps wrote: On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:00:01 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/25/2010 12:28 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... I get a lunch break, but you guys get to post here all day. Rich? Retired? Not me. I work from home, my wife is my boss, and after 20 years, we still get along, couldn't be better. Admittedly much of our business is now automated, but we spent many a year and hour getting here;) I teach at a university in the middle of the state. What do you teach? Upper level undergrad and some grad courses in the traditional liberal arts. Uh oh, one of the brainwashers! As you know, ignorance is being worn as a badge of honor by a good many Americans, including certain beverage-based political organizations. Glad to hear there's still some who are committed to edumacating our yungins. Through no fault of mine, we have a very high percentage of our students going on to receive doctorates in the arts and sciences. Smart is encouraged; stupid is not. :) And still a political troll post, no matter how you look at it... It is trolling to mention teaching and academic achievement? Look out, you've already raised some hairs. Just mentioning higher ed makes folks nervous around here... Kool-aid is served year 'round hereabouts. There really is a strong undercurrent of anti-intellectualism in this country, more so than at any other time I can remember. It's too bad because a dumbed down America will go down the tubes. You mean "down the tubes" faster. The Chinese are turning out engineers at 10 times the rate we are, many of them studying at our universities. The emergence of this beverage-based group really puts a point on it. Their candidates don't require a basic knowledge of the constitution, pivotal supreme court rulings or basic tenets of law. Instead, they just supply a few common sense-isms, rail on the media, taxes, them smart folks who got us in all this trouble, and mention the day they accepted Jesus into their lives as their personal lord and savior. That's it! You're electable and ready to govern! Yahooo! Please don't feel obligated to respond. I'm already tainted by the "liberal" stamp and you can remain above the fray. You should try to keep it that way as long as possible since you'll have chosen sides otherwise. I hope your students help our country rediscover the pride of a liberal arts education, the ability to leverage well-developed critical thinking skills, and be of a country that accepts the responsibility of the social compact between citizens, our obligation to the state and our country. Screw the greedy, the globalists and anybody who shops Walmart. It's ok JPS, our new poster already tainted himself, progressives can't help it, they just can't play fair here or anywhere else... I don't know you at all, but you seem extraordinarily volatile and subject to wide mood swings. One minute you seem to agree this would be a better place without all the personal name calling and the next minute you're engaging in it. Sure, I'm progressive. I believe in progress, in moving forward, in extending rights, in scientific development, in opening doors, in making sure the "play" is fair. I don't believe in scapegoating, in blaming one ethnic group or another for our society's failures, or in trying to get ahead by scaring large blocks of nervous people. Paul, I don't know where you are from, but in my neck of the woods if one wants to minimize arguments and name calling, it makes sense to avoid religious and political topics. Now if you enjoy heated debates, you are right on target. Debating with the likes of you is like hitting a heavy bag. Thud, thud, thud. No response. Just dense mass of filling with a coarse cover. Again, is calling someone a "dense mass of filling with a course cover" in the best interest of a kinder and gentler rec.boats? WTF do you care? You're just a spoofin' fool that likes to buttsniff his percieved adversaries. You seem to be filled with anger and rage. Shouldn't you find another venue to release that pent up frustration? Filled with rage and anger? Your sensors are either completely out of whack or the whole system needs a reboot. My passion is reserved for things that matter. perceived, btw. Why not just set up your news reader to block posts from the ID spoofer? That way, you won't see his b.s. and I won't, either. I've already got him blocked and unless someone quotes him, I don't see him. He obviously cares not a whit about improving the tone in here. At the moment, he's the only one here I am blocking. But there are a couple more ID spoofers on the possibles list, plus two others who seemingly have anger management issues and no self control. I have nearly every yahoo in here blocked. They change their ID every few minutes or mimick someone else's ID that I'd like to read. My bozo bin includes: Tosk Justwait Herring BAR Harry? Canuck Jack Three pontoons Larry and his every-three-week ID change for the past 2 years GC Boater jp christian insurance salesman ...among others Most of these bozos post under several ID's, so I plonk 'em as they come up. Unfortunately, I see their drivel if someone responds to them.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Unfortunately, you are one of the three who haven't even made one bit of an effort to change your style... Nothing at all. So if the group keeps going "up" the way it is, you will probably be irrelevant long before me or anybody else.. Later dude, wallow in your anger, the new breed here will leave you in the dust... It appears that JPS is not yet in your bozo bin. And the other two? Have you filtered them? If not. Why not? So the right thing Scotty. I hate to see these three getting your goat. |
Youse guys must be rich
It appears that JPS is not yet in your bozo bin. And the other two? Have
you filtered them? If not. Why not? So the right thing Scotty. I hate to see these three getting your goat. Damn! "Do" the right thing. |
Youse guys must be rich
|
Youse guys must be rich
