On 10-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

there are few democrats in the south. you're not too bright, are you?

In the South? Like republicans, lawyers and cockroaches, they're
everywhere.

uh,

where?

ever lived in the south?

HUH??? I agrred with you - or whoever posted the previous ignorant
rant........

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 02:04:29 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:




Productivity and profit are the goals (your wages are YOUR profit) but
they're undermined by the slime you've elected. No more handouts due to
bankruptcy, no more core industries, no more jobs. Handouts WHICH CAME
FROM
YOU IN THE FIRST PLACE cannot make you whole, and are making you broke.

productivity went up 30% between 1997 and 2007. the middle class saw
none of this in increased wages while the rich got richer.

Overall productivity went down. Productivity per hour worked may have
increased, via automation, etc. But production went down. Why we have a
large segment unemployed, and imports cause a huge trade deficit. Rich got
richer from siding with government that they purchased via Congress people
and Presidents. Most of those who got richer were not in the production of
real goods arena.

On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 21:31:33 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:


On 10-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:


IF the middle class had SOME ambition the former United States, and you,
would be better off. Begging doesn't grow an economy.

yep. more middle class hatred from the far right.

couldnt have said it better myself. you just hate the middle class and
think the wall street rich are great, hard working folks

"Wall Street" is a tiny little group of people shuffling paper wagers.

and they destroyed the US economy. they ballooned CDO's from ONE
trillion in 97 to SIXTY TWO trillion in 2007

do you REALLY think this had NO effect on the economy?

The
middle class WAS millions (100 million?) - several hundred people control
your destiny? You're REALLY in trouble - your voting and purchasing habits
buried you for the long term.........I guess it's natural to lash out once
you realized you seriously f**ked up.

yeah. i believe a few, rich, powerful men can control a country more
than 100M middle class people can.

you defend the rich. you defend plutocracy.

i happen to love democracy. you dont

On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 21:33:11 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:


On 10-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

For those that never finished elementary school: Stockholders elect the
board of directors.

ever get a proxy letter in the mail? hell, i'm a stockholder. of
course, i have about 0.0000000000000000000001% controlling interest in
any company...


Boards of directors elect officers. Officers hire
management. If it weren't for the stockholders, they would be no company,
and nowhere for the unskilled to make a wage. Let's punish
stockholders!!!

yep you bet!! with capital gains at 15% they pay about half of what
hard working americans pay

YES! And all they do is sit around all day playing with their belly
buttons! (Oops - sorry - slipped into my union analysis mode there)

that's pretty much the case. every time they get into trouble they
come to the middle class for a handout

the right wing believes in socialism for the rich

On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:05:19 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



Rich got
richer from siding with government that they purchased via Congress people
and Presidents. Most of those who got richer were not in the production of
real goods arena.

the american people are about to make the same mistake.

On 10-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

The
middle class WAS millions (100 million?) - several hundred people control
your destiny? You're REALLY in trouble - your voting and purchasing
habits
buried you for the long term.........I guess it's natural to lash out
once
you realized you seriously f**ked up.

yeah. i believe a few, rich, powerful men can control a country more
than 100M middle class people can.

you defend the rich. you defend plutocracy.

i happen to love democracy. you dont

Then you should move to a country where there is a democracy - tell us if
you identify one.

On 10-Sep-2010, "Califbill" wrote:

FROM
YOU IN THE FIRST PLACE cannot make you whole, and are making you broke.

productivity went up 30% between 1997 and 2007. the middle class saw
none of this in increased wages while the rich got richer.

Overall productivity went down. Productivity per hour worked may have
increased, via automation, etc. But production went down. Why we have a
large segment unemployed, and imports cause a huge trade deficit. Rich
got
richer from siding with government that they purchased via Congress people

and Presidents. Most of those who got richer were not in the production
of
real goods arena.

2 out of 310 million people grasp reality.

On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 15:26:22 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:


On 10-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

The
middle class WAS millions (100 million?) - several hundred people control
your destiny? You're REALLY in trouble - your voting and purchasing
habits
buried you for the long term.........I guess it's natural to lash out
once
you realized you seriously f**ked up.

yeah. i believe a few, rich, powerful men can control a country more
than 100M middle class people can.

you defend the rich. you defend plutocracy.

i happen to love democracy. you dont

Then you should move to a country where there is a democracy - tell us if
you identify one.

your hatred of the US is noted.

bpuharic wrote:

the right wing believes in socialism for the rich


That was the dumbest thing I have read in a week.