Liberal election tactics
 

"Secular Humorist" wrote in message ...
In article ,
says...

"BAR" wrote in message . ..
In article ,
says...

On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:04:49 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 08:11:59 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...
Why didn't you get a job and feed yourself. Where is your self respect?

I had a job you simple dweeb. I was also taking a full load of
classes. I didn't make enough to pay for all and lived a frugal life.

Obviously you were not supporting yourself. You were suckling at the
government teat.

Their investment in me paid huge dividends.

Prove it.

**** you, asshole.

Are you always this high strung? Or, is it due to you buying too many
German screw-drivers, you know, pay inflated prices for a metal bar with
a flattened end and a plastic handle on the other end?

You're an asshole Bertie. Just stating a fact and confirming my
feelings for you.

How am I supposed to prove that the investment the government made in
me has paid off? Should I submit my last years w-2 or 1040 for your
review?

1040's would work. Most people don't exaggerate their income when
reporting it to the IRS.


WTF is wrong with you, brain just too ****in' simple? You need to
call someone a liar to make yourself feel tall like the undersized
Freak?

I am 6'2" and I am not a feather weight. Ask a couple here that I've met
in person. Krause isn't one of them, he is afraid of his shadow. So, if
you want to physically intimidate me give it your best shot.


Krause only intimidates women.

Hey, d.f. I have guns.


Wimmins are intimidated by guns. What's your point?

Liberal election tactics
 

On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:22:41 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:48:00 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...
Uh, you do know he didn't buy any screwdrivers, he just made it up to
make a point. Just for the record...

Are you telling me JPS is a liar.

I'm sure you believe the little Freak. You're a gullible idiot who'd
vote to put a lunatic in congress before you'd cross party lines.

Have little circle jerk with the Freak, he's just about your speed.

You try to be intimidating with your words but it doesn't work. What id
does do is show that you are trying to hide some other psychological
problem. Did you get beat up as a little boy, by the other boys in your
neighborhood? What drives your hatred towards those who see things
differently than you?

Your stupidity? I don't hate you, I just loathe fools who'd vote for
a lunatic over a sane person based on party affiliation.

Our country is in the ****ter and you'll vote for the guys that'll
accelerate it to lightspeed.

So you voting for Obama and other Democrats cannot be linked to
increasing the deficit and the debt? Nor can the policies of the
Democrats be at fault with the problems in California?

Government is not and cannot be the vehicle for fixing all of the
problems or perceived problems of society. At some point you run out of
resources and you wind up with massive deficits and debts.

The federal government grew at a faster pace than anytime in history
under Bush and six of those eight years were controlled by a
Republican congress.

What happened when the Congress was controlled by Democrats? How about
full disclosure? Why don't you state what happened when the Democrats
took control?

They were handed two unfunded wars and an unfunded tax cut for the
rich.

You should be ashamed that you're even attempting this weak assed
argument.

Your chosen party signed onto two unfunded wars, kept off the books.

I remember all of the Democrats begging to have a roll call vote so that
they could get it on the record that they supported the coming war in
Iraq. They didn't want to go into the 2002 elections being known as
pacifists.

You don't have a leg to stand on.

History is very unkind to you.

Non-sequiturs don't replace sense, Bertie.

Liberal election tactics
 

On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:16:10 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

1040's would work. Most people don't exaggerate their income when
reporting it to the IRS.

And just why would I feel compelled to have you know my personal
information? You think I need your approval?

You seek my approval every time you respond to me.

You are a simple drone. When I want to test my value in the world,
you're not the guy I'll consult.

Right.

WTF is wrong with you, brain just too ****in' simple? You need to
call someone a liar to make yourself feel tall like the undersized
Freak?

I am 6'2" and I am not a feather weight. Ask a couple here that I've met
in person. Krause isn't one of them, he is afraid of his shadow. So, if
you want to physically intimidate me give it your best shot.

It was a metaphor you dweeb. I don't give a hoot how tall or fat you
are, but I'm concerned for the drone-like behavior exhibited by you
and so many red state Americans.

No it wasn't and you know it. You were trying to physically intimidate
me and it didn't work.

If your only defense in an argument is to call someone a liar, you've
lost that argument on all counts.


You are a liar.

Idiot. Plonk.

Liberal election tactics
 

"BAR" wrote in message . ..
In article ,
says...

1040's would work. Most people don't exaggerate their income when
reporting it to the IRS.

And just why would I feel compelled to have you know my personal
information? You think I need your approval?

You seek my approval every time you respond to me.

You are a simple drone. When I want to test my value in the world,
you're not the guy I'll consult.

Right.

