"A.Boater" wrote in message ...

So, Slammer is interested in the size of my penis, too. I think I'm seeing a
pattern, here.

Since both of you guys are so interested in the penis, maybe you should get
together and play with Chuck's spear.


Racist!

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a PC or a MAC, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a PC or a MAC, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his current ID
Boatless Harry

On Oct 3, 8:43*am, "A.Boater" wrote:
So, Slammer is interested in the size of my penis, too. I think I'm seeing a
pattern, here.

Since both of you guys are so interested in the penis, maybe you should get
together and play with Chuck's spear.

No...you're interested in your Penis. That's why you have to buy an
extension in that .380. LOL.

In article ,
says...

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you aren't trolling for gays,
but if you want to keep talking penis, email Chuck.

Neither of you appear to know anything about guns.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/849728/posts

A properly placed shot will disable most threats.

On Oct 4, 6:12*pm, "A.Boater" wrote:
Boaters leave the dock not expecting to sink, but they carry life preservers
because things don't always work out as planned. A "properly placed shot" is
pretty similar, what is planned doesn't always come to fruition and where
life is at risk, we take exceptional measures.

Nearly all of the militaries and law enforcemnt officers around the world
carry at least a 9mm, not a .22, for a reason. Years ago, I bought my wife
her first gun, a Browning .380. She was comfortable enough with the recoil
to not sacrifice accuracy. However, I can't think of any reason a real man
would carry a concealed weapon (within reason) based on "acceptable recoil"
vs. a knockdown potential found necessary by the militaries and police.

Take stock of the fellows you are defending. They like to discuss, name, and
compare their penis, even with strangers. You didn't strike me as the type.

Is hard enough to know " who " your replying to due to your lack of
quoted text, but no one really cares, Mr Small Penis.

On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 15:44:34 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c"
wrote:

On Oct 4, 6:12*pm, "A.Boater" wrote:
Boaters leave the dock not expecting to sink, but they carry life preservers
because things don't always work out as planned. A "properly placed shot" is
pretty similar, what is planned doesn't always come to fruition and where
life is at risk, we take exceptional measures.

Nearly all of the militaries and law enforcemnt officers around the world
carry at least a 9mm, not a .22, for a reason. Years ago, I bought my wife
her first gun, a Browning .380. She was comfortable enough with the recoil
to not sacrifice accuracy. However, I can't think of any reason a real man
would carry a concealed weapon (within reason) based on "acceptable recoil"
vs. a knockdown potential found necessary by the militaries and police.

Take stock of the fellows you are defending. They like to discuss, name, and
compare their penis, even with strangers. You didn't strike me as the type.

Is hard enough to know " who " your replying to due to your lack of
quoted text, but no one really cares, Mr Small Penis.

I bet'cha A Boater pitches like Charlie Crists...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jirSqpYpvrE