bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:11:12 -0400,
wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:44:25 -0400, Secular Humorist
wrote:




They are prime examples of what happens when you allow fundamentalist
religious types to control a country. And you can bet that a theocracy
is exactly what the crazyconservativechristians want for the united
states.


we'll find out in the nov elections. here in PA pat toomey, the 3rd
most right wing politician since 1995, is poised to win. and in
alaska, a state that gets more federal aid per capita than any other,
another far right wing lunatic is poised to win on the basis that
washington needs to stop sending money to the states.


There is no money left to send unless they print more. Read the WSJ,
dumbass.

thought you said wall street didnt exist?

You don't read very well. The WSJ is a newspaper. Don't dwell on its name.

On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:52:46 -0400, Larry
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:11:12 -0400,
wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:44:25 -0400, Secular Humorist
wrote:



There is no money left to send unless they print more. Read the WSJ,
dumbass.

thought you said wall street didnt exist?

You don't read very well. The WSJ is a newspaper. Don't dwell on its name.

uh...why not 'dwell on its name' if its name refers to something that,
as you contend, does not exist?

bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:52:46 -0400,
wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:11:12 -0400,
wrote:



bpuharic wrote:


On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:44:25 -0400, Secular Humorist
wrote:




There is no money left to send unless they print more. Read the WSJ,
dumbass.


thought you said wall street didnt exist?


You don't read very well. The WSJ is a newspaper. Don't dwell on its name.

uh...why not 'dwell on its name' if its name refers to something that,
as you contend, does not exist?

Bob, I never said there wasn't a street in NY named Wall Street, did I?
That makes you a liar and you know it. You have cleverly clipped the
rest of the thread where we already covered that.

On 9/4/10 9:38 PM, Larry wrote:
bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:52:46 -0400,
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:11:12 -0400,
wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:44:25 -0400, Secular Humorist
wrote:



There is no money left to send unless they print more. Read the WSJ,
dumbass.

thought you said wall street didnt exist?

You don't read very well. The WSJ is a newspaper. Don't dwell on its
name.
uh...why not 'dwell on its name' if its name refers to something that,
as you contend, does not exist?
Bob, I never said there wasn't a street in NY named Wall Street, did I?
That makes you a liar and you know it. You have cleverly clipped the
rest of the thread where we already covered that.



Whoops...thought Dan the Larry Fart was through for the night.

Larry Fart #16

And the bleet goes on.

On Sat, 04 Sep 2010 21:38:30 -0400, Larry
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:52:46 -0400,
wrote:


thought you said wall street didnt exist?


You don't read very well. The WSJ is a newspaper. Don't dwell on its name.

uh...why not 'dwell on its name' if its name refers to something that,
as you contend, does not exist?

Bob, I never said there wasn't a street in NY named Wall Street, did I?
That makes you a liar and you know it. You have cleverly clipped the
rest of the thread where we already covered that.

WTF?? i never said you said that. what i said was that wall street is
a euphemism for the financial sector...which you deny exist

bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 04 Sep 2010 21:38:30 -0400,
wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:52:46 -0400,
wrote:




thought you said wall street didnt exist?



You don't read very well. The WSJ is a newspaper. Don't dwell on its name.


uh...why not 'dwell on its name' if its name refers to something that,
as you contend, does not exist?


Bob, I never said there wasn't a street in NY named Wall Street, did I?
That makes you a liar and you know it. You have cleverly clipped the
rest of the thread where we already covered that.

WTF?? i never said you said that. what i said was that wall street is
a euphemism for the financial sector...which you deny exist


Since I now know your eyesight is poor. Get really close to the monitor
and tell me who these people on Wall Street are that are hurting the
middle class. Names, not bull****, Bob. And remember that Morgan
Stanley is, and never was, a person.

Click Crtl and + at the same time to make the words bigger, Bob!

In article ,
says...

bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 04 Sep 2010 21:38:30 -0400,
wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:52:46 -0400,
wrote:




thought you said wall street didnt exist?



You don't read very well. The WSJ is a newspaper. Don't dwell on its name.


uh...why not 'dwell on its name' if its name refers to something that,
as you contend, does not exist?


Bob, I never said there wasn't a street in NY named Wall Street, did I?
That makes you a liar and you know it. You have cleverly clipped the
rest of the thread where we already covered that.

WTF?? i never said you said that. what i said was that wall street is
a euphemism for the financial sector...which you deny exist


Since I now know your eyesight is poor. Get really close to the monitor
and tell me who these people on Wall Street are that are hurting the
middle class. Names, not bull****, Bob. And remember that Morgan
Stanley is, and never was, a person.

Click Crtl and + at the same time to make the words bigger, Bob!

Hey, I know how you feel.. I am watching a couple of idiots here who
think the little green Gekko really works for the old man in the Geico
commercial

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese!

On 9/5/2010 10:42 PM, I am Tosk wrote:

Hey, I know how you feel.. I am watching a couple of idiots here who
think the little green Gekko really works for the old man in the Geico
commercial


Are the couple of idiots your kids?

"Jim" wrote in message
...
On 9/5/2010 10:42 PM, I am Tosk wrote:

Hey, I know how you feel.. I am watching a couple of idiots here who
think the little green Gekko really works for the old man in the Geico
commercial


Are the couple of idiots your kids?


Maybe one hand doesn't know what the other hand is doing. It happens a lot
around here.

On 9/1/2010 10:42 AM, *e#c wrote:
On the news last night. The Troops are COMING HOME. Good for him. As
promised, he kept his word.

Now, watch the spoofers attack this.

Any takers on how long it takes before it is again a mess?

I hear Obama and the Democrats are now getting pretty worried about
November.

Obama and the Democrats have $1.6 trillion deficit spending going on but
only needs $50 billion more for jobs!!! LMAO... what a buffoon clowns
Obama and the Democrats are. What was the $1.6 trillion for?
Corruption, bailout of banks and billionaires?

They so need to be wiped out. Having every democrat loose the seat in
November would send a good message to DC, produce or get the frac out of
the way.

Obama and the Democrats, what a farce. This is certainly going down as
the worst US government I have seen in my lifetime. So sad you have to
laught. What a BOzero.

--
Is government working for you, or are you working for the government?