WTF is wrong with you, brain just too ****in' simple? You need to
call someone a liar to make yourself feel tall like the undersized
Freak?

I am 6'2" and I am not a feather weight. Ask a couple here that I've met
in person. Krause isn't one of them, he is afraid of his shadow. So, if
you want to physically intimidate me give it your best shot.

It was a metaphor you dweeb. I don't give a hoot how tall or fat you
are, but I'm concerned for the drone-like behavior exhibited by you
and so many red state Americans.

No it wasn't and you know it. You were trying to physically intimidate
me and it didn't work.

If your only defense in an argument is to call someone a liar, you've
lost that argument on all counts.


You are a liar.


You can always fall back to the JPS defense and start swearing.

Liberal election tactics
 

"jps" wrote in message ...
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:16:10 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

1040's would work. Most people don't exaggerate their income when
reporting it to the IRS.

And just why would I feel compelled to have you know my personal
information? You think I need your approval?

You seek my approval every time you respond to me.

You are a simple drone. When I want to test my value in the world,
you're not the guy I'll consult.

Right.

WTF is wrong with you, brain just too ****in' simple? You need to
call someone a liar to make yourself feel tall like the undersized
Freak?

I am 6'2" and I am not a feather weight. Ask a couple here that I've met
in person. Krause isn't one of them, he is afraid of his shadow. So, if
you want to physically intimidate me give it your best shot.

It was a metaphor you dweeb. I don't give a hoot how tall or fat you
are, but I'm concerned for the drone-like behavior exhibited by you
and so many red state Americans.

No it wasn't and you know it. You were trying to physically intimidate
me and it didn't work.

If your only defense in an argument is to call someone a liar, you've
lost that argument on all counts.


You are a liar.

Idiot. Plonk.

Good decision. He was too much for you to deal with.

Liberal election tactics
 

Secular Humorist wrote:
On 9/24/10 10:44 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"Secular Humorist" wrote in message
...
In article , says...

On 9/23/2010 6:24 PM, YukonBound wrote:


"Jim" wrote in message
...
On 9/23/2010 4:38 PM, Secular Humorist wrote:
In ,
says...

"Secular wrote in message
...
In ,

says...

"Harry wrote in message
...
"Secular wrote in message
...
On 9/23/10 8:06 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

Which way is the wind blowing this fall and which way will
you be
voting? Will you be voting with the crowd or will you be
voting your
principles?

You haven't been paying attention.


Yes, I have been paying attention.


Correct. I cannot see a time where I would ever vote for a
Democrat.
They do not represent my beliefs nor are they a
principled lot.

Would you vote for O'Donnell if you lived in Delaware?


I would not vote for the bearded Marxist.


A. He's not a marxist.

B. You'd have no problems voting for a moron like O'Donnell.


She's on her way to the White House in 2012. If Obama did it
with
a couple
of cheap phrases, there's no reason she couldn't replace him
with
a wink
and a smile. I'll bet you could get a hold of a copy of her
college
transcripts an her birth certificate too.

I guess you think she'll put out for you.


Okay, now THAT was funny!

Really? I think she(Plume) is pathetic.

Yeah, but I think she believes all of my tall tales. Did I ever
tell you
about my father's fireboat welcome in New York City? Or my Yale
degree?


What was the name of that idiot who used to post here who had it in
for Harry? Wasn't it Loogey or something like that? Are you Loogey?


It's the best spoof of Looney I've seen in here, even though the
dummy
is using Harry's ID.


He certainly has Looney Loogey down pat.

W.T.F. is "Looney loogey" now?

That would be Kevin Noble of Snellville Georgia.


Loogey is back, posting under a different handle. I don't believe the
tale about the ill wife. He may have told Tim that story, but that
doesn't make the story true.
**** off, WAFA.

Liberal election tactics
 

"Secular Humorist" wrote in message
...
On 9/24/10 10:44 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"Secular Humorist" wrote in message
...
In article , says...

On 9/23/2010 6:24 PM, YukonBound wrote:


"Jim" wrote in message
...
On 9/23/2010 4:38 PM, Secular Humorist wrote:
In ,
says...

"Secular wrote in message
...
In ,

says...

"Harry wrote in message
...
"Secular wrote in message
...
On 9/23/10 8:06 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

Which way is the wind blowing this fall and which way will
you be
voting? Will you be voting with the crowd or will you be
voting your
principles?

You haven't been paying attention.


Yes, I have been paying attention.


Correct. I cannot see a time where I would ever vote for a
Democrat.
They do not represent my beliefs nor are they a
principled lot.

Would you vote for O'Donnell if you lived in Delaware?


I would not vote for the bearded Marxist.


