Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 8-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote: great article in 'slate'... http://www.slate.com/id/2266025/entr.../?hpid=topnews multipart series...telling us what the right doesnt want us to know. How can a middle class be poor and getting poorer? If they're poor, they're not the middle class" unless the "new middle class" are the schlubs in the "new service economy" desperately hanging onto their walkers just inside the door at Walmart. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:51:40 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote: On 8-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote: great article in 'slate'... http://www.slate.com/id/2266025/entr.../?hpid=topnews multipart series...telling us what the right doesnt want us to know. How can a middle class be poor and getting poorer? If they're poor, they're not the middle class" unless the "new middle class" are the schlubs in the "new service economy" desperately hanging onto their walkers just inside the door at Walmart. ?? uh...if you define the middle class as the middle 70% or so of wage earners, then they can, by all means, be poor AND getting poorer compared to their own history. you seem to have a thing about wal mart, not realizing that people shop there BECAUSE that's in lieu of a pay in crease that right wingers have denied middle class workers |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 10-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote: door at Walmart. ?? uh...if you define the middle class as the middle 70% or so of wage earners, then they can, by all means, be poor AND getting poorer compared to their own history. That would make sense to anyone that couldn't pass a breatylizer. you seem to have a thing about wal mart, not realizing that people shop there BECAUSE that's in lieu of a pay in crease that right wingers have denied middle class workers They pay 2 to 3 times as much than if they bought a product that would last more than a couple weeks. Based on your "theory," the "poor" are making themselves poorer. I also know from personal experience that Walmart tells their suppliers to produce outside the United States, or they'll go elsewhere - has been the policy for 15 years. All the foreign crap you buy is not from Walmart - all retail marketing companies sell everything foreign - being the biggest, they're (Walmart) is just symbolic of the greater problem. That will never be understood by the waddling masses. What's so difficult to comprehend about sending the majority of your wages overseas or to the government with the result of being unemployed? |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Colonel Kurtz" wrote in message ... On 10-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote: door at Walmart. ?? uh...if you define the middle class as the middle 70% or so of wage earners, then they can, by all means, be poor AND getting poorer compared to their own history. That would make sense to anyone that couldn't pass a breatylizer. you seem to have a thing about wal mart, not realizing that people shop there BECAUSE that's in lieu of a pay in crease that right wingers have denied middle class workers They pay 2 to 3 times as much than if they bought a product that would last more than a couple weeks. Based on your "theory," the "poor" are making themselves poorer. I also know from personal experience that Walmart tells their suppliers to produce outside the United States, or they'll go elsewhere - has been the policy for 15 years. All the foreign crap you buy is not from Walmart - all retail marketing companies sell everything foreign - being the biggest, they're (Walmart) is just symbolic of the greater problem. That will never be understood by the waddling masses. What's so difficult to comprehend about sending the majority of your wages overseas or to the government with the result of being unemployed? Wow. You sure are angry with the US. Are you Taliban? |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 21:49:46 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote: On 10-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote: door at Walmart. ?? uh...if you define the middle class as the middle 70% or so of wage earners, then they can, by all means, be poor AND getting poorer compared to their own history. That would make sense to anyone that couldn't pass a breatylizer. IOW you think the idea of middle class hasnt changed in 100 years. uh huh. so what's your drink of choice? you seem to have a thing about wal mart, not realizing that people shop there BECAUSE that's in lieu of a pay in crease that right wingers have denied middle class workers They pay 2 to 3 times as much than if they bought a product that would last more than a couple weeks. Based on your "theory," the "poor" are making themselves poorer. uh no. you seem to ignore that only the US has a 'great divergence' problem...a. BIG spread between the middle class and the rich. ONLY the US. All the foreign crap you buy is not from Walmart - all retail marketing companies sell everything foreign - being the biggest, they're (Walmart) is just symbolic of the greater problem. That will never be understood by the waddling masses. the foreign crap is irrelevant. we buy foreign because the rich limit our wage increases. you continue to blame main street. What's so difficult to comprehend about sending the majority of your wages overseas or to the government with the result of being unemployed? what's so hard to understand that the middle class has had NO real increase in wages in almost 4 decades? what does that have to do with walmart? answer: nothing. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 10-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote: That would make sense to anyone that couldn't pass a breatylizer. IOW you think the idea of middle class hasnt changed in 100 years. The middle class is 20% the size it was in 1990. That won't change, unless you were willing to participate. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 15:13:49 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote: On 10-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote: That would make sense to anyone that couldn't pass a breatylizer. IOW you think the idea of middle class hasnt changed in 100 years. The middle class is 20% the size it was in 1990. That won't change, unless you were willing to participate. i do participate. i helped defeat john mccain and sarah 'had me the launch codes' palin |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 11-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote: The middle class is 20% the size it was in 1990. That won't change, unless you were willing to participate. i do participate. i helped defeat john mccain and sarah 'had me the launch codes' palin That's a job half done - you should have defeated the other jackass TOO. D and R are your pallbearers. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
how the rich have screwed the middle class | General | |||
rich get richer in recession | General | |||
rich getting richer? | General | |||
Speaking of boats for the middle class. | General | |||
Boats for the middle class..... | General |