BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   battery charger out (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/118392-battery-charger-out.html)

bpuharic October 8th 10 07:04 PM

battery charger out
 
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:47:59 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



I am tired of your **** you asshole. I spelled it out as you are too
ignorant to fill in the blanks. You are the family with a drunken son, and
you seem to like the sauce also. Bob, claims he lost all his money when the
401k's tanked. He saved nothing. 401k is not saving, it is funding a
retirement plan.


i lost 30%. and i saved diligently, like i was supposed to...all my
life for 30 years. and wall street, courtesy of the rich and the right
wing...destroyed my savings.

He claims to be a high paid engineer, not as high paid as
others as he has not had a raise in 10 years.


gee. all i did was present the FACTS...remember those? if you'd like,
i can post the chart AGAIN. you seem to forget ihave the EVIDENCE
whereas all you have is toilet paper coating

Is wife is an attorney for
the county. They most likely have a combined income greater than $200,000.


WRONG

He wants the rich taxed. And with his family income he is in the rich
category


WRONG


you're so full of **** you qualify for a farm subsidy for fertilizer

bpuharic October 8th 10 07:05 PM

battery charger out
 
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:19:15 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:




It was about five main things, three of which were regarding slavery, two of
which were economics and states rights. If you're going to call someone a
racist, please have some basis in fact.


he calls someone a racist if they dont object to the fact obama's
black

nom=de=plume[_2_] October 8th 10 07:42 PM

battery charger out
 

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:19:15 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:




It was about five main things, three of which were regarding slavery, two
of
which were economics and states rights. If you're going to call someone a
racist, please have some basis in fact.


he calls someone a racist if they dont object to the fact obama's
black


Obama is Irish. lol



LG[_6_] October 9th 10 02:03 AM

battery charger out
 
YukonBound wrote:


"Califbill" wrote in message
...


"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:24:41 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear was
antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North
Carolina
family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black.
Imagine that.

didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more
important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves


And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the
states telling
the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states.

so you're pro slavery? gee. i would never have guessed.

no wonder you hate obama. you object to him not being property


You dumb F@ck. You state the war was about slavery. It was about
economics and states rights. Even Lincoln stated he would not free
the slaves if it saved the Union. You are a racist of the first
order. Anybody saying anything about Obama that is negative, you run
to the racist rant. F@uk you. You are an idiot and will always be
stupid and broke. When Obama or the next Administration decides to
raise taxes on the "rich", I will laugh my ass off, when you find out
you and the wife are rich. And my great Grandfather was wounded
fighting as an Ohio Regular. Fought on the side of the Union. You
probably do not even know a person of color, any color, as a friend.


Swill...lay off the sauce so early in the morning.
In one sentence you say he... "will always be stupid and broke"
and in the next you say "you find out you and the wife are rich".
Which is it?

Why are you commenting on that discussion? Bored _and_ dumb?

LG[_6_] October 9th 10 02:05 AM

battery charger out
 
Califbill wrote:


"YukonBound" wrote in message
...


"Califbill" wrote in message
...


"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:24:41 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear
was
antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North
Carolina
family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black.
Imagine that.

didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more
important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves


And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the
states telling
the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states.

so you're pro slavery? gee. i would never have guessed.

no wonder you hate obama. you object to him not being property


You dumb F@ck. You state the war was about slavery. It was about
economics and states rights. Even Lincoln stated he would not free
the slaves if it saved the Union. You are a racist of the first
order. Anybody saying anything about Obama that is negative, you run
to the racist rant. F@uk you. You are an idiot and will always be
stupid and broke. When Obama or the next Administration decides to
raise taxes on the "rich", I will laugh my ass off, when you find
out you and the wife are rich. And my great Grandfather was wounded
fighting as an Ohio Regular. Fought on the side of the Union. You
probably do not even know a person of color, any color, as a friend.


Swill...lay off the sauce so early in the morning.
In one sentence you say he... "will always be stupid and broke"
and in the next you say "you find out you and the wife are rich".
Which is it?