On 10/28/2010 11:11 AM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 07:05:14 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/28/2010 12:27 AM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:05:17 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Phd, Md. STD" wrote: On 10/27/10 7:25 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:08:12 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Phd, Md. STD" wrote: On 10/27/10 2:38 PM, jps wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:40:33 -0400, "Dr. Dr. Dr. Karen Grear, MD, PhD, wrote: On 10/27/10 6:45 AM, Paul@BYC wrote: On 10/27/2010 6:24 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:00:05 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 5:50 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:01:53 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 3:38 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 10/26/2010 3:18 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:19:34 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/26/2010 11:43 AM, jps wrote: On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:00:01 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/25/2010 12:28 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... I get a lunch break, but you guys get to post here all day. Rich? Retired? Not me. I work from home, my wife is my boss, and after 20 years, we still get along, couldn't be better. Admittedly much of our business is now automated, but we spent many a year and hour getting here;) I teach at a university in the middle of the state. What do you teach? Upper level undergrad and some grad courses in the traditional liberal arts. Uh oh, one of the brainwashers! As you know, ignorance is being worn as a badge of honor by a good many Americans, including certain beverage-based political organizations. Glad to hear there's still some who are committed to edumacating our yungins. Through no fault of mine, we have a very high percentage of our students going on to receive doctorates in the arts and sciences. Smart is encouraged; stupid is not. :) And still a political troll post, no matter how you look at it... It is trolling to mention teaching and academic achievement? Look out, you've already raised some hairs. Just mentioning higher ed makes folks nervous around here... Kool-aid is served year 'round hereabouts. There really is a strong undercurrent of anti-intellectualism in this country, more so than at any other time I can remember. It's too bad because a dumbed down America will go down the tubes. You mean "down the tubes" faster. The Chinese are turning out engineers at 10 times the rate we are, many of them studying at our universities. The emergence of this beverage-based group really puts a point on it. Their candidates don't require a basic knowledge of the constitution, pivotal supreme court rulings or basic tenets of law. Instead, they just supply a few common sense-isms, rail on the media, taxes, them smart folks who got us in all this trouble, and mention the day they accepted Jesus into their lives as their personal lord and savior. That's it! You're electable and ready to govern! Yahooo! Please don't feel obligated to respond. I'm already tainted by the "liberal" stamp and you can remain above the fray. You should try to keep it that way as long as possible since you'll have chosen sides otherwise. I hope your students help our country rediscover the pride of a liberal arts education, the ability to leverage well-developed critical thinking skills, and be of a country that accepts the responsibility of the social compact between citizens, our obligation to the state and our country. Screw the greedy, the globalists and anybody who shops Walmart. It's ok JPS, our new poster already tainted himself, progressives can't help it, they just can't play fair here or anywhere else... I don't know you at all, but you seem extraordinarily volatile and subject to wide mood swings. One minute you seem to agree this would be a better place without all the personal name calling and the next minute you're engaging in it. Sure, I'm progressive. I believe in progress, in moving forward, in extending rights, in scientific development, in opening doors, in making sure the "play" is fair. I don't believe in scapegoating, in blaming one ethnic group or another for our society's failures, or in trying to get ahead by scaring large blocks of nervous people. Paul, I don't know where you are from, but in my neck of the woods if one wants to minimize arguments and name calling, it makes sense to avoid religious and political topics. Now if you enjoy heated debates, you are right on target. Debating with the likes of you is like hitting a heavy bag. Thud, thud, thud. No response. Just dense mass of filling with a coarse cover. Again, is calling someone a "dense mass of filling with a course cover" in the best interest of a kinder and gentler rec.boats? WTF do you care? You're just a spoofin' fool that likes to buttsniff his percieved adversaries. You seem to be filled with anger and rage. Shouldn't you find another venue to release that pent up frustration? Filled with rage and anger? Your sensors are either completely out of whack or the whole system needs a reboot. My passion is reserved for things that matter. perceived, btw. Why not just set up your news reader to block posts from the ID spoofer? That way, you won't see his b.s. and I won't, either. I've already got him blocked and unless someone quotes him, I don't see him. He obviously cares not a whit about improving the tone in here. At the moment, he's the only one here I am blocking. But there are a couple more ID spoofers on the possibles list, plus two others who seemingly have anger management issues and no self control. I have nearly every yahoo in here blocked. They change their ID every few minutes or mimick someone else's ID that I'd like to read. My bozo bin includes: Tosk Justwait Herring BAR Harry? Canuck Jack Three pontoons Larry and his every-three-week ID change for the past 2 years GC Boater jp christian insurance salesman ...among others Most of these bozos post under several ID's, so I plonk 'em as they come up. Unfortunately, I see their drivel if someone responds to them. I've noticed that a couple of those on your blocked list appear to be behaving. There are a couple whose posts I haven't seen yet. The three ID spoofers are now on my blocked list because I see no reason to encourage that sort of bad behavior. Second hand, I've noticed that at least one of them seems to relish being the bad boy, thus proving the correctness of my decision to block his posts. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com