On Aug 29, 9:42*pm, I am Tosk wrote:
In article ,
says...
fault of the deer that we have eliminated much of their

habitat.

Oh, and I favor re-introducing large, dangerous predators...cuts down on
the riff-raff. I am privileged to know some people who legally keep large
predators. The big cats and wolves I've meet seem more deserving of life
than your average palinite.

Ha, ha, ha... What a bunch of ****.. I gotta' admit though, at least
this lie can't be disproved by a simple google search like just about
everything else you have said over the years, you are getting better..
This imaginary friend thing just might work if a newbie comes along that
believes you, snerk...



More appropriate handle would be Secular Spin Meister

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing - We smell like cheese!

I am privileged to know some people who legally keep large
predators.

So do I. One owner got mauled to death awhile ago from his 450 kg
Siberian Tiger. Too bad it couldn't have been Ingersoll. Tigers dont
eat ****, though.I guess the short schitt is safe.

On 8/29/10 9:46 PM, *e#c wrote:
On Aug 29, 9:42 pm, I am wrote:
In articleHtednWqWBsW8BefRnZ2dnUVZ_hudn...@giganews. com,
says...
fault of the deer that we have eliminated much of their

habitat.

Oh, and I favor re-introducing large, dangerous predators...cuts down on
the riff-raff. I am privileged to know some people who legally keep large
predators. The big cats and wolves I've meet seem more deserving of life
than your average palinite.

Ha, ha, ha... What a bunch of ****.. I gotta' admit though, at least
this lie can't be disproved by a simple google search like just about
everything else you have said over the years, you are getting better..
This imaginary friend thing just might work if a newbie comes along that
believes you, snerk...



More appropriate handle would be Secular Spin Meister

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing - We smell like cheese!

I am privileged to know some people who legally keep large
predators.

So do I. One owner got mauled to death awhile ago from his 450 kg
Siberian Tiger. Too bad it couldn't have been Ingersoll. Tigers dont
eat ****, though.I guess the short schitt is safe.


Well, when I said large, I didn't mean *that* large. I do know someone
with a pair of cougars, and another fellow with a wolf.
Ingersoll could be taken down by a couple of the squirrels in our back
yard.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---

"Secular Humanist" wrote in message
...
On 8/29/10 9:46 PM, *e#c wrote:
On Aug 29, 9:42 pm, I am wrote:
In articleHtednWqWBsW8BefRnZ2dnUVZ_hudn...@giganews. com,
says...
fault of the deer that we have eliminated much of their

habitat.

Oh, and I favor re-introducing large, dangerous predators...cuts down
on
the riff-raff. I am privileged to know some people who legally keep
large
predators. The big cats and wolves I've meet seem more deserving of
life
than your average palinite.

Ha, ha, ha... What a bunch of ****.. I gotta' admit though, at least
this lie can't be disproved by a simple google search like just about
everything else you have said over the years, you are getting better..
This imaginary friend thing just might work if a newbie comes along that
believes you, snerk...



More appropriate handle would be Secular Spin Meister

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing - We smell like cheese!

I am privileged to know some people who legally keep large
predators.

So do I. One owner got mauled to death awhile ago from his 450 kg
Siberian Tiger. Too bad it couldn't have been Ingersoll. Tigers dont
eat ****, though.I guess the short schitt is safe.


Well, when I said large, I didn't mean *that* large. I do know someone
with a pair of cougars, and another fellow with a wolf.
Ingersoll could be taken down by a couple of the squirrels in our back
yard.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---

The hamsters we used to have could put a whoopin' on Snotty.

"YukonBound" wrote in message
...


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"YukonBound" wrote in message
...


"JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote in
message
...
On Aug 27, 7:54 pm, I am Tosk wrote:
Watching the show Whale wars for the first time. From what I see it is
a
show glorifying terrorists who wish to do physical harm to the
Whalers,
their boats and crew. I see the Whalers fighting with water cannons, I
think they should go live fire, their lives are being threatened...

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese!

Now the terrorists are shooting acid filled bottles at the commercial
vessels, talking about sinking her, disabling her at sea... And still,
the whalers arent using 50 calibers to defend themselves.. Stupid..
Let their mommies cry about "he was such a good boy". These assholes
are big mouthed punks, playing with peoples lives, just to play up for
the camera.. Crazy, I guess I will have to watch the season fanalie
to see if the Whalers take any of the little punks out... snerk Hey
before you get on me, the terrorists are clearly trying to hurt the
Whalers...


You stupid little half pint of ****.
Those whalers are breaking international ban on commercial whaling.
http://www.animallaw.info/articles/ovuswhalelaws.htm

They remind me of the original Green Peace guys who used to try and get
between ships and drums filled with toxic waste. Big time guts. My
recollection is that the French sank their boat Rainbow Warrior (at the
dock).


Yes, in the South Pacific.
I believe the protest at that time was against the French exploding
nuclear weapons.

Those dirty commies! They were against nuclear fallout!

"JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote in message
...
On Aug 27, 11:25 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote in
message

...