I am tired of your **** you asshole. I spelled it out as you are too
ignorant to fill in the blanks. You are the family with a drunken
son, and you seem to like the sauce also. Bob, claims he lost all his
money when the 401k's tanked. He saved nothing. 401k is not saving,
it is funding a retirement plan. He claims to be a high paid
engineer, not as high paid as others as he has not had a raise in 10
years. Is wife is an attorney for the county. They most likely have
a combined income greater than $200,000. He wants the rich taxed. And
with his family income he is in the rich category. You should have
your spouse read your postings and then she will beat the crap out of
you for showing your stupidity! No only are you a former government
employee leaching off the government teat, you can not afford a boat
bigger than a small used Princecraft. Only way you got to sail on a
big boat as a suckup crew member. there were alcoholics in my family
and I rarely drink, unlike you who seem to get drunk with your son,
who finally moved out of the house at the age of 30+. You should stop
sucking up to Harry. He is a known liar, and since you can not google
up his name with political speech writers, he can not be very good at
that either.


A rant with a lot of good advice!

Secular Humouresque October 9th 10 02:05 AM

battery charger out
 
On 10/8/10 9:03 PM, LG wrote:
YukonBound wrote:


"Califbill" wrote in message
...


"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:24:41 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear was
antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North
Carolina
family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black. Imagine
that.

didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more
important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves


And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the states
telling
the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states.

so you're pro slavery? gee. i would never have guessed.

no wonder you hate obama. you object to him not being property


You dumb F@ck. You state the war was about slavery. It was about
economics and states rights. Even Lincoln stated he would not free
the slaves if it saved the Union. You are a racist of the first
order. Anybody saying anything about Obama that is negative, you run
to the racist rant. F@uk you. You are an idiot and will always be
stupid and broke. When Obama or the next Administration decides to
raise taxes on the "rich", I will laugh my ass off, when you find out
you and the wife are rich. And my great Grandfather was wounded
fighting as an Ohio Regular. Fought on the side of the Union. You
probably do not even know a person of color, any color, as a friend.


Swill...lay off the sauce so early in the morning.
In one sentence you say he... "will always be stupid and broke"
and in the next you say "you find out you and the wife are rich".
Which is it?

Why are you commenting on that discussion? Bored _and_ dumb?



Why do you comment on any discussion here? You add nothing.

--
Republicans are the Party of No:
No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals

LG[_6_] October 9th 10 02:09 AM

battery charger out
 
bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:47:59 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



I am tired of your **** you asshole. I spelled it out as you are too
ignorant to fill in the blanks. You are the family with a drunken son, and
you seem to like the sauce also. Bob, claims he lost all his money when the
401k's tanked. He saved nothing. 401k is not saving, it is funding a
retirement plan.

i lost 30%. and i saved diligently, like i was supposed to...all my
life for 30 years. and wall street, courtesy of the rich and the right
wing...destroyed my savings.

He claims to be a high paid engineer, not as high paid as

others as he has not had a raise in 10 years.

gee. all i did was present the FACTS...remember those? if you'd like,
i can post the chart AGAIN. you seem to forget ihave the EVIDENCE
whereas all you have is toilet paper coating

Is wife is an attorney for

the county. They most likely have a combined income greater than $200,000.

WRONG


He wants the rich taxed. And with his family income he is in the rich
category

WRONG


you're so full of **** you qualify for a farm subsidy for fertilizer

I "made" $11K today thanks to "Wall Street". IF you lost 30%, how did
you fare today? Did you move it all to cash?

You screwed up when you chose the wrong funds in your 401K. That's your
mistake. Call Obama and ask for a refund 202-456-1414.

bpuharic October 9th 10 02:29 AM

battery charger out
 
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 21:09:19 -0400, LG wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:47:59 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



I am tired of your **** you asshole. I spelled it out as you are too
ignorant to fill in the blanks. You are the family with a drunken son, and
you seem to like the sauce also. Bob, claims he lost all his money when the
401k's tanked. He saved nothing. 401k is not saving, it is funding a
retirement plan.

i lost 30%. and i saved diligently, like i was supposed to...all my
life for 30 years. and wall street, courtesy of the rich and the right
wing...destroyed my savings.