A. He's not a marxist.

B. You'd have no problems voting for a moron like O'Donnell.


She's on her way to the White House in 2012. If Obama did it
with
a couple
of cheap phrases, there's no reason she couldn't replace him
with
a wink
and a smile. I'll bet you could get a hold of a copy of her
college
transcripts an her birth certificate too.

I guess you think she'll put out for you.


Okay, now THAT was funny!

Really? I think she(Plume) is pathetic.

Yeah, but I think she believes all of my tall tales. Did I ever
tell you
about my father's fireboat welcome in New York City? Or my Yale
degree?


What was the name of that idiot who used to post here who had it in
for Harry? Wasn't it Loogey or something like that? Are you Loogey?


It's the best spoof of Looney I've seen in here, even though the
dummy
is using Harry's ID.


He certainly has Looney Loogey down pat.

W.T.F. is "Looney loogey" now?

That would be Kevin Noble of Snellville Georgia.


Loogey is back, posting under a different handle. I don't believe the tale
about the ill wife. He may have told Tim that story, but that doesn't make
the story true.

It's either that or he's given one of the other dopers permission to act
like him... with the same lame stupid claims.

Liberal election tactics
 

On Sep 24, 10:22*pm, "YukonBound" wrote:
"Secular Humorist" wrote in message

...





On 9/24/10 10:44 AM, YukonBound wrote:

"Secular Humorist" wrote in message
...
In article , says....

On 9/23/2010 6:24 PM, YukonBound wrote:

"Jim" wrote in message
...
On 9/23/2010 4:38 PM, Secular Humorist wrote:
In ,
says...

"Secular wrote in message
...
In ,

says...

"Harry wrote in message
...
"Secular wrote in message
...
On 9/23/10 8:06 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

Which way is the wind blowing this fall and which way will
you be
voting? Will you be voting with the crowd or will you be
voting your
principles?

You haven't been paying attention.

Yes, I have been paying attention.

Correct. I cannot see a time where I would ever vote for a
Democrat.
They do not represent my beliefs nor are they a
principled lot.

Would you vote for O'Donnell if you lived in Delaware?

I would not vote for the bearded Marxist.

A. He's not a marxist.

B. You'd have no problems voting for a moron like O'Donnell..

She's on her way to the White House in 2012. If Obama did it
with
a couple
of cheap phrases, there's no reason she couldn't replace him
with
a wink
and a smile. I'll bet you could get a hold of a copy of her
college
transcripts an her birth certificate too.

I guess you think she'll put out for you.

Okay, now THAT was funny!

Really? I think she(Plume) is pathetic.

Yeah, but I think she believes all of my tall tales. Did I ever
tell you
about my father's fireboat welcome in New York City? Or my Yale
degree?

What was the name of that idiot who used to post here who had it in
for Harry? Wasn't it Loogey or something like that? Are you Loogey?

It's the best spoof of Looney I've seen in here, even though the
dummy
is using Harry's ID.

He certainly has Looney Loogey down pat.

W.T.F. is "Looney loogey" now?

That would be Kevin Noble of Snellville Georgia.

Loogey is back, posting under a different handle. I don't believe the tale
about the ill wife. He may have told Tim that story, but that doesn't make
the story true.

It's either that or he's given one of the other dopers permission to act
like him... with the same lame stupid claims.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh, waaaaaahhh!!! Do you ever stop your wailing?

Liberal election tactics
 

On 9/25/10 9:33 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Sep 24, 10:22 pm, wrote:
"Secular wrote in message


Loogey is back, posting under a different handle. I don't believe the tale
about the ill wife. He may have told Tim that story, but that doesn't make
the story true.

It's either that or he's given one of the other dopers permission to act
like him... with the same lame stupid claims.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh, waaaaaahhh!!! Do you ever stop your wailing?


Speaking of wailing...it's little man tosk...are you off to sweep the
floor at your "facilities"?

--
Republicans are the Party of No:
No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals

Liberal election tactics
 

"Secular Humourist" wrote in message ...
On 9/25/10 9:33 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Sep 24, 10:22 pm, wrote:
"Secular wrote in message


Loogey is back, posting under a different handle. I don't believe the tale
about the ill wife. He may have told Tim that story, but that doesn't make
the story true.

It's either that or he's given one of the other dopers permission to act
like him... with the same lame stupid claims.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh, waaaaaahhh!!! Do you ever stop your wailing?


Speaking of wailing...it's little man tosk...are you off to sweep the
floor at your "facilities"?

--
Republicans are the Party of No:
No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals


The bigger they are the harder they fall, big fella. You're the man from the failing Dumbocrats, no?