*e#c wrote:

Yes, and herring has been blaming someone else lately.
I'd say this spoofer just has a hard-on for our friend from Ohio.

Care to wager? How about this. If I show you the hard proof, you'll go
away and never come back. If not I will.

There we go again with that " care to wager " ****. Looks exactly like
loser Larry, the one afraid to show the boat he doesn't have.

If you weren't spewing bull**** and yellow teeth constantly you would be
a big enough man to back up your words. Since you are incapable of
that, you will be added to the list of liars.

Secular Humanist wrote:
In , says...

*e#c wrote:

On Sep 7, 1:19 pm, Secular wrote:


Care to wager? How about this. If I show you the hard proof, you'll go
away and never come back. If not I will.

There we go again with that " care to wager " ****. Looks exactly like
loser Larry, the one afraid to show the boat he doesn't have.

That's pure Loogy. Singing the same old song for years - even when he
was Basskisser.
"Larry" can't be so wordy because he always has some fast food in one
hand. Keeps it short so the taco cheese doesn't get in the keyboard.
But all spoofers become Loogy, whether they like it or not.
The first spoof puts the stamp of Loogy on them.
It's a damn shame being cursed like that.

Jim - Yeah, I can find some sympathy if I reach down deep.

Sorry Hertvik, you're wrong. Go call someone's wife and be a nasty piece
of **** to her.

"Don snerk" (Dumb, eh?)

On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:16:23 -0400, Larry
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 22:07:48 -0400,
wrote:



WTF?? i never said you said that. what i said was that wall street is
a euphemism for the financial sector...which you deny exist



i suggest that, if your obsession with spelling continues, you might
go to a usenet group where that's important



Your spelling is one thing. Your capitalization is nonexistent. It's a
sign of intelligence and credibility, Bob. You lack both.

great. if that's your argument, go with it.

me? i use evidence. you? you're a right winger so rely on
irrelevancies.

In article , says...

On 9/7/10 3:40 PM, YukonBound wrote:


"Secular Humanist" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"Secular Humorist" wrote in message
...
On 9/7/10 11:58 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"Secular Humanist" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"Secular Humorist" wrote in message
...
On 9/7/10 10:15 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"Secular Humanist" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

On 9/5/2010 10:42 PM, I am Tosk wrote:

Hey, I know how you feel.. I am watching a couple of idiots
here who
think the little green Gekko really works for the old man
in the
Geico
commercial


Are the couple of idiots your kids?

Hertvik, do you have to stoop that low? Oh, wait you can go
much
lower,
like the phone call to Herring's wife!!

What are you babbling about, idiot?
Recently Herring (or one of his dopers) has been blaming another
poster
for those calls.


Why are the righties picking on hertvik? Isn't he a fellow GOP
traveler?


He does seem to favour the Repugnicants, but that doesn't stop the
Dopers
from stalking & harassing anyone who refuses to sign up for
their Dopey
Army.

He was a scumbag who called Herring's wife and treated her crudely,
rudely, and lewdly.


You know that for a fact... got proof?


Probably something herring lied about...

Yes, and herring has been blaming someone else lately.
I'd say this spoofer just has a hard-on for our friend from Ohio.

Care to wager? How about this. If I show you the hard proof, you'll go
away and never come back. If not I will.


So... you want me to enter a high stakes wager with someone spoofing
another's ID.
You must think I'm prime material for your Dopey Army.


Or...as dumb as tosk, loogy, larry (and dan krueger, too), and the rest
of the turds.

I agree with you for once, spoofer.

bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:16:23 -0400,
wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 22:07:48 -0400,
wrote:




WTF?? i never said you said that. what i said was that wall street is
a euphemism for the financial sector...which you deny exist





i suggest that, if your obsession with spelling continues, you might
go to a usenet group where that's important





Your spelling is one thing. Your capitalization is nonexistent. It's a
sign of intelligence and credibility, Bob. You lack both.

great. if that's your argument, go with it.

me? i use evidence. you? you're a right winger so rely on
irrelevancies.

You define your stupidity nearly every day with your own "evidence".

On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:35:49 -0400, Larry
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:16:23 -0400,
wrote:



Your spelling is one thing. Your capitalization is nonexistent. It's a
sign of intelligence and credibility, Bob. You lack both.

great. if that's your argument, go with it.

me? i use evidence. you? you're a right winger so rely on
irrelevancies.

You define your stupidity nearly every day with your own "evidence".

IOW evidence that you dont get from rush

why am i not surprised

"Larry" wrote in message
...
bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:16:23 -0400,
wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 22:07:48 -0400,
wrote:




WTF?? i never said you said that. what i said was that wall street is
a euphemism for the financial sector...which you deny exist





i suggest that, if your obsession with spelling continues, you might
go to a usenet group where that's important





Your spelling is one thing. Your capitalization is nonexistent. It's a
sign of intelligence and credibility, Bob. You lack both.

great. if that's your argument, go with it.

me? i use evidence. you? you're a right winger so rely on
irrelevancies.

You define your stupidity nearly every day with your own "evidence".

You define stupidity.

On Sep 7, 8:18*pm, Larry wrote:
*e#c wrote:

Yes, and herring has been blaming someone else lately.
I'd say this spoofer just has a hard-on for our friend from Ohio.

Care to wager? How about this. If I show you the hard proof, you'll go
away and never come back. If not I will.

There we go again with that " care to wager " ****. Looks exactly like
loser Larry, the one afraid to show the boat he doesn't have.

If you weren't spewing bull**** and yellow teeth constantly you would be
a big enough man to back up your words. *Since you are incapable of
that, you will be added to the list of liars.

Well, you, and snotty are already on this so-called list. The only
difference, is that I tell the truth. You, and the " Idiot Laureate"
Ingersoll, don't.

BTW...if you've never " seen " my boat, why did you comment on the so-
called " Home Depot " lettering on the transom, hmmmm...liar?

Point proven. You are a lying sack of ****, just like snotty, your ass
boy. Touche' !!!

On Sep 8, 8:08*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Larry" wrote in message

...



bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:16:23 -0400,
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:

On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 22:07:48 -0400,
wrote:

WTF?? i never said you said that. what i said was that wall street is
a euphemism for the financial sector...which you deny exist

i suggest that, if your obsession with spelling *continues, you might
go to a usenet group where that's important

Your spelling is one thing. *Your capitalization is nonexistent. *It's a
sign of intelligence and credibility, Bob. *You lack both.

great. if that's *your argument, go with it.

me? i use evidence. you? you're a right winger so rely on
irrelevancies.

You define your stupidity nearly every day with your own "evidence".

You define stupidity.

No, Yellow-Back Larry defines cowardly, lying, sack of ****.

"*e#c" wrote in message
...
On Sep 8, 8:08 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Larry" wrote in message

...



bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:16:23 -0400,
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:

On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 22:07:48 -0400,
wrote:

WTF?? i never said you said that. what i said was that wall street
is
a euphemism for the financial sector...which you deny exist

i suggest that, if your obsession with spelling continues, you
might
go to a usenet group where that's important

Your spelling is one thing. Your capitalization is nonexistent.
It's a
sign of intelligence and credibility, Bob. You lack both.

great. if that's your argument, go with it.

me? i use evidence. you? you're a right winger so rely on
irrelevancies.

You define your stupidity nearly every day with your own "evidence".

You define stupidity.

No, Yellow-Back Larry defines cowardly, lying, sack of ****.

My error. I apologize.