He claims to be a high paid engineer, not as high paid as

others as he has not had a raise in 10 years.

gee. all i did was present the FACTS...remember those? if you'd like,
i can post the chart AGAIN. you seem to forget ihave the EVIDENCE
whereas all you have is toilet paper coating

Is wife is an attorney for

the county. They most likely have a combined income greater than $200,000.

WRONG


He wants the rich taxed. And with his family income he is in the rich
category

WRONG


you're so full of **** you qualify for a farm subsidy for fertilizer

I "made" $11K today thanks to "Wall Street". IF you lost 30%, how did
you fare today? Did you move it all to cash?


i work for a living. i dont have time to diddle my bank acct all day
like you do

You screwed up when you chose the wrong funds in your 401K.


me and the entire middle class. you keep blaming the middle class for
doing what the rich gave us. typical right wing bull****


LG[_6_] October 9th 10 02:59 AM

battery charger out
 
Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/8/10 9:03 PM, LG wrote:
YukonBound wrote:


"Califbill" wrote in message
...


"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:24:41 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear
was
antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North
Carolina
family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black. Imagine
that.

didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more
important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves


And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the states
telling
the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states.

so you're pro slavery? gee. i would never have guessed.

no wonder you hate obama. you object to him not being property


You dumb F@ck. You state the war was about slavery. It was about
economics and states rights. Even Lincoln stated he would not free
the slaves if it saved the Union. You are a racist of the first
order. Anybody saying anything about Obama that is negative, you run
to the racist rant. F@uk you. You are an idiot and will always be
stupid and broke. When Obama or the next Administration decides to
raise taxes on the "rich", I will laugh my ass off, when you find out
you and the wife are rich. And my great Grandfather was wounded
fighting as an Ohio Regular. Fought on the side of the Union. You
probably do not even know a person of color, any color, as a friend.

Swill...lay off the sauce so early in the morning.
In one sentence you say he... "will always be stupid and broke"
and in the next you say "you find out you and the wife are rich".
Which is it?

Why are you commenting on that discussion? Bored _and_ dumb?



Why do you comment on any discussion here? You add nothing.

Why not give the group a quick summary of your posts in the last 24
hours that added something, other than personal attacks?



LG[_6_] October 9th 10 03:02 AM

battery charger out
 
bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 21:09:19 -0400, wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:47:59 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



I am tired of your **** you asshole. I spelled it out as you are too
ignorant to fill in the blanks. You are the family with a drunken son, and
you seem to like the sauce also. Bob, claims he lost all his money when the
401k's tanked. He saved nothing. 401k is not saving, it is funding a
retirement plan.


i lost 30%. and i saved diligently, like i was supposed to...all my
life for 30 years. and wall street, courtesy of the rich and the right
wing...destroyed my savings.

He claims to be a high paid engineer, not as high paid as


others as he has not had a raise in 10 years.


gee. all i did was present the FACTS...remember those? if you'd like,
i can post the chart AGAIN. you seem to forget ihave the EVIDENCE
whereas all you have is toilet paper coating

Is wife is an attorney for


the county. They most likely have a combined income greater than $200,000.


WRONG



He wants the rich taxed. And with his family income he is in the rich
category


WRONG


you're so full of **** you qualify for a farm subsidy for fertilizer


I "made" $11K today thanks to "Wall Street". IF you lost 30%, how did
you fare today? Did you move it all to cash?

i work for a living. i dont have time to diddle my bank acct all day
like you do

You screwed up when you chose the wrong funds in your 401K.

me and the entire middle class. you keep blaming the middle class for
doing what the rich gave us. typical right wing bull****


No, Bob, my retirement portfolio was up $11K today. I made no changes
or trades.

Your "middle class" diatribes boor me.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com