In article ,
says...

bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 21:00:07 -0400, wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 11:02:17 -0400, wrote:



and not being willing to budge.


The only states that are growing in manufacturing capacity are the
non-union states.


also wrong.


Their unions aren't corrupt.

our corporations are. unions didn't destroy our economy. wall street
did

Wall street is a street in NYC. Can you try to be more specific in your
silly rants?

Really, this has been going on for months.. Both of you need to
understand that there is no difference between "wall st" and "labor".
They are and have always been in bed together to take from the sweating
members of the group... The union is bought and paid for by the Company
to keep the workers "content" and in the dark, that's why so much
violence surrounded the teamsters Business agents during the time when
they were selling us to the SureFine Sugar corp

--
OH, I could do the 105 footer, but I would hate to waste the last few
seconds of my life with my eyes closed, screaming like a little
girl...

"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...

Really, this has been going on for months.. Both of you need to
understand that there is no difference between "wall st" and "labor".
They are and have always been in bed together to take from the *sweating
members of the group*... The union is bought and paid for by the Company
to keep the workers "content" and in the dark, that's why so much
violence surrounded the teamsters Business agents during the time when
they were selling us to the SureFine Sugar corp


"sweating members of the group"???
I hope you don't include yourself in that designation.

On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 23:03:42 -0400, I am Tosk
wrote:


Really, this has been going on for months.. Both of you need to
understand that there is no difference between "wall st" and "labor".
They are and have always been in bed together to take from the sweating
members of the group.

if this were true, wall street wouldnt have destroyed labor. labor
unions would be flourishing.

they're not

On Oct 3, 2:20*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 23:03:42 -0400, I am Tosk

wrote:
Really, this has been going on for months.. Both of you need to
understand that there is no difference between "wall st" and "labor".
They are and have always been in bed together to take from the sweating
members of the group.

if this were true, wall street wouldnt have destroyed labor. labor
unions would be flourishing.

they're not

Exactly, Labor destroyed manufacturing...

"JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote in message ...
On Oct 3, 2:20 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 23:03:42 -0400, I am Tosk

wrote:
Really, this has been going on for months.. Both of you need to
understand that there is no difference between "wall st" and "labor".
They are and have always been in bed together to take from the sweating
members of the group.

if this were true, wall street wouldnt have destroyed labor. labor
unions would be flourishing.

they're not

Exactly, Labor destroyed manufacturing...


Specifically union labor. It's a shame we let them do it.

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a PC or a MAC, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a PC or a MAC, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his current ID
Boatless Harry

On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 12:45:30 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote:

On Oct 3, 2:20*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 23:03:42 -0400, I am Tosk

wrote:
Really, this has been going on for months.. Both of you need to
understand that there is no difference between "wall st" and "labor".
They are and have always been in bed together to take from the sweating
members of the group.

if this were true, wall street wouldnt have destroyed labor. labor
unions would be flourishing.

they're not

Exactly, Labor destroyed manufacturing...

as i've often stated, being a conservative is a learning disability.

timothy noah, in 'slate', has a nice series of articles on current
economics. countries with the strongest unions have the strongest
manufacturing base.

guess what that means about the US?

i've tried to make this as simple as i can for your level of
understanding.

"JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote in message
...
On Oct 3, 2:20 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 23:03:42 -0400, I am Tosk

wrote:
Really, this has been going on for months.. Both of you need to
understand that there is no difference between "wall st" and "labor".
They are and have always been in bed together to take from the sweating
members of the group.

if this were true, wall street wouldnt have destroyed labor. labor
unions would be flourishing.

they're not

Exactly, Labor destroyed manufacturing...

Now, that's funny. Without labor how do you think manufacturing gets done?
MORON!

On Oct 3, 3:45*pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote:
On Oct 3, 2:20*pm, bpuharic wrote:

On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 23:03:42 -0400, I am Tosk

wrote:
Really, this has been going on for months.. Both of you need to
understand that there is no difference between "wall st" and "labor".
They are and have always been in bed together to take from the sweating
members of the group.

if this were true, wall street wouldnt have destroyed labor. labor
unions would be flourishing.

they're not

Exactly, Labor destroyed manufacturing...

Snotty the " non-working leach " thinks that everyone should work for
nothing. This from a poor, uneducated, unemployable leach of a man who
lives off the back of his poor Wife. Panty Liner also gambles with her
hard-earned cash, instead of doing ANYTHING to help her in life.

You really do need a bitch-slap, you ****ing slug.

"*e#c" wrote in message
...
On Oct 3, 3:45 pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote:
On Oct 3, 2:20 pm, bpuharic wrote:

On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 23:03:42 -0400, I am Tosk

wrote:
Really, this has been going on for months.. Both of you need to
understand that there is no difference between "wall st" and "labor".
They are and have always been in bed together to take from the
sweating
members of the group.

if this were true, wall street wouldnt have destroyed labor. labor
unions would be flourishing.

they're not

Exactly, Labor destroyed manufacturing...

Snotty the " non-working leach " thinks that everyone should work for
nothing. This from a poor, uneducated, unemployable leach of a man who
lives off the back of his poor Wife. Panty Liner also gambles with her
hard-earned cash, instead of doing ANYTHING to help her in life.

You really do need a bitch-slap, you ****ing slug.

He's just jealous that most people actually go out and work for a living.

On 10/4/10 7:47 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"*e#c" wrote in message
...
On Oct 3, 3:45 pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote:
On Oct 3, 2:20 pm, bpuharic wrote:

On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 23:03:42 -0400, I am Tosk

wrote:
Really, this has been going on for months.. Both of you need to
understand that there is no difference between "wall st" and "labor".
They are and have always been in bed together to take from the
sweating
members of the group.

if this were true, wall street wouldnt have destroyed labor. labor
unions would be flourishing.

they're not

Exactly, Labor destroyed manufacturing...

Snotty the " non-working leach " thinks that everyone should work for
nothing. This from a poor, uneducated, unemployable leach of a man who
lives off the back of his poor Wife. Panty Liner also gambles with her
hard-earned cash, instead of doing ANYTHING to help her in life.

You really do need a bitch-slap, you ****ing slug.

He's just jealous that most people actually go out and work for a living.

Here's a non sequitur for you: I just sold my Parker for more than
Little Man Tosk has earned in the last three or more years, and it
wasn't that expensive of a boat. How is that possible? Little Man Tosk
has no earnings.



--
Republicans are the Party of No:
No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals