On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:44:25 -0400, Secular Humorist
wrote:



They are prime examples of what happens when you allow fundamentalist
religious types to control a country. And you can bet that a theocracy
is exactly what the crazyconservativechristians want for the united
states.

we'll find out in the nov elections. here in PA pat toomey, the 3rd
most right wing politician since 1995, is poised to win. and in
alaska, a state that gets more federal aid per capita than any other,
another far right wing lunatic is poised to win on the basis that
washington needs to stop sending money to the states.

bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:44:25 -0400, Secular Humorist
wrote:



They are prime examples of what happens when you allow fundamentalist
religious types to control a country. And you can bet that a theocracy
is exactly what the crazyconservativechristians want for the united
states.

we'll find out in the nov elections. here in PA pat toomey, the 3rd
most right wing politician since 1995, is poised to win. and in
alaska, a state that gets more federal aid per capita than any other,
another far right wing lunatic is poised to win on the basis that
washington needs to stop sending money to the states.

There is no money left to send unless they print more. Read the WSJ,
dumbass.

On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:11:12 -0400, Larry
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:44:25 -0400, Secular Humorist
wrote:



They are prime examples of what happens when you allow fundamentalist
religious types to control a country. And you can bet that a theocracy
is exactly what the crazyconservativechristians want for the united
states.

we'll find out in the nov elections. here in PA pat toomey, the 3rd
most right wing politician since 1995, is poised to win. and in
alaska, a state that gets more federal aid per capita than any other,
another far right wing lunatic is poised to win on the basis that
washington needs to stop sending money to the states.

There is no money left to send unless they print more. Read the WSJ,
dumbass.

thought you said wall street didnt exist?

On Sep 2, 10:02*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:11:12 -0400, Larry
wrote:



bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:44:25 -0400, Secular Humorist
*wrote:

They are prime examples of what happens when you allow fundamentalist
religious types to control a country. And you can bet that a theocracy
is exactly what the crazyconservativechristians want for the united
states.

we'll find out in the nov elections. here in PA pat toomey, the 3rd
most right wing politician since 1995, is poised to win. *and in
alaska, a state that gets more federal aid per capita than any other,
another far right wing lunatic is poised to win on the basis that
washington needs to stop sending money to the states.

There is no money left to send unless they print more. *Read the WSJ,
dumbass.

thought you said wall street didnt exist?

Touche'.

bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:11:12 -0400,
wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:44:25 -0400, Secular Humorist
wrote:




They are prime examples of what happens when you allow fundamentalist
religious types to control a country. And you can bet that a theocracy
is exactly what the crazyconservativechristians want for the united
states.


we'll find out in the nov elections. here in PA pat toomey, the 3rd
most right wing politician since 1995, is poised to win. and in
alaska, a state that gets more federal aid per capita than any other,
another far right wing lunatic is poised to win on the basis that
washington needs to stop sending money to the states.


There is no money left to send unless they print more. Read the WSJ,
dumbass.

thought you said wall street didnt exist?

You don't read very well. The WSJ is a newspaper. Don't dwell on its name.

On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:52:46 -0400, Larry
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:11:12 -0400,
wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:44:25 -0400, Secular Humorist
wrote:



There is no money left to send unless they print more. Read the WSJ,
dumbass.

thought you said wall street didnt exist?

You don't read very well. The WSJ is a newspaper. Don't dwell on its name.

uh...why not 'dwell on its name' if its name refers to something that,
as you contend, does not exist?

bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:52:46 -0400,
wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:11:12 -0400,
wrote:



bpuharic wrote:


On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:44:25 -0400, Secular Humorist
wrote:




There is no money left to send unless they print more. Read the WSJ,
dumbass.


thought you said wall street didnt exist?


You don't read very well. The WSJ is a newspaper. Don't dwell on its name.

uh...why not 'dwell on its name' if its name refers to something that,
as you contend, does not exist?

Bob, I never said there wasn't a street in NY named Wall Street, did I?
That makes you a liar and you know it. You have cleverly clipped the
rest of the thread where we already covered that.

On 9/4/10 9:38 PM, Larry wrote:
bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:52:46 -0400,
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:11:12 -0400,
wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:44:25 -0400, Secular Humorist
wrote:



There is no money left to send unless they print more. Read the WSJ,
dumbass.

thought you said wall street didnt exist?

You don't read very well. The WSJ is a newspaper. Don't dwell on its
name.
uh...why not 'dwell on its name' if its name refers to something that,
as you contend, does not exist?
Bob, I never said there wasn't a street in NY named Wall Street, did I?
That makes you a liar and you know it. You have cleverly clipped the
rest of the thread where we already covered that.



Whoops...thought Dan the Larry Fart was through for the night.

Larry Fart #16

And the bleet goes on.

On Sat, 04 Sep 2010 21:38:30 -0400, Larry
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:52:46 -0400,
wrote:


thought you said wall street didnt exist?


You don't read very well. The WSJ is a newspaper. Don't dwell on its name.

uh...why not 'dwell on its name' if its name refers to something that,
as you contend, does not exist?

Bob, I never said there wasn't a street in NY named Wall Street, did I?
That makes you a liar and you know it. You have cleverly clipped the
rest of the thread where we already covered that.

WTF?? i never said you said that. what i said was that wall street is
a euphemism for the financial sector...which you deny exist

On Sep 2, 8:11*pm, Larry wrote:
bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:44:25 -0400, Secular Humorist
*wrote:

They are prime examples of what happens when you allow fundamentalist
religious types to control a country. And you can bet that a theocracy
is exactly what the crazyconservativechristians want for the united
states.

we'll find out in the nov elections. here in PA pat toomey, the 3rd
most right wing politician since 1995, is poised to win. *and in
alaska, a state that gets more federal aid per capita than any other,
another far right wing lunatic is poised to win on the basis that
washington needs to stop sending money to the states.

There is no money left to send unless they print more. *Read the WSJ,
dumbass.

I told you the spoofing dip****s like Kreuger couldn't resist. Above
is the proof. Poor Larry.