On Aug 27, 10:04 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 19:54:48 -0400, I am Tosk

wrote:

Watching the show Whale wars for the first time. From what I see it
is a
show glorifying terrorists who wish to do physical harm to the
Whalers,
their boats and crew. I see the Whalers fighting with water cannons,
I
think they should go live fire, their lives are being threatened...

gee. physical harm to people who want to destroy endangered species.
imagine that

Yeah, I know for Progressives, breaking the law, destruction of
personal property, attempted murder, terrorism and while we are at it
voter intimidation, voter fraud are all acceptable methods of changing
society, as long as those doing it agree with your own personal self
indulgent politics...

Anyway, the program is over and the spoiled kiddies got away with
their terrorist activity with minor concequences... Too bad really...

While you sit on your couch drinking beer and lamenting the good old
days!

Well, have a great weekend!!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Do you have any integerity at all or are you content just being a
clown? Gym earlier this evening, then prepare for The Motocross
Nationals (we will be spectators) tomorrow at Southwick. :Last year
Jessica got a few minutes one on one time with Ashley Fiolek (fastest
girl in the world) and her interpreter in Ashleys Trailer, and after a
race, Jeff Alessi gave Jess the Goggles off of his head. I missed it
last year as it was raining and I had already had too much rain over
the race season, just couldn't go. This will be my first Nationals, I
am very excited. Sunday we will be up at 6 and done with the gym by
9:30 then we will come home and prepare the equipment and coolers, and
hit the track for a training session. We will leave the track after
6pm, stop home to clean the gear, and head up to the barn to hang out
with the wife and her babies. So basically, you are just blowing smoke
out of your ass again. What is worse is you are not even slightly
ashamed, I still say you are harry's sister. Someday when you are
ready to admit that, you can tell us what the F448 your dad did to you
two to make you all so bitter and stupid?

Anyway, you are really not worth any more of my time. I know you will
spew the same accusation again, but It's fun to brag a bit anyway I
love my life, my kid loves her life, my wife loves her life... it's a
beautiful thing

I will answer you again next year, maybe....

You sir are the clown. Feel free to ignore my posts... like that's going to
happen.

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
In article ,
says...

Watching the show Whale wars for the first time. From what I see it is a
show glorifying terrorists who wish to do physical harm to the Whalers,
their boats and crew. I see the Whalers fighting with water cannons, I
think they should go live fire, their lives are being threatened...

It would be interesting to see what the Admiralty Courts did if the
Japanese sent frigates to protect their research vessels from the pirate
anti-whaling vessels. It is just like what is happening off the coast of
Somalia.

And, what are a nations naval forces for but to protect their merchant
vessels on the high seas?

So, you're equating Somali pirates with people trying to protect whales. The
false equivalency really dumbs down any argument you might have.

"Harry ?" wrote in message
...
"Secular Humanist" wrote in message
...
On 8/28/10 8:33 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

Watching the show Whale wars for the first time. From what I see it is
a
show glorifying terrorists who wish to do physical harm to the Whalers,
their boats and crew. I see the Whalers fighting with water cannons, I
think they should go live fire, their lives are being threatened...

It would be interesting to see what the Admiralty Courts did if the
Japanese sent frigates to protect their research vessels from the pirate
anti-whaling vessels. It is just like what is happening off the coast of
Somalia.

And, what are a nations naval forces for but to protect their merchant
vessels on the high seas?


Interesting how you and at least one other piece of right-wing **** here,
Toskie Ingersoll, support "commercial interests" no matter what horrors
they inflict on society, humanity, or the environment.

The whalers' vessels ought to be sunk.



Take it a step further and sink all fishing boats too.Eh?


So, more false equivalence.... killing whales is the same as killing fish.

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"Harry ?" wrote in message
...
"Secular Humanist" wrote in message
...
On 8/28/10 8:33 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

Watching the show Whale wars for the first time. From what I see it is
a
show glorifying terrorists who wish to do physical harm to the
Whalers,
their boats and crew. I see the Whalers fighting with water cannons, I
think they should go live fire, their lives are being threatened...

It would be interesting to see what the Admiralty Courts did if the
Japanese sent frigates to protect their research vessels from the
pirate
anti-whaling vessels. It is just like what is happening off the coast
of
Somalia.

And, what are a nations naval forces for but to protect their merchant
vessels on the high seas?


Interesting how you and at least one other piece of right-wing ****
here, Toskie Ingersoll, support "commercial interests" no matter what
horrors they inflict on society, humanity, or the environment.

The whalers' vessels ought to be sunk.



Take it a step further and sink all fishing boats too.Eh?


So, more false equivalence.... killing whales is the same as killing fish.



**** off.

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:44:05 -0400, Secular Humanist
wrote:

I don't have a problem with those who have no other way to put meat on
their table going out and shooting a deer. But there sure isn't any
sport in it.

Why not shoot deer, there is certainly no shortage of them. Deer have
become a burden on the environment because we eliminated all of the
predators and I do not see much of a movement to reintroduce big cats
to the north east.

