On 10/7/2010 9:13 AM, Harry® wrote:
wrote in message ...
On 10/7/2010 8:42 AM, Secular Humoresque wrote:


I'm not. I'm Secular Humoresque. You though, are Hertvik, the one who
ran his son off to the Marines and then called a poster's wife and
threatened to molest her.

So sorry, poseur, but:

1. I am not now nor have I ever been "Hertvik."
2. I do not have a son who is or was in the Marines.
3. I've never called the wife of any present or former poster here.
4. I've never threatened to molest anyone.


So who are you, funny man?



Me?

I'm not Rappaport.

You can call me Jim.

It is obvious you are just another ID spoofer. You'd do better here I
think if you would drop the ID spoofing. You're not Harry. The guess is
you are loogy, flajim or worse scott ingersoll. If you are I can
appreciate why you would not want to be identified as any of those three.

Why not pick a new unused ID for yourself and stick with it? If you did,
you might find more posters engaging you.

In article , says...

On 10/7/2010 9:13 AM, Harry® wrote:
wrote in message ...
On 10/7/2010 8:42 AM, Secular Humoresque wrote:


I'm not. I'm Secular Humoresque. You though, are Hertvik, the one who
ran his son off to the Marines and then called a poster's wife and
threatened to molest her.

So sorry, poseur, but:

1. I am not now nor have I ever been "Hertvik."
2. I do not have a son who is or was in the Marines.
3. I've never called the wife of any present or former poster here.
4. I've never threatened to molest anyone.


So who are you, funny man?



Me?

I'm not Rappaport.

You can call me Jim.

It is obvious you are just another ID spoofer. You'd do better here I
think if you would drop the ID spoofing. You're not Harry. The guess is
you are loogy, flajim or worse scott ingersoll. If you are I can
appreciate why you would not want to be identified as any of those three.

Why not pick a new unused ID for yourself and stick with it? If you did,
you might find more posters engaging you.

You sure are ****ty at guessing then. Are you the only "Jim" on usenet?

On 10/7/2010 10:25 AM, Secular Humoresque wrote:
In , says...

On 10/7/2010 9:13 AM, Harry® wrote:
wrote in message ...
On 10/7/2010 8:42 AM, Secular Humoresque wrote:


I'm not. I'm Secular Humoresque. You though, are Hertvik, the one who
ran his son off to the Marines and then called a poster's wife and
threatened to molest her.

So sorry, poseur, but:

1. I am not now nor have I ever been "Hertvik."
2. I do not have a son who is or was in the Marines.
3. I've never called the wife of any present or former poster here.
4. I've never threatened to molest anyone.


So who are you, funny man?



Me?

I'm not Rappaport.

You can call me Jim.

It is obvious you are just another ID spoofer. You'd do better here I
think if you would drop the ID spoofing. You're not Harry. The guess is
you are loogy, flajim or worse scott ingersoll. If you are I can
appreciate why you would not want to be identified as any of those three.

Why not pick a new unused ID for yourself and stick with it? If you did,
you might find more posters engaging you.

You sure are ****ty at guessing then. Are you the only "Jim" on usenet?

Jim happens to be my first name. You are using the ID handle of someone
else.

In article , says...

On 10/7/2010 10:25 AM, Secular Humoresque wrote:
In , says...

On 10/7/2010 9:13 AM, Harry® wrote:
wrote in message ...
On 10/7/2010 8:42 AM, Secular Humoresque wrote:


I'm not. I'm Secular Humoresque. You though, are Hertvik, the one who
ran his son off to the Marines and then called a poster's wife and
threatened to molest her.

So sorry, poseur, but:

1. I am not now nor have I ever been "Hertvik."
2. I do not have a son who is or was in the Marines.
3. I've never called the wife of any present or former poster here.
4. I've never threatened to molest anyone.


So who are you, funny man?



Me?

I'm not Rappaport.

You can call me Jim.

It is obvious you are just another ID spoofer. You'd do better here I
think if you would drop the ID spoofing. You're not Harry. The guess is
you are loogy, flajim or worse scott ingersoll. If you are I can
appreciate why you would not want to be identified as any of those three.

Why not pick a new unused ID for yourself and stick with it? If you did,
you might find more posters engaging you.

You sure are ****ty at guessing then. Are you the only "Jim" on usenet?

Jim happens to be my first name. You are using the ID handle of someone
else.

Of course! Only a fool would use their real name in usenet.

On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 08:47:41 -0400, Jim wrote:

On 10/7/2010 8:42 AM, Secular Humoresque wrote:


I'm not. I'm Secular Humoresque. You though, are Hertvik, the one who
ran his son off to the Marines and then called a poster's wife and
threatened to molest her.

So sorry, poseur, but:

1. I am not now nor have I ever been "Hertvik."
2. I do not have a son who is or was in the Marines.
3. I've never called the wife of any present or former poster here.
4. I've never threatened to molest anyone.

Whoever this dweeb is that you've engaged is another of the wingers
with boogieman delusions.

As far as he's concerned, you're Hertvik. Nothing you can say or do
will convince him otherwise. He's patiently waiting for trickle down,
supply side economics to start working.

On 10/8/2010 12:51 AM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 08:47:41 -0400, wrote:

On 10/7/2010 8:42 AM, Secular Humoresque wrote:


I'm not. I'm Secular Humoresque. You though, are Hertvik, the one who
ran his son off to the Marines and then called a poster's wife and
threatened to molest her.

So sorry, poseur, but:

1. I am not now nor have I ever been "Hertvik."
2. I do not have a son who is or was in the Marines.
3. I've never called the wife of any present or former poster here.
4. I've never threatened to molest anyone.

Whoever this dweeb is that you've engaged is another of the wingers
with boogieman delusions.

As far as he's concerned, you're Hertvik. Nothing you can say or do
will convince him otherwise. He's patiently waiting for trickle down,
supply side economics to start working.


There seems to be a general dimwittedness among these ID copiers.

"Jim" wrote in message
...
On 10/8/2010 12:51 AM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 08:47:41 -0400, wrote:

On 10/7/2010 8:42 AM, Secular Humoresque wrote:


I'm not. I'm Secular Humoresque. You though, are Hertvik, the one who
ran his son off to the Marines and then called a poster's wife and
threatened to molest her.

So sorry, poseur, but:

1. I am not now nor have I ever been "Hertvik."
2. I do not have a son who is or was in the Marines.
3. I've never called the wife of any present or former poster here.
4. I've never threatened to molest anyone.

Whoever this dweeb is that you've engaged is another of the wingers
with boogieman delusions.

As far as he's concerned, you're Hertvik. Nothing you can say or do
will convince him otherwise. He's patiently waiting for trickle down,
supply side economics to start working.


There seems to be a general dimwittedness among these ID copiers.

They don't call them 'dopers' for nothing.

In article ,
says...

"Jim" wrote in message
...
On 10/8/2010 12:51 AM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 08:47:41 -0400, wrote:

On 10/7/2010 8:42 AM, Secular Humoresque wrote:


I'm not. I'm Secular Humoresque. You though, are Hertvik, the one who
ran his son off to the Marines and then called a poster's wife and
threatened to molest her.

So sorry, poseur, but:

1. I am not now nor have I ever been "Hertvik."
2. I do not have a son who is or was in the Marines.
3. I've never called the wife of any present or former poster here.
4. I've never threatened to molest anyone.

Whoever this dweeb is that you've engaged is another of the wingers
with boogieman delusions.

As far as he's concerned, you're Hertvik. Nothing you can say or do
will convince him otherwise. He's patiently waiting for trickle down,
supply side economics to start working.


There seems to be a general dimwittedness among these ID copiers.

They don't call them 'dopers' for nothing.

Who is "they"?

On 10/8/10 4:08 PM, Secular Humoresque wrote:
In ,
says...

wrote in message
...
On 10/8/2010 12:51 AM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 08:47:41 -0400, wrote:

On 10/7/2010 8:42 AM, Secular Humoresque wrote:


I'm not. I'm Secular Humoresque. You though, are Hertvik, the one who
ran his son off to the Marines and then called a poster's wife and
threatened to molest her.

So sorry, poseur, but:

1. I am not now nor have I ever been "Hertvik."
2. I do not have a son who is or was in the Marines.
3. I've never called the wife of any present or former poster here.
4. I've never threatened to molest anyone.

Whoever this dweeb is that you've engaged is another of the wingers
with boogieman delusions.

As far as he's concerned, you're Hertvik. Nothing you can say or do
will convince him otherwise. He's patiently waiting for trickle down,
supply side economics to start working.


There seems to be a general dimwittedness among these ID copiers.

They don't call them 'dopers' for nothing.

Who is "they"?

Duhhhhh. Harry and Don are they.



--
Dr. Karen Grear
Harry's Landlord