BTW the white tail deer is the most dangerous animal in the US killing
more people than all the predators, snakes and poisonous insects
combined.


I fish sometimes for "table fish," and never take more than I'm going
to
eat for a meal that day or the next. When I catch one, I don't see the
need any longer to post a photo of it. It's just a fish I happened to
catch. I'm not the great white fisherman and I don't want to be.


How would you feel if a PETA whacko rammed your boat while you were
fishing?



If it sank in deep water, I'd be ok. I have full replacement insurance
on everything.

Your life and the life of your crew is not important to you? OK

My major complaint about "hunters" is their macho bravado...as if
shooting a deer with a rifle is some sort of serious accomplishment.
As I said, if you hunt because it is the only way you can put meat on
the table, I have no problem with that.

It isn't the fault of the deer that we have eliminated much of their
habitat.

It is not really a habitat problem. The typical American suburb is
great deer habitat. In fact we have more deer here than there were
when Columbus landed.
Personally I think they should sell managed hunts to suburban hunters
at a fairly significant return to the tax rolls.
Bait the deer into a safe kill zone and let Bwana shoot them with a
decent back stop behind the deer for several hundred bucks. That is a
win-win. You cull the excess deer population, satisfy the hunter urge
and the state makes a lot of money.
It would end up cheaper for most hunters too.

Oh, and I favor re-introducing large, dangerous predators...cuts down on
the riff-raff. I am privileged to know some people who legally keep
large predators. The big cats and wolves I've meet seem more deserving
of life than your average palinite.

I doubt folks would be happy if they dropped a dozen mountain lions in
Rock Creek Park and called them "The Endangered Maryland Panther".
That is pretty much what happened with the Florida Panther.
To start with you would need to reduce all the speed limits so they
wouldn't get killed by cars, they would need to build 10 foot fences
around the beltway and the various other interstate feeders with
panther tunnels under the road. The people in Chevy Chase would just
have to understand a panther coming out of the park and eating pets
was just nature's way. Molesting the panther is a federal crime.
Just keep your kids inside at night and be careful where you jog.

Big news stories here lately is about three or four horses being attacked by
mountain lions.
Gov't still says we don't have any here.
http://www.outdoorns.com/features/cougar.htm
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/nova-scotia...ed-cougar.html

On 8/30/10 7:37 AM, YukonBound wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:44:05 -0400, Secular Humanist
wrote:

I don't have a problem with those who have no other way to put meat on
their table going out and shooting a deer. But there sure isn't any
sport in it.

Why not shoot deer, there is certainly no shortage of them. Deer have
become a burden on the environment because we eliminated all of the
predators and I do not see much of a movement to reintroduce big cats
to the north east.

BTW the white tail deer is the most dangerous animal in the US killing
more people than all the predators, snakes and poisonous insects
combined.


I fish sometimes for "table fish," and never take more than I'm
going to
eat for a meal that day or the next. When I catch one, I don't see the
need any longer to post a photo of it. It's just a fish I happened to
catch. I'm not the great white fisherman and I don't want to be.


How would you feel if a PETA whacko rammed your boat while you were
fishing?



If it sank in deep water, I'd be ok. I have full replacement insurance
on everything.

Your life and the life of your crew is not important to you? OK

My major complaint about "hunters" is their macho bravado...as if
shooting a deer with a rifle is some sort of serious accomplishment.
As I said, if you hunt because it is the only way you can put meat on
the table, I have no problem with that.

It isn't the fault of the deer that we have eliminated much of their
habitat.

It is not really a habitat problem. The typical American suburb is
great deer habitat. In fact we have more deer here than there were
when Columbus landed.
Personally I think they should sell managed hunts to suburban hunters
at a fairly significant return to the tax rolls.
Bait the deer into a safe kill zone and let Bwana shoot them with a
decent back stop behind the deer for several hundred bucks. That is a
win-win. You cull the excess deer population, satisfy the hunter urge
and the state makes a lot of money.
It would end up cheaper for most hunters too.

Oh, and I favor re-introducing large, dangerous predators...cuts down on
the riff-raff. I am privileged to know some people who legally keep
large predators. The big cats and wolves I've meet seem more deserving
of life than your average palinite.

I doubt folks would be happy if they dropped a dozen mountain lions in
Rock Creek Park and called them "The Endangered Maryland Panther".
That is pretty much what happened with the Florida Panther.
To start with you would need to reduce all the speed limits so they
wouldn't get killed by cars, they would need to build 10 foot fences
around the beltway and the various other interstate feeders with
panther tunnels under the road. The people in Chevy Chase would just
have to understand a panther coming out of the park and eating pets
was just nature's way. Molesting the panther is a federal crime.
Just keep your kids inside at night and be careful where you jog.

Big news stories here lately is about three or four horses being
attacked by mountain lions.
Gov't still says we don't have any here.
http://www.outdoorns.com/features/cougar.htm
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/nova-scotia...ed-cougar.html



Hey...they have to eat, you know.
At least cougars don't get drunk at the local Moose lodge and brag to
the other cougars about they deer they shot. Hell, they might eat the
moose, too.